DistroWatch Weekly |
Tip Jar |
If you've enjoyed this week's issue of DistroWatch Weekly, please consider sending us a tip. (Tips this week: 0, value: US$0.00) |
|
|
|
bc1qxes3k2wq3uqzr074tkwwjmwfe63z70gwzfu4lx lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhxarpw3jkc7tzw4ex6cfexyfua2nr 86fA3qPTeQtNb2k1vLwEQaAp3XxkvvvXt69gSG5LGunXXikK9koPWZaRQgfFPBPWhMgXjPjccy9LA9xRFchPWQAnPvxh5Le paypal.me/distrowatchweekly • patreon.com/distrowatch |
|
Extended Lifecycle Support by TuxCare |
|
Reader Comments • Jump to last comment |
1 • LXQt for Manjaro OpenRC (by Arch Watcher 402563 on 2016-01-11 00:33:32 GMT from North America)
The main dev on Manjaro OpenRC, artoo, makes LXQt desktop on that platform. There's also a new Lumina desktop from the BSD folks, available in some Linux repos. Lumina for now uses Fluxbox but plans its own window manager. It's even more alpha than LXQt so not for the faint of heart.
PS For Kragle #59 last week. Casually dismissive hardly. I used Debian for years. Did you google me as suggested. I would say in partial agreement with you that incremental regular updates (typical of Arch) are more stable than mass updates (typical of Debian). The guy was on Ubuntu. Google my statements on Ubuntu.
FUD on updates is not about updates but packaging methodologies and development workflows. Distros don't want to admit design problems so they blame updating itself as something inherently risky, a ridiculous proposition, as most updates are bug fixes by orders of magnitude. Unstable updates indicate poor distro design.
2 • Survey (by GuntherT on 2016-01-11 00:45:42 GMT from North America)
Although I have never created my own spin/distro/lfs OS, I must admit I've thought about it.
The comment about there being more distros than users was funny.
3 • Creating my own distro (by Crystal the Glaceon on 2016-01-11 01:46:17 GMT from North America)
I actually did start an Arch-Based distro, but it never got very far. I was aiming for a user-friendly Arch-Based distro, but I found Manjaro and ended up ending my project.
4 • Survey (by Sam on 2016-01-11 02:54:10 GMT from South America)
I created multiple SuseStudio appliances ("spins") based on openSUSE Leap 42.1, and I called it GeckoLinux. I did this to offer the sort of out-of-the-box experience that I personally require, and which I have found to be best for the many new Linux users that I support. My spin focuses on things like complete, un-crippled multimedia support out of the box, much better font rendering, sane package selections with minimal user of patterns so that software doesn't get re-installed if the user removes it, no glut of automatically installed packages during the first use of the package manager after the installation, and a separate spin optimized for each one of the major desktop environments. I currently have live installable ISO images for Cinnamon, XFCE, Plasma 5, Gnome, Mate, Budgie, and LXQt, in addition to a "barebones" edition for customizers. The best part of the whole thing is that it continues to be 100% openSUSE (with Packman third party packages), so even if I get hit by a bus, users who have installed my spin won't miss a beat.
5 • LXQt / Qt lightweight? (by Will B on 2016-01-11 03:44:55 GMT from North America)
I have to say my opinion differs about Qt-based desktop environments being 'lightweight'. I am a developer who uses, and for the most part, enjoys the Qt toolkit, but it's certainly not lighter weight than, say, Gtk2 or FLTK.
I have written a standalone application menu with both Gtk2/3 as well as Qt, and the Qt app *always* uses more resources. I am now working on the same standalone menu using the FLTK toolkit, so that ought to be very lightweight compared to Gtk and Qt. All menu and other projects can be viewed at my blog by clicking my name above.
I did a comparison once of a program that just pops up a simple, blank window in the top toolkits, and it was something like this (from memory, might differ from your experience):
• Pure X11 - 3 MB • FLTK - 5 MB • Gtk2 - 12 MB • Gtk3 - 24 MB • Qt 5 - 50 MB • Java - 72 MB (I know, not so much a toolkit)
6 • Secure Comm - Get Packaging, Distros (by Arch Watcher 402563 on 2016-01-11 06:02:35 GMT from North America)
Web pages not linked widely enough, so for general distribution:
http://youbroketheinternet.org/secure-email http://secushare.org/comparison https://www.eff.org/secure-messaging-scorecard
7 • Respins (by hobbitland on 2016-01-11 06:17:16 GMT from Europe)
I used to respin Ubuntu but now I create respins of Debian.
The reason to recreate respins to to fix bugs and annoyances and missing stuff. Having it all on a live USB stick is nice. Less work when installing on multiple machines.
8 • Issues. (by IkeyDoherty on 2016-01-11 07:58:30 GMT from Europe)
I find it interesting you link to articles about our future, yet failed to read them to see how to resolve the boot issues.
