| DistroWatch Weekly
|Linux Foundation Training
|Reader Comments • Jump to last comment
1 • Opinion poll (by DaveW on 2016-11-07 01:06:19 GMT from United States) |
I selected other because I use a different methods. My most used apps are in a dock, just click and go. For other programs, I browse the application menu. I never use search, because if its not one of my favorite programs, I generally wouldn't know what to type anyway.
2 • search v. browse (by linuxista on 2016-11-07 01:13:32 GMT from United States)
Searching for apps has become an essential feature for me. Even if I'm using openbox or i3, I still use dmenu primarily. So much faster and easier, I have a hard time imagining going back to a menu tree.
3 • Poll Question (by cykodrone on 2016-11-07 01:17:22 GMT from Canada)
Like all good trained rats, my MS brainwashing is still alive and well..."menu tree". I'm proof that people can get 'conditioned' and stuck in their ways. Even the icons on my desktop are still in the same locations from 1998, how sad is that? FYI, I've been completely MS free since 2010.
4 • Menu designers (by Greg Zeng on 2016-11-07 01:20:03 GMT from Australia)
Glad that menu designers have some metrics, on what to offer us.
1) type searches: 7 (19%)
2) menu tree: 18 (50%)
3) flat grid of icons: 0 (0%)
4) all of the above: 11 (31%)
5) Other: 0 (0%)
The leading menu creators (Amazon, eBay, YouTube) know what works best; All of these choices, simultaneously, plus intelli-search.
Initially (4) was my choice. However the major missing category is: the intelli-search.
Intelligent-search "remembers" the users' preferences. My IP shows my nation, currency, language, metrics, etc. My user-name remembers my last use, my preferences, my indexes.
Using my preferred Web-browser (Slimjet on Linux & Windows), I just enter the first letter. "d" will automatically show this url (distrowatch.com). "f" will autoshow "freewarefiles.com". "fi" will modify my choice to "fileforum.betanews.com".
5 • Poll (by Martin on 2016-11-07 01:37:55 GMT from Czech Republic)
I use keyboard shortcuts to launch most applications. Searching using rofi is there for the rest.
6 • Search (by argent on 2016-11-07 04:32:37 GMT from United States)
Will use whatever is quickest and depending on which Wm, find some tiling Wm's to be better than others, use dmenu with most.
Very anti-icon, just don't like the distraction and clutter. Some people even use them in Openbox, Fluxbox menus and find that very distracting. But easy to remedy that if I choose to keep a distro installed.
Use tint2 on Openbox and Fluxbox, but without icons or clock. No conky as well.
7 • poll (by mes on 2016-11-07 08:26:21 GMT from Netherlands)
No icons on the desktop.
I use Cairo dock for the applications that I frequently use.
A few applications are favorites in the menu (kde5) so easy to find.
Other applications: When I know where the application is located in the menu I use the menu otherwise I will search.
8 • FreeBSD 11.0 Review (by Andy Mender on 2016-11-07 09:10:06 GMT from Austria)
Thank you kindly for this detailed review and especially looking at the boot environments. However, it seems most of your problems came from the fact that you did not properly install FreeBSD 11.0, hence no /boot directory/partition and later issues. I'm using FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p3 on a UEFI-compliant commodity ASUS ultrabook and not only is the /boot directory/partition there, but also everything else works fine :).
In case of issues with ZFS on GPT I would try rolling with the standard UFS setup to see how it compares.
9 • Another vote for Search (by BeGo on 2016-11-07 10:48:05 GMT from United States)
Yups, I always search my apps, whether in Bodhi or KDE
10 • Launching apps (by PePa on 2016-11-07 12:15:56 GMT from Thailand)
I am mainly using a dock/panel launcher for all most used applications, and configure the same for my users. I am never tempted to type in a menu when offered the option. I think the option "dock/panel launcher" should have been part of the poll.
11 • search vs browse (by wally olson on 2016-11-07 13:37:17 GMT from United States)
ditto DaveW: 4 or 5 items in a dock, everything else via menu or typed directly on command line.
12 • FreeBSD review (by Jordan on 2016-11-07 13:46:56 GMT from United States)
Thank you for that review. I'm always looking around for reviews and info on the various BSD projects.
I admit to being too chicken to actually install BSD of any flavor on my machines, as I keep seeing hardware issues brought up, no matter which BSD.
I do like the whole idea of an alternative to linux, but sometimes it seems like the BSD philosophy is pretty close to what systemd does in linux. I obviously need more info and understanding. These reviews help.
13 • Searching vs Browsing Application Menus (by Kevin on 2016-11-07 13:49:51 GMT from United States)
Other - I use DWM as my window manager. There is no search function. Although there is a menu app available for it, I don't use that either. I type commands at a ZSH prompt to launch apps.
14 • FreeBSD (by aary on 2016-11-07 14:19:53 GMT from Japan)
Thanks for putting focus on Free BSD 11.0. since it's become my recent favorite distro. I love the balance of details and simplicity in the handbook, the solid and pro-ish feeling of the working distro. It installs and works fine on my asus z97 mobo with haswell refresh i5 cpu. BTW Jesse, did you configure the xorg related files (/etc/rc.conf, ~/.xinitrc) both in root and users settings? I bet you did, bu I am just saying because I got stuck there and could not make it work properly for a while. Wish you guys the best here at DW.
15 • FreeBSD (by Jesse on 2016-11-07 14:28:04 GMT from Canada)
>> " However, it seems most of your problems came from the fact that you did not properly install FreeBSD 11.0, hence no /boot directory/partition and later issues."
This seems highly unlikely. Partly because there are no ways to mess up an installation and not have things like /boot enabled. There is just not an option I could change to made that happen. Remember I'm pretty much taking all the default options in the installer. If taking the installer's defaults results in a non-working system, that is a bug. And partly because I've done a lot of installs of FreeBSD. I mean a lot. This is the first time I've had these problems. The issue does not exist in any of the 10.x series, the 9.x series or previous versions.
>> "In case of issues with ZFS on GPT I would try rolling with the standard UFS setup to see how it compares."
