 DistroWatch Weekly |
| Tip Jar |
If you've enjoyed this week's issue of DistroWatch Weekly, please consider sending us a tip.
(Tips this week: 0, value: US$0.00) |
|
|
|
 bc1qxes3k2wq3uqzr074tkwwjmwfe63z70gwzfu4lx  lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhxarpw3jkc7tzw4ex6cfexyfua2nr  86fA3qPTeQtNb2k1vLwEQaAp3XxkvvvXt69gSG5LGunXXikK9koPWZaRQgfFPBPWhMgXjPjccy9LA9xRFchPWQAnPvxh5Le paypal.me/distrowatchweekly • patreon.com/distrowatch |
|
| Extended Lifecycle Support by TuxCare |
|
|
| Reader Comments • Jump to last comment |
1 • RAM/bloat (by Juan Bolsa on 2024-12-02 01:22:51 GMT from United States)
Just doubled to 16gb from 8. Got a Ryzen 7 to handle video and browsers better, seems to be working.
2 • MX linux (by Pumpino on 2024-12-02 01:44:24 GMT from Australia)
I don't know about anyone else, but I've always been sceptical of MX linux holding the top spot for years. I don't find the distro especially unique and I find it hard to believe that it would consistently receive more clicks than other distros for so long. Maybe someone script has stopped reloading the page.
3 • 4GB is still OK (by Mint4TheWin on 2024-12-02 01:47:29 GMT from France)
I used to have a computer with 4GB of RAM around 5 years ago. At this time, 8GB was the near future, and 16GB was projected to be just enough 5 years later, so about today.
I won't say much about others OS than *nix but 4GB of RAM nowadays is, when not having a bunch of browser tabs, still pretty decent.
So maybe the Moore's law didn't happened for RAM, or maybe not in the Linux/BSD world, because I rarely use more than 4GB, not even about 2GB on average (without counting file cache and zRAM swap), and never get out of memory kills, except after opening some wild javascript websites.
Maybe it's just because penguins have no fear for obsolescence...
4 • MX (by Jesse on 2024-12-02 01:51:05 GMT from Canada)
@2: " Maybe someone script has stopped reloading the page."
I've heard conspiracy theories like this every week for the past four years. There is no basis to any of them. Even if MX (or another distro) had a script that loaded their page, or if they added a bookmark to their default browser try to increase their page clicks, it wouldn't work. We filter for things like that. You can't just refresh the page, or run a bot to load the page, and have it affect our PHR.
Some projects have tried to manipulate our PHR. (MX isn't one of them.) It doesn't do anything, just uses their bandwidth for a few weeks until they realize it isn't working and then they stop.
MX Linux got to the top of the list for the reasons I outlined above in the News section. No more, no less.
People who come up with these outlandish theories must think we don't check our web traffic logs or something, it would be really really obviously if suddenly thousands of page hits for the same project came in every day from manipulated traffic.
5 • Poll, MX Linux (by Otis on 2024-12-02 02:19:34 GMT from United States)
Heck I don't know if my RAM usage has changed, the computer does that and over time it's never occurred to me to analyse it. I do know that my CPU speed has improved, graphics etc gotten better because I've upgraded my computers to better hardware. The cheapo oldies I have are for fooling around with this or that distro for a while, but I stick with MX as workhorse.
MX inflating their Page Hit Ranking here is so silly that I thought the questioner up there @2 was kidding. MX Linux is at or near the top for the reasons it exists in the first place: To be an "out of the way of the user" distro that just works and does not by default depend upon systemd as init. MX Linux will never leave one of my machines for those and other reasons that stopped me from distro hopping quite some time ago.
6 • measuring memory (by Andy Prough on 2024-12-02 02:51:23 GMT from United States)
I like using the ps_mem.py program for measuring memory usage. Shows you one program at a time what ram is used in a very clear listing.
7 • RAM (by Kurt_Aust on 2024-12-02 04:23:56 GMT from Australia)
I do enjoy pointing out that my current computer has 8 MILLION (2^23) times as much RAM as my first computer.
From TRS-80 (16 KB) to X99 chipset workstation (128 GB), yes I know it's ridiculously excessive.
8 • Amount of ram (by Wolf on 2024-12-02 04:32:25 GMT from United States)
I remember a time when 1gig was way more than enough for everything. Over the years it's gradually gotten hungrier and hungrier. I'm a gamer and 16gigs is barely adequate anymore. Same with graphics. Most games are very hungry. Just my 2cents as an old af Linux gamer.
9 • Memory usage (by Wedge009 on 2024-12-02 04:38:22 GMT from Australia)
On my primary system, I find mostly browser processes and maybe LibreOffice applications to be the biggest consumers of memory. But I usually leave processes open for days until something stops working and a reset is needed. And certainly some sites use more memory over time than others, especially ones like weather tracking that updates itself. On a fresh boot, memory usage is pretty low and I'm sure the situation is still better overall than on a Windows system.
10 • MX Linux (by AdrianTM on 2024-12-02 05:56:54 GMT from United States)
As one of the MX contributors I find these "wonderings" about Distrowatch rank very insulting. We don't manipulate shit, if anything we are happy we are dropping from the top spot to avoid this kind of accusations and trolls who target us because of that.
It's fine you don't find MX especially unique, it's probably not for you. MX is an independent distro that is made by users for users and we don't make money from it having more users is not something we search on purpose and it doesn't bring us any direct benefit, only the satisfaction that what we do is appreciated and is useful for others, this kind of gross accusations or innuendos say something about the people who make them.
11 • Memory Usage... (by Vukota on 2024-12-02 08:35:09 GMT from Serbia)
It used to be enough 8GB of RAM to run Linux smooth. In past year or two it came up to 16BG. With 8 it still runs ok, but with hiccups here and there.
What is a top ranked distro on DW, it doesn't really matter. Good general distro will be among top 20.
12 • RAM (by eb on 2024-12-02 09:25:40 GMT from France)
Hello,
- main computer, 10 years old, runs fine with 4 go RAM & Fluxbox
- secondary computer, a bit older, slow but usable with 2 go RAM & Ratpoison
- server, 18 years old (!), no X, fine with 2 go RAM & zram
With :
Slackware_15 (respectively 64 32 32)
kernel_huge (an error, I should have installed generic)
no Desktop Environment since 2010.
