DistroWatch Weekly |
| Tip Jar |
If you've enjoyed this week's issue of DistroWatch Weekly, please consider sending us a tip. (Tips this week: 1, value: US$11.50) |
|
|
|
 bc1qxes3k2wq3uqzr074tkwwjmwfe63z70gwzfu4lx  lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhxarpw3jkc7tzw4ex6cfexyfua2nr  86fA3qPTeQtNb2k1vLwEQaAp3XxkvvvXt69gSG5LGunXXikK9koPWZaRQgfFPBPWhMgXjPjccy9LA9xRFchPWQAnPvxh5Le paypal.me/distrowatchweekly • patreon.com/distrowatch |
|
| Extended Lifecycle Support by TuxCare |
|
|
| Reader Comments • Jump to last comment |
1 • CentOS (by Pumpino on 2021-01-25 00:33:34 GMT from Australia)
So Red Hat has realised that people are ditching CentOS for other distros like Ubuntu and Debian rather than paying for subscriptions, so they're back-tracking by offering free subscriptions, which will likely be withdrawn in the future, leaving people having to pay.
Red Hat might not get as many new subscriptions from businesses, as IT professionals running home servers will switch to Ubuntu or Debian and implement one of these in production environments also. I'm glad I moved to Ubuntu 20.04.
2 • Red Hat Linux (by Yan on 2021-01-25 00:36:44 GMT from Canada)
Red Hat has shown itself to be unreliable by suddenly cutting the support period for CentOS 8 by 8 years. I'm not about to ask for a free subscription to Red Hat Linux. Fool me once...
3 • Systemd (by Friar Tux on 2021-01-25 01:12:40 GMT from Canada)
Jesse, I commend you on that fair treatment of systemd. (Considering you maintain SysV and all.) I, personally, don't care what init system is used so long as it works well with the distro at hand. (In fact, most of the distros I've tested that did NOT work out well were using init systems OTHER than systemd.) As for the poll, again, I really have no preferred parent OS so long as the distro derived from it works out-of-box. At present, I'm using Mint. I see it as Debian putting together a really good OS. Ubuntu taking that and improving on it and kicking it back into the pool. The Mint improving on Ubuntu and releasing that back into the pool. I HAVE tried Feren OS (which takes Mint and enhances it) but unfortunately Feren seems to go belly up at every other update. And I don't have the inclination or time to fiddle with it each time. One last thing, mostly for those of us from Canada and the States. If you have ever watched Loonytune's Duck Dodger on Planet X, have you noticed that the MX Linux logo looks like one of the scenes from that cartoon, a big X over a couple of mountains. (This is in no way intended to be derogatory, just for fun.)
4 • systemd, not for me (by MikeOh Shark on 2021-01-25 01:34:00 GMT from Netherlands)
I used Mint 13 back when it was current. One of the systemd updates broke my DNS setup without telling me and instead of a locked down and limited dnsmasq with DNScrypt to my preferred upstream resolver, systemd thought I needed to use google. The systemd command to stop the systemd resolver did not shut it down as all the documentation promised. Since then, I have been happily using MX Linux without having booted to use systemd.
I don't like mission creep and changes that happen without asking. If you make a change, present it to the users!
Thank you Jesse for maintaining SysV init for us!!
5 • Mabox (by Flyingalone on 2021-01-25 02:28:45 GMT from Australia)
The review about Mabox by Jesse is quite spot on , having played with it the last two days It is a busy screen , changing the panels position from top to bottom also took some effort finding , Given time to find the settings I'm sure it can be toned down two or three notches and the business wouldn't be so in your face , Mabox is fast , good looking , heaps of potential it's just the settings especially need to be to somehow be easier to find , I'm a long time KDE user but here looking for the correct page was challenging at times , On the positive side that is one good way to improve your patience level (ha ha) Those window borders same thing , given time to find and change , no luck this time. The variety of themes is a BiG amount some never seen before with dark theme but not too dark more medium greys complimented with soft greens or oranges etc , Mabox will improve most Linux Distros do overtime , Mabox is fast , good looking , heaps of potential thats why I will seriously give another go , I reckon installing on a laptop for the lounge/entertainment area would good for watching Vimeo and yeah YT videos. Really only thing on my wishlist for Mabox that would be a centralized settings panel
@Friar Tux (In fact, most of the distros I've tested that did NOT work out well were using init systems OTHER than systemd.)
Glad I read that , your right , good to know other's have that happen too , well not good that it happens just good to read and good to know it's not just my doing .
6 • Fave "Parent" distro (by Otis on 2021-01-25 02:54:41 GMT from United States)
Systemd cleaned Arch = Artix. Amazoing distro.. and systemd free. ;)
Arch itself has been a mainstay of may others, as mentioned in the poll blurb. But it went with an init system I prefer not to have on my main machine.
7 • The non-favorite parent distros that I'm using only out of necessity (by Andy Prough on 2021-01-25 03:06:47 GMT from United States)
I use Debian-based (antiX, MX, Devuan) and Arch-based (Artix) distros because I need access to the large amounts of software, but I'm not at all happy with the design decisions of Debian or Arch. Ultimately I will probably end up rolling my own with Gentoo, where a lot of people seem to end up as they find their needs are met with outright hostility by these big "parent" distros.
8 • My current synonymn for Linux is Artix (by Jyrki on 2021-01-25 04:35:10 GMT from Czechia)
When I talk about Linux, I talk about Artix. Linux has changed over decades I've been using it. And not all changes I can live with. Artix is the very last distro where I feel home. But we all know that Linux distros come and go. And for this case I have started using BSDs on some machines and virtuals to get used to it.
9 • So many distros even the 'experts' are confused... (by R. Cain on 2021-01-25 06:06:10 GMT from United States)
Since when is Debian NOT the parent distro of Ubuntu? Why is Ubuntu listed as a 'Parent' distro?
10 • Independent Distos (by Dan on 2021-01-25 07:19:22 GMT from United States)
I always preferred Independent distros such as Tiny Core, 4MLinux, and Kaos.
11 • Mabox vs PacBang (by Douglas Hinds on 2021-01-25 07:48:34 GMT from Mexico)
PacBang is the name of the current version of Manjaro Openbox (a community distro) and is what I have been using.
Which leads me to wonder what differences exist between the two.
12 • Using parent or child distribution (by Alexandru on 2021-01-25 08:54:31 GMT from Austria)
I am not only in "Debian family", but I actually use plain Debian itself.
When somebody asks me to install Linux on his computer, I usually install Mint (before Mint it was Ubuntu). But for me Mint is a no go in the long term. Mint is much more polished, easy to setup, has much of what you are ever want from an operating system.
