 DistroWatch Weekly |
| Tip Jar |
If you've enjoyed this week's issue of DistroWatch Weekly, please consider sending us a tip.
(Tips this week: 1, value: US$23.40) |
|
|
|
 bc1qxes3k2wq3uqzr074tkwwjmwfe63z70gwzfu4lx  lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhxarpw3jkc7tzw4ex6cfexyfua2nr  86fA3qPTeQtNb2k1vLwEQaAp3XxkvvvXt69gSG5LGunXXikK9koPWZaRQgfFPBPWhMgXjPjccy9LA9xRFchPWQAnPvxh5Le paypal.me/distrowatchweekly • patreon.com/distrowatch |
|
| Extended Lifecycle Support by TuxCare |
|
|
| Reader Comments • Jump to last comment |
1 • Endeavour and Calamares (by Brad on 2022-07-25 00:53:05 GMT from United States)
I had similar issues when attempting to try Endeavour - crashes while using Calamares. I gave up for that reason.
Keeping in mind the Q&A regarding HW/Distro compatability, I guess I can't fault the developers of Endeavour or Calamares too much. I can only say that for the HW that I use (Dell/Lenovo/HP) that Manjaro has given me the most stable experience for years. I still find occasional issues with Calamares, but I'm not (yet) ready to blame the developers. Earlier versions of Calamares worked flawlessly - it only seems to be the latest versions that have some issues.
2 • EndeavourOS (by verndog on 2022-07-25 01:13:47 GMT from United States)
I have three EndeavourOS installed (Gnome, KDE, XFCE), and they all work perfectly. Very fast and easy to keep updated. I installed all three so I could determine which one to keep. Can't decide. I like all three. They each have their own strengths.
I rarely, is ever have issues with them, and when I do, issue is solved within a day or two at most.
Great forum by the way. Very helpful! Not condescending at all.
3 • Running desktop environments on an Arch Linux base (by Guido on 2022-07-25 01:31:50 GMT from Philippines)
Why limit yourself to one desktop? I have 3 PCs with Manjaro Linux installed. One with Gnome, one Mate and one LXQt.
I can only recommend pamac as the graphical package manager for Pacman. In the terminal write:
sudo pacman -S pamac
That should also work in Endeavour. And change also the mirrors close to you. Can be done in pamac.
4 • Poll (by Friar Tux on 2022-07-25 01:33:01 GMT from Canada)
Since having discovered the Cinnamon DE, any distro I have tested in the last year or so has had the Cinnamon DE. I find it to be the end all and be all of desktop environments. I don't think I will ever go to anything else. It seems to work quite well with my methodology and muscle memory.
5 • EndeavourOS (by rich52 on 2022-07-25 02:00:20 GMT from United States)
I've used Manjaro for the longest time but EndeavorOS has been more cutting edge with what they have to offer in upgrades and software. Both are excellent Distro's. The online installation option worked fine for me and the software was up to date at the point in time you've downloaded it. Overall it's been very stable and KDE Plasma has been nicely packaged and runs very smoothly.
6 • Desktop (by Ken on 2022-07-25 02:08:38 GMT from United States)
I finally gave i3 a try, and now that I'm used to it and how quickly I can do what I need to do, I find it hard to go back to the standard desktop paradigm. I could do it, and there are days when I have the urge to install Xfce, but so far, I'm happy.
I'm not the least bit surprised that installing GDM also installed the entire GNOME desktop and automatically switched your login session to it. GNOME is getting as pushy as Windows and Mac, and is the reason I'm starting to experiment with primarily QT applications instead of getting locked into the GNOME system through GTK.
7 • slax (by dave on 2022-07-25 02:47:17 GMT from United States)
I have never even used Slax but still managed to feel annoyed when I learned they had switched to Debian.. and I'm a longtime Debian user! If he's not gonna base it on Slackware, he should change the project name. I wouldn't say it's misleading to the average person, but let's be honest-- the average person isn't gonna find Slax anyway. Probably 99% of the people who would stumble across it will be Linuxfolk and will immediately assume it's a derivative of Slackware because of its name.
8 • Blaming the publisher of the operating system? (by Greg Zeng on 2022-07-25 03:11:42 GMT from Australia)
The editorial comment here suggests that publishers should not be blamed. Most users need to categorise these publishers, to increase our chances for success with the operating system.
Most "open source" operating systems have small numbers and small teams to create these products. The smaller and newer teams generally have less reliable final products, as discovered by this week's review of EndeavourOS.
There are 242 Linux "active" operating systems, currently. https://distrowatch.com/search.php?ostype=Linux&category=All&origin=All&basedon=All¬basedon=None&desktop=All&architecture=All&package=All&rolling=All&isosize=All&netinstall=All&language=All&defaultinit=All&status=Active#simple
If a "desktop" is needed, there are 211 brandnames. Most of these (117) are based on the Debian package manager, as has been since the creation of mature versions of Debian.
Of the 117, 50 are based on Ubuntu. These Ubuntu-derived systems supposedly "benefit from the accumated teamwork of the earlier "upstream" coding teams. Not true!
If any user wants to gamble on the products of unstable, insecure adventures, there are very many (most) operating systems. The younger and smaller the development team, the greater the risk of instability, as shown in the Linux system reviews.
Blame the development team? With Linux, you can choose your "parents". Most (all?) commercial & government systems do not allow this "freedom".
9 • @7 - slax (by Andy Prough on 2022-07-25 03:40:05 GMT from United States)
>"I have never even used Slax but still managed to feel annoyed when I learned they had switched to Debian.. and I'm a longtime Debian user! If he's not gonna base it on Slackware, he should change the project name."
Slax has been well-known for being a lightweight live Linux distro for many years. Most of the time a user would add new software by installing "modules", not by doing a bunch of slackware command line work. And in fact, Slax has also been able to use Debian packages for many years now.
So the people who were using Slax were probably doing so because of its characteristics as a lightweight live distro with amazing live usb features. When I used it, I did not care what it was based on - I did not know a thing about running slackware at the time. So moving to a Debian base wouldn't make as big a difference as what you might think. Continuing to call it Slax simply let people know that it's still a good lightweight live distro.
10 • Slax (by Charlie on 2022-07-25 03:55:50 GMT from Hong Kong)
@9
Well, I am the one happy to know Slax would give another spin to Slackware once again.
Slax actually has a much longer history and fame as a Slackware liveCD than a Debian one, I still remeber the time I used it, a polished Slackware with KDE 3, and you can simply install it to harddisk in later versions.
There are also many Debian related LiveCDs and communities, you can even easily install a lightweight Debian desktop on your own. But Slackware LiveCD is the blue ocean, currently I don't think there's one except alienBOB (Slackware official developer) doing that.