Window managers spare your RAM !:-)
13 • MX Linux (by illumos on 2024-12-02 10:56:08 GMT from Japan)
MX is 'not' using systemd.
And MX is very easy to use and user friendly distro.
So MX is No.1!
14 • AnduinOS? (by Wally on 2024-12-02 11:25:47 GMT from Australia)
I'm usually in favor of variety, the more new distros the merrier. I respect the time and effort put in creating live ISOs to distribute and finding and maintaining places to distribute from. But:
The point of AnduinOS escapes me. My wife's laptop runs Ubuntu 22.04 unmodified except for the removal of snaps. It would take me less than a half-hour to get it looking just like AnduinOS, except for the wallpaper. AnduinOS is Ubuntu with a few extensions added: Dash to Panel, Arc Menu, weather, and a few others whose purpose really escapes me. That's it. Seems like much ado about very little.
In the process they lost a lot of Ubuntu's built-in usefulness. A minimal Ubuntu install offers more. They also lost the panel's power icon in the system menu, which they placed in the bottom right corner. Jesse refers to it as "system tray". (Gnome gods named it. Don't blame me.:-) Turning off all extensions and logging out restored it to the top bar where the Gnome gods intended. Turning extensions back on one at a time found the culprits in the disappearance and got the AnduinOS looks back including the bottom panel with power visible.
Menus in the middle? Funny thing, but on my copies of Windows 11 I move the start menu to the left side where I prefer it to be. To each his own.
15 • MX Linux (by RetiredIT on 2024-12-02 11:58:29 GMT from United States)
After achieving good results from MX 18.3 and 19.4 and less so from the 21.x series, I have been greatly disappointed with the 23.x releases. I have tried to install MX 23.2 multiple times on my Lenovo Thinkpad T490 (32 GB/500 MB) and MX 23.3 on my Dell Latitude 7490 (64 GB/2.0 TB).
Again, seeming like the developers finally got their act together with 23.3 on my Latitude, bugs appeared even before I could get the install set up the way I wanted. I could not restart or shutdown from the desktop and had to use the ON/OFF button to restart. It kept going back to the login screen. The options in the upper right corner of the screen were grayed out and inoperable. Again, an infinite loop became apparent at that point with no way out.
The only way I could install 23.3 was to do an upgrade step by step from MX 21.3 to 23.0, then to 23.1, 23.2 and finally 23.3. This is really a ludicrous way to do things and another statement for the poor state of today's Linux landscape.
It's a real shame because MX Linux seems to have had so much to offer in the past, especially in the way of tools. However, it is very dated, especially the ugly, notorious installer, and it has become a real memory hog compared to earlier releases. Just like so many other Linux distros, it has fallen off dramatically, especially since 19.4, which I believe was their very best work.
I have been having so much more success and satisfaction with Ubuntu 24.0 with Snaps removed and registered the Ubuntu Pro option on three of my five laptops with updates until 2036. Linux Mint and LMDE have also both stood the test of time. I plan to be using all three of them for the foreseeable future.
16 • AnduinOS (by dragonmouth on 2024-12-02 12:22:29 GMT from United States)
"there is no update manager in Anduin"
Since AnduinOS is based on Ubuntu, one can always install Synaptic.
17 • RAM Usage (by dragonmouth on 2024-12-02 12:33:20 GMT from United States)
Feature creep and making programs/apps more and more user-friendly.
18 • @15 MX Linux (by Jan on 2024-12-02 12:33:37 GMT from The Netherlands)
I too have had installation problems with MX (KDE) Linux.
I finally found that installation only ran well, and without later usage problems, with using a RUFUS made installation USB-stick.
Installation from a VENTOY-usb-stick always resulted in problems (for my hardware-situation), certainly when on this Ventoy-USB-stick also other MX-ISO-versions or AntiX-iso-versions were present.
After installing MX-KDE (MX-XFCE ran very sluggish on my old hardware) from a RUFUS-made USB-stick, MX-KDE ran very good.
19 • @15+@18 MX linux (by Jan on 2024-12-02 13:01:03 GMT from The Netherlands)
Addition to my comment @18
I ran all my MX-linux installations in dual-boot with Windows.
Maybe installation as only-installation gives other results.
20 • @16 AnduinOS (by Wally on 2024-12-02 13:04:33 GMT from Philippines)
"one can always install Synaptic." One can always install update-manager and gnome-software or snap-store, but the idea of the distro is that it's friendly to newcomers from Windows, so they probably should have come already installed. Synaptic is my favorite GUI app for the purpose, but it's not exactly newbie friendly.
21 • mint and mx (by dolphin oracle on 2024-12-02 13:08:22 GMT from United States)
We are and always will be grateful to distrowatch that allowed our little distribution so much exposure.
And we are very happy to even be mentioned in the same breath as some of the other larger projects.
It was fun to sit on top of that list for so long. I remain happy. :)
22 • @13 - systemd in MX (by Uncle Slacky on 2024-12-02 13:33:26 GMT from France)
systemd is available as an option at boot, so MX can work with systemd if required.
23 • MX Still (by Nathan on 2024-12-02 13:37:19 GMT from United States)
I have been running MX since before Covid.
All is well.
I did add the Cinnamon desktop to the XFCE version of MX
and never looked back.
I did not have any install or update issues at any time.
So yes, MX is my daily driver.
I distro hop on my "play" laptop, presently on Elementary 8.0
E is pretty but will not be my daily driver.
By the way, all my USB efforts were made by using the MX Tools USB Maker app.
24 • RAM (by Robert on 2024-12-02 14:56:33 GMT from United States)
Couldn't tell you if RAM usage has increased over time. It's not something I monitor. I don't really care how much memory everything uses as long as it stays below the 32GB I have in my PC.
Besides, whatever increase in memory usage exists from kernel, desktop, and background services will absolutely pale in comparison to my web browser with however many dozens or hundreds of tabs open. Yes I'm like that, yes it's a problem. But I'm probably not gonna fix it.
25 • 4GB??? (by Distrowitch on 2024-12-02 13:32:13 GMT from United Kingdom)
Current laptop with 4GB always hitting swap, previous 4GB laptop never hit swap 10 years ago.