But when I want to do some unusual configuration (and Mint has no graphical tool to configure it) I manually modify configuration files... and the change is not working. I don't know why. In Debian (and probably in many other distributions) the configuration file is the source of configuration, not only a compatibility layer for some subsystem, which is not standard across Linux distribution. In Mint I can use preinstalled software and can expect it works well. However, if I install some more software it may not work or may not work with some other software. I never have such issues in Debian, where each piece is tested to co-work with the whole. Only this way I can account for 59000 of packages, when I can use any combination thereof.
13 • Systemd... (by bigblack on 2021-01-25 09:28:55 GMT from United States)
I have noticed through using difficulties with systemd, on the distros that use it that I run ala debian. I sometimes rather than install a completely new system, just netcat from one machine to another an already setup system. I did this with debian and it will not boot, as I cannot fix the problem by chrooting into the sysytem and making the changes required - systemd stops that from happening - properly. The old init sysytem has no problems with this, so no to systemd for myself.
14 • Distros (by Hu on 2021-01-25 09:31:17 GMT from Spain)
I voted for Debian, but my favorite is Slackware where the changes do not come for the change's sake. I have voted that way because Debian has much more "children" and can be considered as a parent distro meanwhile Slackware is strong mainly in his own.
15 • Arch Linux as the parent (by OstroL on 2021-01-25 09:50:58 GMT from Poland)
All distros that take Arch Linux as their parent distro are more or less easy ways to install Arch, except for few that keeps their own cloned Arch repos. Most of them, while installing pulls packages from Arch. All of these distros can be turned to pure Arch Linux, after installing. Most times, it is the /etc/os-release, /etc/issue and /etc/lsb-release and few wallpapers are the difference. But, they are very good at giving the newbie an easy chance to use that great Arch Linux.
This is not like Ubuntu and Debian, where the deb packages don't match most of the time, even though most of the Ubuntu packages are made by Debian developers/packagers.
16 • Linux parents; small & large families, etc. (by Greg Zeng on 2021-01-25 10:12:49 GMT from Australia)
This week's theme topic touches on the failures & successes of the many families in open source Linux communities. The successful "parents" have the most third party coders using these beginnings. Coders are (1) system coders; (2) application coders; & (3) corporate investors of several types.
The system coders used to only stay with alpha-numerics, pretending that GUI etc were not Important. The first large "packaging system:" was RPM. However the later "loser" - Debian - attracted far more of the many three types of coders than the RPM package system ever had.
Each "child" in these open source families tries to be better in some narrow aspect than their parent. Systemd is one such developing child of the system code. Majority opinion seems to be that it is OK. Minority opinions also exist. For example, minority coders specialize in 32 bit, Wayland, BTRFS, and other Linux "independents".
Some users prefer the smaller independents. Corporate Investors also devote staff, code, & supports to Linux development. Notable are Google, IBM, Microsoft, but not Apple. Often ignored by some Linux users are the open source products from Google: Android & Chromium OS. Just as the traditional computer users stay with the larger computer systems, these traditionalists seem to want to ignore the latest small computer systems which are also open source: IoT, networking, Android & Chromium devices, etc.
Traditionalists are generally slow to recognize public market places. Luckily this Covid-19 world, with its forced Internet reliance in study, research, business and recreation, will continue leading the traditional computing industries away from their elitism. The children of the children, such as Mabox (ex-Arch, ex-Manjaro), or Mint (ex-Debian, ex-Ubuntu) will attempt more risky experiments than their conservative parents. As defined by the long & tested laws of "evolution", most children do not do anything remarkable with their lives. But they do provide testing areas for future support & innovation.
The RPM children, compared to the Debian children, are disadvantaged because so many third party coders are by the complex & incompatible RPM binary codes. Eventually, perhaps the Linux containers such as Flatpak, might smooth enough, to attract the application coders away from Microsoft, Apple & Android. Until then, Linux on the desktop & general public usage will be a very lonely & distant Bronze Prize "winner".
17 • Parent distro and Boogeyman (by James on 2021-01-25 10:47:57 GMT from United States)
@ 9 • Since when is Debian NOT the parent distro of Ubuntu? Why is Ubuntu listed as a 'Parent' distro? Totally agree, and while using Ubuntu, I voted Debian.
The boogeyman. I used Point from Russia, and it was what Debian should be for the user. Unfortunately it was short lived. Yet I never worried it was from Russia.
18 • systemd vs the others (by slink on 2021-01-25 11:32:11 GMT from United States)
I understand the concerns of those who prefer other alternate init systems over systemd. I essentially agree with their arguments although I don't know enough about the internals of any init system to prove or disprove their arguments. It just "sounds right" to me.
That said, I use systemd. Mainly because it's in all the major distros and because I have difficulty getting some programs to run with other init systems. The main sticking point seems to be vpn for Linux. I am required to use one of these for work, and I have a second one for personal use, and both of them assume systemd is running. If I could find a way to get them going under sysvinit, or runit, or whatever else I would do so.
19 • Parent distro (by Pat Menendez on 2021-01-25 11:45:11 GMT from Canada)
Why wasn't Mandrake, the parent for PCLinuxOS, Rosa, Mageia, etc. mentioned? With a user Rating of 9.0 Rosa should be in 9th place on that list but isn't mentioned and both PCLinuxOS and Mageia also place well on that list. Mandrake is older than Gentoo and Ubuntu, which isn't a parent. All the Ubuntu forks do Ubuntu better than Ubuntu! Fedora isn't a parent any more than Mandrake either since it is directly connected to Red Hat. Mandrake split off far earlier and has NO connection to Red Hat now.
20 • systemd (by Theodoro on 2021-01-25 12:12:30 GMT from Brazil)
Systemd is the worst and most hated init system, EVER. But it DOES work!
Unfortunately, I just could not boot MX Linux with SysV, only with Systemd...
Maybe it's time for Linux devs start playing with OpenRC and Runit.
21 • Opinion poll (by kc1di on 2021-01-25 12:34:16 GMT from United States)
I agree that Mandrake should have been listed as a parent, I know it went belly up. But in the family tree you have PCLinuxOS, Madravia etc. They are not connected to any other parentage.
22 • The OpenBox Desktop (by i like linux on 2021-01-25 12:34:52 GMT from Germany)
I like the OpenBox Desktop very much because its very lightwight ( i guess quicker than XFCE ) and its very customizable for my especially taste, including the jgmenu and a lot of writable config-files.
On the other side the last Release of OpenBox been five years ago and also there is a decreasing support for Xorg.
Nevertheless there is actually a little Revival of the OpenBox in new Releases of Distros. So the Madbox OS, the Crux OS, or the Slack Os.
I personally hope of a upcoming good working Distro with Waybox that working safty on Wayland.