Slackware is a good traditional distro with the most original UNIX style, it's the longest surviving distro but with very few developers, you can tell how amazing it is by achieving that.
11 • KDE install - EndeavourOS, ArcoLinux-B, & Garuda on 12 year old Lenovo notebook (by 1-DOT.com on 2022-07-25 04:04:49 GMT from United States)
I recently made KDE Plasma installations of Arch-based distros EndeavourOS, ArcoLinux-B and Garuda OS to 3 hard-disk partitions to an old 12 year old Lenovo (Intel i7) notebook. Unlike bad experiences installing XeroLinux and StormOS (Arch distros), I had no issues installing any of these other more mainstream Arch-based distros.
I was disappointed that Garuda forced me install to a BTRFS partition instead of EXT4, BTRFS does not play nice with the Grub-Customizer or OS-Prober utilities.
ArcoLinux-B requires more Linux experience to optimize its longer detailed installation but, for me, Arco was my "first impression" favorite of the three. As installed, Arco-B did include KDE's Discover GUI-based software installer. It also included a few Plasma widgets that I like that were missing in EndeavourOS and Garuda.
As noted in Jesse Smith's review, EndeavourOS did not include KDE Discover or any other GUI-based software installer. It did, however, include the "yay" command line installer which, as a Debian-base fan, I much prefer to learning the more complex syntax of Pacman. Since I still prefer a GUI software option, I used yay to install Manjaro's pamac-nosnap to my EndeavourOS installation. I did note that once installed, pamac is labelled "Add/Remove Software" and not PAMAC in the EndeavourOS menu.
Looking at memory use via Neofetch and Stacer utilties, KDE Plasma seems more memory efficient than most KDE Plasma Debian-based distros and much more efficient than the KDE Plasma Fedora distro. Overall subjective performance on this 12 year old notebook seemed very similar for Arco, Garuda and Endeavour.
I won't keep my Garuda installation due to forced BTRFS usage, Between the other two, after adding PAMAC to EndeavourOS, I could be happy with either Arco or Endeavour.
12 • Hardware compatibility (by Simon on 2022-07-25 05:04:06 GMT from New Zealand)
This is really a kernel issue, not a distro issue. Regardless of distro, your hardware's not going to work if there's no Linux driver for it... and, again regardless of distro, if there is a Linux driver for it, the default distro kernel can be replaced with a newer one that supports the new hardware. For beginners it can be an ease-of-installation thing, whether a distro uses a recent kernel and/or has it configured properly to support the desired hardware... so I do understand thinking in terms of distro hardware compatibility when recommending distros to beginners... but really it's the Linux kernel, rather than any distribution of it with any other software, that determines hardware compatibility. So, anyone concerned about the compability of a specific piece of hardware should be checking for Linux kernel drivers, not mucking around testing different distros to see if they happen to include them.
13 • Fair review (by LTS user on 2022-07-25 05:36:23 GMT from Germany)
The fairly written review here of the popular rolling release distribution expresses, in my view, everything a new Linux user needs to consider. Of course, many are happy with the rolling release model, but looking at it objectively, it is only understandable that the (commercial) large providers will offer their business customers an OS like MicroOS or Silverblue in the future; besides, of course, the proven LTS distributions like Debian or Ubuntu. When you switch on your computer in the morning at work to drive projects forward, it is simply inconceivable to want the added thrill of any rolling releases.
14 • Xfce :( (by Leon on 2022-07-25 06:11:27 GMT from France)
I highly doubt, I'll be living so long, to see only one single properly looking (OOTB) Xfce based distribution ever.
https://ibb.co/yszgJ94
15 • slax and the name (by Any on 2022-07-25 06:46:40 GMT from Spain)
I stopped downloading Slax when he changed the name.
16 • @ Could-not-take-my-desktop-with (by Leon on 2022-07-25 06:49:20 GMT from France)
I hope you're still here and read this -- it was too late for the answer on the Friday night.
"The problem is... THERE IS NO “ADD” BUTTON IN THE APPEARANCE APPLICATION OF MX 19.4 and I don't know how to install a theme without using that freaking button...
Excuse my ignorance (I'm a stupid newbie), and the lack of clarity in my previous post. I hope I had been clearer this time. By the way, it doesn't matter the specific theme I want to install (which name is “Neutronium”), since I don't know HOW TO DO IT."
You DO NOT NEED the 'Add' button, but you MUST provide the link to the specific theme.
Since the simple answer, 'extract and move to' isn't enough for you, if you do not provide us with the link, we won't know what exact theme you are trying to install.
The thing here is, there are different Neutronium themes around the net and a theme is not the same as a theme, and not every theme will work.
Working Xfce theme in 2022 must consist of xfwm part (for the window borders) and of gtk3 part (for inside the window looks + gtk2 for compatibility reasons), and it must have appropriate folder structure (== path) -- often there is 'one folder too much' in the path, that prevents the theme from being properly recognized.
As you can see here:
Theme unrecognized: https://ibb.co/TkJm4ZR
Theme recognized: https://ibb.co/12QDNVb
And as you can see, this Neutronium works without issues on:
MX 18.3: https://ibb.co/Hrkr8cV
MX 19.4: https://ibb.co/cQQbVJr
MX 21.1: https://ibb.co/kmJkZYT
Mint 20.3: https://ibb.co/jvfMjP6
We could easily explain to you HOW, if you helped us to help you and tell us WHAT ...
17 • Poll (by Someguy on 2022-07-25 06:55:11 GMT from United Kingdom)
Noting comments in Q&A, but, for a more complete picture of readers & users, maybe it would also be helpful to have a 'None of the above' option for folks like YT who never use Arch-based OSes, indeed avoid them?
18 • @16 correction (by Leon on 2022-07-25 06:58:43 GMT from France)
The links should've been like this:
MX 18.3: https://ibb.co/cQQbVJr
MX 19.4: https://ibb.co/kmJkZYT
MX 21.1: https://ibb.co/jvfMjP6
Mint 20.3: https://ibb.co/Hrkr8cV
19 • GDM (by Andreas on 2022-07-25 09:07:56 GMT from Czechia)
> I guess GDM assumes we want GNOME and pulls it in
This is a huge mistake. "Don't assume anything", goes the rule, and rightly so. Either the maintainers/devs are seriously lacking in knowledge, or they are just plain "evil". You *do not* make choices like this for the user behind their backs. This, coupled with the crashes mentioned in the reviews is another reason to keep clear of Gnome and the Arch family.
20 • slax name (by Any on 2022-07-25 09:16:58 GMT from Spain)
@15 - error
I mean "I stoped downloading Slax when he changed to Debian."