Had to stop using cinnamon and switch the witch to mate to calm the fan.
Current lappy is fanless so back to cinnamon, add pipewire, etc, now using 700MB swap regularly!!!
26 • Ram 'n MX (by Friar Tux on 2024-12-02 15:41:50 GMT from Canada)
My "lappy" (love that word) is about a year old with 7 GB of ram. BUT, I don't really care. The fan rarely comes on. (It's a mid-range HP.) At this stage, all I care about is - does it work and does it work consistently without issues. (Getting old, patience is wearing thin.)
As for MX Linux... nope. Could never get it to work. Stress the "could never" as I tried many times. Can't figure out how it's number one, but don't really care. For me, Linux Mint was the only distro that CONSISTENTLY worked no matter how many times I installed it and how many computers, I installed it on. All the other distros, even the "biggies", had issues, either during installation or afterwards (MX included).
One other thing I've found is that I had LESS issues with distros running SystemD than with other inits. So now I partial to SystemD as it seems to make things run, and run smoother. And before we start bringing out the flame-throwers, that is MY opinion, from MY experiences. Your experiences may vary.
27 • ram amounts and chromium tabs (by brad on 2024-12-02 15:55:26 GMT from United States)
I want a computer with 32gb+ ram and see how many chromium tabs I can open before i run out lol
28 • RAM (by David on 2024-12-02 16:31:52 GMT from United Kingdom)
I'm puzzled by people who say they need at least 8 GB. Games, I presume. This desktop, 5 years old, has 4 GB because that was the smallest available. Occasionally I have a look to see how much RAM is being used and I've never caught it using more than 2 GB. Of course, I'm running PCLinuxOS with Xfce.
29 • RAM & MX (by Pogi Americano on 2024-12-02 17:17:25 GMT from United States)
My RAM has increased (4g - 8g) simply because I do more with my computer. Standard operation for me is to have Firefox open with 1 or (most of the time) 2 Libre Write files open with several different text files (3 or 4) all open at the same time. ... Sometimes with utube music added to the bunch. If my computer could handle 16g I would upgrade but according to the docs it goes only to 8g. I've been using MX for several years simply because it works on my pc and I've gotten used to it. It's probably no better than say. Ubuntu or Arch or Fedora, just my preference. If something ever goes wrong with MX I'll be searching for something that works with my pc and I'll just have to get used to something else.
30 • @15, 18, and 19 (by Brad on 2024-12-02 17:33:33 GMT from United States)
I too, spent (wasted) most of the day yesterday trying to get MX23 installed on an older HP laptop - I tried a couple of different approaches, replacing a working copy of Manjaro, which stalled trying to format the disk, and then in desperation, wiping the disk (SATA SSD) with GParted and then installing, which stalled and failed in the exact same way.
I too, remember MX fondly, before the most recent iterations. I even had a hard time installing the MX-23 live media to a USB to use persistently - it finally worked after much heartache - I don't recall having such a problem with MX-19 on the same USB.
In any case, I gave up on MX as a lost cause for my older X-64 laptop, burned a copy of SolydK on a spare USB, installed it onto my laptop, and Bob was my uncle!
I realize that a lot of time and effort has been placed into MX, but it seems it's not working for some of us, at least.
31 • MX (by rijnsma on 2024-12-02 17:52:27 GMT from The Netherlands)
I use MX from 1917 and it never complaints. I tested many, but for the moment I keep this. That says all!
32 • MX (by rijnsma on 2024-12-02 17:55:25 GMT from The Netherlands)
Joke 2017 haha...
33 • RAM (by Squid on 2024-12-02 18:03:51 GMT from United States)
RAM consumption depends on the desktop environment used:
LXDE requires 500 MB at start-up
KDE Plasma booting up to 1.4GB quietly
More features, more ram. This is the hard law to live by.
34 • @ 24 • RAM (by Titus Groan on 2024-12-02 18:18:19 GMT from New Zealand)
"Besides, whatever increase in memory usage exists from kernel, desktop, and background services will absolutely pale in comparison "
I have a script, that takes a while to run. typically an hour.
over the last year, with no hardware changes, just software inc kernel updates, that hour has dropped by 25% to about 44 minutes.
Just saying that there are certainly software improvements being made, improving efficiency overall, so maybe that ram upgrade can be put off, for at least a bit.
35 • @20 Wally: (by dragonmoiuth on 2024-12-02 18:18:50 GMT from United States)
"it's [Synaptic] not exactly newbie friendly. "{
And APT or dpkg is? :-)
IMNSHO, Synaptic is much more functional than any of the Software Centers that Debian-based distros use although it may not be as pretty. No extraneous eye-candy, just function.
36 • Zorin Base (by Dan on 2024-12-02 20:03:30 GMT from Canada)
Just wanting to clarify something in the review. You stated that Zorin (the latest version) is based on 24.04, which it's not, it's based on 22.04. The only thing it has is the kernel that is used in 24.04, other than that, it is still a 22.04 base.
37 • LMDE -- MXDE. Linux Mint rises to the top of popularity ranking. (by de on 2024-12-02 20:06:41 GMT from United States)
Does LMDE play a significant role on the rise in popularity of Linux Mint? Is there some statistics on the ratio of regular Linux Mint user count and LMDE user count (eg. DistroWatch polls)?
MX is based on both AntiX and Debian. Is there a plan for "MXDE", a version of MX that is based on only Debian?
38 • Slightly higher RAM usage (by Flavio R. Cavalcanti on 2024-12-02 20:12:44 GMT from Brazil)
Maybe, we should note that:
Users who ran the "free" command to measure the initial RAM usage of Debian 12 Bookworm RC, in April 2023, got a shock: — Almost double what "free" command indicated in Debian 11.
It wasn't Debian that changed. — What changed were the "free" / "top" tools, from the "procps" 4.0 package — but this had already been happening with other tools, at least since 2020.
Indeed, since August 2020 , Conky 1.11.6 started showing much higher RAM usage values.
It wasn't a bug. — It was a “correction” of the “Used RAM Memory” calculation — proposed or signed by Linus Torvalds since January 2014 (Kernel 3.14).