As for eopkg it is already incompatible with pisi and has been for the longest time. It's optimised for the _developer_ experience: https://github.com/solus-project/package-management
As for sluggish, well, you're running it in a VM :) Budgie uses libmutter which requires GPU acceleration. In reality yes we could potentially do some optimisation for virtualisation here, but at the expense of watering down the experience for users on real machines. So I opted for the lesser of two evils.
I can see just by looking at your screenshots you've not performed any updates, a number of issues have already been resolved, please do so :) (GIMP has already been addressed, for example.)
I fail to see why you got excited about a package manager from our website, we've repeatedly stressed in all of our communications that the package manager is the single most unimportant factor. All package managers just deal entirely with glorified tarballs.
We make a point in *not* going on about the package manager, because its only relevant to the developer experience.
As for the other issues, please report them on the bug tracker so that they may be resolved and benefit everyone, it's hard for us to pick up on issues if they're only on blogs and such :)
9 • Rosa sister worked good for me (by dbrion on 2016-01-11 08:54:14 GMT from Europe)
Mageia5 was -and keeps being- very satisfactory with LXDe, at least for me. I chose LXDE for three reasons: (a) my "net" "books" are old (1 G RAM) (b) I do not like new, "phone" like (or W10 like) DEs (c) it is RPis DE
The only trouble I found with playing with Mageia5 (I discovered opencv, played with microcontrollers) was with qtextserial I cannot compile and link simple programs using this library, and the fact that their Arduino packaging is broken -cannot cross compile (Fedora's is not, neither is rapsbian). This can be fixed by downloading the official Arduino's tar.gz ....
10 • DIstrowatch Weekly (by Andy Bear on 2016-01-11 09:30:59 GMT from Europe)
@Arch Watcher Completely agreed! I also see small incremental updates to individual packages as being more stable than batch updates. That's just the nature of things - more variables interconnected = higher probability to break something. For instance, it pains me sometimes how Ubuntu breaks config files between releases.
# dbrion If you have 1GB of RAM, Mageia 5 is not a very good choice. Try Lubuntu, Arch Linux or something similarly lightweight if you don't like tablet/smartphone interfaces :).
Jesse, why did you run FreeBSD-CURRENT on a Pi and then complained it doesn't work 100% well? As you yourself admitted, it's a developer version, not meant for end-user testing at all (and I mean it...). I would recommend giving -STABLE a try. I'm using it on a desktop and it hardly has issues :).
11 • My own spin (by Mark B on 2016-01-11 10:13:19 GMT from Europe)
I had the idea of making a custom version of Linux Mint especially for writers of all kinds. I spent a long time getting it just so and I was proud of it. The idea was to make it easy for writers to carry their writing environment around with them on a DVD or, better still a USB stick. It worked a treat and I really believed in it. I would have given it away to anyone who could have found it useful. I sounded out a couple of tech journalists in the UK and US, and they were very supportive of the concept as potential users. I hit a snag when I talked to people on the Mint forums who explained I needed to remove the Mint artwork for copyright reasons. Although I do understand that, to some degree, it does seem at odds with the spirit of free software. I looked at other Ubuntu/Debian-based distros but had similar issues. I simply don't know enough about the guts of Linux to be able to strip out the artwork and replace it with some original stuff. So, rather than save other writers tons of time and pain I am the sole user of my creation. I am really disappointed it panned out that way. I'd love some help to turn out a well-polished distro' but I cannot really be a distro' maintainer. Pity really, I think it would be enormously useful to people.
12 • @Andy Bear (by dbrion on 2016-01-11 10:21:08 GMT from Europe)
" Try Lubuntu, Arch Linux " I had tried Lubuntu on other PCs -very old- , and their internal disk formatting was slow, the status of the installation was kept hidden. I do not know whether Arch and LUBU can install -i.e : the package manager works, as if it was a rotating disk; not in the DVD emulation mode- on USB sticks (Mageia and Fedora do : one just has to remove swap partitiion ... and be patient). Other issue with Arch is that I am not familiar with their package manager (I am happy with rapsbian *debs, FC and Mageia *rpms and upstreams *tar.gz : I never was in a package_managers-hopping mode)
Maybe Mageia is not the best choice (but I need to read some pdf, (cross) compile, and that 's all) but I donot think memory ressources linked with DE depend on the distribution (do Arch /LUBU offer special patches/optimisation Mageia/Fedora do not offer for LXDE ? How much (1%, 10% 50%?) RAM can gained, if this is true?). Even if it is not optimal, it is satisfying **for me and for friends** -needed to watch/catch youtube video, and that was almost all- who had an old 2 G RAM laptop.
13 • @ 5 (by kc1di on 2016-01-11 10:54:34 GMT from North America)
Hi Wil B, nice to see another Christian and Ham on here :)
I've been down the same road even lxde use more of my system resources than I'd Like. Try a couple of LXQT installs but found it not quite up to stuff yet , may have to give it another try. I used Fluxbox for quite awhile. but haven't seen much about it lately. in any event 73, from another ham.