Slax is a clear allusion to Slackware and when there is no Slackware then there should not be any mention of it.
Debix or Debbix would have been the correct name.
21 • Running desktop environments on Arch Linux base (by zcatav on 2022-07-25 09:17:17 GMT from Turkey)
I don't use Arch BTW.
22 • installing endeavour (by peer on 2022-07-25 09:30:48 GMT from Netherlands)
installation of Endeavour failed:
offline: crash
online kde: failed
online community openbox: failed
23 • Desktops on Arch (by krell on 2022-07-25 09:36:43 GMT from Thailand)
Should have had a I don't use any arch based distro option.
Void is a superio cousin of arch.
For general use Fedora 36 or Clearlinux all the way babe!
24 • EndeavourOS (by borgio3 on 2022-07-25 09:59:21 GMT from Italy)
Hello everyone, in this very moment i'm on EndeavourOS 22.6 OpenBox community edition. Except for the configuration of the Nvidia 470 drivers, installed thanks to the suggestions of the Enedavour development team, no other problems arose. I have adapted some openbox stuff using the terminal and other tools and now it is a perfect system for my needs. Fast, consuming few resources and also aesthetically pleasing. Thanks to the development team.
25 • Slax naming (by sly on 2022-07-25 10:05:36 GMT from Canada)
simple Slax names based on distro type :)
Slackware: Slax
Debian: Slex
NixOS: Slix
Opensuse: Slox
Gentoo: Sloox
Ubuntu: Slux
EasyOS: Sleasy
26 • Closest is not always fastest (by JeffC on 2022-07-25 10:52:13 GMT from United States)
@3
You recommend switching to the closest package mirrors.
Since the days when I was using CrunchBang as my distro of choice and read on their forum that the distro dev used a mirror in Germany because it was faster than any in the UK for him (which was where he lived) I have chosen by highest speed instead of lowest distance.
In my own experience I found a mirror that was about 900 miles (1500 km) away which was faster for me than one that was less than 60 miles (100 km) away (closest to me).
27 • Desktops on Arch (by krell on 2022-07-25 12:06:41 GMT from Thailand)
Mate on Fedora
28 • Hardware Compatibility (by penguinx86 on 2022-07-25 13:35:21 GMT from United States)
I used to have lots of problems with failed installations 10-15 years ago. I'd burn the ISO to a CD or DVD, and the install would error out. I wasted lots of CDs and DVDs because of this. I'm not sure if it was due to hardware incompatibility, bad CDs/DVDs, missing drivers, or maybe just because I was a Noob?
But these days, I rarely have installations fail. I switched to booting from USB live media or installing ISOs in VirtualBox. Occasionally, I have a VirtualBox install fail. Usually a reinstall fixes the problem. If drivers are missing, like Video Drivers, I can usually install them from the VirtualBox Guest Additions ISO.
But installing from USB live media is another story. There are SO MANY distros that do not include compatible Wifi adapter drivers. How can I download missing drivers on a laptop without Wifi? If my Wifi doesn't work out of the box, I ditch that distro and move on. But then, I have to reformat my SSD and reinstall my old reliable distro Linux Mint to get Wifi working again. This is why I've given up installing new distros from USB live media. I'm sticking with what works out of the box, Linux Mint.
29 • Eneavor popularity (by Otis on 2022-07-25 13:40:49 GMT from United States)
Crashy installation. No joy. But, looking at the DW PHR we see it rising gradually and taking aim at the number 1 spot. Tried it twice, once early last year and then again recently. Same thing kept happening at install.. both times thought it was me, my machine, or bad hash match. None of it.
Made me wonder about the rankings here again.. realizing that there could be a negative aspect to some near the top, being clicked on by dozens of people per day just to see what all the ruckus is about by reading the spiel rather than to truly investigate, download, and install. MX is NOT the most popular Linux distribution in the world.
And Endeavor is not the 2nd most.
30 • Running desktop environments on Arch Linux base (by Tim on 2022-07-25 13:43:43 GMT from United States)
I just run "vanilla" Arch Linux with the Awesome window manager. Easy peasy!
31 • finally succesfull install Endeavour (by peer on 2022-07-25 14:05:57 GMT from Netherlands)
see comment #22
Online installation failed because Endeavour could not delete the target partition.
So I removed the partition and then installed Endeavour. Now Endeavour kde plasma is running
32 • Page Hit Rankings (by penguinx86 on 2022-07-25 14:19:38 GMT from United States)
I agree with @29. The page hit rankings don't reflect which distro is really the most popular. It seems like the 'flavour of the week' gets more page hits, because people click out of curiosity. A while back, Fedora was the first distro to include Gnome 40 as the default desktop environment. Fedora got lots of page hits and even beat out Ubuntu for a couple of weeks. But now, Fedora dropped to 7th place, below Ubuntu at 6th place. And what about the bottom of the page hit rankings? A couple of months ago Haiku and Emmabuntus were in the top 10. Now Haiku is in 92nd place and Emmabuntus is in 99th place. How did that happen? I'm also curious how many page hits are from the same people spamming their favorite distro to make it higher in the rankings?
33 • @4 - AGREE! (by mandatory on 2022-07-25 14:26:29 GMT from United States)
Upon last reinstall (Debian Stable), I switched from Cinnamon to Gnome.
Big mistake I deeply regret!
Cinnamon rules.
Gnome drools.
34 • PHR (by Otis on 2022-07-25 15:18:08 GMT from United States)
@32 Yes, it's past the debate point about the "popularity" of a distro and its place on the list here. There's a link on the top right explaining this to users of DW.
My point is mainly how a distro can rise on the list because it is being talked about due to a (partially or fully) negative review, reflecting nothing muc at all about its world wide usage on computers.
35 • EndeavourOS (by Johnny on 2022-07-25 17:24:36 GMT from Estonia)
The space travel theme is pure cringe. I'd never use it for that reason alone.
36 • DEs (by Cheker on 2022-07-25 17:31:50 GMT from Portugal)
I have two Archs (Manjaro, Artix) across two PCs, both have Xfce. My DE of choice used to be KDE but it had some dumb slowdowns (I blame the Nvidia card), so after that I moved to Xfce and now I favor it. Mate is a very close second.
37 • Desktop on Arch (by Robert on 2022-07-25 18:05:32 GMT from United States)
I daily drive Wayfire on my arch machine. It works well, if a bit barebones.
KDE is my preferred desktop, and I keep it installed and check in from time to time to see if enough bugs have been cleared out for me to go back. But lately it's gone from "almost there" to "takes several minutes to log in, and everything is broken when it finally does." Probably something on my end, but I have no idea what and can't be bothered to do a full reinstall.
I quite like MATE as well, and wouldn't mind switching back to that when they get a full Wayland session implemented.