Here are some notes about this — with a Translate button above the Title:
https://byteria.blogspot.com/2020/10/conky-wrong-ram-memory-usage.html
And, yes, I have seen a slightly higher RAM usage, by many distros, along the years, even in my old PC with 4 GB RAM. — Things are getting better, and I think it is natural to use a few more RAM.
And it growed a few more, from one day to another, when I started using a new PC with 16 GB RAM. — I think it is natural that distros use more RAM if there is more RAM to be used.
I always use KDE, so I can compare some distros, all in the same machine (dualboot or multiboot), all without PackageKit automatic check for updates at startup, and all without PIM suite. — Mageia, Fedora, openSUSE, Debian use a few more RAM, as they run a few more services in background. — PCLinuxOS, Slackware, Void use a few less RAM at startup (5 minutes uptime, idle), but I don't think it has anything to do with their init software. They are just less bloated.
Here are some notes about this:
https://byteria.blogspot.com/2023/06/multi-booting-12-distros-linux.html
39 • Zorin and LMDE (by Jesse on 2024-12-02 20:20:03 GMT from Canada)
@36: " You stated that Zorin (the latest version) is based on 24.04, which it's not, it's based on 22.04. The only thing it has is the kernel that is used in 24.04, other than that, it is still a 22.04 base."
This is a fair point. I was thinking at the time specifically of things like hardware support at the timme, but it's true that other packages are older. However, Zorin OS users can enable backports if they want newer software.
@37: "Does LMDE play a significant role on the rise in popularity of Linux Mint? "
Not really.
"Is there some statistics on the ratio of regular Linux Mint user count and LMDE user count"
Yes. The Mint project has talked about this in the past. I don't have a link to the post at the moment, but I think they indicated a little under 10% of their users run LMDE.
40 • RAM usage (by JG on 2024-12-02 20:46:24 GMT from United States)
Some of the package managers like Synaptic and Slapt-get now fail with less than 1GB of RAM. This makes it more difficult to find modern distros that will work with my dinosaur Slot 1 and Socket 370 systems from roughly 25 years ago. Most 32-bit distros have also disappeared. The web browsers will no longer work on these processors either, but I cannot force myself to throw these systems out... LOL.
41 • Mint top ranked now (by JeffC on 2024-12-02 21:54:06 GMT from United States)
Mint is the top on page hits now?
Oh, good, maybe now the haters will move on to hating it.
Someone asked what distros people were using on their ThinkPads on Reddit, I said MX Linux and was downvoted.
It must be some sort of heresy to not say Arch BTW there.
42 • not systemd distro (by illumos on 2024-12-02 22:54:23 GMT from Japan)
There are many attractive distributions that do not use systemd.
Diversity of init systems leads to the development of Linux and benefits its users.
We encourage you to use these distributions.
SysVinit:MX, PCLinuxOS, Devuan, Slackware, Zenwalk, NuTyX, CRUX, Pisi
OpenRC:Gentoo, Calculate, Alpine, Adélie, Alpaquita, Artix, Parabola
Runit:VOID, antiX, Venom, Joborun, Dragora
s6:Obarun, glaucus
dinit:Chimera
sinit:Spark
shinit:Carbs
Shepherd:Guix
43 • @35 Dragomouth, AnduinOS (by Wally on 2024-12-03 01:08:13 GMT from Australia)
"it's [Synaptic] not exactly newbie friendly. "{
And APT or dpkg is? :-) You seem to have missed this from my comment @20:
"install update-manager and gnome-software or snap-store" "should have come already installed" Kindly don't pick pick out snippets out of context to carp on. It's dishonest criticism to say the least.
I ran a PC repair shop for many years, mostly Windows PCs. I know quite a bit about Windows users. I managed to install a few Linux systems on clients' machines over the years. Retired for a while now. Ran into an old client the other day. I had installed Mint on his machine years ago, and ran him through some basics. Now he wanted to know if I could install Linux on his new laptop. In all the years he learned nothing. Mint-update? Great! Synaptic? Gimme a break!
44 • DW PHR list (by David Milovanović on 2024-12-03 01:34:10 GMT from Serbia)
I am currently using Linux Mint (decided to give it another try when I got a new computer) and I used to use MX Linux for a few years, and I have to say that it doesn't matter which distro is first on the DW list, what matters is that we have such good options to choose from. Both distros are great IMHO. Of course, there are other great distros beside these ( Trisquel, Lite, AntiX, Puppy and Devuan are my favorites ).
45 • DW-PHR (by Jan on 2024-12-03 11:31:17 GMT from The Netherlands)
I think when a distro is high on the PHR it is a self-establishing position. The distro is hit on because it is high on the PHR.
I rather look at the average rating.
However even that is questionable. It strikes me that at the rating page there are very much 10-rating, combined with very low ratings. They sometimes have huge stories, which seem to me to be not from real users (so AI-stories) and not objective (so from fan or anti-fan boys/girls, linux evangelists).
46 • MX stats.. (by Tom_Servo on 2024-12-03 13:17:35 GMT from United States)
@10
Good god, calm down. You had one rando make that assertion, and you're one of the public faces/devs of the distro; responding to trolls is not a good look.
I don't use Mepis, but I have in the past and I think it's a very strong distro. Since one of the feeder projects was a fantastic user-friendly distro called MEPIS (which was a competitor to one of my favorites, Libranet back in the day), many of us followed Mepis to MX,
I think y'all do great work, and please keep doing so.
47 • RAM Usage (by penguinx86 on 2024-12-03 14:39:35 GMT from United States)
I've been using Linux for over 10 years. Whey I type the "vmstat -s" command, my typical desktop usage is 2-4gb active memory and 0gb swap used. It doesn't seem to matter if I have 8gb or 16gb of RAM installed. The only time I use more RAM is running virtual clients in VirtualBox. But of course, this is home desktop usage with only 1 user, and not a multi-user server under a heavy workload.
48 • How much RAM is needed vs how much is used. (by vw72 on 2024-12-03 16:21:38 GMT from United States)
Looking at how much RAM is in use could identify a problem with a program leaking memory (not releasing it when finished), but as long as you have enough RAM to do what you normally do without having to hit swap, you are fine.
