 DistroWatch Weekly |
| Tip Jar |
If you've enjoyed this week's issue of DistroWatch Weekly, please consider sending us a tip.
(Tips this week: 4, value: US$188.85) |
|
|
|
 bc1qxes3k2wq3uqzr074tkwwjmwfe63z70gwzfu4lx  lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhxarpw3jkc7tzw4ex6cfexyfua2nr  86fA3qPTeQtNb2k1vLwEQaAp3XxkvvvXt69gSG5LGunXXikK9koPWZaRQgfFPBPWhMgXjPjccy9LA9xRFchPWQAnPvxh5Le paypal.me/distrowatchweekly • patreon.com/distrowatch |
|
| Extended Lifecycle Support by TuxCare |
|
|
| Reader Comments • Jump to last comment |
1 • Netrunner review (by Andy Prough on 2020-04-13 01:01:17 GMT from United States)
This review of Netrunner is basically the state of KDE on Debian in 2020 - badly out-of-date, slow, and missing functionality. And the situation is unlikely to improve anytime soon, as the next release probably won't be out for over a year from now. By then, the KDE 5.14 plasma desktop that's on Buster will be nearly 3 years old. That's just a sad state of affairs.
2 • Net Traffic (by Nathan NetNoman on 2020-04-13 01:41:59 GMT from Canada)
Network Traffic,
Are we talking about traffic from individual components or cumulative?
In fact, I have voted for I Don't care I mean I do not measure.
3 • Netrunner and Debian KDE (by randomly generated entity on 2020-04-13 02:32:47 GMT from United States)
It's been a long while since I've tried Netrunner, so I can't really comment intelligently on its implementation of KDE, though I agree that that menu would be the first thing to go for me. As for Debian and KDE in general, the only hope of being anywhere near up to date is to use sid, and even then you'll be lagging severely. It's only been in the last month or two that it got bumped up to 5.17.5 from 5.14.x.
The moral of this story is that Debian is simply not the undercarriage best suited to getting the best and brightest out of KDE. That said, I do have a sid/KDE install that's been in place for a few years now with zero issues aside from age of packages. It does what I need it to do (the basics - web, torrents, music processing including tagging with Picard, light video editing) so it does get used as daily driver from time to time.
I'd agree with Jesse's conclusion... what indeed does Netrunner provide that its base doesn't, and probably better (sid anyway) because of less tinkering with defaults? I suppose Calamares is marginally easier, if less specific, than Debian's installer, but beyond that and choice of apps (something I'd rather see leaning toward less, not more), I can't see any reason to try Netrunner again anytime soon.
4 • Net Traffic (by greenpossum on 2020-04-13 03:44:57 GMT from Australia)
In short, no. I don't monitor work LANs anymore. My home LAN is Gbit so I never worry about bandwidth. As for traffic with the Internet, I live within my speed tier. It could be faster of course but I'd have to pay more.
5 • @1 re Netrunner (by Simon on 2020-04-13 06:24:11 GMT from New Zealand)
I use Debian precisely because it has the good sense to exclude software from "stable" until it's been thoroughly tested (in the "testing" distro), which takes time. The last thing I want is for the distributors to inflict software on me when it's only been written a short time ago: I'm happy to wait a few years for the latest bells and whistles, but I'm not happy to have software fail when I need it to work...and that's the inevitable risk you run if you allow your distro to package software for you before it's been properly tested. I guess it's a "sad state of affairs" if you prioritise features over dependability...but not everyone does. Bleeding edge distros exist so that folks like you can use software a short while after it's available upstream, and distros like Debian and CentOS exist so that folks like me can use the software a few years later, without worrying that it might crash when we're counting on it to work. To each his/her own: it's great to have the options.
6 • Network traffic with ksysguard (by Luca on 2020-04-13 07:43:00 GMT from Italy)
I do not monitor network traffic often, but if I need to, I use KDE System Monitor (ksysguard)
7 • Network monitoring (by Pikolo on 2020-04-13 09:50:30 GMT from United Kingdom)
@6 KSysGuard shows you a quantified approach for the internet connections - how much traffic goes out and in. That doesn't really let you see which programs are using the network.
I use lsof -i to peek at the open network sockets, to see what my programs are talking to. I'll probably install itop and check it out instead.
8 • Debian v Arch etc (by Abigail on 2020-04-13 11:13:20 GMT from United Kingdom)
I've been using Plasma on Debian stable for years now. I know it's a fairly old version, and I've tried the newest version via Arch and there are some nice improvements, but on the computer I use for work and play all day I just don't have the time or patience for the constant maintenance required on an Arch installation. Another 100MB of updates every morning when booting gets a bit wearing after a while.
I like the Debian approach - test everything exhaustively to make sure it all fits and works together, and then release a system that doesn't change underneath you for several years. It means I don't get to use the latest shiny Plasma, but it also means I don't have to spend more time fixing my computer than using it.
9 • Poll (by some random user on 2020-04-13 11:48:21 GMT from United States)
I do not know if gkrellm counts or not, but that is one of the tools that I use.
10 • Nothing wrong with stable, dependable (by Dark Man on 2020-04-13 12:08:44 GMT from United States)
@5 Well stated, Simon NZ
@8 Great comment, Abigail UK, "I don't have to spend more time fixing my computer than using it."
11 • Plasma (by Mark on 2020-04-13 12:10:05 GMT from Canada)
Anybody who rolls with a Debian Testing distro (me Sparky) can upgrade Plasma to 5.17.5 right now.
As always, Arch Linux has the latest Plasma 5.18.4 to grab.
Surprised no mention of the kerfuffle between KDE and QT_Company :
https://www.osnews.com/story/131646/new-qt-releases-possibly-restricted-to-paying-customers-for-12-months-kde-not-particularly-happy/
12 • Debian Stability (by Penguin on 2020-04-13 16:12:40 GMT from United States)
I too run Debian stable with KDE and am quite happy with it. No issues for a long time now. I am a musician rather than a coder and have had some unrecoverable (for me) issues with the more bleeding-edge distros. I use my computer extensively for production, recording and writing and prioritize stability over the newest software. KDE's new versions seem to usually be very incremental upgrades, so I guess if you need emojis in Konsole then you'll have to go with an Arch spin or whatever.