23 • Parent distro (by Jesse on 2021-01-25 12:40:57 GMT from Canada)
@9: "Why is Ubuntu listed as a 'Parent' distro?"
As was explained in the poll question, Ubuntu has a huge number of children, and is not binary compatible with Debian, making it logical to give it its own category. Debian has about 120 children and grandchildren. Of those about half, 50-some, are specifically Ubuntu children.
Ubuntu's family has become so large, and incompatible, it has effectively become the head of its own category.
24 • Mandrake (by Jesse on 2021-01-25 13:02:06 GMT from Canada)
@19: "Why wasn't Mandrake, the parent for PCLinuxOS, Rosa, Mageia, etc. mentioned? "
Because it has been dead a long time. Mandrake Linux/Mandriva was discontinued years ago and the distributions in its family are now all independently developed. Mageia, PCLinuxOS, Rosa, etc are not longer children of a parent distro, they are their own base.
25 • VPN on Linux (by barnabyh on 2021-01-25 13:56:42 GMT from Germany)
I would agree that Ubuntu requires its own category because it has grown so large and has essentially spawned its own ecosystem.
Directed @18, slink: I have found that most provider-side VPN clients work with SysVinit, at least the ones I tried. Private Internet Access are now also actively supporting OpenRC, there just remains the question whether you want to use them. And of course whatever your work requires you to use is outside your control, oh well...
26 • systemd (by Tim on 2021-01-25 14:56:11 GMT from United States)
I do not think systemd is malicious, I just think it is a convoluted mess. It automates many, many functions, thus hiding them from the user. When the user has some problem, he usually has to dig through many levels of this hidden automation to find the actual problem. The "old" way was simpler and easier to troubleshoot.
27 • Poll (by tricyx1 on 2021-01-25 15:16:06 GMT from United States)
I use Arch for my primary desktop and old laptop, but debian or ubuntu variants for everything else. CentOS for work servers.
I would say I'm most familiar with the Debian ecosystem, but Arch... that AUR and wiki though is incredible.
28 • Parent distributions (by Microlinux on 2021-01-25 15:19:21 GMT from France)
Ubuntu is not a parent distribution. And you forgot Red Hat Enterprise Linux, whose clones are currently running more than half of the whole Internet.
29 • Parent... (by Friar Tux on 2021-01-25 15:54:27 GMT from Canada)
@28 (Microlinux) Sorry, my friend, but Ubuntu has many, many children. >> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1b/Linux_Distribution_Timeline.svg/2220px-Linux_Distribution_Timeline.svg.png. This only goes to the middle of 2019 but you'll get the idea.
30 • Of VPN's... (by tom joad on 2021-01-25 16:07:31 GMT from United States)
In the past year I have used a number of VPNs. During that time I have found Mullvad to be the overall best for me. Yes, I have tried the biggies; Nordvpn, Expressvpn, Windscribevpn, Airvpn and Protonvpn. Both Windscribe and Proton have free but limited vpn's available.Mozilla has just begun to offer a vpn too. It runs on the back of Mullvad though they stress it is not a recycled Mullvad. No, I haven't tried the Mozilla and likely won't.
All of the vpn's I have used worked pretty well with Mint Cinnamon. I had no real issue though some are much easier to use than others. Some have CLI's and gui's.
What really turned me off about most of the VPNs I have tried is price. One has to buy a year or more to get a decent monthly rate. No thanks. I don't want to be tied to any technology for a year or more.
Mullvad has $5 a month flat rate. One can pay by gift card or even real $$$$! And they offer the use of Wireguard too which is the new standard for VPNs. Mozilla is charging $5 a month flat rate also.
Thought some here would want to know.
31 • Arch (by Otis on 2021-01-25 16:20:13 GMT from United States)
@15 @20 No.. no no .. again.. ARTIX = No systemd .. and yes it's OpenRC, runit, or s8; your choice.
I see I'm sounding like a fanboi of Artix.. well, we keep seeing Arch mentioned as a (very good) parent of other distros that "enable the user to install Arch easier," or, "All distros that take Arch Linux as their parent distro are more or less easy ways to install Arch, except for few that keeps their own cloned Arch repos. Most of them, while installing pulls packages from Arch. All of these distros can be turned to pure Arch Linux, after installing."
Artix is Arch (again) without systemd. Love that phrase "It uses OpenRC, runit or s6 as init because PID1 must be simple, secure and stable."
32 • @ 30 on VPNs (by Lin on 2021-01-25 16:41:00 GMT from United States)
Well, I am using a VPN to post this comment. And, it is free.
33 • Parent distro (by Jesse on 2021-01-25 17:04:19 GMT from Canada)
@28: "Ubuntu is not a parent distribution. And you forgot Red Hat Enterprise Linux, whose clones are currently running more than half of the whole Internet. "
Ubuntu by any reasonable definition is a parent distribution, as explained in the poll question and in my previous comment. It has 50+ children which are not binary compatible with their grandparent, Debian.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux, on the other hand, is clearly not a parent distro. For two reasons: 1. Fedora is the parent distro in the Red Hat family. RHEL is a child of Fedora. 2. RHEL doesn't have children so much as clones. Oracle, CentOS Linux, Scientific, etc aren't based on RHEL so much as re-builds of the source code. I suppose you might argue that the clones are sort of children, but they'd still be better classified as children of Fedora, not RHEL.
34 • @ 25 VPN on Linux (by Lin on 2021-01-25 17:08:16 GMT from United States)
What has VPN to do with SysVinit or OpenRC or even SystemD? The same VPN can be had in Linux or in Windows. It is a web service, after all.
35 • Parent distro (by David on 2021-01-25 17:10:51 GMT from United Kingdom)
I'm surprised that only 4% responded that they used an unlisted independent, considering that this would include Solus, PCLinuxOS, and Mageia. Of course, some bias is introduced by the fact that this is an English-language site — in Russia ALT and ROSA would be the most popular.
On the subject of Mandriva as a parent, it's still recorded in this site's search tool as the parent of ALT and ROSA, although not of PCLinuxOS, Mageia, or OpenMandriva!
36 • Child distros (by Akoi on 2021-01-25 17:12:41 GMT from United States)
Arch actually doesn't have child distros, not even Manjaro is such a child distro. Its packages come from Arch. But, Ubuntu is a child of Debian, for it has its own debs, which differ from the Debian debs. Mint and others are clones of Ubuntu, rather than children. If one might call them children, then they are vampires.
37 • @ 36 child distros (by Lin on 2021-01-25 17:17:05 GMT from United States)
You maybe right, for you cannot use Ubuntu debs to create a Debian install, vice versa, but you can always turn Manjaro to pure Arch with few actions.