Case in point - a Raspberry PI 3b+ only has 1GB of ram and is quite useful running klipper for a 3d printer or acting as a local file server or both, with RAM to spare. Of course, it's not running a DE, just the cli.
My point is if one is just browsing the net, checking email, etc., you don't need a lot of RAM. On the other hand if one is doing video editing, 3d modeling, music/midi work, then 16GB seems to be a good starting point (although these types of applications will work with less, it is much slower as things write and read the swap partition/file).
Linux, in and of itself, does not use a terrible amount of RAM. Different DEs use various amounts of RAM from 200MB to 1GB. So figure 1.5GB for the basic system and then calculate the RAM needs of your most RAM hungry program and add a little bit more.
Personally, I have an old Dell laptop with only 6GB of RAM, running Debian 12 with the Gnome desktop and it runs as well as my newer machine with 16GB.
In short, don't stress about RAM unless you are being constrained by it.
49 • MX and RAM (by Albert on 2024-12-03 22:47:44 GMT from United States)
I'm wrinting this on MX Xfce 23.4_ahs (Libretto) on one PC. It's been several years now that I've been running this OS without problems. I tried the KDE version, but I seem to remember I faced some kind of trouble with it, can't specify what. I'm very satisfied with MX as I am with the other systems that are installed on the machine -currently the three versions of Linux Mint 22 (Yes, all of them, I couldn't just pick one), Pardus Xfce linux and this one.
I'm testing FreeBSD and GhostBSD now also (not very much luck with them for the moment, they only work on an old laptop where even the wifi works for them, but they refuse to function properly either on a more recent laptop or on this PC). I also have one copy of Void Linux on a USB waiting to be tested and I'm checking on Redox development from time to time.
As for RAM usage, I've just run 'vmstat -s' and it tells me that the used memory is 4 Gb, while 3.8 is the active memory. It seems a bit high to me considering that I'm neither playing any video or audio, nor working with anything else. However, this doesn't worry me at all since this PC was given 24 Gb to use it as needed.
50 • Tavares (by Linux and Zram on 2024-12-03 23:38:05 GMT from France)
"My point is if one is just browsing the net, checking email, etc., you don't need a lot of RAM. On the other hand if one is doing video editing, 3d modeling, music/midi work, then 16GB seems to be a good starting point (although these types of applications will work with less, it is much slower as things write and read the swap partition/file)."
But there is "zram": it is a Linux kernel module for creating a compressed block device in RAM, i.e. a RAM disk with on-the-fly disk compression. The block device created with zram can then be used for swap or as general-purpose RAM disk. The two most common uses for zram are for the storage of temporary files (/tmp) and as a swap device.
51 • RAM Usage (by hellfire103 on 2024-12-04 08:29:12 GMT from Germany)
Well, I was still running Windows five years ago, complete with the bloatware from HP and Microsoft that I didn't care enough to remove. I remember having 7.5 GB or RAM being used (out of the 8GB I had upgraded to), simply by having Opera, LibreOffice, and Windows Explorer open at the same time after a day's work.
Today, meanwhile, my RAM usage rarely goes above 3GB (out of 24). I am running Arch+Sway, and the heaviest software I use is probably either Mullvad Browser, Eclipse, or Steam.
52 • 32-bit distros (by tomas on 2024-12-04 12:29:04 GMT from Czechia)
Linux has been said to give new life to old hardware. I am not so sure if that is still valid.
A good old notebook was given to me. The only problem seems to be its 32-bit processor.
Not considering myself to be a noobie anymore I still prefer distros that run everything I need out of the box.
I have tried to find and install several distros on the notebook with little success.
At the time being the best result is Q4OS with Trinity desktop (firefox added runs OK @40).
Searching on Distrowatch is difficult here - you must go through i386, i486, i586 and i686.
Searching for i686 only (according to the processor) does not (always) show the distros for lower specifications.
When using the results of the searches and going to the download, you may find:
- the 32-bit is no longer present
- the EOL is near without a view for further support
- the downloaded ISO does not work or the installation fails
- when installed the PC does not boot
- the installation has not the declared properties.
There is only a minimum of usable distros for 32-bit PCs.
I wonder if DW could make a survey and review on that.
53 • 32 bit distros (by Kruger on 2024-12-04 23:29:51 GMT from Australia)
>>I have tried to find and install several distros on the notebook with little success.
I would suggest you try Devuan which is available as an i386 ISO or one of its derivatives like:
- Peppermint OS
- Loc-OS
- Refracta
Antix is another great choice
You have plenty of options even with an old redundant 32bit processor, you just need to look
54 • Why MX Linux? (by denk_mal on 2024-12-05 07:30:38 GMT from Germany)
All the people that claim about the popularity of MX Linux ignoring a small but for us important fact: MX Linux is (nearly) the only Linux that provides us with a systemd-free linux that is usable in a smooth way.
If there is no reason to not using systemd then you get a buch of distros here but if "no systemd, please" is a necessary requirement (for your computer or for your better feeling ;-) ) then there is nearly only MX Linux.
This is IMHO the base for the popularity.
BTW Funfact: on my business laptop I also use a systemd free linux called WSL2 from Microsoft, the company L. Poettering is working for.
55 • @55, Why MX Linux and Why not PCLinuxOS? (by Tasio on 2024-12-05 11:34:44 GMT from Philippines)
Nothing against MX, but PCLinuxOS gets lost in the no-systemd shuffle. It's works quite well, easy install and I have a fondness for it because it's one of the first distros I used many years ago.
56 • @56 PCLinuxOS, stuck booting (by Jan on 2024-12-05 12:08:26 GMT from The Netherlands)
In the last year several times I tried to boot PCLinux-KDE form a live-USB, each new ISO I tried again. On my hardware the booting stuck somewhere. Initially 1 year ago, sometimes the booting succeeded, but a started OS froze after circa 5 minutes. The latest ISO's never boot to a working OS, so it has become worse.
Several KDE-distros work on my old hardware, so it seems to be a PCLinuxOS-KDE (or KDE-setting) problem.
I have seen several messages on this problem, not only PCLOS. So something to work on?
57 • @57,PCLinuxOS, stuck booting (by Tasio on 2024-12-05 12:44:19 GMT from Philippines)
"The latest ISO's never boot to a working OS, so it has become worse." If you have an interest, the place to bring up the problem is at the PCLinuxOS forum.