That wouldn't do me much good since my primary issue was with boot environments. UFS does not support boot environments. It might fix the freebsd-update issue, but at the expense of one of FreeBSD's best features. It would be a bit like cutting off my leg to fix a limp, technically it might work, but at the expense of losing what I wanted to do in the first place.
>> " Jesse, did you configure the xorg related files (/etc/rc.conf, ~/.xinitrc)"
Yes, indeed I did. These are nicely laid out in the documentation.
16 • Searching vs. browsing (by Microlinux on 2016-11-07 15:13:03 GMT from France)
After fifteen years of using Linux exclusively, I've found the perfect solution for handling applications. I've added Whiskermenu to my upper Xfce panel while replacing the lower panel with ElementaryOS' Plank dock. This way, I can easily drag-and-drop much needed applications to the dock. My clients also love it. Here's what it looks like.
17 • RE: FreeBSD (by Andy Mender on 2016-11-07 15:26:53 GMT from Austria)
>> "This seems highly unlikely. Partly because there are no ways to mess up an installation and not have things like /boot enabled. There is just not an option I could change to made that happen. Remember I'm pretty much taking all the default options in the installer. If taking the installer's defaults results in a non-working system, that is a bug. And partly because I've done a lot of installs of FreeBSD. I mean a lot. This is the first time I've had these problems. The issue does not exist in any of the 10.x series, the 9.x series or previous versions."
The computer I mentioned had UEFI related issues until I went with the defaults (GPT + UFS). However, since you did roll with the defaults for GPT + ZFS, I think it's worth posting the specific issue on the FreeBSD forums or the bugzilla, or testing the most recent .isos. There were around 3-4 patches already since the release. Some of them related to GPT + ZFS.
18 • No Menus Needed (Almost) (by Rich'rd on 2016-11-07 16:03:16 GMT from United States)
Though I now use Mint's KDE-4 I don't need a menu much. I keep a terminal window open in one Virtual Desktop in which I type commands like "top" and "ls" or the name of a browser or file manager; for the rest, I use Dolphin or any file manager and open the *document* on which I want to work. All doc types are associated with applications to open them, so I need not open a menu at all for most tasks.
Very rarely I will need a utility without a doc type association. For this I use the search function in Mint Menu.
There are no icons on my desktop except documents on which I am currently working.
It works for me; I have used this method for fifteen years, starting on Blackbox with RH-6.2 (the old one.)
19 • MX Linux (by albinard on 2016-11-07 16:04:12 GMT from United States)
Just a brief recommendation for MX Linux, which is at MX-16 right now. I've used this on and off since MX-14, and it seems to be a solid distro, somewhat conservative (it’s based on Debian Stable, after all) with a few surprising tweaks. The documentation is largely a series of exceptionally well-presented videos by Dolphin Oracle which provide both information and a whole lot of encouragement.
20 • Simplicity on AntiX (by Linux Apocalypsis on 2016-11-07 16:16:54 GMT from Ireland)
I, for one, welcome the new AntiX-based Simplicity. I will give it a try as soon as possible.
21 • Panel (by Doug on 2016-11-07 16:22:53 GMT from United States)
I voted for the menu tree. But, for the applications I use most, Chromium and kpatience, I access them from the panel.
22 • FreeBSD (by silent on 2016-11-07 17:43:30 GMT from Hungary)
I use FreeBSD without any extras. I did not have any problem with the boot directory, update works. I configured SLIM as a DM with Mate DE and a lightweight WM. The SWF plugin with wine is a bit fuzzy, but it works with firefox. I can even use DVB-T USB sticks. The upgrade from 10.3 to 11.0 was smooth. I have an old PC with BIOS, just chain load FreeBSD from grub. May be I am lucky, for me it just works :).
23 • Searching vs. browsing (by David on 2016-11-07 17:45:48 GMT from United States)
I use keyboard shortcuts for commonly used applications and the menu for the rest. I'm puzzled as to why anyone would want to type in the name of the program: isn't that what GUIs were invented to replace?
24 • MX Linux documentation (by Jerry on 2016-11-07 17:48:55 GMT from United States)
@ #19 "The [MX Linux] documentation is largely a series of exceptionally well-presented videos by Dolphin Oracle" Is there a reason you ignore the full Users Manual (https://www.mxlinux.org/user_manual_mx16/mxum.html) and the Technical Wiki (https://www.mxlinux.org/wiki)?
25 • MX and Simplicity (by G Savage on 2016-11-07 18:19:03 GMT from Canada)
I loved Mepis. It was my first successful Linux. I also think Simplicity was the best Puppy after MacPup development ended.
I am looking forward to trying both. :-)
26 • #19 MX Linux (by anticapitalista on 2016-11-07 18:49:08 GMT from Greece)
You may have missed out on the fact that due to the excellent work carried out by MX packagers many of the included apps on MX-16 are the latest available.
27 • Very useful review of FreeBSD (by oko on 2016-11-07 19:18:46 GMT from United States)
Often times I skim the DW review on Monday's just to be irritated by the very low quality reviews. For once the review of FreeBSD was really useful. I have bunch of TrueOS 10.3 in production which I was planning to upgrade to FreeBSD 11.0 since PC-BSD is dead now and new TrueOS is following unstable branch. Boot environment besides ability to install the root on ZFS mirror was one of the killer features of TrueOS 10.xxx which served me well. I am really disturbed to read that vanilla FreeBSD is still unable to to that properly and even worse binary system upgrade is still not functional. I will make sure I test 11.0 before deciding to upgrade.
28 • MX Linux (by Ali on 2016-11-07 19:51:52 GMT from Russian Federation)
That's not MX advantage over Debian. Debian users are able to install latest packages from backport repository if they want.
29 • @28 - MX Linux (by Hoos on 2016-11-07 20:12:21 GMT from Singapore)
MX's packaging team has also packaged applications not found in Debian or Debian backports, for instance, applications that were originally for Ubuntu.
They may even go the extra mile to put together packages more up-to-date than the version in the Debian backport repo, assuming the dependencies can all be resolved.
If you can't find what you want in the backport repo, a package request can be made for the team's consideration.