38 • Deepin vs SystemD (by trebec on 2021-01-25 18:00:01 GMT from United States)
It a little ridiculous to compare the apprehension from systemd to the concerns over using deepin don't you think? One is mainly accused of violating the unix philosophy. The other is software developed in a country run by an authoritarian regime with an abysmal human rights record (see concentration camps, etc.) which has no qualms about spying/hacking/stealing intellectual property and often uses "private" enterprise to accomplish its goals. I think there is a tad more to people's unwillingness to use foreign software than simple FUD.
39 • software concerns (by Jesse on 2021-01-25 18:38:48 GMT from Canada)
@38: "I think there is a tad more to people's unwillingness to use foreign software than simple FUD."
To be frank: there isn't. In both cases the software is open source. If there were any malicious bits included then they could be held up as evidence. However, with no evidence, it is just pointless fear mongering.
I'd like to point out, by the way, that the same concerns you raise about deepin (due to its Chinese ties) apply just as much to American companies to people who live outside America. That's the whole problem with people pointing fingers at "foreign" software: all software is foreign and within reach of governments most of the rest of the world don't trust.
Again, it's just as silly to fear monger over SELinux or Red Hat as it is systemd or deepin or ALT. It's all just pointless hand wringing unless someone actually puts forward some evidence. The code is open and auditable so people with concerns should either put their evidence on display or admit they're just fear mongering.
40 • Newly added dists - waiting list (by barnabyh on 2021-01-25 19:02:52 GMT from Germany)
Storm OS is a poor name. We already had Storm Linux https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=storm with which it might get confused by people still remembering it (fondly).
I hope the project can come up with a different name, seeing it seems to have changed name already at least once.
41 • children vs clones (by pengxuin on 2021-01-25 19:16:31 GMT from New Zealand)
Last time I checked, apart from access to my wallet, my children are pretty much independent from me, but they are not fully independent.
The children of Debian and Ubuntu do have regular access to the "wallet" (aka repos), so yes, thanks for clarifying that they are exactly that: children, ie not grown up distros.
At least the "clones" of Red Hat are completely independent, as they have there own repos, so if Red hat goes to La-La-Land, the clones don't HAVE to follow.
If you want, you can swap La-La-Land for systemd.
42 • Why, just why? (systemd) (by Nerd Police on 2021-01-25 23:02:46 GMT from France)
You are all under arrest for being waaaaaay too geeky. (kidding)
Systemd, *face palm*. Bloat written by a corporation that has many contracts with the government (spyware trojan?), and literally bullied its way in to the Linux ecosystem, and now developers have to cater to its whims like an abusive relationship, creepy, just creepy. Third party apps should run in ANY distro, sytemd or not. I have NEVER used it (gave it a spin a few times, but then showered with steel wool afterwards), and I'm still not stupid or lame. That file erase bug, eep, glad I missed that one.
Ubuntu, I have to agree with its 'fork' (parent) designation, while I am not a huge fan, you can't deny its sheer size and influence (and its mutation away from its birth mother). I also use a fork of Debian, which begs the question, isn't Devuan more pure to the Debian ethos than systemd infested Debian itself? So wouldn't that make Devuan the TRUE parent, and Debian a prisoner of RH borg collective? I mean, it's half way to being a RH clone, repackage all those sys'd dependent .debs as .rpms, and foof, Deb Hat, lol. (watches with glee as nerd brains loop and crash at the enigmatic questions)
@3 MX Linux logo, umm, I see the resemblance to the cartoon, but I believe it's a mixture of the old Mepis logo and the 'X' from antiX. If I am wrong (because it's just a guess), please, by all means, I am not immune to correction.
Now git outta my cruiser, Ima letting you off with a warning, lol. :D
43 • Red Hat said in their CentOS announcement that they were going to... (by Scott Dowdle on 2021-01-25 23:24:47 GMT from United States)
@1 - Red Hat included in their announcement about the CentOS Linux 8 -> CentOS Stream 8 that they would be coming out with some free-to-use RHEL options after the new year. They were only following through on that.
Note also this is said to be the "first round" of free-to-use options... so expect more to happen in the not-too-distant future.
44 • Evidence (by Friar Tux on 2021-01-26 03:50:12 GMT from Canada)
@39 (Jesse) Here, here!! My sentiments exactly. Where is the evidence. It is easier to just throw about accusations than to show evidence. In fact, it appears, lately, to be a trend all over the Internet. Hopefully, most of us are intelligent enough to wait for the ever illusive evidence. Thanks, Jesse. Well written. Oh, and @42 (Nerd Police), you're absolutely correct about the X and M in the logo, as per the MX Linux site.
45 • @25, 34 - VPN on Linux, init (by Hoos on 2021-01-26 05:09:14 GMT from Singapore)
I believe most VPN clients work with any init, but some vendors have Linux packages that only have scripts for systemd.
If you know how to add the appropriate scripts for the init you're using, you'll have no problem. Or if you're using MX, their package installer does make it easy to install some of the more well known VPN clients complete with sysV script.
But not all linux users know that and just assume their VPN doesn't work without systemd.
46 • systemD and parent distro (by Henry on 2021-01-26 07:59:57 GMT from Belgium)
I like some of the functionality that systemD offers. Especially easy access to information, and controlling processes with a few unified commands. However I try to avoid using systemD in my personal situation.
Because, one of the reasons I came to Gnu/linux is the simplicity principle(kiss). I like to know how all stuff works under the Graphical User Interface (i.o.w. command-line), and I like the simplicity of controlling/configuring stuff with config files that contains text. With SystemD, I would probably have to spend many weeks, full-time, to understand how everything is glued together. I also don't like the fact that it becomes a dependency of so many other software. Like Jesse already explained, do one thing, and do it good. And if not, or something else does it better, it can be easily replaced. If so many relies on systemD, it can no longer be easily replaced by something better. In other words, corporations now control the direction of the gnu/linux systems development.
The last years you see more development in gnu/linux that deviates from the kiss principle. Mostly because developers/corporations want to offer functionality, that gives users ease of use or complicated functionality on the surface, while giving complexity under the surface, that is too hard to understand by simple folks like me.
Luckily there is still choice. which brings me to Slackware, my favorite parent distro. Though fro the desktop I use Salix.
47 • VPN on Linux (by Koi on 2021-01-26 08:42:48 GMT from United States)
You don't need a special scripts to use VPN on Linux, or to pay for it. I use a free VPN, and that's what I am going to use in the future to write comments here. I can be of any name that way. AS I have Windows on dual boot, I can use few more online free VPNs, so my names could be 50-100, and fill this thread, arguing with each name. :)
48 • Favorite parent distro (by penguinx86 on 2021-01-26 11:09:16 GMT from United States)
My favorite parent distro is Debian. Isn't Ubuntu based on Debian? But most of the time, I use Ubuntu based Linux Mint because it has better hardware support than other distros.