58 • deb vs rpm (by illumos on 2024-12-05 12:58:15 GMT from Japan)
@56 Not only does PCLOS not use systemd, it also uses rpm as its package instead of deb and dpkg.
This is surprising, as rpm is the package format used by the RHEL family, so using rpm without systemd is an impressive feat.!!!
59 • @59 Forum reporting (by Jan on 2024-12-05 13:03:02 GMT from The Netherlands)
Seem logical, but you need to register.
But I have a very bad experience with trying to register or reporting problems on the specific forum's. The forum-owners seem not to like people who want to report a problems.
60 • VOID and Alpine (by illumos on 2024-12-05 13:11:49 GMT from Japan)
@56 MX and PCLOS are using sysVinit.
But VOID uses runit, and Alpine uses OpenRC.
VOID is a more advanced distro than Arch and can be used as a daily driver.
And Alpine allows you to easily install a desktop environment using the 'setup-desktop' script.
Consider VOID and Alpine as potential distro without systemd!
61 • @60, deb vs rpm (by Tasio on 2024-12-05 13:36:29 GMT from Philippines)
@60, Not only RPM with sysVinit but also apt for rpm and Synaptic. Don't know if that is impressive or not.:-)
62 • elogind (by illumos on 2024-12-05 13:48:45 GMT from Japan)
@63 PCLOS not only does not use systemd, it does not use elogind either.
It is a true systemd-free distribution.
AntiX does not use elogind either, but MX does.
63 • RAM usage (by R. Cain on 2024-12-05 12:48:16 GMT from United States)
“Is your RAM usage higher or lower than it was five years ago?”
My RAM usage is--almost--*precisely* the same as it was five years ago, as I run the same distro now as I installed more than five years ago--across all computers, and am still using all the time. It was the best there was then, and it is STILL the best there is now...if not much better than what is available now.
I refuse to ‘drink the kool-aid’ of “...if it’s not the newest, biggest, most feature-filled version, it _can’t_ be the best...”. This is the destructive mentality--of both users AND distro developers AND MOST ESPECIALLY web-browser developers--which has led most once-great Linux distributions to be the pathetic (under-)performers they are today.
Consider for a moment: arguably, one of the best, tightest, ‘most bang-for-the-buck’ distros, _ever_, was Linux Mint’s Maya: a beautiful, do-everything, have-everything distro, and all this within a ‘footprint’ of 960 MB!
And, yes: the argument that keeping a distro for five years or more is counter-productive because of the inability to run the latest web-browser is *NOT* an argument against doing so--it is an argument AGAINST the ‘newest, biggest, most feature-filled’ development-mentality of the browser developers...and of the entire Linux ‘distroscape’.
Because of the total lack (on the part of developers) of any time, now, to devote to ANY Q-A, validation testing, or responding to input from consumers / users, one can forget arguing (against keeping a really good, older distro) about a lack of ‘security upgrades’, or ‘bug-fixes’; both are, for all intents and purposes, non-existent in almost all contexts in which one wishes to discuss these points, and will only serve to confirm a serious case of confirmation bias.
64 • systemD and elogind (by Otis on 2024-12-05 22:35:21 GMT from United States)
@62 I am not sure why the deployment of elogind is considered by some a negative in distro development. At the Gentoo site the definition/description of elogind is:
"Elogind is the systemd project's logind, extracted to a standalone package. It's designed for users who prefer a non-systemd init system, but still want to use popular software such as KDE or GNOME that otherwise hard-depends on systemd."
I have no qualms about it, I am merely wanting to understand, as it seems to me that it was "extracted" from the systemD schema for reasons that systemD detractors want.
65 • @63, RAM usage (by Tasio on 2024-12-06 02:49:09 GMT from Philippines)
@63, A couple of things: Mint Maya is a bit over 5 years old, 2012 to be exact. I installed Mint at 2.0, code-name Barbara in 2007. Ran very nicely on a laptop with 256MB RAM installed. Guess I should have stayed there while the staying was good.
Also, browsers can be easily installed from outside the repos. I have a VM running Bodhi 32 bit legacy based on Ubuntu 18.04 with the latest Firefox. Idles at 132MB. Not bad. latest 64 bit Bodhi based on 22.04 is up to 230MB. Debian Bookworm 32 bit version is over 400MB.Talk about inefficiency!
66 • hard non-systemd (by illumos on 2024-12-06 12:35:27 GMT from Japan)
@64 GNOME is not possible without elogind, but KDE is possible without elogind.
Distros without elogind are called "hard non-systemd".
antiX (runit), PCLOS (sysVinit), VENOM (sysVinit) and Obarun (s6) are "hard non-systemd" distros.
These distros do not adopt elogind and use seatd to implement x11 or wayland.
67 • non systemD (by Otis on 2024-12-06 15:21:57 GMT from United States)
@66 I think I understood all that from reading that description I posted in @64, also from sayings here and there over time.
More choices is the way I see all of this.
Incidentally, the PCLinuxOS distro has been around long enough now as a ("hard") non-systemD offering that to me it serves as a reminder of just how good a distro can be without that particular init. sysV seems to be proving itself with that distro's popularity.
68 • Pop OS (by Kruger on 2024-12-06 22:58:15 GMT from Australia)
Why even release Alphas of any software, especially an OS? Don't they have testers out there who can test the Apha release for bugs?
Is it just me or is it weird? Releasing a Beta of a product also doesn't make much sense, except to testers.
What is the purpose of these Alpha releases?
69 • @68 --alpha and beta releases--Why? (by R. Cain on 2024-12-07 00:27:33 GMT from United States)
See the last paragraph of @64.
Not to put too fine a point on this...
The purpose of alpha and beta releases are to off-load--TO THE DISTRO USER-- the testing of new distros, because distro developers simply do not have the time for anything related to ensuring the quality of their product. They're MUCH too busy working on the *next* bigger, faster, feature-filled version of their latest distro to be bothered with ensuring that the product is really ready for release.
This is a real shame, and almost guarantees that there will never be a "Year of Linux On The Desktop".
Alpha- and beta-versions of Linux distributions used to be unknown. (It would be really interesting to pinpoint exactly when this phenomenon became a "thing".)