38 • @29 - top of the page hit rankings (by Andy Prough on 2022-07-25 17:58:58 GMT from United States)
> "Made me wonder about the rankings here again.. realizing that there could be a negative aspect to some near the top, being clicked on by dozens of people per day just to see what all the ruckus is about by reading the spiel rather than to truly investigate, download, and install. MX is NOT the most popular Linux distribution in the world."
Don't fool yourself - the top 5 on the page hit rankings are all incredibly good and feature-filled distros. We couldn't even dream about distros like those when I got started with GNU/Linux systems. None of them is the "most used distro in the world", because the most used distro in the world is determined by corporate/enterprise spending and decisions, just like the way that Windoze became the most used OS for corporate offices and the way ChromeOS is so heavily used by schools and universities.
But they probably are the "most often chosen Linux distros by knowledgeable users making their own private, non-corporate decisions".
39 • marketing (by Tad Strange on 2022-07-25 19:01:08 GMT from Canada)
I wonder if "Terminal-Centric" is just Endeavour's way of saying that they are basically an installer for a mildly configured vanilla Arch desktop with few added features.
It's not like you cannot be "terminal-centric" to your hearts content in any other brand of Linux.
Just seems to be an odd thing to make into the primary marketing for the thing.
I tried it. Tend to prefer Manjaro, with it's somewhat more conservative attitude and small array of useful tools.
Plasma desktop, of course. I've got it on an old W520 Thinkpad and want for nothing.
40 • XFCE (by ro0t on 2022-07-25 19:59:04 GMT from Germany)
XFCE until grave.
Nothing else matters.
41 • Poll results (by Robert on 2022-07-25 20:01:12 GMT from United States)
I found the poll results surprising. KDE and Xfce way out ahead, with Gnome well behind, roughly even with window managers. Would've expected Gnome to be near the top what with it being default on most major distros.
But I guess this is about arch, and Arch users know better.
42 • GNOME (by Jesse on 2022-07-25 20:07:24 GMT from Canada)
@41: "I found the poll results surprising. KDE and Xfce way out ahead, with Gnome well behind, roughly even with window managers. Would've expected Gnome to be near the top what with it being default on most major distros."
The idea that "GNOME is the default" is a common, but inaccurate meme. It's really only the default desktop on a few commercially backed distros (Fedora, Ubuntu, SLE). Pretty much all community distributions use something else.
Technically Debian uses GNOME as its "default", but since Debian is such a flexible system iat setup time ts default doesn't really mean anything. Almost all Arch-based, Ubuntu-based, and Slackware-based systems use something else - typically Xfce or KDE Plasma.
43 • @28 hardware compatability (by Titus_Groan on 2022-07-25 20:09:15 GMT from New Zealand)
"There are SO MANY distros that do not include compatible Wifi adapter drivers."
likely due to patents preventing drivers being "freely re-disributed"
yes, you bought the hardware and you would think the drivers were paid for by purchasing the hardware, but software patents dont work like that.
Distros should be aware that by providing a patent encumbered driver, they are exposing themselves - not the end user, to severe penalties for breach of patent terms.
Linux Mint, in particular, in the past, has been quite cavalier in its attitude towards patent encumbered software, particularly audio and video codecs.
44 • Linux Mint (by Friar Tux on 2022-07-25 20:36:12 GMT from Canada)
@43 (Titus_Groan) "Linux Mint, in particular, in the past, has been quite cavalier in its attitude towards patent encumbered software, particularly audio and video codecs." (And WIFI)
I believe this is what made Mint the top distro and has kept it there (despite its position on the DW chart). Cavalier or not, Mint works out-of-box every time and THAT is what folks are looking for. Install and go right to work. If a distro can't do that, I move on to one that can.
45 • Mint (by Jesse on 2022-07-25 22:27:04 GMT from Canada)
@43 and @44: "Linux Mint, in particular, in the past, has been quite cavalier in its attitude towards patent encumbered software, particularly audio and video codecs"
Mint has been the opposite of cavalier toward encumbered software, like wifi drivers and media codecs. Remember earlier versions of Mint shipped with separate editions for people in the USA and Japan where software patents were still a thing. (The rest of the world didn't recognize software patents, so the codecs weren't encumbered in those countries.)
Check out this past announcement, for example: "Linux Mint 11 comes as a live DVD. A live CD is also available for people without a DVD burner or distributors established in the USA and Japan. The live CD comes with fewer applications, no multimedia codecs and no restricted software, making it fit within 700 MB and safely distributable in countries where the legislation allows patents to apply to software."
https://distrowatch.com/?newsid=06669
46 • Top 5 PHR (by Otis on 2022-07-25 22:36:10 GMT from United States)
@38, I understand that point, but to mine Mageia, Fedora, and openSuse were in the top 5 just ten years ago. We need not debate the usefulness of any of those distros as they are long standing. Even then, though and incremented throughout Linux history, distros have come and gone irrespective of their high position on that list.
The DW PHR top 5 now are not the top 5 distros as to usage in the world of Linux is an easier thing to understand then to try to pretend that they really are. As to that I'd guess Arch and Debian as the only sure things as to high worldwide popularity.
47 • Arch, no DE yet (by TheTKS on 2022-07-25 23:02:56 GMT from Canada)
I voted Arch CLI because that's what I happen to have at the moment.
I'm trying to get Linux to run with a DE on a 32-bit Chromebook that's out of support, but still works well as a travel laptop for light use. The most detailed instructions I could find online for the "easy" version (ha, ha) for a first try were for Arch and for Debian dual booting a distro on top of ChromeOS kernel on an SD card or USB drive. I went with Arch's more straightforward instructions for my first time trying Arch.
Arch installation instructions from a couple of years back got me a lot of the way there: I got ArchLinuxArm installed (thank you, Arch and ArchARM!) but stuck in boot.
Nikolas on github gave tips for more recent installations and got me through booting to the command line (thank you, Nikolas!).
No wifi, so stuck in a USB wifi dongle and got a working wifi connection (but only if I stuck the USB dongle in after booting - wouldn't pick it up if I fired it up with the dongle already in.) Ping worked, but couldn't download. Another post somewhere (probably Arch wiki about networking) got me past that... something about not having two network managers trying to fight for dominance. I read somewhere that it's always DNS.
I tried updating Arch but failed on my first try. I've gotten as far as a reinstallation to the CLI with working internet again.
I would like to try installing X and a DE next, Xfce.
If I get that to work... then I would really like to get SlackwareARM 15.0 32-bit running on this.
Aside: other than the wifi and post-installation update related problems, the roadblocks I ran into were systemd related. As the "admin" of only a few single-user computers, I don't see what benefits systemd brings me and really didn't enjoy the time I spent with it.