In the few instances I have needed a newer version of a product (Telegram), I've been able to install a flatpak that works great. I also plan to enjoy my trusty Firefox ESR as long as possible before I'm required to update to a version with the LARGER ADDRESS BAR! which for some reason helps me do something.
13 • Re: Network monitoring and KDE-Qt animosity (by Cheker on 2020-04-13 17:26:52 GMT from Portugal)
I rarely go beyond nmap and ksysguard, if those even count. Looked at wireshark once, found it overwhelming.
@11 Ah Jesus. Well then, y'all excuse me while I go and get further acquainted with MATE
14 • Stable Point Releases Vs Rolling (by M.Z. on 2020-04-14 00:28:26 GMT from United States)
I can't comment on all rolling distros, because most sounded like a bit of a hassle in terms of maintenance; however, having used Mageia, Mint, & Debian based systems along with PCLinuxOS I can say there are fewer upgrades on Debian based system & Mageia compared to PCLOS. The rolling on PCLOS is gentle, but it still has a fair bit more upgrades over the course of a typical week. I would say most of the rough edges were related to Kernel upgrades & could be rolled back fairly easily by booting into the old kernal in Grub & removing the new one. On the other hand I did run into other bugs over the course of 4 or 5 years that I ran PCLOS on one machine. I'm not entirely convinced that the difference is enough to matter on a personal use PC, but I'm sure no IT department would want a rolling distro & a long term point release like Debian is plenty good for those who don't yearn for fresh new software.
15 • @14 Point Releases Vs Rolling (by OstroL on 2020-04-14 06:25:20 GMT from Poland)
Its always better to use rolling releases. Whatever that needs to get updated would be wetted by the efficient developers before being published. If you are using any distro or OS, you trust the developers. All you need is an application that'd remind you about updates and then update them with your permission. Arch and Gentoo had been the forerunner of rolling distros and are developing today. More than 2 billion people use a Gentoo based distro daily, Android, and gets updates practically everyday.
Users are not interested in reinstalling a distro every 6 months. Even Windows 10 is rolling for last 4 and 1/2 years!
16 • @15 STABLE Point Releases vs Beta Point Releases (by curious on 2020-04-14 08:33:55 GMT from Germany)
You state categorically that rolling releases are better. That is obviously a very specialised opinion.
The argument that users are not interested in reinstalling every 6 months is true, but the distros that release every 6 months are not stable. The "regular" Ubuntu or Fedora releases are not to be taken seriously. They are for trying things out.
A STABLE point release is something like Mageia, Ubuntu LTS, RHEL/CentOS, OpenSUSE LEAP or Debian. A user would only need to reinstall or upgrade every few YEARS.
That model makes much more sense than constantly having major system components updated, just because some upstream developer wants to test a new experimental feature - oops - broken again ... please undo ...
And I very seriously doubt that Arch developers do much "wetting".
17 • @15 Rolling Android (by Noah on 2020-04-14 08:57:55 GMT from Switzerland)
Well, my Android are not rolling; one is stuck at 9 and the other one at 5. Updates and upgrades is not the same thing. Windows rolling? Sure. We all know how.
18 • @15 STABLE Point Releases vs Beta Point Releases (by Frank Nießen on 2020-04-14 08:59:18 GMT from Germany)
full ack to @16
and only for the records: Even Win 10 is not a rolling release because there are subreleases (1803, 1809, 1903, 1909 ...) like on Ubuntu et al.
19 • @16 (by akoy on 2020-04-14 09:21:25 GMT from United Kingdom)
"And I very seriously doubt that Arch developers do much "wetting". "
How do you know?
20 • @18 (by akoy on 2020-04-14 09:24:22 GMT from United Kingdom)
"and only for the records: Even Win 10 is not a rolling release because there are subreleases (1803, 1809, 1903, 1909 ...) like on Ubuntu et al."
No, not exactly. The user doesn't have to do anything to get the Windows 10 "subrelease" to install itself and get it going. With Ubuntu, it is your headache.
21 • Rolling with Andy (by Angel on 2020-04-14 10:09:01 GMT from Philippines)
@15 -Android? Rolling? You're not serious? You get what the manufacturer brung. You maybe get one or if you are lucky, two releases, when and if and assuming the said manufacturer cares to do so. If you want more and feel brave, you might get a custom ROM if available and flash it while crossing your fingers hoping it doesn't brick the device. You get security updates every once in a while, yes, and again maybe, at the manufacturer's whim.. Those "practically every day" updates are apps, northing to do with the OS, and not so much different from what you get with Ubuntu, et al.
Anyone who re-installs every few months does so because that's what they want to do. Centos: 10 years. Ubuntu LTS: 5 years, or more if paying. Even 5 years is quite a bit longer than your Android updates will be around.
Re-installing, I've found over the years, is not so difficult if you partition properly. That's of course assuming you don't have hundreds of apps to redo. I'll give you that Windows is getting easier. Last update, to 1909, didn't leave my PCs useless for hours. That is indeed progress.
22 • @15 rolling (by Fredo on 2020-04-14 10:26:54 GMT from United States)
I have nothing against rolling. Arch is nice. Lots of people love Manjaro and others. But they do take more time and care. Broke Arch doing an upgrade? Tsk! Tsk! You didn't read the alerts. We keep telling you: RTFM! If it's your thing, enjoy!
Artix was trending here, so I tried it with runit, fresh off the oven. Booted up nice and fast. Looked really good. Broke at the first upgrade. Didn't roll very far. It's not that I can't fix that, I can look up the problem, reinstall if needed, etc., when and if I want to dedicate time to that. In the meanwhile, I'll be using something else.
23 • @21 rolling.... (by akoy on 2020-04-14 11:32:03 GMT from United Kingdom)
Android is rolling, every month. And, it is based on another rolling distro, Gentoo.
If you have a problem with a device manufacturer, take that up with him. His device is proprietary. But, it doesn't mean Android is not rolling. It never stopped rolling.
"Re-installing, I've found over the years, is not so difficult if you partition properly."
Of course a geek like you might, but not your grandma, or the hundreds of your neighbours.
Windows 10 also is rolling, and it does the installing behind the scenes; it finishes updating and finishing up, when you put the computer off. And, it takes few minutes.