30 • Launching Programs (by JJ on 2016-11-07 20:18:45 GMT from United States)
@23: Yeah, that's what I thought, too. I've added keyboard shortcuts before just so I didn't have to move my hand away from the keyboard, but why would want to go click on some box only to type in a search. You might as well use the command line to launch everything at that point.
I either pin to the task bar (Windows) or add to a quick launch bar (Linux). I want to point-and-click, though I did select "menu tree" as my preferred way if I'm going to go hunt for something.
31 • @29 mx Linux (by mandog on 2016-11-07 21:18:13 GMT from Peru)
Actually there is nothing to stop you from using Mx ports on Debian if you want to they are actually only using debian testing/ unstable
32 • @23 Search v. Menu (by linuxista on 2016-11-08 00:51:14 GMT from United States)
I use kbd shortcuts for most common apps, and search for the rest. B/c app search has auto-complete/auto-select (even the minimalist ones like dmenu), after just the first two or three letters your app icon is selected. So much faster than browsing a menu in my opinion. Don't have to do the thing where you have to remember if what you're looking for is in preferences or system settings, or accessories or utilities or whatever.
33 • Buggy operating systems (Windows, IOS, Linux, BSD): the truth please. (by Greg Zeng on 2016-11-08 02:52:44 GMT from Australia)
Distrowatch showed this url, this week:
> Ubuntu Stats
> Bug Stats
> Open (126930) +427 over the last 2 weeks
> Critical (376) -15 over the last 2 weeks
> Unconfirmed (62714) +243 over the last 2 weeks
Windows, Apple hide these truths: it's their religious duty. BSD seems so short-staffed that they cannot track them, as shown by the BSD comments here. Linux is usually well staffed, and OPEN!
Desktop Linux users usually have Ubuntu-based distributions (at least 68+ Brand-names). distrowatch.com/search.php?basedon=Ubuntu
This is because the hardware-fitting problems are the least of all operating systems. Deficiencies in the parent system are extremely easy to trouble-shoot and rectify. Interpreting the above statistics:
> Unsolved: 127,000; with 427 extra added in the last 2 weeks, or 0.3% increased.
> Critical: (376) -15 over the last 2 weeks; or 361 serious faults, 0.3% of total.
> Unsure (62714) +243 over the last 2 weeks; or 0.2% extra added.
If the insiders of Windows & Apple could leak these related stats to Wikileaks, or here in Dw, we would welcome the honest comparisons. Rationally, mathematically designed language systems like these are so fluid, powerful and complex. The above engineering error-rates are expected, and better than other aspects of human engineering. Windows & Apple are telling lies, when they pretend to be better than Linux, imho. That is why & how closed, secretive systems work.
34 • @Greg (by Andy Mender on 2016-11-08 08:49:03 GMT from Austria)
Neither Microsoft nor Apple will openly admit to the bugs their respective operating systems suffer from. It's merely politics. That would incite panic and destroy the falsely positive image of the operating systems being stable, secure and reliable. For instance, it would often take months for Apple to admit to certain hardware flaws like the infamous "Staingate" incident or faulty nVidia GT 8600M chips in the 2008 MacBook series.
On the other hand, remember that:
1. Not all reported bugs are real bugs, but either misconfigurations or human errors in software usage.
2. Per above, notifying customers about every single bug sends a distressing message: "our system is error-prone and full of holes".
3. The more complex and user-friendly an operating system, the more prone it will be to bugs, insecurities, etc.
Have a look at the bugs you mentioned. How many of them are real bugs or have the appropriate "severity" set? How many of them are properly reported and how many are merely cries for help?
35 • Debian testing Xfce is the best rolling release (by debiantestingxfce on 2016-11-08 09:55:18 GMT from Finland)
* best netinstaller: https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
* 2 weeks testing period in unstable makes testing stable
* simple to maintain with Synaptic, well documented
* many fast servers around the world, so package download is fast
* many users, organizations and companies use Debian
* No bloatware that is in Debian derivatives.
* Xfce is fast,light, stable and freely configurable desktop
* Oibaf ppa and Padoka ppa compatible, you can use the latest mesa git drivers. Also xenial flashplugin-installer is useful
* it is easy to create custom kernel package, just install kernel dev tools, configure any kernel and run: export CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=4 fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd kernel_image
36 • mx-linux (by dolphin oracle on 2016-11-08 13:25:14 GMT from United States)
@31 actually still debian stable.
but the mx-repo is a great feature, without the strangeness of the default debian-backports default priority settings.
@19 while I'm flattered at the mention of my videos, the mx linux manual and the wiki are truly excellent. In fact, when I do a how-to video, I generally pull from the wiki.
37 • @ 33 • Buggy operating systems (Windows, IOS, Linux, BSD) (by Alex on 2016-11-08 19:36:14 GMT from United States)
Why do we talk so much about Windows here, if we are supposed to use either Linux or BSD? Why do we care about what problems Windows or iOS has? They have their own forums sponsored by owners of those OSs, don't they?
I use both Linux and Windows. I had used iOS for few years too. For some time, I was using only Linux, but now I've gone back to using Win10. Out of the 3 different types of Linux distros i'm using, I had met with some breakage in those distros, while strangely, I didn't get any problems with Win10.
I think, if we are going to discuss bugs, we should discuss bugs in Linux and BSD distros.
38 • #37 buggy distros (by debiantestingxfce on 2016-11-09 01:15:35 GMT from Finland)
for #37, use Debian testing Xfce. No problems, one of our gaming pc is now used 2 years without any breaks.One office pc is used 2.5 years with Debian testing Xfce without problems.
39 • @38 (by Alex on 2016-11-09 07:47:55 GMT from United States)
I suppose you didn't understand what I said. I answered Greg Zeng, who keeps on bringing Windows, iOS into the discussion here. This website is for users of Linux and BSD, not Windows and iOS. So, if we are going to discuss bugs, let's discuss our Linux and BSD distros.
Btw, I mentioned 3 types of Linux distros, in which one of them is Debian Testing, and I'm using Linux from more than 10 years.