Now, they (alpha- and beta-versions) are indications of not-ready-for-prime-time distributions.
Number of Comments: 69
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
| | |
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Archives |
| • Ussye 1118 (2025-04-21): Fedora 42, strange characters in Vim, Nitrux introduces new package tools, Fedora extends reproducibility efforts, PINE64 updates multiple devices running Debian |
| • Issue 1117 (2025-04-14): Shebang 25.0, EndeavourOS 2025.03.19, running applications from other distros on the desktop, Debian gets APT upgrade, Mint introduces OEM options for LMDE, postmarketOS packages GNOME 48 and COSMIC, Redox testing USB support |
| • Issue 1116 (2025-04-07): The Sense HAT, Android and mobile operating systems, FreeBSD improves on laptops, openSUSE publishes many new updates, Fedora appoints new Project Leader, UBports testing VoLTE |
| • Issue 1115 (2025-03-31): GrapheneOS 2025, the rise of portable package formats, MidnightBSD and openSUSE experiment with new package management features, Plank dock reborn, key infrastructure projects lose funding, postmarketOS to focus on reliability |
| • Issue 1114 (2025-03-24): Bazzite 41, checking which processes are writing to disk, Rocky unveils new Hardened branch, GNOME 48 released, generating images for the Raspberry Pi |
| • Issue 1113 (2025-03-17): MocaccinoOS 1.8.1, how to contribute to open source, Murena extends on-line installer, Garuda tests COSMIC edition, Ubuntu to replace coreutils with Rust alternatives, Chimera Linux drops RISC-V builds |
| • Issue 1112 (2025-03-10): Solus 4.7, distros which work with Secure Boot, UBports publishes bug fix, postmarketOS considers a new name, Debian running on Android |
| • Issue 1111 (2025-03-03): Orbitiny 0.01, the effect of Ubuntu Core Desktop, Gentoo offers disk images, elementary OS invites feature ideas, FreeBSD starts PinePhone Pro port, Mint warns of upcoming Firefox issue |
| • Issue 1110 (2025-02-24): iodeOS 6.0, learning to program, Arch retiring old repositories, openSUSE makes progress on reproducible builds, Fedora is getting more serious about open hardware, Tails changes its install instructions to offer better privacy, Murena's de-Googled tablet goes on sale |
| • Issue 1109 (2025-02-17): Rhino Linux 2025.1, MX Linux 23.5 with Xfce 4.20, replacing X.Org tools with Wayland tools, GhostBSD moving its base to FreeBSD -RELEASE, Redox stabilizes its ABI, UBports testing 24.04, Asahi changing its leadership, OBS in dispute with Fedora |
| • Issue 1108 (2025-02-10): Serpent OS 0.24.6, Aurora, sharing swap between distros, Peppermint tries Void base, GTK removinglegacy technologies, Red Hat plans more AI tools for Fedora, TrueNAS merges its editions |
| • Issue 1107 (2025-02-03): siduction 2024.1.0, timing tasks, Lomiri ported to postmarketOS, Alpine joins Open Collective, a new desktop for Linux called Orbitiny |
| • Issue 1106 (2025-01-27): Adelie Linux 1.0 Beta 6, Pop!_OS 24.04 Alpha 5, detecting whether a process is inside a virtual machine, drawing graphics to NetBSD terminal, Nix ported to FreeBSD, GhostBSD hosting desktop conference |
| • Issue 1105 (2025-01-20): CentOS 10 Stream, old Flatpak bundles in software centres, Haiku ports Iceweasel, Oracle shows off debugging tools, rsync vulnerability patched |
| • Issue 1104 (2025-01-13): DAT Linux 2.0, Silly things to do with a minimal computer, Budgie prepares Wayland only releases, SteamOS coming to third-party devices, Murena upgrades its base |
| • Issue 1103 (2025-01-06): elementary OS 8.0, filtering ads with Pi-hole, Debian testing its installer, Pop!_OS faces delays, Ubuntu Studio upgrades not working, Absolute discontinued |
| • Issue 1102 (2024-12-23): Best distros of 2024, changing a process name, Fedora to expand Btrfs support and releases Asahi Remix 41, openSUSE patches out security sandbox and donations from Bottles while ending support for Leap 15.5 |
| • Issue 1101 (2024-12-16): GhostBSD 24.10.1, sending attachments from the command line, openSUSE shows off GPU assignment tool, UBports publishes security update, Murena launches its first tablet, Xfce 4.20 released |
| • Issue 1100 (2024-12-09): Oreon 9.3, differences in speed, IPFire's new appliance, Fedora Asahi Remix gets new video drivers, openSUSE Leap Micro updated, Redox OS running Redox OS |
| • Issue 1099 (2024-12-02): AnduinOS 1.0.1, measuring RAM usage, SUSE continues rebranding efforts, UBports prepares for next major version, Murena offering non-NFC phone |
| • Issue 1098 (2024-11-25): Linux Lite 7.2, backing up specific folders, Murena and Fairphone partner in fair trade deal, Arch installer gets new text interface, Ubuntu security tool patched |
| • Issue 1097 (2024-11-18): Chimera Linux vs Chimera OS, choosing between AlmaLinux and Debian, Fedora elevates KDE spin to an edition, Fedora previews new installer, KDE testing its own distro, Qubes-style isolation coming to FreeBSD |
| • Issue 1096 (2024-11-11): Bazzite 40, Playtron OS Alpha 1, Tucana Linux 3.1, detecting Screen sessions, Redox imports COSMIC software centre, FreeBSD booting on the PinePhone Pro, LXQt supports Wayland window managers |
| • Issue 1095 (2024-11-04): Fedora 41 Kinoite, transferring applications between computers, openSUSE Tumbleweed receives multiple upgrades, Ubuntu testing compiler optimizations, Mint partners with Framework |
| • Issue 1094 (2024-10-28): DebLight OS 1, backing up crontab, AlmaLinux introduces Litten branch, openSUSE unveils refreshed look, Ubuntu turns 20
| | • Issue 1093 (2024-10-21): Kubuntu 24.10, atomic vs immutable distributions, Debian upgrading Perl packages, UBports adding VoLTE support, Android to gain native GNU/Linux application support |
| • Issue 1092 (2024-10-14): FunOS 24.04.1, a home directory inside a file, work starts of openSUSE Leap 16.0, improvements in Haiku, KDE neon upgrades its base |