Arch doesn't break after an upgrade. Once installed, it stays installed. You may not use the system for months, and then let it update. Nothing goes wrong, nothing breaks. I've tested this many times.
24 • Network Monitor (by Jeff on 2020-04-14 12:39:42 GMT from Canada)
I've been using nethogs to monitor network traffic on my computer for almost a year now. I just have it running in a terminal in the corner and glance at it once in awhile.
Couple times it reported a few odd anomalies that made me have a look but in the end, they were all good.
25 • network monitoring (by Gary W on 2020-04-14 13:25:43 GMT from Australia)
iftop is handy for a quick look, but I find iptraf and netwatch provide a lot more information.
26 • All the kerfuffle over rolling distros (by Friar Tux on 2020-04-14 13:41:47 GMT from Canada)
Sorry, folks, for me it comes down to one simple priority - does it work without issues. I want/need something that will NOT require daily attention. I want/need an LTS distro that can handle my daily grind without getting jittery. I don't want/need the latest or greatest. And just to be clear, I'm retired and my laptop is usually on 16 hours a day. It is my 'everything'. (I've said this before.) It is my library (books), newspaper, magazine, technical journal, recipe box, encyclopedia, writer's tool (stories, poems, article, etc.), graphic artist's tool (painting, drawing, 'needle-work' - yup, you read that right), and much, much more. This has helped to declutter/downsize the amount of stuff I would have had to cram into my, now, small apartment (780 sq. ft.).
As with any device, be it car, phone, or toaster, if it doesn't work to MY satisfaction I get something that will. The same goes for my OS. (Mine has an EOL date of 2023.) I have not had to fiddle or fidget with it in four years (that's when I installed it). Definitely a keeper (Linux Mint/Cinnamon).
27 • Stable (by Gary W on 2020-04-14 13:59:56 GMT from Australia)
@26, @8 ditto. I have plenty of computers to experiment with, when I have time. But I want, and expect, my prime computer to assist my ventures in the real world, without, like a child, involving me with its own time-consuming peculiarities. I have a motorbike for intellectual and emotional engagement, but I also have a car for carrying stuff and just getting things done.
28 • @23, Arch and Android (by Angel on 2020-04-14 15:13:06 GMT from Philippines)
I'll go to the source:
Before upgrading, users are expected to visit the Arch Linux home page to check the latest news, or alternatively subscribe to the RSS feed or the arch-announce mailing list. When updates require out-of-the-ordinary user intervention (more than what can be handled simply by following the instructions given by pacman), an appropriate news post will be made.
Before upgrading fundamental software (such as the kernel, xorg, systemd, or glibc) to a new version, look over the appropriate forum to see if there have been any reported problems.
Users must equally be aware that upgrading packages can raise unexpected problems that could need immediate intervention; therefore, it is discouraged to upgrade a stable system shortly before it is required for carrying out an important task. It is wise to wait instead to have enough time in order to be able to deal with possible post-upgrade issues.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/System_maintenance#Read_before_upgrading_the_system
https://www.archlinux.org/
Te fact that you can upgrade to a new release does not make a rolling distro. You can upgrade to new releases in Ubuntu, Fedora, et al. Google it!
Android is developed by Google until the latest changes and updates are ready to be released, at which point the source code is made available to the Android Open Source Project (AOSP),[134] an open source initiative led by Google.[135] The AOSP code can be found without modification on select devices, mainly the Google Nexus and Google Pixel series of devices.[136] The source code is, in turn, customized by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to run on their hardware.[137][138] Android's source code does not contain the device drivers, often proprietary, that are needed for certain hardware components.[139] As a result, most Android devices, including Google's own, ship with a combination of free and open source and proprietary software, with the software required for accessing Google services falling into the latter category.
The fact that you can upgrade to a new release does not make a rolling distro. You can upgrade to new releases in Ubuntu, Fedora, and others. Google it! That's why we are on Android 10, or Ubuntu 20.04, but Arch is still Arch Linux, not Arch Linux 20.
29 • What is rolling? (by Fredo on 2020-04-14 16:06:39 GMT from United States)
I think there's some confusion as to what "rolling" is. A rolling distro is always ready for release. Arch may release install media at intervals using a snapshot of the system at that time, but development continues and maybe a few days later they could have a newer kernel, new libraries or whatever. No new install media is provided until the next snapshot, which is taken at an arbitrary. point Arch does it monthly.
A fixed release is developed to a point when it's deemed ready by the developers, then it's released. Major changes to the system will come as point (minor) releases or major ones. Updates are usually provided for the apps and for security purposes when needed. Whether you reinstall or upgrade using the package manager is irrelevant. Over the years I have done both quite a few times.
Android and Windows are not rolling releases, they are developed until ready, and then released. In between you get bug fixes and security updates. If some people want to redefine what rolling means, that's a different thing..
30 • What's rolling... (by OstroL on 2020-04-14 16:51:16 GMT from Poland)
Arch and Gentoo are rolling distros, no one appears to dispute that here. Ubuntu is not, because it just cannot be -- its pretty hard to continue using untested Debian unstable packages continuously. So, the LTSs, point releases and intermediate releases. Ubuntu packages are dependent on Debian and its developers.
Fedora on the other hand is a semi rolling distro, whatever number it carries at a given moment. Fedora creates the packages, together with the mother distro. It doesn't borrow them from another distro.
Android is a rolling, always developing. And, that's why it is based on Gentoo. The device you have has nothing to do with that. Windows 10 is a rolling OS, independent of the device you use to run it. It gets updated without the need of user intervention. The apps work always, and that's what the user wants. The 8 year old device will run the same OS as the brand new one and all the apps. This happens very well with Arch Linux on an old computer or on a brand new one, just the same. You can bring down the user intervention to a minimum with helper updater apps. I've not had Arch Linux breaking for last 5 or so years.
31 • Rolling windows (by anticapitalista on 2020-04-14 17:28:30 GMT from Greece)
@30 so are you saying that windows 10 will automatically roll on to windows 11 (or whatever they decide to call it)?
32 • @31 (by OstroL on 2020-04-14 18:34:48 GMT from Poland)
No, it won't. Not for next 5 years or so. If it ever change the number, it'd be given free, and installed without the user intervention. Creating OSs for people to own is not the business of today and of the future. It is a service, and the apps in the cloud. Read the thoughts of the current bossman. And, that's why he's the bossman. Btw, both the bosses of Google and MS were born in one country.