40 • Double Click for the Win (by Arch Watcher 402563 on 2016-11-09 08:22:19 GMT from United States)
Like most folks I just double-click a file for the computer to open it. The computer knows the app for me. I have seen others organize by desktop icon clutter, though I don't.
I tried smart search gizmotrons for finding apps, but never liked them. I think the important thing with apps is just an icon for visual association in menus, panels, and shortcuts. The name of the actual binary is usually meaningless to anyone but its mother. It's strange how devs name things like they're still under DOS file name limits.
Once upon a time I surveyed "tagging" file managers, which by now may have improved wonderfully, I don't know. I actually use grep to search text files and wouldn't want an automagicjumbobutler doing such simple things for me.
41 • Gecko Linux (by Chris on 2016-11-09 10:47:32 GMT from New Zealand)
During the week I tried an install of Gecko Linux. First problem was the first boot menu was non responsive, and required finding text to write, similar to a terminal to log in. It then decided it would install to the same USB drive the iso was reading from. The partitioning menu looked dreadfully difficult and not capable of selection of a drive to write the iso too. I gave up.
42 • MX-16 public beta1 is very useful and solid (by Brian Masinick on 2016-11-09 16:30:46 GMT from United States)
I agree with: 19 • MX Linux (by albinard on 2016-11-07 16:04:12 GMT from United States)
MX-16 Public Beta1 is a really solid system, enough so that I was willing to replace a VERY STABLE and nicely working MX-15. Fortunately there is an option to retain the /home directory hierarchy, which is where all of my personal changes go.
The beta1 installed without a hitch and continues to work well, in spite of updates. Frankly, it's more stable than at least half of the available desktop and mobile distributions.
43 • Heirachy of launchers (by mikef90000 on 2016-11-09 20:24:08 GMT from United States)
Xfce with the whisker menu gives you a useful, easy to configure heirarchy:
- Panel (left side) for the most used apps
- Whisker menu favorites for the 'next most' used
- Default menu for seldom used or newly installed apps
A bonus is you can keep your desktop clear of icon clutter.
Search is for mobile device fanbois. Newbies won't remember most app names anyway.
44 • Its becoming pretty boring! (by adamek on 2016-11-09 22:32:49 GMT from United States)
Nothing spectacular is happening with Linux or BSD, and it had become quite boring. Gobo Linux is thinking bit out of the box, sort of...while the Lumina desktop is forked of Fluxbox. Neither the Unity nor Gnome DEs are putting out anything "stop press" and not much from Plasma. Its really getting terribly boring!
45 • Lumina (by Jesse on 2016-11-09 22:57:30 GMT from Canada)
>> "while the Lumina desktop is forked of Fluxbox"
Lumina is not a fork of Fluxbox. Lumina is a "from scratch" desktop written using Qt. It uses Fluxbox as the default window manager. The two projects do not share code.
46 • Lumina WM DIY (by Arch Watcher 402563 on 2016-11-09 23:21:55 GMT from United States)
Lumina plans to write its own WM to replace Fluxbox. The key Linux differentiator in Lumina is zero deps on systemd or consolekit/policykit.
47 • Browsing vs Searching with Menus and Synapse (by Simon Wainscott-Plaistowe on 2016-11-10 00:44:41 GMT from New Zealand)
Perhaps someone's already mentioned it but I didn't spot it in previous comments. I use Cinnamon & MATE desktops, both of these have a good Applications menu with search built in. For that I use the SUPER+ALT hotkey.
Also I use Synapse for more comprehensive searches and for quick access to oft-used apps & docs. For that I use the SUPER+SPACE hotkey.
48 • Re: Very useful review of FreeBSD (by oko on 2016-11-10 02:29:39 GMT from United States)
I was a bit too fast assessing this week DWW review as very useful. I just played with 11.0 and this paragraph is totally inaccurate
"A little poking around revealed that the /boot directory was just a symbolic link to a location which did not exist. I set up the missing /boot directory and was then able to create boot environments. However, then I ran into a few other problems. At start-up time, I was unable to select alternative boot environments from the boot menu as no snapshots were listed in the boot menu. Once the operating system was up and running, I was able to use beadm to set a specific snapshot to use the next time the system was restarted. Unfortunately, selecting any but the default boot environment would cause the system to fail to boot properly. FreeBSD could not connect to the network when booting alternative snapshots and failed to reach the login prompt."
beadm on FreeBSD actually worked as advertised when I tested it. Moral of the story is that people who don't know how to use computer have no business evaluating an OS.
49 • Failure diagnosis (by Kragle von Schnitzelbank on 2016-11-10 04:22:28 GMT from United States)
Instead of denigrating a failure victim, ask why it worked on one system and failed on another. That's responsible diagnosis.
50 • OB Revenge OS (by Gekxxx on 2016-11-10 13:30:54 GMT from Belgium)
Using Antergos right now (very pleased with it), but looking forward to a review of OB Revenge OS.
51 • Poll - new isn't always good; old-fashioned is appreciated (by curious on 2016-11-10 15:43:27 GMT from Germany)
The poll results show that the phone-style flat grid of icons is the least popular alternative (only 4-5%) - not really surprising, but developers of DEs or user interfaces in general should take notice. Windows 8 is not the only one that went wrong here.
Personally, I prefer a simple hierarchical menu tree that MUST be browsable with the keyboard (unfortunately, the Xfce-Whisker menu fails here).
Sometimes I also use a search, but I prefer if the search box is not a prominent part of the menu.
52 • search app (by Ted in Minnesota on 2016-11-10 16:33:03 GMT from United States)
I search apps mainly by the drop-down menus, but sometimes I want to search by a Search App function if the linux distro I am using supports that. Unfortunately most linux apps I have run across search only for FILES, only a few search for APPS, and even fewer search for BOTH! I really want a linux OS that searches for BOTH!! (Big Hint to OS Developers out there...)
53 • #40 (by figosdev on 2016-11-10 20:19:52 GMT from United States)
@40 "It's strange how devs name things like they're still under DOS file name limits."
not too strange-- whether this is about typing, tab-completion, searching, reading icons, or listing files in a long view, there is a law of diminishing returns on the advantage of filename length.
the sense of limitation never was from dos; dos simply had a very notable limit; when it was removed, only some people felt "this sort of rambling filename that is mostly not more descriptive or helpful.word" is a better naming convention. opinions differ of course; i would rather use ls than listfiles (but an alias would be welcome.)