49 • @48 (by Akoi on 2021-01-26 11:37:44 GMT from United States)
If a distro is based on another, then those two distros could be interchanged, but you can't do that with Debian and Ubuntu -- they have different packages, even though they are called debs.
You can make Manjaro out of Arch or another Arch based distro and vice versa with a little effort. Linux Mint is an Ubuntu clone with few additional packages, and a DE, but can be changed back.
50 • VPNs on Linux (by barnabyh on 2021-01-26 12:09:13 GMT from Canada)
If you're just using networkmanager with the openvpn plugin you won't have a problem, except perhaps having to import plenty of config files. However, NM itself is tied to a certain init.
If you are using client software your provider has given you to download it makes a difference because the service needs to start and shut down and interact with the network interfaces (in very simple terms), or why do you think a provider would be mentioning explicitly that theirs is now supporting OpenRC. You may be lucky and your distro has done the work for you and repackaged or provides a package with said scripts like Artix does for certain software s6, runit and openrc. Even better if you have the skills to make it work yourself.
The slackbuilds site for example provides instructions on how to get the Windscribe client up and running on Slackware: https://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.2/network/windscribe/?search=windscribe. This wouldn 't be necessary if Windscribe 'just worked' with their chosen init.
You see, there is a lot more to it. You could also read my review of Artix.
I would really discourage using a free VPN if it's not a free plan from an otherwise reputable provider. Take some time to read up on why it is not a good idea to use a gratis VPN, unless you're just doing it for laughs.
51 • Parent distros (by Alessandro di Roma on 2021-01-26 13:16:44 GMT from Italy)
Ok, maybe Debian is not parent of Ubuntu, but it is anyway interesting to note that for DW readers Debian 36% + Ubuntu 18% = 54%
52 • Ubuntu package file type filename extension (by Ubu Roi on 2021-01-26 15:12:30 GMT from Luxembourg)
@49 You may have a point, maybe Ubuntu packages should have their own filename extension, like *.ubu? Then again, in this litigious world... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubu_Productions
Ya know, how diff is a Linux leech corporation from, let's say, a cheesy fake environment TV commercial from a notorious fossil fuel entity? Ignore me, I'm just completely jaded and cynical. There's ALWAYS a hidden agenda.
53 • Parent Distros: Void (by Nemo on 2021-01-26 16:37:30 GMT from United States)
I suppose now that Trident is based on Void (instead of FreeBSD), that qualifies Void as a parent distro. So that will be my favorite. Otherwise, I'd have said Arch.
54 • distro (by hulondalo on 2021-01-26 22:21:18 GMT from Indonesia)
i'm basically an arch user but my work horse is debian for its stability and modularity. dependencies are a moving target so they shouldn't be set in stone. i like how debian handles dependencies, for ex. if a package requires sending/receiving mails, it can be satisfied by installing exim4 or sendmail
55 • and my favorite is.. (by Dr. Dave on 2021-01-27 07:27:13 GMT from United States)
TempleOS
I know it's not based on Ganoo Linux, but with TempleOS, I simply have no use for all these glow in the dark distros
56 • Ubuntu's parent (by anon on 2021-01-28 00:47:27 GMT from United States)
@49 and @52: How in the heck is Debian NOT Ubuntu's parent!? Ubuntu literally came directly from Debian, and Mark Shuttleworth states this himself! Ubuntu is NOT an original, built from scratch distro like Debian, Arch, Redhat, Solus, etc! They may be binary incompatible now, but that is not how they started out! Ubuntu came from Debian, and has branched out to the point that they are no longer 1:1 compatible, but that does not negate the fact that Ubuntu came from Debian. It is so weird to see people try to deny this easily provable fact. It is not enough to benefit from the hard work and success of the distro that even made your distro possible to begin with? Now you must turn around and try to deny the link after using them as a base to build yourself up? It's funny and sad at the same time. I wonder if there are any Manjaro users trying to openly deny that it came from Arch, or any OEL users trying to openly deny that it came from RHEL. The least people can do is acknowledge the roots and give proper credit to the source.
57 • *buntu (by Cheker on 2021-01-28 01:30:40 GMT from Portugal)
@56 Nobody is denying Ubuntu came from Debian. The argument being made is that it followed its own path and grew apart from Debian to the point where they aren't 100% compatible anymore. Also, the undeniable amount of children it spawned, from all the *buntus to POP and Mint.
Ubuntu is both a parent distro in its own right AND comes from Debian.
58 • Not as claimed (by UncleVom on 2021-01-28 05:32:47 GMT from Canada)
I'm also one who does not look at Ubuntu as a "parent distro" it is just a mostly incompatibly forked Debian.
I also think the people still comparing Systemd to SysVinit as an init are really missing the big picture of what has become an interdependent bloated self isolating framework. It was largely sold as an init and it was even then far more, it was in retrospect a big con/selling job, a framework that now most distros now depend on. It is sad how it broke a lot of the freedom of choice that was GNU/Linux and especially Debian.
59 • @56 Ubuntu - why it should be distinguished from Debian (by Hoos on 2021-01-28 06:41:03 GMT from United Kingdom)
@56 - It is precisely because Ubuntu and Debian are not 100% compatible, that it should be made clear that Ubuntu is a parent distro and no longer really Debian-based.
If you ran Debian or actual Debian-based distros, you will know or have read of examples of users who destroyed their Debian installation because they added Ubuntu repos to their installation on the mistaken assumption that being "Debian-based", the contents of such repos would be 100% compatible with the "equivalent" Debian release.
Unfortunately, this assumption is not usually true except in some cases where the Ubuntu package happens to use libraries and dependencies with the exact same name or version as the Debian counterpart (bear in mind that each Ubuntu release is a mixture of Debian Testing, plus packages from Debian Sid and even Experimental).
You would need to be knowledgeable enough to examine the details of the Ubuntu package in question to use such repos safely, but how many who add such repos do?
60 • Debbie's Family Feud (by Who? Me? on 2021-01-28 12:15:16 GMT from Canada)
Calm down guys! How about let Debian be the grand-pappy, Ubuntu the Ubuntu the ungrateful son who decided to compete and outshine its own daddy, and all the Ubuntu progeny can be the grand-kids. Devuan on the other hand, is the shy kid who ran away for fear of The Blob, but still lives off its parent. No need for all this discord. It's all in the family.
61 • New Distros (by pfb on 2021-01-28 19:48:33 GMT from United States)
Fedora 33 just failed (xfce). And I am looking for a replacement. Fedora will not be it, as both Fedora and Opensuse have adopted a new form of grub that has become egregiously slow in booting. Plus, though they look the same, they will not recognize each other. So you cannot dual boot with them.