33 • @31 security??? (by Simon on 2020-04-14 19:23:20 GMT from Switzerland)
My Debian is also rolling: from version 7 to 8,9 and 10 and it will roll to version 11 in the future ; frankly, as long as Debian exists, I can not care less what the "thoughts of the current bossman" of MS are or in which country he is born. Btw, I certainly do not want some bossman to install something on my PC "without the user intervention".
34 • Comments (by Justin on 2020-04-14 19:51:50 GMT from United States)
@11: That is bad news. It makes me reconsider using Qt software.
@12: You can disable the larger bar in about:config by setting to False the different "update1" properties.
@20: With Windows 10, it is also your headache. Go ask all those people with problems from the March update, the February update, the January update. I expect more the same today.
@22: That was my unfortunate experience as well. It's not that I can't fix stuff. It's that I don't want to fix stuff. I don't want be "afraid" to take updates or replan my evening just in case. I do use pure Arch and run it on btrfs for that reason but only on a secondary computer.
@26: More power to you.
@31: I agree, that's why it's not rolling. Rolling has nothing to do with auto-updating. That is an add-on, and you can get it in Debian stable (unattended-upgrades). The base does not change from under you. There are no intended breaking changes or major version updates.
Windows 10 is such an ugly smear now. There is not a single Windows 10 but a family of point releases. They should just call it Windows 19.03, 19.10, 20.03. Wait, I think they already did that one.
35 • @33 (by OstroL on 2020-04-14 20:08:00 GMT from Poland)
I believe I didn't reply to you, Simon, but to anticapitalista, who asked the question. Sorry, if that troubled you, but I lost the interest to be fixed one OS or one type of OS about a decade ago. The life is short, it'd be a pity not to try many OSs as possible, but not become politically connected to one. Right now, I'm writing from a lovely Android tab with convergence. I even have Ubuntu 16.04 on it. I also have 2 dedicated Linux boxes with all kinds Linuxes. And, I use Onedrive to keep data and move them between Android, Linux and Windows computers. Life is short, but lovely!
36 • Rolling release thoughts (by randomly generated entity on 2020-04-14 21:32:35 GMT from United States)
Over the years I've spent significant stretches with both rolling and non-rolling flavors of Linux, mostly Debian stable for the latter and Arch for the former. I had more trouble upgrading my Wheezy with KDE to Jessie (admittedly not a recommended practice) than I've ever had with Arch.
Maybe my hardware is extra-cooperative or maybe my use case (very very basic) is ideal, but I almost never have problems with the rolling release model, and yes, I do enjoy having the latest versions of certain programs. My PC gets used more as an entertainment center than for serious work (sans hard core gaming - what gaming I do is what KDE provides mostly, i.e. kpat), so again, my needs are basic, as I suspect the majority of casual (non-geek) PC users' are.
There is no right answer is my point. Some folks need rock solid stability and can deal with few updates to programs, while others may need newer kernels/programs for any number of reasons. It all boils down to what the individual user demands from his or her computer, and no two people are the same.
I'm a guy with enough time to read up on possible pitfalls before updating my Arch, Gentoo, Void, etc. so I prefer to roll. To each their own.
37 • A song (by CS on 2020-04-14 22:43:02 GMT from United States)
Will my computer work today?
When you're running Arch you can never say!
Android is based on Gentoo, you know?
Even though Google doesn't say it's so.
Two billion people use rolling releases.
But they don't know since their phone version seldom increases.
But it's rolling, trust me I know!
Sundar Pichai, he told me so.
He came to me in a dream I had.
"Install new updates every day, my lad."
Nothing could go wrong, are you forgetting?
The packages were given a very thorough wetting!
38 • Gentoo Based OS - NOT Android (by M.Z. on 2020-04-14 23:20:00 GMT from United States)
Some of you folks appear to be very confused about what Android is and is not. Android is Not based on Gentoo at all, nor is it a rolling release. Android is based on a custom version of the Linux kernel & is basically a totally independent Linux based OS that phone manufacturers do hardware support on, as others have stated. The version my phone won't upgrade & that is a common problem that many run into within a couple of years or so of getting a Droid. That has to do with phone manufactures not wanting to do the work to support upgrading their custom hardware from one point release to another, or at least not from one release to many others.
Now if you want a rolling release Linux based OS from Google that is derived from Gentoo Linux, the you are thinking of Chrome OS:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrome_OS#Architecture_2
sourced from here:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-secret-origins-of-googles-chrome-os/
It is important to note that while Android has some superficial similarities to Chrome OS they are very much different things, and the latest I've seen from a DDG search on compatibility between the two indicated that a VM for Android was likely to be built into Chrome OS. That of course indicates that the two projects are separate & have no real native compatibility without a special side effort from Google.
It's also worth noting that Google has done a fair amount to make upgrades easier since my old phone came out & they are trying to get better support for upgrades in part by moving more to the play store & by taking more control away from phone makers:
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/09/android-10-the-ars-technica-review/3/#h3
There are a few neat technical bits about Android in there & improved upgrasdes, but nothing I've heard anywhere says anything about about rolling releases or a change to the base of the OS. If you've go a better source for 'rolling Android releases' info, by all means share: however, some here seem to confuse Chrome OS for Android.
39 • @38 • Gentoo Based OS - NOT Android (by Greg Zeng on 2020-04-15 02:54:22 GMT from Australia)
Read the links in greater detail:
> "While Gentoo's Portage is still used for package management in Chrome OS, sources say that today's Chrome OS "kernel is a regular upstream kernel plus our own changes.
> "We don't pick up anything from Gentoo in that area."
> "... Chrome OS is based on Google's own take on the vanilla Linux kernel while Portage is still used for software package management."
Similar to Android, Google's published Android & Chrome OS are both based on very different open sourced products, Android & Chromium OS". Independent OEM's use these open source versions to make the closed source products.
Many coding houses product branded closed source products which are licensed to be used by many OEM's. Samsung & others are finding that updates, more regular rolling releases, bug fixes etc are better done by these specialist coding houses, rather than inhouse by the OEM hardware factory.
Perhaps the Linux world might follow this coding house model as well: Ubuntu, Pop!_OS, Linspire, LinDoz etc.