TKS
48 • Hardware compatibility (by Mike on 2022-07-26 11:18:15 GMT from Netherlands)
I have used OpenSuse for many years, until I bought a new desktop.
Suddenly I had issues with my soundcard. Everytime sound started with a pop.
More people mentioned having this issue on multiple places on the internet. No solution was found. No reaction on the forum. I decided to move to a different distro that did not have the issue. I tried later releases but the problem remained.
What made me sad was that no response came on the OpenSuse forum.
Now I have moved on.
49 • Databases of compatible hardware (by Otis on 2022-07-26 16:57:56 GMT from United States)
Thanking Jesse for his explanation of review(s) overview in the Q&A section of DW Weekly, also providing the link to three important lists provided at DW: 1. Organizations which sell computers with Linux/BSD pre-installed, 2. Phones and tabletsm, and (to me the biggie) 3. Databases of compatible hardware.
I will peruse that third one just out of curiosity as to my three laptop's varying hardware, and mainly to see how much the list could aid in distro choices to even bother with.
50 • OpenSUSE (by qwerty99 on 2022-07-26 17:45:43 GMT from United Kingdom)
The micro OS download for OpenSUSE is 3.7GB! Some micro OS!
51 • Sound @48 (by Cheker on 2022-07-26 17:47:06 GMT from Portugal)
I suspect I know what you're describing:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1230833/annoying-click-popping-sound-on-ubuntu-20-04
Elijah Lynn's answer is what did it for me. I saw this behaviour on several distros.
52 • DW and Distro Popularity (by Samuel on 2022-07-26 20:22:47 GMT from South Africa)
How many people out there use Linux but do not visit DW? Sure there is no way of knowing how many. Just hearing people talk about a linux desktop distro or a Linux desktop alternative to other OSes, Ubuntu seems to be by far the most popular distro in terms of long term installations in machines. Among the visitors to DW it might be the first 5 on PHR.
53 • distro popularity (by dave on 2022-07-27 03:39:27 GMT from United States)
@52 I have to agree with this. Ubuntu is easily the Linux distribution that is most well known among normies. For many normies, Ubuntu is synonymous with Linux. Mint is easily 2nd. One hypothetical way to prove this could be to take stock of all the news clips with visible computer screens. The most common sightings are (obviously) Windows, OSX and a distant 3rd is stock Ubuntu using Unity/Gnome.. you'll basically never see anything beyond that (which is sad)..
54 • DW popularity list (by Leon on 2022-07-27 07:24:59 GMT from France)
@29, @32, @34, @38, @46, @52, @53
First and foremost, DW list is partially wrong. Ubuntu should be at least at 4th place (all *buntu 2'193), however, both, the DW and the DW ranking are actually irrelevant.
Why?
Normal people don't care for the OS. They buy a new PC and the OS comes preinstalled.
It'll usually come with Windows or rarely with macOS, and it'll stay at it until EOL.
When the PC becomes unbearably slow, normal people get another PC.
Sometimes, after HW isn't supported or performant enough, some will try to 'breathe it the 2nd life'.
Then they will simply download Ubuntu, which will stay there for the next couple of years.
After Ubuntu, if they still can't or won't part from 'the good old potato' ...
They might start experimenting with different distributions.
Note that that's the normal case because ...
Normal people don't care for the OS -- they care for their applications.
Normal people don't care for the PC, nor they know of DW.
DW ranking list is comparable to a zoo.
Most people will stand in front of some caged exotic beast.
However, at home, they'll still keep their kitty and won't get a tiger.
If I think of myself and my own clicks, I doubt that I ever clicked once on Fedora or Ubuntu.
I know where I can get them, if and when I need them, but ...
I clicked countless times on some 'junkstrybutions', as it is much easier to get some messed up distribution from DW, then to go and hunt some messed up distribution from their own website, which will redirect one to some mirrors page, which will then redirect to some ... whatever.
As example: Each time when I want to show some badly miss-configured Xfce, I download the latest MX-Linux from DW, make a couple of screenshots, and trash the ISO again. Brings ranking up. And then, the people who saw the screenshots and won't believe that something can really be that bad, also go to DW and download it for themselves to try. DW ranking again goes up ...
55 • Distrowatch distro popularity list is irrelevant (by Thinking normie on 2022-07-27 22:50:57 GMT from France)
@29, @32, @34, @38, @46, @52, @53, @54
Who can really disagree with Leon?
Distrowatch measures Distrowatch readers clicks on distro names. That's indeed just Distrowatch buzz stats, and no distro popularity ranking at all. First of all you have to know that Ditrowatch exists to read it. Secondly there's no directe connection between using a distro a clicking links on Distrowatch!
I myself has been using Ubuntu on several machine for 15 years and Manjaro on a machine for nearly 4 years. Guess what? I almost never click on Ubuntu or Manjaro articles when having a look at Distrowatch. When i first installed Ubuntu on a machine in 2007 - the only distro that really worked after installation, i almost stopped reading Distrowatch articles on Ubuntu. Same for Manjaro in 2018...
I don't read Distrowatch to get information about distros i use because i know them and get better information about them elsewhere. I read Distrowatch to keep an eye on whats's going on with distros I DO NOT use.
I wouldn't be surprised that most distro hits on Distrowatch are actually connected with distros readers don't use at all themselves either.
56 • Distrowatch distro popularity list is irrelevant (ERRATUM) (by Thinking normie on 2022-07-27 22:55:18 GMT from France)
Erratum:
Secondly there's no direct connection between using a distro AND clicking links on Distrowatch!
57 • Closest mirror does not yield fastest download (by Thinking normie on 2022-07-27 23:42:10 GMT from France)
@26, @3
JeffC's right.
There several reasons that make a download quicker or slower from one server compared to another one.
First of all, the geographically nearest server from you may be too slow or too overloaded.
And then, there is all the Internet infrastructure between the server and your machine, beginning with the server's Internet acces link.
From Paris (France) i clearly get better results from californian mirrors set by US data carriers big shots (seemingly server farms with high throughput, nearly directly connected to major Internet backbones) than from the server of the university lab just across the Seine river, less than 2 miles away from my home (obvioulsy a more modest server with a much more limited Internet connection...).
If a distro has a central download location (like Ubuntu.com) i use it because it certainly is the most used server and Internet operator caches usually simply make it the quickest download source. Manjaro (maybe any Arch-based distro?) has an option on Pacman that allows selecting the currently quickest responding mirror (and usually selects for me an Austrian server, far from Paris-located mirrors, across more than one border). Otherwise from experience i choose big Internet-operator-hosted mirrors in Norhwestern Europe or Northern America (intercontinental and continental Internet backbones interconnexions matter more than pure geography...).