While searching for a new distro, I am reminded why Linux is not very popular. 1. The IMG or ISO file should be burnable to a usb by any image writer program. Special scripts that require the ISO wanted are only practical if you have a way to run the distro without burning the ISO to media. If I can do that, why burn it? 2. If you have an image that boots with a usable video driver, use it. Expecting the user to tear his computer apart to find out what he has for video card is OK for geeks, but not for the rest of us. 3. When I click on install, I want all screen savers, lockers, power management turned OFF. The slide shows do not last that long and, while I an doing something useful, I would like to look over and see how the progress bar is doing. Also the progress bar should mean something. Staying at 100% for longer than the total install very irritating. 4. Ethernet should work. Wifi is a poor substitute. Having neither is unacceptable. 5. Number lock ON! It is a keypad with numbers on it. Why would anyone toss this for a duplication of perfectly good keys that are right alongside? 6. Vi/vim really? I have not found ANY word editors that are not better. This must be like Morse code for hams. We had to use it in the olden days, so you should also? 7. Install /EFI/boot to the drive used. If I am installing on a usb as part of the computer, that stuff belongs on the usb, and not cluttering up sda. 8. Dumping the install to gparted or cfdisk is a show stopper. If I have to guess at partitions and their sizes, I will not be happy with the result.
There may be some things I have forgotten, but Linux is getting better. I remember when we had to tell the system that a CD drive was not a cup holder.
62 • Red Hat, systemd, and parent distros (by Simon on 2021-01-28 19:54:10 GMT from New Zealand)
Red Hat's extending free RHEL deployment to 16 or fewer systems is a good move that does fill some of the CentOS gap. I agree that a community distro (like the pre-Red-Hat CentOS) would be a slightly better option, both in terms of scalability and because Red Hat could indeed, as others have noted, reverse this decision at any time...but I think that's unlikely, and for now it's a great option for lots of current CentOS installations. I think it's very likely Red Hat will keep this free plan open as their main customers are big clients, not lots of small community and personal installations.
In fact, I might switch my home systems to Red Hat myself...were it not for systemd. Jesse's article was very respectful towards Lennart et al., but I think it understates how shocking that kind of irresponsibility is, and even to argue (in systemd's favour) that nobody "has dug into the source code for systemd and found an intentional problem" is questionable after just listing a bunch of serious problems that are very much by design. I guess it hangs on your definition of "malicious". If it only counts as "malice" to attempt to insert a back door so that people can damage your system covertly, then of course an open source project like systemd is very unlikely to be malicious. But, why do you need a covert back door when so much damage is being done overtly through the front door?! Given that systemd damages people's systems overtly, and very deliberately subverts well established principles of good system design, I'd call it malicious.
@59: To claim that Ubuntu is "no longer really Debian based" is simply false: from your comment that "unfortunately" you can't add Ubuntu repos to a Debian installation (!) you seem to misunderstand the meaning of parent/child distros, and to imagine that being "based" on a parent distro means being *compatible* with that distro. That's just not the case: being based on a parent means that instead of creating your distro directly from upsteam sources, you source most of your packages from another distro that has already done that (harder) work. Ubuntu is based on Debian: it tracks Debian with the vast bulk of Ubuntu coming originally from Debian packages.
@60: Ubuntu is not "ungrateful", happily acknowledging its Debian parent and passing bug fixes back to it, and Devuan is not "the shy kid who ran away for fear of The Blob". On the contrary, Devuan is the courageous part of Debian that stayed true to its founder's intentions, honouring the community's democratic decision not to switch to systemd rather than the technical committee's following Lennart's example and saying "screw the community, Windows-style is better and these UNIX idiots will come around to that truth eventually". Devuan (a) stays true to UNIX principles by avoiding systemd, and (b) stays true to democratic principles by implementing what the Debian community voted for rather than what its Lennart fans went ahead and did despite that vote. As for "lives off its parent" (which again makes it sound like some kind of worthless inferior), it's just Debian with init freedom: it never claimed to be some kind of independent distro, and deliberately stays as close t Debian as possible (maintaining, as much as possible, the kind of compatibility #59 feels a child distro should have). The only discord is around the systemd issue, and unfortunately that's justified: Debian dropped the ball on that one, both technically and democratically.
63 • @61 (by Simon on 2021-01-28 20:21:00 GMT from New Zealand)
Amen to that list: it's astounding that modern distros can't get these things right. Re vi I've had roughly the opposite experience from yours: I've never found an editor that comes close to it in terms of its speed and efficiency. Watching a vi master code is like watching magic, the text appears so quickly out of nowhere. Still, I do agree that installers designed for newbies should make other editors available, as vi has a steep learning curve, so forcing newcomers to use it is indeed unreasonable.
I have zero tolerance for some of those kinds of issues these days. Very nearly 100% of the distro's users will be using the installer, and it's everyone's "first impression" of the distro...so if the developers can't even get that right, to me it's a warning sign that the rest of operating system is likely to be annoying too. With some exceptions (e.g. scrupulously free distros that refuse to support non-free WiFi drivers...users should know what they're getting into if they install something like that) the network, graphics and basic input drivers should all be working acceptably at first login. If they aren't, I can't be bothered fiddling to make them work, as the distro's already shown it's sloppier than plenty of alternatives.
64 • @62 - "Debian-based" (by Hoos on 2021-01-29 10:00:51 GMT from Singapore)
Of course the phrase "Debian-based" is literally accurate, I don't have a problem with that.
My concern is with the impression that phrase gives to unsuspecting new Debian or Ubuntu users.
I feel that the more distance between Ubuntu and Debian there is in the public's perception, the more understanding there is that they are not binary-compatible and the less chance of newcomers just blindly adding Ubuntu repos to Debian installations.
That's why I agree that Ubuntu should also be considered a parent distro and thus I agree with the poll's categorisation.
65 • @63 Simon: (by dragonmouth on 2021-01-29 12:59:22 GMT from United States)
" I've never found an editor that comes close to it in terms of its speed and efficiency." Vi is archaic, byzantine, esoteric and like something out of the late 1960s. It is about as intuitive as Asse3mbler. We are in the second decade of the 21 st century. It is high time for a more modern text editor. The same people that call Synaptic ancient and out of date, think Vi is the greatest thing since sliced bread and feel everybody should be using it.
I've never found a programming language that comes close to Assembler in terms of its speed and efficiency. Watching an Assembler master code is like watching magic. HOWEVER, I would never make Assembler the default programming language for ANY O/S. If anybody is feeling masochistic, they can download it after they install the O/S.
66 • Agree with 19: Mandrake should be listed (by Carney on 2021-01-29 17:26:06 GMT from United States)
I agree that Mandrake needs to be listed as a parent distro in its own right, and for the same reason that Ubuntu is despite Ubuntu being a "child" of Debian: it grew up and most importantly has its own descendants.