This week's Distrowatch mentions Package Management. As the above Android link writes:
> "... Portage is Gentoo's package management system.
> "It's most noteworthy because, instead of using prepared program packages, such as those used in Red Hat's RPM or Debian's DEB, for installing software, it compiles programs directly from source code.
Package Management for all operating systems is the biggest hurdle. Poor architectural design (Windows) can be overcome if the application base is much better than any other operating system. All the Unix based systems (Apple, Linux, Abdroid, BSD, etc) are greatly disadvantaged by the poor package management.
Most Unix based systems can had tedoius & expert compilation from source code, or coversion utilities to try to make some other package formats work. These other formats include APK, RPM, DEB, AUR, APPIMAGE, SNAP, FLATPAK, PUP, EXE, MSI, etc.
When using "converters" to massage these packages to work on other operating systems, usually it is not successful. Canonical & Red Hat started and then allowed independent devolopment of more universal Linux packages: snap & Flatpak. These still are buggy and rapidly evolving, so are not yet popular end users nor applicatoin coders. Which of these last two will win is still undergoing the development race.
40 • Observations about Netrunner (by eco2geek on 2020-04-15 05:10:30 GMT from United States)
IIRC Netrunner used to have an edition based on Kubuntu. Then they based it on KDE neon and changed its name to Maui. That version doesn't seem to have been updated since 2017, although the web site is still up.
For desktop users, now they have one edition based on Debian Stable, which is the one Jesse reviewed, and one (rolling) edition based on Manjaro.
I tried Netrunner 20.01, running from a USB stick, and was confused when my changes to Firefox didn't stay. For example, I'd turn off the menu bar and get rid of the flexible spaces. I'd add in the zoom control and the bookmarks menu. But when I exited out of, then restarted Firefox, my customizations would be gone and it would look the way it did when it started.
It turns out that Netrunner has a bunch of *.deb packages installed that control its look and feel. One of them is named "netrunner-settings-firefox". Once that was uninstalled, my customizations to Firefox stayed put. I still had to figure out how to turn off the title bar, which didn't obey the on/off setting in Firefox. I imagine this has something to do with the way the Kvantum theme is set up.
There's nothing wrong with Debian Stable, except maybe for people who don't like systemd (use Devuan!) or older software (that's the tradeoff for being tested and stable). What Netrunner adds is a certain look and feel. They've got a bunch of user themes, nice downloadable wallpaper, and so on to choose from. If you like its mix of software and artwork, then try it out. (They also have instructions on how to upgrade it to Testing if you want to.)
(I'm unsure why reviewers like to judge how fast a distro runs in a virtual machine like VirtualBox. You're essentially running one operating system on top of another operating system. Of course it's going to be slow, unless you have a multi-core CPU, a bunch of RAM, and maybe are helped by starting out running a lightweight OS.)
41 • @39 (by OstroL on 2020-04-15 15:54:32 GMT from Poland)
" Poor architectural design (Windows) can be overcome if the application base is much better than any other operating system. All the Unix based systems (Apple, Linux, Android, BSD, etc) are greatly disadvantaged by the poor package management."
Could you explain in detail, 1) the poor architectural system, 2) poor package management system?
42 • @40 (by Justin on 2020-04-15 17:38:25 GMT from United States)
The VirtualBox comments matter in that performance can differ between platforms. I've experienced the same thing where running in VirtualBox is much worse than bare metal compared to another distro running in Virtualbox and bare metal. Not everyone will do a direct install, and having knowledge about Virtualbox is a valid use case. The Linux Mint 17.3 Cinnamon live CDs had a bug that showed up for me in VirtualBox but not on bare metal (I was using Mint's 17.2 VirtualBox, so I'm not sure how they missed it). I use tons of VMs, so I appreciate the reviews in VirtualBox since that is what I would test first and how I would likely run the distro.
43 • @42 - point taken (by eco2geek on 2020-04-15 19:33:20 GMT from United States)
I've gotten lazy over the last decade. I used to install one distro on a partition, then reformat and install another over it, etc. Then I went from doing that to using VBox to test out distros. Now I just use USB sticks. :-) Only problem with using USB sticks is that it doesn't usually allow you to test a distro out over a longer period of time than a couple days before the ramdisk fills up.
44 • re: Gentoo Based OS - NOT Android (by M.Z. on 2020-04-15 22:05:27 GMT from United States)
@39
If you want a longer more detailed explanation, of course read the link that is why it is there. And as the link states, Chrome OS was originally based on Ubuntu, then redone using Gentoo as a base & indeed moved to a more vanilla Linux kernel while retaining Portage from Gentoo, so it is indeed based _Loosely_ on Gentoo Linux. If you want to nitpick, there is certainly a distinction between a fork from Gentoo as Chrome OS is & being entirely based on Gentoo as an upstream parent Distro, like say Sabayon. Regardless of that Chrome OS is far closer to what's being misidentified as Android above, which was of course the point.
From #39
" As the above Android link writes:
> "... Portage is Gentoo's package management system."
Wait a second, you want me to read in greater detail, then misidentify the Chrome OS link as being about Android? I think you missed the point while you were nitpicking over the wrong details. There were two important things to take away:
1) Chrome OS was forked from Gentoo & is a rolling system from Google
2) Android is a different OS with a different base, while still being a Google system
45 • iotop (by Germany)
@7:
iotop is also a fine program for watching what is going on on your system(s) while complimenting the network monitoring app(s).
46 • Android and Chrome OS (by Hoos on 2020-04-16 02:33:59 GMT from Singapore)
I recall from reading about Google's litigation with Oracle long ago on Groklaw that while Android uses a Linux kernel, the rest of the OS is based on some form of Java environment with a compatibility layer called dalvik.
Wiki informs me that since then, Google has moved to a more clearly open source version of Java but it's still Java.
47 • Spheniscus Magellanicus vultus ex fenestram, and R2D2 too. (by Spheniscus Magellanicus on 2020-04-16 10:13:39 GMT from Canada)
Good grief! Of course one person can run a rolling distro without major problems. I installed Tumbleweed for someone, and not having the bandwidth for a net install or the big DVD, I used Gecko ISO I had lying around, about 18 months old, because once installed I could switch to a faster server. Installed and updated with barely a minor hitch or two. That doesn't mean it will always happen, nor would I recommend Tumbleweed to someone on a production or enterprise s system. That's why they make Leap, and of course Suse's paid products.