54 • Omg what a bad journalism (by Ljenux on 2016-11-10 23:35:33 GMT from Croatia)
did you read freebsd 11 release notes? they admit that amd graphic cards are not working properly. thats why you had problems, but not in virtual mode. But you have to read a little before you make conclusions. What a bad journalism
55 • FreeBSD (by Jesse on 2016-11-10 23:44:59 GMT from Canada)
>> "did you read freebsd 11 release notes?"
>> " they admit that amd graphic cards are not working properly. thats why you had problems"
I know. That's why I covered it in the review.
>> "But you have to read a little before you make conclusions."
You seem to be under the impression I was surprised or disappointed by FreeBSD not working with my video card. But I'm not sure why. The fact is I have an AMD video card and I test all the operating systems I review on my equipment to confirm it works (or doesn't work). To my mind, that is what reviewers are supposed to do, test, verify and report on their experiences. Would you have preferred I had read that FreeBSD doesn't work with some video cards and just not bothered to test it? That would seem pretty irresponsible to me.
56 • Gimme an Apps Folder Or Else (by Arch Watcher 402563 on 2016-11-11 02:20:10 GMT from United States)
@53 Hence I used the word "like," not the word "because." Programmers adopt all sorts of weird conventions for all sorts of weird reasons. Usually they're ridiculous when you look into them. Current "dev 133t-5p33k" names should be the aliased ones.
English names in /usr/bin (er, /user/binaries?) would be simpler than DW surveys on magick wizardz to give 133t-5p33k a human interface. Suppose I just open /usr/binaries and see pretty icons with full titles. You know, like MacOS "Apps" folder...
57 • @37; @38; @39; Linux in the computing world (by Greg Zeng on 2016-11-11 04:11:54 GMT from Australia)
Distrowatch afaik, has specialized on most open-source operating systems which are based on a Linux and BSD operating systems.
The computer world has tiny, medium and big computers. Linux is dominant in all of these, EXCEPT the Desktop computers (medium). The Desktop is dominated by anti-open-source systems: 1) Windows, & 2) Apple. Linux is less than two (2) per cent of Desktop computing. Distrowatch, its readers and advertisers would like this to be more than 2%.
There are several main ways to overcome Linux's supposed faults. In pure Engineering code, Linux-based systems are better than the two closed-source, secretive competitors, as shown by my comment here @33.
In mass-marketing terms, Linux fails, because Linux coders do not understand open-markets. As "conservatives" like Apple Microsoft & the 2017 President of the Free World, factoids work.
Promises & secrecy defeats everything sensible & rational. Including Linux.
Not all Linux-based operating systems are open-source, particularly some of the Android-based ones. Here in the comments, we need to declare Linux's limits openly, as good examples of why the two commercial competitors (& their supporters) are wrong.
58 • Linux malware prevention (e.g. "Dirty Cow") (by Greg Zeng on 2016-11-11 04:13:06 GMT from Australia)
Linux kernel is always being patched every day, by several upstream authorities. Most people have very simple ideas about Linux. Wikipedia provides only downstream, low-hanging "gossip" about Linux. It rejects true expertise & writers like myself, unless heavily url-referenced.
The Linux kernel is maintained by several authorities. Best known maybe the Linux Foundation. It is heavily funded, because of their commercial worth to the profit sectors: NEC, ORACLE, Qualcomm, Samsung, CITRIX, EBAY, Fujitsu, HP, IBM, Intel, Qualcomm ($500k+ yearly), etc. [Wikipedia].
Upstream to the work of the code work of the Linux Foundation are the kernel innovators: Redhat, IBM, Ubuntu, Microsoft, etc. These companies innovate new Linux kernels privately [canary testing, 34'07"] before injection into the non-profit kernel [Linux Action Show, #440]. Ubuntu [$150 p.a., 4 nodes; 39'50"], Red Hat/Oracle [$1300+$2300/node, 40'25"], openSUSE [$1500/node/yr, 41'06"].
Playing catch-up is the open-source version of the Linux Kernel, version 4.9. It will finally allow open access to live-patching, to change kernel running code, long after the commercial users of Linux.
59 • @58 (by Lennie on 2016-11-11 18:13:47 GMT from Canada)
What you are actually saying is that the Linux kernel is done (maintained) for the needs of private companies rather than for us. In other words, Linux kernel is a pretty good product to make living from. If not for these very rich private companies, Linux kernel would not have survived.
Not much of a difference from proprietary kernels, right?
60 • Together we all profit more ... (by Kragle on 2016-11-11 23:51:30 GMT from United States)
Is (business involvement in) Linux, an Operating System 'kernel', a rare example of businesses understanding the benefit of cooperation and overcoming their customary paranoia?
This concept is unpopular in "western" cultures, but common in "eastern" communities, right? Perhaps due to a different perspective on short-term gains?
Of course, it's really not limited to benefiting only private business interests, is it?
61 • BSD & Linux (by M.Z. on 2016-11-12 01:16:28 GMT from United States)
I tend to agree with the reviewer's comment, verification of hardware support is fundamental to and good Distro review. I also tend to find that BSDs do poorly on the desktop due to hardware support, which is supported by the review. It's a great firewall for me & it streams more data than you can shake a stick at from Netflix, but BSDs are every bit as weak in hardware support as the review indicates & it deserves to be mentioned how this was verified on the review's hardware.
Regardless of how the Linux kernel is developed you the user have full rights over any copy of it you receive. That's part of why big commercial Distros like Red Hat Enterprise Linux tend to have a free version for the community like CentOS. If a free copy doesn't exist someone will come along & make one, so Red Hat may as well give some support to CentOS. This is a sign of the big & fundamental differences that you don't seem to grasp. It's okay of Red Hat makes big money of paid support, because you still have equal access & Red Hat R&D benefits the free community & hobbyists in addition to benefiting Red Hat because of the way the GPL license works.