58 • Rankings (by asdfg12 on 2022-07-28 05:21:29 GMT from Germany)
@54 That is true in many respects. I myself, like many others, just click on one of the top distros to read the latest comments and of course that drives up their rankings. I've also noticed that there seems to be a rather childish clicking competition among users of certain related distros (like Debian-Ubuntu, Arch-Manjaro-Endeavour, even Mageia-OpenMandriva). I've often seen, for example, a new overly jubilant review gets positive feedback ("Was this review helpful?") and then massive downvoting shortly afterwards. Or when there is a critical review, that almost immediately afterwards effusive counterstatements are written or that the fans of the mother distribution have nothing better to do than to portray the derivative as negatively as possible.
59 • How to install desktop themes in Xfce (by Could-not-take-my-desktop-with on 2022-07-28 05:44:39 GMT from Brazil)
@16
Hey Leon, thanks for trying to help me!
The Xfce desktop theme I wasn't able to install is “Neutronium Xfwm4”, labeled as 46566-Neutronium-Xfwm4.tar.bz2 and available for download at least in these two addresses:
https://www.xfce-look.org/p/1016569
https://apps.plasma-bigscreen.org/p/1016569/
Both webpages have a blue button suggestively called “Install”, but something is telling me I should not click on it... (Well, the OS running on my PC is a frugal install of MX 19.4 AHS using a persistent storage that is being gradually configured to remaster the distro. And since I accidentaly destroyed the previous install, it made me affraid of everything online.)
Learning Linux sometimes is daunting for a newbie, but the hard way of learning is better than the easy way. So I prefer not to perform the online method of installing “Neutronium Xfwm4”. If I couldn't do it offline, then I will upgrade to MX 21.1 and do it by means of the ADD button of the Appearance application.
Either way, I appreciate your solicitude. Thanks once again for taking the time to teach me how to beautify the Xfce desktop! Your words in post #14 are a holy truth. Every distro under the Sun has a terrible look OOTB. Even MS Windows is ugly as hell.
Believe me: My remaster of MX 19.4 AHS is getting incredibly beautiful and easy to use __ too different from the original version made by the MX team. In the near future, when it will be finished and updated, I'd like to know a trustful file-sharing website where I could place it to be downloaded by anybody around the world. Maybe I call it “MX 19.4 AHS x64 Pretty Xfce Edition”.
60 • Desktop Environment on Arch (by Dr.J on 2022-07-28 08:06:40 GMT from Germany)
we have several notebooks in the household, all running Archlinux. I have been using Arch for more than 10 years, but have slimmed it down a bit (without systemd, runit instead; no display manager, autologin via agetty, etc.). As DE we use XFCE and Openbox. I prefer the latter, because even though I like XFCE, it runs too buggy. Lots of trouble with the panels (which don't automatically hide as they should) or autostarts at login. Openbox doesn't cause any problems of this kind. And it's fantastically easy once you get used to the syntax of the three configuration files. If I had to use a tiling window manager, I would install Awesome, which I tried for some time but don't really need.
61 • Failure of an ISO to install (by DachshundMan on 2022-07-28 09:40:28 GMT from United Kingdom)
If I get an ISO that fails to install I simply download a different distro as I am not so fixated on any particular distro that I must have it. This how I came to use Mint Mate which I am writing this on now. Previously I was using Manjaro XFCE until some of the programs I installed from the AUR messed up the updating and I could not fix it in a short time. Instead of spending a lot of time to fix it I just tried a few ISOs until I found one that (a) installed OK and (b) laid things out in a way that suited me. Normally I try to stick to distros near the top of the DistroWatch ranking as I reckon they will probably not have many problems.
I agree with Jesse that nobody should be blamed for failures to install due to HW incompatibilities. However as I feel, maybe wrongly, that the big distros should install more reliably I normally recommend them if asked.
In my limited experience big name HW is just as likely as a home built system to have compatibility issues.
62 • Slax (by Norbert on 2022-07-28 11:07:57 GMT from France)
@25 good distro chuckle
63 • DW PHR List (by Otis on 2022-07-29 15:08:02 GMT from United States)
@55 Distrowatch provides many good services to the Linux community, and the computing community at large. One of the best and most used I'm sure is the PHR list itself. A hundred distros right there, each one on the list a link to info about it, most with reviews here and linked to other sites with reviews, not to mention each distro's download links.
One can come here to this clearinghouse for Linux distros and explore to one's heart's delight via that PHR list, not just get an idea as to how many others are exploring by looking at the order of distros on the list.
64 • @59 (by Could-not-take-my-desktop-with) (by Leonie on 2022-07-29 17:01:53 GMT from Netherlands)
"Learning Linux sometimes is daunting for a newbie, but the hard way of learning is better than the easy way. So I prefer not to perform the online method of installing “Neutronium Xfwm4”. If I couldn't do it offline, then I will upgrade to MX 21.1 and do it by means of the ADD button of the Appearance application."
I went back and was reading what you wrote, what Leon responded and also Jesse's explanation.
Jesse's explanation was minimal and not very useful for a noob. Leon tried to help, but I'm somehow insecure did it actually help you or not, since from your writing above ...
First of all, you can easily 'do it offline'. You just go to the website and download the theme.
https://ibb.co/dK4LP39
https://ibb.co/SsxTZB5
If in doubt that it could be a malicious file, you can check that online too:
https://ibb.co/nDf7dHP
As Jesse and Leon already explained, all you need to do is to unpack the theme and move it inside the hidden folder .themes inside your home directory -- AND YOU WILL ALWAYS BE ABLE TO FIND IT -- despite your claim 'I could not find it'.
You did install the theme, but you didn't know the very basics, and those, you couldn't find where to activate, what you just installed.
As Leon already wrote, a full Xfce theme consists of three parts: gtk2, gtk3 and xfwm4.
However, some themes are incomplete and do not have all of those parts, and that's why they are not called Xfce theme, but GTK or xfwm themes.
This is what happened to you, after reading Jesse's incomplete explanation ...
Jesse didn't mention that Xfce needs two different settings, on two different places, to set up the theme, but mentioned only 'Appearance', and you, who downloaded only xfwm theme (without GTK part), of course didn't find anything, and even with 'Add' button, you wouldn't find it.
Xfce settings has separate 'Appearance' and 'Window Manager' settings. Your Neutronium theme, which consists only of xfwm part of the theme, is visible only under 'Window Manager', and since it is missing the GTK part, it can not be shown under 'Appearance', as of Jesse's writing.