But according to you, since they do all their development and don't use someone else's repos, Leap is a rolling release too. And so is Slackware. Come to think of it, Slackware will run fine on ten year old systems. That's because it's probably at least that old, but it rocks, and by your definition, it rolls.
I'm a Windows insider, fast lane. That means I run beta (more like alpha sometimes) systems. Betas are for squashing bugs before a release is made available to the general users. Fixed date release. Rolling distros don't have betas. User intervention? Hell, that's what I like about Linux: It doesn't do things behind my back. I don't allow Windows to do that either, and any enterprise maintainer who does would be a fool. So it will still be called Windows 10, it's just a name. Active OSes are always under development, but they are not all rolling becuase of that..
I also have two older Android devices, neither of which can be upgraded anymore. Can't run the newer apps. (From the same maker as your convergence thingie, by the way. Your device will soon meet the same fate.) The old phone I will flash one of these days, when the wife decides to let me. The old tablet, while working fine, is really a goner, barely can connect to WiFi. It's American from Verizon, can't flash a custom ROM. No, Android is not rolling, and consumer versions are upgradable only for a short life.
@34, Justin - "Windows 10 is such an ugly smear now." I do wish people would be able to express a preference without, to use your word, smearing what doesn't suit them. I find Windows 10 much superior to earlier versions, and easier to manage. I can say that without also saying Linux (or Windows 7) is a POS. Just tried the Deepin beta. Beautiful looking thing.
48 • Windows... a smear (by Friar Tux on 2020-04-16 13:42:31 GMT from Canada)
@47 (Sph* Mag*) Unfortunately, my vote has to go to @34. The ONLY reason I, as an avid fan of Windows, switched to Linux was that Windows DID NOT WORK. Neither did it work for The Wife. True, it works BETTER now than even a year ago, but still not as well as what I'm getting from Linux. So far, four years of not even the slightest issue.
As for Android, and/or Chrome OS, again, as I commented earlier, DOES IT WORK? If yes, then use it. If no, then don't use it. Find something that does. Why are we making something so simple so difficult.
By the way, @43 (eco2geek), I, too, have stopped using VM's to test distros. I find running a distro in a VM is like working in a pool of molasses. Everything seem to go in slow motion. Also, running straight off a USB doesn't work for me either, for the same reason you mentioned. I just install and run on a dedicated laptop - wipe and install, wipe and install. Works the best and gives me an idea of how a non-tech-savvy person will be able to work with the installer. (I usually also supply a USB with the OS.iso just in case. Most folks don't seem to have trouble re-installing with a bit of help.)
49 • @48, what works (by Spheniscus Magellanicus on 2020-04-16 15:03:55 GMT from Canada)
Did not ask for a vote. "Windows DID NOT WORKI" Well, it works on over a billion machines, including some I own. Linux works too. I stopped using Linux Mint some years ago, but it still works for you, I believe, and I don't feel the need to call it an "ugly smear."
50 • Somthing that works (by Nathan NetNoman on 2020-04-17 02:11:31 GMT from Canada)
@#48 and @#49
Opinions are always self-centered.
Something that works for someone does not really mean that it will work for for others.
With Gentoo, of course a rolling released, while compiling various (numerous) packages for other lots of Linux users (newbies) I know, brought only three surprises. Two were mismatch of c library and one that I could not compile for various reasons.
51 • @49: (by dragonmouth on 2020-04-17 13:07:48 GMT from United States)
"it works on over a billion machines"
I agree that Windows "runs" on over a billion machines but whether it "works" depends on your definition of the word. How many of those "Billion machines" are in corporate use and HAVE TO run Windows whether the Windows "works" or not?
52 • Does Windows work or not? (by Mr T on 2020-04-17 17:28:29 GMT from United Kingdom)
In my various work environments Word, Excel, Autocad, Adobe and the like, running under various Windows flavours, were the staples which were relied on for productivity for the best part of 30 years. Mostly it worked well enough that I didn't care what the OS was.
Occasionally some things broke but got fixed quickly. Is any other OS different?
Perhaps Libreoffice could fulfll many of these office type functions as well as MS Office (as a VBA user I would have missed Excel). Is there an Autocad clone for Linux?
But that isn't to say that Windows doesn't just work for the vast majority of office based staff. Presumably if Windows was causing sufficient problems for the corporate machine they'd choose another way.
Personally I prefer Linux, but I also have a windows machine available "just in case".
It doesn't get much use, but then these days I'm just a home user.
53 • @# 52 (by Nathan NetNoman on 2020-04-17 23:00:11 GMT from Canada)
"In my various work environments Word, Excel, Autocad, Adobe and the like, running under various Windows flavours, were the staples which were relied on for productivity for the best part of 30 years."
Microsoft would not probably exist if three floppy disks of PC-DOS would not have been stolen from IBM. Still remember my dad using Word*Star, a perfect word-editor. And, Lotus-123 suite for spread-sheets and graphs. Some of Peter Norton's powerful utilities.
Rise of Microsoft (or any Gang FANG-AM) has paved a deep-dark grave yard for many other small software companies and patent trolling as a bonus.
As of the day, Microsoft Windows "works", Google Android "works", MacOSX "Works", BSD "works", and so does "GNU/Linux "works" as well.
Regarding GNU/Linux, Slackware, Debian, Arch, and Gentoo they all "works" with all of their derivatives as well. Because with GNU/Linux no matter what the brand it is, Debian or Arch or Slack, under the hood it almost same core ingredients.
For every GNU/Linux distro I have tried (with different DEs) has just "worked" perfectly.
Something that "WORKS" is merely defined by requirements or needs to be met of any particular user(s). For GNU/Linux under the hood - skeleton is almost same. Once can transform one brand into an another one. And, that's the beauty of GNU/Linux.
The only difference remains how you define "it works".
54 • Is there an Autocad clone for Linux? (by Nathan NetNoman on 2020-04-17 23:25:54 GMT from Canada)
One should give QCAD, LibreCAD, FreeCAD, SolveSpace or SketchUp a try, might not as featured as AutoCAD.