| • Issue 1091 (2024-10-07): Redox OS 0.9.0, Unified package management vs universal package formats, Redox begins RISC-V port, Mint polishes interface, Qubes certifies new laptop |
| • Issue 1090 (2024-09-30): Rhino Linux 2024.2, commercial distros with alternative desktops, Valve seeks to improve Wayland performance, HardenedBSD parterns with Protectli, Tails merges with Tor Project, Quantum Leap partners with the FreeBSD Foundation |
| • Issue 1089 (2024-09-23): Expirion 6.0, openKylin 2.0, managing configuration files, the future of Linux development, fixing bugs in Haiku, Slackware packages dracut |
| • Issue 1088 (2024-09-16): PorteuX 1.6, migrating from Windows 10 to which Linux distro, making NetBSD immutable, AlmaLinux offers hardware certification, Mint updates old APT tools |
| • Issue 1087 (2024-09-09): COSMIC desktop, running cron jobs at variable times, UBports highlights new apps, HardenedBSD offers work around for FreeBSD change, Debian considers how to cull old packages, systemd ported to musl |
| • Issue 1086 (2024-09-02): Vanilla OS 2, command line tips for simple tasks, FreeBSD receives investment from STF, openSUSE Tumbleweed update can break network connections, Debian refreshes media |
| • Issue 1085 (2024-08-26): Nobara 40, OpenMandriva 24.07 "ROME", distros which include source code, FreeBSD publishes quarterly report, Microsoft updates breaks Linux in dual-boot environments |
| • Issue 1084 (2024-08-19): Liya 2.0, dual boot with encryption, Haiku introduces performance improvements, Gentoo dropping IA-64, Redcore merges major upgrade |
| • Issue 1083 (2024-08-12): TrueNAS 24.04.2 "SCALE", Linux distros for smartphones, Redox OS introduces web server, PipeWire exposes battery drain on Linux, Canonical updates kernel version policy |
| • Issue 1082 (2024-08-05): Linux Mint 22, taking snapshots of UFS on FreeBSD, openSUSE updates Tumbleweed and Aeon, Debian creates Tiny QA Tasks, Manjaro testing immutable images |
| • Issue 1081 (2024-07-29): SysLinuxOS 12.4, OpenBSD gain hardware acceleration, Slackware changes kernel naming, Mint publishes upgrade instructions |
| • Issue 1080 (2024-07-22): Running GNU/Linux on Android with Andronix, protecting network services, Solus dropping AppArmor and Snap, openSUSE Aeon Desktop gaining full disk encryption, SUSE asks openSUSE to change its branding |
| • Issue 1079 (2024-07-15): Ubuntu Core 24, hiding files on Linux, Fedora dropping X11 packages on Workstation, Red Hat phasing out GRUB, new OpenSSH vulnerability, FreeBSD speeds up release cycle, UBports testing new first-run wizard |
| • Issue 1078 (2024-07-08): Changing init software, server machines running desktop environments, OpenSSH vulnerability patched, Peppermint launches new edition, HardenedBSD updates ports |
| • Issue 1077 (2024-07-01): The Unity and Lomiri interfaces, different distros for different tasks, Ubuntu plans to run Wayland on NVIDIA cards, openSUSE updates Leap Micro, Debian releases refreshed media, UBports gaining contact synchronisation, FreeDOS celebrates its 30th anniversary |
| • Issue 1076 (2024-06-24): openSUSE 15.6, what makes Linux unique, SUSE Liberty Linux to support CentOS Linux 7, SLE receives 19 years of support, openSUSE testing Leap Micro edition |
| • Issue 1075 (2024-06-17): Redox OS, X11 and Wayland on the BSDs, AlmaLinux releases Pi build, Canonical announces RISC-V laptop with Ubuntu, key changes in systemd |
| • Issue 1074 (2024-06-10): Endless OS 6.0.0, distros with init diversity, Mint to filter unverified Flatpaks, Debian adds systemd-boot options, Redox adopts COSMIC desktop, OpenSSH gains new security features |
| • Issue 1073 (2024-06-03): LXQt 2.0.0, an overview of Linux desktop environments, Canonical partners with Milk-V, openSUSE introduces new features in Aeon Desktop, Fedora mirrors see rise in traffic, Wayland adds OpenBSD support |
| • Issue 1072 (2024-05-27): Manjaro 24.0, comparing init software, OpenBSD ports Plasma 6, Arch community debates mirror requirements, ThinOS to upgrade its FreeBSD core |
| • Issue 1071 (2024-05-20): Archcraft 2024.04.06, common command line mistakes, ReactOS imports WINE improvements, Haiku makes adjusting themes easier, NetBSD takes a stand against code generated by chatbots |
| • Issue 1070 (2024-05-13): Damn Small Linux 2024, hiding kernel messages during boot, Red Hat offers AI edition, new web browser for UBports, Fedora Asahi Remix 40 released, Qubes extends support for version 4.1 |
| • Issue 1069 (2024-05-06): Ubuntu 24.04, installing packages in alternative locations, systemd creates sudo alternative, Mint encourages XApps collaboration, FreeBSD publishes quarterly update |
| • Issue 1068 (2024-04-29): Fedora 40, transforming one distro into another, Debian elects new Project Leader, Red Hat extends support cycle, Emmabuntus adds accessibility features, Canonical's new security features |
| • Issue 1067 (2024-04-22): LocalSend for transferring files, detecting supported CPU architecure levels, new visual design for APT, Fedora and openSUSE working on reproducible builds, LXQt released, AlmaLinux re-adds hardware support |
| • Full list of all issues |
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
| Random Distribution | 
SuliX
SuliX was a Hungarian, Fedora-based distribution for schools. Its main features are usability, Hungarian language support, "freshness" in terms of software updates and educational purpose. It can be used in schools, for IT education or as a Linux migration tool. The name "SuliX" comes from Hungarian: "suli" means "school" in child's language. SuliX was developed by a small group of teachers in Hungary.
Status: Discontinued
|
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
|
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