With other words, inside 'Appearance', one will find the GTK theme and icons, but the window borders (xfwm4 part, like Neutronium), will appear only under 'Window Manager'!
https://ibb.co/hDcRVvm
Simply move your downloaded themes in .themes, and select them under 'Appearance' and 'Window Manager' settings.
https://ibb.co/HK86kmV
This is what it could look like, your MX 19.4:
https://ibb.co/qFgFvjc
https://ibb.co/hKSdQdY
https://ibb.co/25S7rc2
BUT -- there is one small caveat.
One can move the themes either inside the user folder (home) or inside the system folder (usr/share/themes). Both of them will will 'work', but there is a big difference between.
Sometimes, some program might need to run with administrative privileges, and it's highly probable, that it will not use the theme installed in .themes folder inside the home, but that it will insist on the theme installed inside /usr/share/themes.
Will say, it might happen that you occasionally get two completely different themes in two different windows -- different GTK theme, different window borders and different icons and mouse cursor, if you did also change them, and installed them inside .icons folder in your home.
BTW, there is a free and easy way to share any file, incl. movies and ISO's, but for more control, you should make an account -- even it also works without.
https://ibb.co/K9bsRh3
The website is reliable and anonymous -- as much as anything web can be anonymous. ;)
Number of Comments: 64
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
| | |
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Archives |
| • Issue 1090 (2024-09-30): Rhino Linux 2024.2, commercial distros with alternative desktops, Valve seeks to improve Wayland performance, HardenedBSD parterns with Protectli, Tails merges with Tor Project, Quantum Leap partners with the FreeBSD Foundation |
| • Issue 1089 (2024-09-23): Expirion 6.0, openKylin 2.0, managing configuration files, the future of Linux development, fixing bugs in Haiku, Slackware packages dracut |
| • Issue 1088 (2024-09-16): PorteuX 1.6, migrating from Windows 10 to which Linux distro, making NetBSD immutable, AlmaLinux offers hardware certification, Mint updates old APT tools |
| • Issue 1087 (2024-09-09): COSMIC desktop, running cron jobs at variable times, UBports highlights new apps, HardenedBSD offers work around for FreeBSD change, Debian considers how to cull old packages, systemd ported to musl |
| • Issue 1086 (2024-09-02): Vanilla OS 2, command line tips for simple tasks, FreeBSD receives investment from STF, openSUSE Tumbleweed update can break network connections, Debian refreshes media |
| • Issue 1085 (2024-08-26): Nobara 40, OpenMandriva 24.07 "ROME", distros which include source code, FreeBSD publishes quarterly report, Microsoft updates breaks Linux in dual-boot environments |
| • Issue 1084 (2024-08-19): Liya 2.0, dual boot with encryption, Haiku introduces performance improvements, Gentoo dropping IA-64, Redcore merges major upgrade |
| • Issue 1083 (2024-08-12): TrueNAS 24.04.2 "SCALE", Linux distros for smartphones, Redox OS introduces web server, PipeWire exposes battery drain on Linux, Canonical updates kernel version policy |
| • Issue 1082 (2024-08-05): Linux Mint 22, taking snapshots of UFS on FreeBSD, openSUSE updates Tumbleweed and Aeon, Debian creates Tiny QA Tasks, Manjaro testing immutable images |
| • Issue 1081 (2024-07-29): SysLinuxOS 12.4, OpenBSD gain hardware acceleration, Slackware changes kernel naming, Mint publishes upgrade instructions |
| • Issue 1080 (2024-07-22): Running GNU/Linux on Android with Andronix, protecting network services, Solus dropping AppArmor and Snap, openSUSE Aeon Desktop gaining full disk encryption, SUSE asks openSUSE to change its branding |
| • Issue 1079 (2024-07-15): Ubuntu Core 24, hiding files on Linux, Fedora dropping X11 packages on Workstation, Red Hat phasing out GRUB, new OpenSSH vulnerability, FreeBSD speeds up release cycle, UBports testing new first-run wizard |
| • Issue 1078 (2024-07-08): Changing init software, server machines running desktop environments, OpenSSH vulnerability patched, Peppermint launches new edition, HardenedBSD updates ports |
| • Issue 1077 (2024-07-01): The Unity and Lomiri interfaces, different distros for different tasks, Ubuntu plans to run Wayland on NVIDIA cards, openSUSE updates Leap Micro, Debian releases refreshed media, UBports gaining contact synchronisation, FreeDOS celebrates its 30th anniversary |
| • Issue 1076 (2024-06-24): openSUSE 15.6, what makes Linux unique, SUSE Liberty Linux to support CentOS Linux 7, SLE receives 19 years of support, openSUSE testing Leap Micro edition |
| • Issue 1075 (2024-06-17): Redox OS, X11 and Wayland on the BSDs, AlmaLinux releases Pi build, Canonical announces RISC-V laptop with Ubuntu, key changes in systemd |
| • Issue 1074 (2024-06-10): Endless OS 6.0.0, distros with init diversity, Mint to filter unverified Flatpaks, Debian adds systemd-boot options, Redox adopts COSMIC desktop, OpenSSH gains new security features |
| • Issue 1073 (2024-06-03): LXQt 2.0.0, an overview of Linux desktop environments, Canonical partners with Milk-V, openSUSE introduces new features in Aeon Desktop, Fedora mirrors see rise in traffic, Wayland adds OpenBSD support |
| • Issue 1072 (2024-05-27): Manjaro 24.0, comparing init software, OpenBSD ports Plasma 6, Arch community debates mirror requirements, ThinOS to upgrade its FreeBSD core |
| • Issue 1071 (2024-05-20): Archcraft 2024.04.06, common command line mistakes, ReactOS imports WINE improvements, Haiku makes adjusting themes easier, NetBSD takes a stand against code generated by chatbots |
| • Issue 1070 (2024-05-13): Damn Small Linux 2024, hiding kernel messages during boot, Red Hat offers AI edition, new web browser for UBports, Fedora Asahi Remix 40 released, Qubes extends support for version 4.1 |
| • Issue 1069 (2024-05-06): Ubuntu 24.04, installing packages in alternative locations, systemd creates sudo alternative, Mint encourages XApps collaboration, FreeBSD publishes quarterly update |
| • Issue 1068 (2024-04-29): Fedora 40, transforming one distro into another, Debian elects new Project Leader, Red Hat extends support cycle, Emmabuntus adds accessibility features, Canonical's new security features |
| • Issue 1067 (2024-04-22): LocalSend for transferring files, detecting supported CPU architecure levels, new visual design for APT, Fedora and openSUSE working on reproducible builds, LXQt released, AlmaLinux re-adds hardware support |