Especially PCLinuxOS, which is important enough to basically crash the Ubuntu / systemd - only party in any list of major distros, and basically also can by itself force the inclusion of Mandrake in any list of parent distros.
Number of Comments: 66
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
| | |
| TUXEDO |

TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
Archives |
| • Issue 1156 (2026-01-19): Chimera Linux's new installer, using the DistroWatch Torrent Corner, new package tools for Arch, Haiku improves EFI support, Redcore streamlines branches, Synex introduces install-time ZFS options |
| • Issue 1155 (2026-01-12): MenuetOS, CDE on Sparky, iDeal OS 2025.12.07, recommended flavour of BSD, Debian seeks new Data Protection Team, Ubuntu 25.04 nears its end of life, Google limits Android source code releases, Fedora plans to replace SDDM, Budgie migrates to Wayland |
| • Issue 1154 (2026-01-05): postmarketOS 25.06/25.12, switching to Linux and educational resources, FreeBSD improving laptop support, Unix v4 available for download, new X11 server in development, CachyOS team plans server edtion |
| • Issue 1153 (2025-12-22): Best projects of 2025, is software ever truly finished?, Firefox to adopt AI components, Asahi works on improving the install experience, Mageia presents plans for version 10 |
| • Issue 1152 (2025-12-15): OpenBSD 7.8, filtering websites, Jolla working on a Linux phone, Germany saves money with Linux, Ubuntu to package AMD tools, Fedora demonstrates AI troubleshooting, Haiku packages Go language |
| • Issue 1151 (2025-12-08): FreeBSD 15.0, fun command line tricks, Canonical presents plans for Ubutnu 26.04, SparkyLinux updates CDE packages, Redox OS gets modesetting driver |
| • Issue 1150 (2025-12-01): Gnoppix 25_10, exploring if distributions matter, openSUSE updates tumbleweed's boot loader, Fedora plans better handling of broken packages, Plasma to become Wayland-only, FreeBSD publishes status report |
| • Issue 1149 (2025-11-24): MX Linux 25, why are video drivers special, systemd experiments with musl, Debian Libre Live publishes new media, Xubuntu reviews website hack |
| • Issue 1148 (2025-11-17): Zorin OS 18, deleting a file with an unusual name, NetBSD experiments with sandboxing, postmarketOS unifies its documentation, OpenBSD refines upgrades, Canonical offers 15 years of support for Ubuntu |
| • Issue 1147 (2025-11-10): Fedora 43, the size and stability of the Linux kernel, Debian introducing Rust to APT, Redox ports web engine, Kubuntu website off-line, Mint creates new troubleshooting tools, FreeBSD improves reproducible builds, Flatpak development resumes |
| • Issue 1146 (2025-11-03): StartOS 0.4.0, testing piped commands, Ubuntu Unity seeks help, Canonical offers Ubuntu credentials, Red Hat partners with NVIDIA, SUSE to bundle AI agent with SLE 16 |
| • Issue 1145 (2025-10-27): Linux Mint 7 "LMDE", advice for new Linux users, AlmaLinux to offer Btrfs, KDE launches Plasma 6.5, Fedora accepts contributions written by AI, Ubuntu 25.10 fails to install automatic updates |
| • Issue 1144 (2025-10-20): Kubuntu 25.10, creating and restoring encrypted backups, Fedora team debates AI, FSF plans free software for phones, ReactOS addresses newer drivers, Xubuntu reacts to website attack |
| • Issue 1143 (2025-10-13): openSUSE 16.0 Leap, safest source for new applications, Redox introduces performance improvements, TrueNAS Connect available for testing, Flatpaks do not work on Ubuntu 25.10, Kamarada plans to switch its base, Solus enters new epoch, Frugalware discontinued |
| • Issue 1142 (2025-10-06): Linux Kamarada 15.6, managing ZIP files with SQLite, F-Droid warns of impact of Android lockdown, Alpine moves ahead with merged /usr, Cinnamon gets a redesigned application menu |
| • Issue 1141 (2025-09-29): KDE Linux and GNOME OS, finding mobile flavours of Linux, Murena to offer phones with kill switches, Redox OS running on a smartphone, Artix drops GNOME |
| • Issue 1140 (2025-09-22): NetBSD 10.1, avoiding AI services, AlmaLinux enables CRB repository, Haiku improves disk access performance, Mageia addresses service outage, GNOME 49 released, Linux introduces multikernel support |
| • Issue 1139 (2025-09-15): EasyOS 7.0, Linux and central authority, FreeBSD running Plasma 6 on Wayland, GNOME restores X11 support temporarily, openSUSE dropping BCacheFS in new kernels |
| • Issue 1138 (2025-09-08): Shebang 25.8, LibreELEC 12.2.0, Debian GNU/Hurd 2025, the importance of software updates, AerynOS introduces package sets, postmarketOS encourages patching upstream, openSUSE extends Leap support, Debian refreshes Trixie media |
| • Issue 1137 (2025-09-01): Tribblix 0m37, malware scanners flagging Linux ISO files, KDE introduces first-run setup wizard, CalyxOS plans update prior to infrastructure overhaul, FreeBSD publishes status report |
| • Issue 1136 (2025-08-25): CalyxOS 6.8.20, distros for running containers, Arch Linux website under attack,illumos Cafe launched, CachyOS creates web dashboard for repositories |
| • Issue 1135 (2025-08-18): Debian 13, Proton, WINE, Wayland, and Wayback, Debian GNU/Hurd 2025, KDE gets advanced Liquid Glass, Haiku improves authentication tools |
| • Issue 1134 (2025-08-11): Rhino Linux 2025.3, thoughts on malware in the AUR, Fedora brings hammered websites back on-line, NetBSD reveals features for version 11, Ubuntu swaps some command line tools for 25.10, AlmaLinux improves NVIDIA support |
| • Issue 1133 (2025-08-04): Expirion Linux 6.0, running Plasma on Linux Mint, finding distros which support X11, Debian addresses 22 year old bug, FreeBSD discusses potential issues with pkgbase, CDE ported to OpenBSD, Btrfs corruption bug hitting Fedora users, more malware found in Arch User Repository |
| • Issue 1132 (2025-07-28): deepin 25, wars in the open source community, proposal to have Fedora enable Flathub repository, FreeBSD plans desktop install option, Wayback gets its first release |
| • Issue 1131 (2025-07-21): HeliumOS 10.0, settling on one distro, Mint plans new releases, Arch discovers malware in AUR, Plasma Bigscreen returns, Clear Linux discontinued |