62 • @61 (by Lennie on 2016-11-12 09:09:51 GMT from Canada)
When' someone pays, he tells you how to spend the money. Even if you work in the R&D dept, you still have to do as the Board had planned. Companies are there to make profits, not to throw money away. Even consortium of different companies have Board, which decides how much & for what.
63 • GPL goodness (by M.Z. on 2016-11-12 15:35:38 GMT from United States)
Yes, ...and? I don't really see the complaint. Red Hat gets the code they need to sell more RHEL to business, & you can use a copy of the code in Fedora or CentOS. Now if you want code that does exactly what you want perhaps you should donate to a project working on that specific type of thing, be it a community project to improve Linux on the desktop or LibreOffice. Of course if the community project wants to do something similar to Red Hat they are free to use & modify any GPL code that Red Hat creates & the reverse is also true so long as everyone respects the GPL & keeps the code open. The point of Open Source licenses like the GPL isn't to make Red Hat waste their time & money on the wants of every random Linux user, its meant to keep the code open so anyone can use, modify, & redistribute the code as they see fit. That way Mint, Mageia, PCLinuxOS etc. can benefit every bit as much from the work of Red Hat as Fedora users, who can also get Mint's Cinnamon Desktop.
Why don't you see that you are gaining a lot in this Open Source development process. Project take code & modify as they see fit. PCLinuxOS uses the RPM package format from Red Hat but not Systemd, while all Linux based projects rely heavily on the kernel work done by Red Hat. Debian based projects use the kernel, but keep their own software management systems via .deb & APT, but despite those differences RPM based Mageis & Debian based Mint use the same basic USB writing software.
All these loosely related projects can share common code at will & you are free to benefit from their work & use modified versions of their code to do whatever you want with Open GPL software. The point is that they all -can- benefit from using, reusing & modifying common open code, not that they all -must- give some benefit to others by doing work unrelated to their goals. They way it exists now not only benefits everyone using GPL software, but it makes rational sense as well. Again feel free to donate to some Open project that aligns with you goals more closely & if part of that project uses code from Red Hat or ends up in something I'm using then we'll all benefit from other people's freely given GPL code. Not only is that totally different from how closed software works, but its a big win for everyone involved.
64 • @63 (by Lennie on 2016-11-12 17:45:37 GMT from Canada)
>>Yes, ...and? I don't really see the complaint<<
What complaint? It was a statement. Company pays, company tells you what to do. ..or else...
65 • no work no pay is axiomatic (by M.Z. on 2016-11-12 18:48:26 GMT from United States)
I have full rights over every copy of Linux I use, that's what the difference was always supposed to be. Personally I rely on others to turn those rights into final products, but if I could code & had a job at Red Hat I would have enough common sense to realize jobs come with obligations that must be meet to earn pay. That's just axiomatic, not insightful or interesting. Also some companies like Google have things like 20% time in which you can spend a day a week creating new software that you care about, so things are quite different depending on where you work. The important part is that jobs in Open Source contribute to a community of open projects & can be used by anyone to try to create some new & innovative derivative work. Your myopic sentiments miss the big picture of all the good possibilities being opened up with the GPL.
66 • @65 (by Lennie on 2016-11-12 19:23:09 GMT from Canada)
Go read #58 and then comment.
Funding is another word for payment. If you don't keep to guidelines, the funding stops. You and I are just a miniscule amount of users in the world, who get some Linux kernel based distro, but the companies that put money into 'development' of it earns millions of $s. If there is no profit, no tax paying company would put money in any project.
67 • the difference (by M.Z. on 2016-11-12 21:37:47 GMT from United States)
I don't really care about comment #58 or what it's trying to get at. I'm commenting on this:
#59 "... Not much of a difference from proprietary kernels, right?"
We know that there are big for profit companies doing a lot of the heavy lifting, but I'm pointing out there is another side to Linux that does indeed make it very different. The thing about open source is what other can do with the products after they are released & the nature of users & communities that form around open projects. There is also still a fair amount of work being done on the Linux kernel from people who are apparently unaffiliated with any company. In fact last time I checked I thought that unaffiliated group was bigger than any one company working on Linux, but regardless there is a fundamentally different dynamic at work in Linux. There are lots of companies with lots of different reasons to contribute to Linux, and they are all willing to work cooperatively with the wider community in creating something that is often given away freely. What you are talking about certainly exists in Linux, but the fact that there is more to it than simple profit of one company is core to what Linux is & what GPL software was intended to be from the time the license was written.
68 • @67 (by Lennie on 2016-11-12 21:51:07 GMT from Canada)
Linux Foundation cannot exist without money, right? And, we the "home users" don't fund it to exist, right? But, a group of profit-earning companies fund it, right? Have you seen a company that won't work for profit?
Linux kernel is mostly developed for the use of those companies that make profit out of it. If no such profit-earning companies won't be there to fund the development, the Linux kernel would die just like many Linux distros. Without money, no development would last long. That way, Linux kernel development has the same attributes of a proprietary kernel. No money - no development.
Loose collection of free developers won't last long. You need money buy bread.
69 • Opinion Poll brouse vs search (by slick on 2016-11-13 01:38:15 GMT from United States)
When it comes to apps would be most logical to keep the number to the minimum and just those you actually use, narrowing the need for a search. So, yes the menu is often used.
However use tiling wm's along with openbox, and keyboard shortcuts are essential.
Notice a little bit of discussing regarding opensource versus Windows or funded development of OS's and or distributions. Same also with programs and apps. Would say that contributions or donations to opensource maybe a lot more than people think, not only individual users but corporate and government funds as well. Fact is an alternate must always be there for competition, without that then there would be a monopoly and stagnation.
Use Linux for one reason, the desire not to be exploited. Windows 10 is nothing more from start to finish a large Trojan to spy and exploit every aspect of the user for profit and control.
Knowing this, when any distribution starts collaborating with Microsoft, I bail out from it and look and learn something else. Right now it is freeBSD.
70 • Just Curious (by sasdthoh on 2016-11-13 14:44:51 GMT from United States)
I was just wondering what has happened to Warren Woodford, the creator of Mepis Linux. I made a few Internet inquiries to find out general information but did not find much in the way of current information.