| • Issue 1066 (2024-04-15): Fun projects to do with the Raspberry Pi and PinePhone, installing new software on fixed-release distributions, improving GNOME Terminal performance, Mint testing new repository mirrors, Gentoo becomes a Software In the Public Interest project |
| • Issue 1065 (2024-04-08): Dr.Parted Live 24.03, answering questions about the xz exploit, Linux Mint to ship HWE kernel, AlmaLinux patches flaw ahead of upstream Red Hat, Calculate changes release model |
| • Issue 1064 (2024-04-01): NixOS 23.11, the status of Hurd, liblzma compromised upstream, FreeBSD Foundation focuses on improving wireless networking, Ubuntu Pro offers 12 years of support |
| • Issue 1063 (2024-03-25): Redcore Linux 2401, how slowly can a rolling release update, Debian starts new Project Leader election, Red Hat creating new NVIDIA driver, Snap store hit with more malware |
| • Issue 1062 (2024-03-18): KDE neon 20240304, changing file permissions, Canonical turns 20, Pop!_OS creates new software centre, openSUSE packages Plasma 6 |
| • Issue 1061 (2024-03-11): Using a PinePhone as a workstation, restarting background services on a schedule, NixBSD ports Nix to FreeBSD, Fedora packaging COSMIC, postmarketOS to adopt systemd, Linux Mint replacing HexChat |
| • Issue 1060 (2024-03-04): AV Linux MX-23.1, bootstrapping a network connection, key OpenBSD features, Qubes certifies new hardware, LXQt and Plasma migrate to Qt 6 |
| • Issue 1059 (2024-02-26): Warp Terminal, navigating manual pages, malware found in the Snap store, Red Hat considering CPU requirement update, UBports organizes ongoing work |
| • Issue 1058 (2024-02-19): Drauger OS 7.6, how much disk space to allocate, System76 prepares to launch COSMIC desktop, UBports changes its version scheme, TrueNAS to offer faster deduplication |
| • Issue 1057 (2024-02-12): Adelie Linux 1.0 Beta, rolling release vs fixed for a smoother experience, Debian working on 2038 bug, elementary OS to split applications from base system updates, Fedora announces Atomic Desktops |
| • Issue 1056 (2024-02-05): wattOS R13, the various write speeds of ISO writing tools, DSL returns, Mint faces Wayland challenges, HardenedBSD blocks foreign USB devices, Gentoo publishes new repository, Linux distros patch glibc flaw |
| • Issue 1055 (2024-01-29): CNIX OS 231204, distributions patching packages the most, Gentoo team presents ongoing work, UBports introduces connectivity and battery improvements, interview with Haiku developer |
| • Issue 1054 (2024-01-22): Solus 4.5, comparing dd and cp when writing ISO files, openSUSE plans new major Leap version, XeroLinux shutting down, HardenedBSD changes its build schedule |
| • Issue 1053 (2024-01-15): Linux AI voice assistants, some distributions running hotter than others, UBports talks about coming changes, Qubes certifies StarBook laptops, Asahi Linux improves energy savings |
| • Issue 1052 (2024-01-08): OpenMandriva Lx 5.0, keeping shell commands running when theterminal closes, Mint upgrades Edge kernel, Vanilla OS plans big changes, Canonical working to make Snap more cross-platform |
| • Issue 1051 (2024-01-01): Favourite distros of 2023, reloading shell settings, Asahi Linux releases Fedora remix, Gentoo offers binary packages, openSUSE provides full disk encryption |
| • Issue 1050 (2023-12-18): rlxos 2023.11, renaming files and opening terminal windows in specific directories, TrueNAS publishes ZFS fixes, Debian publishes delayed install media, Haiku polishes desktop experience |
| • Issue 1049 (2023-12-11): Lernstick 12, alternatives to WINE, openSUSE updates its branding, Mint unveils new features, Lubuntu team plans for 24.04 |
| • Issue 1048 (2023-12-04): openSUSE MicroOS, the transition from X11 to Wayland, Red Hat phasing out X11 packages, UBports making mobile development easier |
| • Issue 1047 (2023-11-27): GhostBSD 23.10.1, Why Linux uses swap when memory is free, Ubuntu Budgie may benefit from Wayland work in Xfce, early issues with FreeBSD 14.0 |
| • Issue 1046 (2023-11-20): Slackel 7.7 "Openbox", restricting CPU usage, Haiku improves font handling and software centre performance, Canonical launches MicroCloud |
| • Issue 1045 (2023-11-13): Fedora 39, how to trust software packages, ReactOS booting with UEFI, elementary OS plans to default to Wayland, Mir gaining ability to split work across video cards |
| • Issue 1044 (2023-11-06): Porteus 5.01, disabling IPv6, applications unique to a Linux distro, Linux merges bcachefs, OpenELA makes source packages available |
| • Issue 1043 (2023-10-30): Murena Two with privacy switches, where old files go when packages are updated, UBports on Volla phones, Mint testing Cinnamon on Wayland, Peppermint releases ARM build |
| • Issue 1042 (2023-10-23): Ubuntu Cinnamon compared with Linux Mint, extending battery life on Linux, Debian resumes /usr merge, Canonical publishes fixed install media |
| • Issue 1041 (2023-10-16): FydeOS 17.0, Dr.Parted 23.09, changing UIDs, Fedora partners with Slimbook, GNOME phasing out X11 sessions, Ubuntu revokes 23.10 install media |
| • Issue 1040 (2023-10-09): CROWZ 5.0, changing the location of default directories, Linux Mint updates its Edge edition, Murena crowdfunding new privacy phone, Debian publishes new install media |
| • Issue 1039 (2023-10-02): Zenwalk Current, finding the duration of media files, Peppermint OS tries out new edition, COSMIC gains new features, Canonical reports on security incident in Snap store |
| • Issue 1038 (2023-09-25): Mageia 9, trouble-shooting launchers, running desktop Linux in the cloud, New documentation for Nix, Linux phasing out ReiserFS, GNU celebrates 40 years |
| • Issue 1037 (2023-09-18): Bodhi Linux 7.0.0, finding specific distros and unified package managemnt, Zevenet replaced by two new forks, openSUSE introduces Slowroll branch, Fedora considering dropping Plasma X11 session |
| • Issue 1036 (2023-09-11): SDesk 2023.08.12, hiding command line passwords, openSUSE shares contributor survery results, Ubuntu plans seamless disk encryption, GNOME 45 to break extension compatibility |
| • Full list of all issues |
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
| Random Distribution | 
Aurora OS
Aurora OS started its life as Eeebuntu, an Ubuntu-based distribution optimised for ASUS Eee PC and other popular netbooks. In June 2010, the project was renamed to Aurora OS, with a goal of becoming a more general Linux distribution for the desktop with user-friendly features.
Status: Discontinued
|
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
|
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
0x969CD4E778C7b6549A2B00e34114e0168c86A542 