| • Issue 1130 (2025-07-14): openSUSE MicroOS and RefreshOS, sharing aliases between computers, Bazzite makes Bazaar its default Flatpak store, Alpine plans Wayback release, Wayland and X11 benchmarked, Red Hat offers additional developer licenses, openSUSE seeks feedback from ARM users, Ubuntu 24.10 reaches the end of its life |
| • Issue 1129 (2025-07-07): GLF OS Omnislash, the worst Linux distro, Alpine introduces Wayback, Fedora drops plans to stop i686 support, AlmaLinux builds EPEL repository for older CPUs, Ubuntu dropping existing RISC-V device support, Rhino partners with UBports, PCLinuxOS recovering from website outage |
| • Issue 1128 (2025-06-30): AxOS 25.06, AlmaLinux OS 10.0, transferring Flaptak bundles to off-line computers, Ubuntu to boost Intel graphics performance, Fedora considers dropping i686 packages, SDesk switches from SELinux to AppArmor |
| • Issue 1127 (2025-06-23): LastOSLinux 2025-05-25, most unique Linux distro, Haiku stabilises, KDE publishes Plasma 6.4, Arch splits Plasma packages, Slackware infrastructure migrating |
| • Issue 1126 (2025-06-16): SDesk 2025.05.06, renewed interest in Ubuntu Touch, a BASIC device running NetBSD, Ubuntu dropping X11 GNOME session, GNOME increases dependency on systemd, Google holding back Pixel source code, Nitrux changing its desktop, EFF turns 35 |
| • Issue 1125 (2025-06-09): RHEL 10, distributions likely to survive a decade, Murena partners with more hardware makers, GNOME tests its own distro on real hardware, Redox ports GTK and X11, Mint provides fingerprint authentication |
| • Issue 1124 (2025-06-02): Picking up a Pico, tips for protecting privacy, Rhino tests Plasma desktop, Arch installer supports snapshots, new features from UBports, Ubuntu tests monthly snapshots |
| • Issue 1123 (2025-05-26): CRUX 3.8, preventing a laptop from sleeping, FreeBSD improves laptop support, Fedora confirms GNOME X11 session being dropped, HardenedBSD introduces Rust in userland build, KDE developing a virtual machine manager |
| • Issue 1122 (2025-05-19): GoboLinux 017.01, RHEL 10.0 and Debian 12 updates, openSUSE retires YaST, running X11 apps on Wayland |
| • Issue 1121 (2025-05-12): Bluefin 41, custom file manager actions, openSUSE joins End of 10 while dropping Deepin desktop, Fedora offers tips for building atomic distros, Ubuntu considers replacing sudo with sudo-rs |
| • Issue 1120 (2025-05-05): CachyOS 250330, what it means when a distro breaks, Kali updates repository key, Trinity receives an update, UBports tests directory encryption, Gentoo faces losing key infrastructure |
| • Issue 1119 (2025-04-28): Ubuntu MATE 25.04, what is missing from Linux, CachyOS ships OCCT, Debian enters soft freeze, Fedora discusses removing X11 session from GNOME, Murena plans business services, NetBSD on a Wii |
| • Issue 1118 (2025-04-21): Fedora 42, strange characters in Vim, Nitrux introduces new package tools, Fedora extends reproducibility efforts, PINE64 updates multiple devices running Debian |
| • Issue 1117 (2025-04-14): Shebang 25.0, EndeavourOS 2025.03.19, running applications from other distros on the desktop, Debian gets APT upgrade, Mint introduces OEM options for LMDE, postmarketOS packages GNOME 48 and COSMIC, Redox testing USB support |
| • Issue 1116 (2025-04-07): The Sense HAT, Android and mobile operating systems, FreeBSD improves on laptops, openSUSE publishes many new updates, Fedora appoints new Project Leader, UBports testing VoLTE |
| • Issue 1115 (2025-03-31): GrapheneOS 2025, the rise of portable package formats, MidnightBSD and openSUSE experiment with new package management features, Plank dock reborn, key infrastructure projects lose funding, postmarketOS to focus on reliability |
| • Issue 1114 (2025-03-24): Bazzite 41, checking which processes are writing to disk, Rocky unveils new Hardened branch, GNOME 48 released, generating images for the Raspberry Pi |
| • Issue 1113 (2025-03-17): MocaccinoOS 1.8.1, how to contribute to open source, Murena extends on-line installer, Garuda tests COSMIC edition, Ubuntu to replace coreutils with Rust alternatives, Chimera Linux drops RISC-V builds |
| • Issue 1112 (2025-03-10): Solus 4.7, distros which work with Secure Boot, UBports publishes bug fix, postmarketOS considers a new name, Debian running on Android |
| • Issue 1111 (2025-03-03): Orbitiny 0.01, the effect of Ubuntu Core Desktop, Gentoo offers disk images, elementary OS invites feature ideas, FreeBSD starts PinePhone Pro port, Mint warns of upcoming Firefox issue |
| • Issue 1110 (2025-02-24): iodeOS 6.0, learning to program, Arch retiring old repositories, openSUSE makes progress on reproducible builds, Fedora is getting more serious about open hardware, Tails changes its install instructions to offer better privacy, Murena's de-Googled tablet goes on sale |
| • Issue 1109 (2025-02-17): Rhino Linux 2025.1, MX Linux 23.5 with Xfce 4.20, replacing X.Org tools with Wayland tools, GhostBSD moving its base to FreeBSD -RELEASE, Redox stabilizes its ABI, UBports testing 24.04, Asahi changing its leadership, OBS in dispute with Fedora |
| • Issue 1108 (2025-02-10): Serpent OS 0.24.6, Aurora, sharing swap between distros, Peppermint tries Void base, GTK removinglegacy technologies, Red Hat plans more AI tools for Fedora, TrueNAS merges its editions |
| • Issue 1107 (2025-02-03): siduction 2024.1.0, timing tasks, Lomiri ported to postmarketOS, Alpine joins Open Collective, a new desktop for Linux called Orbitiny |
| • Issue 1106 (2025-01-27): Adelie Linux 1.0 Beta 6, Pop!_OS 24.04 Alpha 5, detecting whether a process is inside a virtual machine, drawing graphics to NetBSD terminal, Nix ported to FreeBSD, GhostBSD hosting desktop conference |
| • Issue 1105 (2025-01-20): CentOS 10 Stream, old Flatpak bundles in software centres, Haiku ports Iceweasel, Oracle shows off debugging tools, rsync vulnerability patched |
| • Full list of all issues |
| Star Labs |

Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
| Random Distribution | 
LuninuX OS
LuninuX OS was an Ubuntu-based Linux distribution designed to be beautiful, clean, simple, fast, and stable.
Status: Discontinued
|
| TUXEDO |

TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Star Labs |

Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
|