I have (long-ago) successfully installed AutoCAD-12 authentic version with a physical hardware lock with WINE on Linux for someone who was heavy AutoCAD user.
Number of Comments: 54
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
| | |
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Archives |
| • Issue 1100 (2024-12-09): Oreon 9.3, differences in speed, IPFire's new appliance, Fedora Asahi Remix gets new video drivers, openSUSE Leap Micro updated, Redox OS running Redox OS |
| • Issue 1099 (2024-12-02): AnduinOS 1.0.1, measuring RAM usage, SUSE continues rebranding efforts, UBports prepares for next major version, Murena offering non-NFC phone |
| • Issue 1098 (2024-11-25): Linux Lite 7.2, backing up specific folders, Murena and Fairphone partner in fair trade deal, Arch installer gets new text interface, Ubuntu security tool patched |
| • Issue 1097 (2024-11-18): Chimera Linux vs Chimera OS, choosing between AlmaLinux and Debian, Fedora elevates KDE spin to an edition, Fedora previews new installer, KDE testing its own distro, Qubes-style isolation coming to FreeBSD |
| • Issue 1096 (2024-11-11): Bazzite 40, Playtron OS Alpha 1, Tucana Linux 3.1, detecting Screen sessions, Redox imports COSMIC software centre, FreeBSD booting on the PinePhone Pro, LXQt supports Wayland window managers |
| • Issue 1095 (2024-11-04): Fedora 41 Kinoite, transferring applications between computers, openSUSE Tumbleweed receives multiple upgrades, Ubuntu testing compiler optimizations, Mint partners with Framework |
| • Issue 1094 (2024-10-28): DebLight OS 1, backing up crontab, AlmaLinux introduces Litten branch, openSUSE unveils refreshed look, Ubuntu turns 20
| | • Issue 1093 (2024-10-21): Kubuntu 24.10, atomic vs immutable distributions, Debian upgrading Perl packages, UBports adding VoLTE support, Android to gain native GNU/Linux application support |
| • Issue 1092 (2024-10-14): FunOS 24.04.1, a home directory inside a file, work starts of openSUSE Leap 16.0, improvements in Haiku, KDE neon upgrades its base |
| • Issue 1091 (2024-10-07): Redox OS 0.9.0, Unified package management vs universal package formats, Redox begins RISC-V port, Mint polishes interface, Qubes certifies new laptop |
| • Issue 1090 (2024-09-30): Rhino Linux 2024.2, commercial distros with alternative desktops, Valve seeks to improve Wayland performance, HardenedBSD parterns with Protectli, Tails merges with Tor Project, Quantum Leap partners with the FreeBSD Foundation |
| • Issue 1089 (2024-09-23): Expirion 6.0, openKylin 2.0, managing configuration files, the future of Linux development, fixing bugs in Haiku, Slackware packages dracut |
| • Issue 1088 (2024-09-16): PorteuX 1.6, migrating from Windows 10 to which Linux distro, making NetBSD immutable, AlmaLinux offers hardware certification, Mint updates old APT tools |
| • Issue 1087 (2024-09-09): COSMIC desktop, running cron jobs at variable times, UBports highlights new apps, HardenedBSD offers work around for FreeBSD change, Debian considers how to cull old packages, systemd ported to musl |
| • Issue 1086 (2024-09-02): Vanilla OS 2, command line tips for simple tasks, FreeBSD receives investment from STF, openSUSE Tumbleweed update can break network connections, Debian refreshes media |
| • Issue 1085 (2024-08-26): Nobara 40, OpenMandriva 24.07 "ROME", distros which include source code, FreeBSD publishes quarterly report, Microsoft updates breaks Linux in dual-boot environments |
| • Issue 1084 (2024-08-19): Liya 2.0, dual boot with encryption, Haiku introduces performance improvements, Gentoo dropping IA-64, Redcore merges major upgrade |
| • Issue 1083 (2024-08-12): TrueNAS 24.04.2 "SCALE", Linux distros for smartphones, Redox OS introduces web server, PipeWire exposes battery drain on Linux, Canonical updates kernel version policy |
| • Issue 1082 (2024-08-05): Linux Mint 22, taking snapshots of UFS on FreeBSD, openSUSE updates Tumbleweed and Aeon, Debian creates Tiny QA Tasks, Manjaro testing immutable images |
| • Issue 1081 (2024-07-29): SysLinuxOS 12.4, OpenBSD gain hardware acceleration, Slackware changes kernel naming, Mint publishes upgrade instructions |
| • Issue 1080 (2024-07-22): Running GNU/Linux on Android with Andronix, protecting network services, Solus dropping AppArmor and Snap, openSUSE Aeon Desktop gaining full disk encryption, SUSE asks openSUSE to change its branding |
| • Issue 1079 (2024-07-15): Ubuntu Core 24, hiding files on Linux, Fedora dropping X11 packages on Workstation, Red Hat phasing out GRUB, new OpenSSH vulnerability, FreeBSD speeds up release cycle, UBports testing new first-run wizard |
| • Issue 1078 (2024-07-08): Changing init software, server machines running desktop environments, OpenSSH vulnerability patched, Peppermint launches new edition, HardenedBSD updates ports |
| • Issue 1077 (2024-07-01): The Unity and Lomiri interfaces, different distros for different tasks, Ubuntu plans to run Wayland on NVIDIA cards, openSUSE updates Leap Micro, Debian releases refreshed media, UBports gaining contact synchronisation, FreeDOS celebrates its 30th anniversary |
| • Issue 1076 (2024-06-24): openSUSE 15.6, what makes Linux unique, SUSE Liberty Linux to support CentOS Linux 7, SLE receives 19 years of support, openSUSE testing Leap Micro edition |
| • Issue 1075 (2024-06-17): Redox OS, X11 and Wayland on the BSDs, AlmaLinux releases Pi build, Canonical announces RISC-V laptop with Ubuntu, key changes in systemd |
| • Issue 1074 (2024-06-10): Endless OS 6.0.0, distros with init diversity, Mint to filter unverified Flatpaks, Debian adds systemd-boot options, Redox adopts COSMIC desktop, OpenSSH gains new security features |
| • Issue 1073 (2024-06-03): LXQt 2.0.0, an overview of Linux desktop environments, Canonical partners with Milk-V, openSUSE introduces new features in Aeon Desktop, Fedora mirrors see rise in traffic, Wayland adds OpenBSD support |