There were a few references to past interviews and work related listings but nothing more. Does anyone have any general info; how is he doing; what are his current interests, etc.?
71 • open development models (by M.Z. on 2016-11-13 15:27:00 GMT from United States)
"...when any distribution starts collaborating with Microsoft, I bail out from it and look and learn something else. Right now it is freeBSD."
It's certainly true that some companies (like SCO Group) have tried to assert some big rights over Linux & tried to gain some form of control over the project or at least big rights to profits, none have ever been effective in taking control. This is in part because the GPL license was designed to protect users rights over the software & it makes anyone who distributes Linux or other GPL software abide by the license & allow users equal rights to the software or else lose the right to distribute the software. This is why I could generally care less who in the Linux world works with MS, because if they start trying to take control & assert special rights they automatically lose all the control they sought.
Under that sort of rule any company that is dependent on distributing GPL software would shoot themselves in the foot if they tried to take control away from users because someone would sue them for violating the GPL & they couldn't sell their product. It's another part of the dynamic of the Linux community that sets it apart from just being typical software created by & for big business, although some don't seem to be able to acknowledge this fact. It's true that companies like IBM & Red Hat are vital to the health of Linux, but the relationship that they have with the software they create & the users they give the software to is fundamentally different. These companies have to give us the users & the rest of the community rights over the software if they want to keep distributing it.
I do like BSD & there is a lot about it that great, even if support for a desktop on my hardware is not. That being said the different dynamic between software companies & the community under the GPL is something that makes Linux seem like the better model to me. I know that someone can't take my favorite Linux distro & turn it into the next closed source Mac computer, which is what Apple did with FreeBSD. Of course the original BSD licensed code is still around & still free, but Apple has no obligation to give anything back to the community after doing whatever they want with BSD. Obviously BSD creators & supporters don't care, but something about that rubs me the wrong way & makes me prefer Linux & the GPL. I feel like anything I do to support Linux will stay within the open source community to a degree that it it wouldn't if I gave that support to BSD. I still like both projects & use both all the time with my pfSense/BSD firewall & various desktop Linux distros & Android, but I prefer Linux.
72 • DW Tips (by Dave Postles on 2016-11-13 16:59:47 GMT from United Kingdom)
I've sent $10; hope you receive more. DW always an informative read, even for the less technically-proficient like me.
73 • MEPIS (by M.Z. on 2016-11-13 20:41:14 GMT from United States)
I don't know about that one, but I have wondered why MEPIS went dormant. There obviously hasn't been any activity on their website in a couple of years, but the question is why. I poked around a little not that long ago but couldn't find much on what happened besides this mention that MEPIS is on indefinite hold & there is now an alternative with XFCE as the DE:
Number of Comments: 73
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
|• Issue 819 (2019-06-17): OS108 and Venom, renaming multiple files, checking live USB integrity, working with Fedora's Modularity, Ubuntu replacing Chromium package with snap|
|• Issue 818 (2019-06-10): openSUSE 15.1, improving boot times, FreeBSD's status report, DragonFly BSD reduces install media size|
|• Issue 817 (2019-06-03): Manjaro 18.0.4, Ubuntu Security Podcast, new Linux laptops from Dell and System76, Entroware Apollo|
|• Issue 816 (2019-05-27): Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0, creating firewall rules, Antergos shuts down, Matthew Miller answers questions about Fedora|
|• Issue 815 (2019-05-20): Sabayon 19.03, Clear Linux's developer features, Red Hat explains MDS flaws, an overview of mobile distro options|
|• Issue 814 (2019-05-13): Fedora 30, distributions publish Firefox fixes, CentOS publishes roadmap to 8.0, Debian plans to use Wayland by default|
|• Issue 813 (2019-05-06): ROSA R11, MX seeks help with systemd-shim, FreeBSD tests unified package management, interview with Gael Duval|
|• Issue 812 (2019-04-29): Ubuntu MATE 19.04, setting up a SOCKS web proxy, Scientific Linux discontinued, Red Hat takes over Java LTS support|
|• Issue 811 (2019-04-22): Alpine 3.9.2, rsync examples, Ubuntu working on ZFS support, Debian elects new Project Leader, Obarun releases S6 tools|
|• Issue 810 (2019-04-15): SolydXK 201902, Bedrock Linux 0.7.2, Fedora phasing out Python 2, NetBSD gets virtual machine monitor|
|• Issue 809 (2019-04-08): PCLinuxOS 2019.02, installing Falkon and problems with portable packages, Mint offers daily build previews, Ubuntu speeds up Snap packages|
|• Issue 808 (2019-04-01): Solus 4.0, security benefits and drawbacks to using a live distro, Gentoo gets GNOME ports working without systemd, Redox OS update|
|• Issue 807 (2019-03-25): Pardus 17.5, finding out which user changed a file, new Budgie features, a tool for browsing FreeBSD's sysctl values|
|• Issue 806 (2019-03-18): Kubuntu vs KDE neon, Nitrux's znx, notes on Debian's election, SUSE becomes an independent entity|
|• Issue 805 (2019-03-11): EasyOS 1.0, managing background services, Devuan team debates machine ID file, Ubuntu Studio works to remain an Ubuntu Community Edition|
|• Issue 804 (2019-03-04): Condres OS 19.02, securely erasing hard drives, new UBports devices coming in 2019, Devuan to host first conference|
|• Issue 803 (2019-02-25): Septor 2019, preventing windows from stealing focus, NetBSD and Nitrux experiment with virtual machines, pfSense upgrading to FreeBSD 12 base|