| • Issue 1072 (2024-05-27): Manjaro 24.0, comparing init software, OpenBSD ports Plasma 6, Arch community debates mirror requirements, ThinOS to upgrade its FreeBSD core |
| • Issue 1071 (2024-05-20): Archcraft 2024.04.06, common command line mistakes, ReactOS imports WINE improvements, Haiku makes adjusting themes easier, NetBSD takes a stand against code generated by chatbots |
| • Issue 1070 (2024-05-13): Damn Small Linux 2024, hiding kernel messages during boot, Red Hat offers AI edition, new web browser for UBports, Fedora Asahi Remix 40 released, Qubes extends support for version 4.1 |
| • Issue 1069 (2024-05-06): Ubuntu 24.04, installing packages in alternative locations, systemd creates sudo alternative, Mint encourages XApps collaboration, FreeBSD publishes quarterly update |
| • Issue 1068 (2024-04-29): Fedora 40, transforming one distro into another, Debian elects new Project Leader, Red Hat extends support cycle, Emmabuntus adds accessibility features, Canonical's new security features |
| • Issue 1067 (2024-04-22): LocalSend for transferring files, detecting supported CPU architecure levels, new visual design for APT, Fedora and openSUSE working on reproducible builds, LXQt released, AlmaLinux re-adds hardware support |
| • Issue 1066 (2024-04-15): Fun projects to do with the Raspberry Pi and PinePhone, installing new software on fixed-release distributions, improving GNOME Terminal performance, Mint testing new repository mirrors, Gentoo becomes a Software In the Public Interest project |
| • Issue 1065 (2024-04-08): Dr.Parted Live 24.03, answering questions about the xz exploit, Linux Mint to ship HWE kernel, AlmaLinux patches flaw ahead of upstream Red Hat, Calculate changes release model |
| • Issue 1064 (2024-04-01): NixOS 23.11, the status of Hurd, liblzma compromised upstream, FreeBSD Foundation focuses on improving wireless networking, Ubuntu Pro offers 12 years of support |
| • Issue 1063 (2024-03-25): Redcore Linux 2401, how slowly can a rolling release update, Debian starts new Project Leader election, Red Hat creating new NVIDIA driver, Snap store hit with more malware |
| • Issue 1062 (2024-03-18): KDE neon 20240304, changing file permissions, Canonical turns 20, Pop!_OS creates new software centre, openSUSE packages Plasma 6 |
| • Issue 1061 (2024-03-11): Using a PinePhone as a workstation, restarting background services on a schedule, NixBSD ports Nix to FreeBSD, Fedora packaging COSMIC, postmarketOS to adopt systemd, Linux Mint replacing HexChat |
| • Issue 1060 (2024-03-04): AV Linux MX-23.1, bootstrapping a network connection, key OpenBSD features, Qubes certifies new hardware, LXQt and Plasma migrate to Qt 6 |
| • Issue 1059 (2024-02-26): Warp Terminal, navigating manual pages, malware found in the Snap store, Red Hat considering CPU requirement update, UBports organizes ongoing work |
| • Issue 1058 (2024-02-19): Drauger OS 7.6, how much disk space to allocate, System76 prepares to launch COSMIC desktop, UBports changes its version scheme, TrueNAS to offer faster deduplication |
| • Issue 1057 (2024-02-12): Adelie Linux 1.0 Beta, rolling release vs fixed for a smoother experience, Debian working on 2038 bug, elementary OS to split applications from base system updates, Fedora announces Atomic Desktops |
| • Issue 1056 (2024-02-05): wattOS R13, the various write speeds of ISO writing tools, DSL returns, Mint faces Wayland challenges, HardenedBSD blocks foreign USB devices, Gentoo publishes new repository, Linux distros patch glibc flaw |
| • Issue 1055 (2024-01-29): CNIX OS 231204, distributions patching packages the most, Gentoo team presents ongoing work, UBports introduces connectivity and battery improvements, interview with Haiku developer |
| • Issue 1054 (2024-01-22): Solus 4.5, comparing dd and cp when writing ISO files, openSUSE plans new major Leap version, XeroLinux shutting down, HardenedBSD changes its build schedule |
| • Issue 1053 (2024-01-15): Linux AI voice assistants, some distributions running hotter than others, UBports talks about coming changes, Qubes certifies StarBook laptops, Asahi Linux improves energy savings |
| • Issue 1052 (2024-01-08): OpenMandriva Lx 5.0, keeping shell commands running when theterminal closes, Mint upgrades Edge kernel, Vanilla OS plans big changes, Canonical working to make Snap more cross-platform |
| • Issue 1051 (2024-01-01): Favourite distros of 2023, reloading shell settings, Asahi Linux releases Fedora remix, Gentoo offers binary packages, openSUSE provides full disk encryption |
| • Issue 1050 (2023-12-18): rlxos 2023.11, renaming files and opening terminal windows in specific directories, TrueNAS publishes ZFS fixes, Debian publishes delayed install media, Haiku polishes desktop experience |
| • Issue 1049 (2023-12-11): Lernstick 12, alternatives to WINE, openSUSE updates its branding, Mint unveils new features, Lubuntu team plans for 24.04 |
| • Issue 1048 (2023-12-04): openSUSE MicroOS, the transition from X11 to Wayland, Red Hat phasing out X11 packages, UBports making mobile development easier |
| • Issue 1047 (2023-11-27): GhostBSD 23.10.1, Why Linux uses swap when memory is free, Ubuntu Budgie may benefit from Wayland work in Xfce, early issues with FreeBSD 14.0 |
| • Issue 1046 (2023-11-20): Slackel 7.7 "Openbox", restricting CPU usage, Haiku improves font handling and software centre performance, Canonical launches MicroCloud |
| • Full list of all issues |
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
| Random Distribution | 
ZENIX GNU/Linux
ZENIX GNU/Linux was a Linux distribution based on Linux From Scratch. It was built directly from scratch to stand for a reliable Server OS. ZENIX consists of a basic system and some additional packages. A single package will provide a full server environment for a specific need, such as DNS server, web server or mail server.
Status: Discontinued
|
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
|
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