|• Issue 802 (2019-02-18): Slontoo 18.07.1, NetBSD tests newer compiler, Fedora packaging Deepin desktop, changes in Ubuntu Studio|
|• Issue 801 (2019-02-11): Project Trident 18.12, the meaning of status symbols in top, FreeBSD Foundation lists ongoing projects, Plasma Mobile team answers questions|
|• Issue 800 (2019-02-04): FreeNAS 11.2, using Ubuntu Studio software as an add-on, Nitrux developing znx, matching operating systems to file systems|
|• Issue 799 (2019-01-28): KaOS 2018.12, Linux Basics For Hackers, Debian 10 enters freeze, Ubuntu publishes new version for IoT devices|
|• Issue 798 (2019-01-21): Sculpt OS 18.09, picking a location for swap space, Solus team plans ahead, Fedora trying to get a better user count|
|• Issue 797 (2019-01-14): Reborn OS 2018.11.28, TinyPaw-Linux 1.3, dealing with processes which make the desktop unresponsive, Debian testing Secure Boot support|
|• Issue 796 (2019-01-07): FreeBSD 12.0, Peppermint releases ISO update, picking the best distro of 2018, roundtable interview with Debian, Fedora and elementary developers|
|• Issue 795 (2018-12-24): Running a Pinebook, interview with Bedrock founder, Alpine being ported to RISC-V, Librem 5 dev-kits shipped|
|• Issue 794 (2018-12-17): Void 20181111, avoiding software bloat, improvements to HAMMER2, getting application overview in GNOME Shell|
|• Issue 793 (2018-12-10): openSUSE Tumbleweed, finding non-free packages, Debian migrates to usrmerge, Hyperbola gets FSF approval|
|• Issue 792 (2018-1203): GhostBSD 18.10, when to use swap space, DragonFly BSD's wireless support, Fedora planning to pause development schedule|
|• Issue 791 (2018-11-26): Haiku R1 Beta1, default passwords on live media, Slax and Kodachi update their media, dual booting DragonFly BSD on EFI|
|• Issue 790 (2018-11-19): NetBSD 8.0, Bash tips and short-cuts, Fedora's networking benchmarked with FreeBSD, Ubuntu 18.04 to get ten years of support|
|• Issue 789 (2018-11-12): Fedora 29 Workstation and Silverblue, Haiku recovering from server outage, Fedora turns 15, Debian publishes updated media|
|• Issue 788 (2018-11-05): Clu Linux Live 6.0, examining RAM consumpion, finding support for older CPUs, more Steam support for running Windows games on Linux, update from Solus team|
|• Issue 787 (2018-10-29): Lubuntu 18.10, limiting application access to specific users, Haiku hardware compatibility list, IBM purchasing Red Hat|
|• Issue 786 (2018-10-22): elementary OS 5.0, why init keeps running, DragonFly BSD enables virtual machine memory resizing, KDE neon plans to drop older base|
|• Issue 785 (2018-10-15): Reborn OS 2018.09, Nitrux 1.0.15, swapping hard drives between computers, feren OS tries KDE spin, power savings coming to Linux|
|• Issue 784 (2018-10-08): Hamara 2.1, improving manual pages, UBports gets VoIP app, Fedora testing power saving feature|
|• Issue 783 (2018-10-01): Quirky 8.6, setting up dual booting with Ubuntu and FreeBSD, Lubuntu switching to LXQt, Mint works on performance improvements|
|• Issue 782 (2018-09-24): Bodhi Linux 5.0.0, Elive 3.0.0, Solus publishes ISO refresh, UBports invites feedback, Linux Torvalds plans temporary vacation|
|• Issue 781 (2018-09-17): Linux Mint 3 "Debian Edition", file systems for SSDs, MX makes installing Flatpaks easier, Arch team answers questions, Mageia reaches EOL|
|• Issue 780 (2018-09-10): Netrunner 2018.08 Rolling, Fedora improves language support, how to customize Kali Linux, finding the right video drivers|
|• Issue 779 (2018-09-03): Redcore 1806, keeping ISO downloads safe from tampering, Lubuntu makes Calamares more flexible, Ubuntu improves GNOME performance|
|• Issue 778 (2018-08-27): GuixSD 0.15.0, ReactOS 0.4.9, Steam supports Windows games on Linux, Haiku plans for beta, merging disk partitions|
|• Issue 777 (2018-08-20): YunoHost 18.104.22.168, limiting process resource usage, converting file systems on Fedora, Debian turns 25, Lubuntu migrating to Wayland|
|• Issue 776 (2018-08-13): NomadBSD 1.1, Maximum storage limits on Linux, openSUSE extends life for 42.3, updates to the Librem 5 phone interface|
|• Issue 775 (2018-08-06): Secure-K OS 18.5, Linux is about choice, Korora tests community spin, elementary OS hires developer, ReactOS boots on Btrfs|
|• Issue 774 (2018-07-30): Ubuntu MATE & Ubuntu Budgie 18.04, upgrading software from source, Lubuntu shifts focus, NetBSD changes support policy|
|• Issue 773 (2018-07-23): Peppermint OS 9, types of security used by different projects, Mint reacts to bugs in core packages, Slackware turns 25|
|• Issue 772 (2018-07-16): Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre 0.2.4, UBports running desktop applications, OpenBSD auto-joins wi-fi networks, boot environments and zedenv|
|• Issue 771 (2018-07-09): Linux Lite 4.0, checking CPUs for bugs, configuring GRUB, Mint upgrade instructions, SUSE acquired by EQT|
|• Issue 770 (2018-07-02): Linux Mint 19, Solus polishes desktop experience, MintBox Mini 2, changes to Fedora's installer|
|• Issue 769 (2018-06-25): BunsenLabs Helium, counting Ubuntu users, UBports upgrading to 16.04, Fedora CoreOS, FreeBSD turns 25|
|• Issue 768 (2018-06-18): Devuan 2.0.0, using pkgsrc to manage software, the NOVA filesystem, OpenBSD handles successful cron output|
|• Full list of all issues|
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the Star Lite, Star LabTop and more. Available with a choice of Ubuntu or Linux Mint pre-installed with many more distributions supported. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|Random Distribution |
UserLinux was a GNU/Linux distribution based from Debian, but streamlined to a smaller set of default applications. The UserLinux variants (server, desktop, etc.) will be freely available in both source and ISO formats. Application specifics are being worked out right now. The desktop environment will be GNOME featuring OpenOffice.org for word processing. The server configuration will include Apache and Postfix. UserLinux will be complemented by a network of service providers offering certification, support, and professional services.