14 • The case for a LXDE version of Linux`Mint (by Nemrut on 2016-01-11 11:32:30 GMT from North America)
I truly love Linux Mint. I hope devs would consider releasing a LXDE variant of it. I have, over the years, installed Mint's Xfce version on countless machines for friends and neighbors and i myself use it too. Most of those folks (myself included) never need to use majority of preloaded software (such as LibreOffice, Gimp, etc). Therefore i think a bloatware-free, super lite LXDE version of Mint would attract thousands and thousands more folks to join Linux Mint's OS revolution led by daring Clam, the great and his equally great comrades-in-coding .....!
15 • custom spin (by sam on 2016-01-11 12:10:29 GMT from Europe)
I needed to teach some software, so I created an ubuntu live cd, with the software, documentation and worksheets pre-installed. Was able to get every machine in the lab booted into it, so that the session could get straight to teaching, and the students could take the software home with them.
16 • FreeBSD and the Raspberry Pi (by Jesse on 2016-01-11 12:40:54 GMT from North America)
>> "Jesse, why did you run FreeBSD-CURRENT on a Pi and then complained it doesn't work 100% well? As you yourself admitted, it's a developer version, not meant for end-user testing at all (and I mean it...). I would recommend giving -STABLE a try. I'm using it on a desktop and it hardly has issues :)."
Two reasons: 1. I ran FreeBSD -Current about six months ago on the RPi2 and it worked fairly well, with a few rough edges. I was checking in to see how the port was progressing. As it turned out, it was regressing. 2. There is no FreeBSD -Stable release for the Raspberry Pi 2, just the RPi1. So it would be impossible for me to test the -Stable release on my equipment.
Also, I wasn't complaining about the status of the port, I was observing. I'm not bitter about it, just curious.
17 • Solus Review (by Jesse on 2016-01-11 12:48:03 GMT from North America)
@8: There are a few assumptions you made in your comment which are not correct.
>> "I find it interesting you link to articles about our future, yet failed to read them to see how to resolve the boot issues."
I read them, Solus still doesn't boot on that test machine.
>> "As for sluggish, well, you're running it in a VM :) Budgie uses libmutter which requires GPU acceleration. "
I'd like to point out using VirtualBox 3-D acceleration works for GNOME Shell and Unity. Why doesn't it work for Budgie?
>> "I can see just by looking at your screenshots you've not performed any updates, a number of issues have already been resolved, please do so"
This is completely incorrect, I installed all available updates prior to writing the review.
>> "We make a point in *not* going on about the package manager, because its only relevant to the developer experience."
The package manager got its own section of the release announcement and it is a unique fork. It would be weird if I ignored it.
18 • Solus Review (by vaithy on 2016-01-11 14:05:31 GMT from Asia)
Same problem with my installation attempt.. But I don't understand how did You able to boot it in to Desktop?.. After two failed attempt I went on to download Deepin 15 and happy!
19 • Fedora stability and Plasma 5 (by Stan on 2016-01-11 14:23:33 GMT from Europe)
It is interesting to read the blog post about Fedora, I was a fan of Fedora since Fedora Core 4 but their rapid releases leave very much to say. I don't think that they even have the time to squash 50% of the bug as I can judge from the comments of that post that they ignore everything expect GNOME 3.
What shock me very much was some other blog entry linked within in the comments about the stability of Plasma 5:
https://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2015/10/some-thoughts-on-the-quality-of-plasma-5/
I'll quote the most shocking part IMHO:
{" Another problem we noticed is that fixes we created doesn’t reach our users. This is mostly to how some distributions work with the exception of rolling release distributions. They create a “stable” and “feature frozen” product. If a major version number increases it’s not going to be updated. I just described the problem with outdated Qt, that’s part of the story. The update didn’t get into the distribution and thus fixes don’t reach our users.
Even more with frameworks we don’t provide bug fix releases and that creates “problems” for distributions. They don’t roll our the new frameworks, although they fix important issues. This is slowly improving, distributions need to get used to this process and also accept that their policy doesn’t apply. "}
This partially one of the reasons why I think Arch surpasses any other distro, I've seen myself ditching distros because they are practically stuck with bugs until next release.
20 • @17 (by IkeyDoherty on 2016-01-11 14:50:14 GMT from Europe)
> I read them, Solus still doesn't boot on that test machine.
We have IRC and forum support, would've been happy to help :) In fact you have my email address too, could've really streamlined it for you.
> I'd like to point out using VirtualBox 3-D acceleration works for GNOME Shell and Unity. Why doesn't it work for Budgie?
As I've said, we make a point in *not* optimising for virtualisation. Of all people you well know that virtualisation is not a true reflection of real hardware testing.
> This is completely incorrect, I installed all available updates prior to writing the review.
So this is the reason I actually replied again. Your screenshots clearly indicate you're using the older Budgie package. I know this because I maintain it in all repositories and write the code :) (The giveaway is actually your menu icon, I changed it in the 10.2.1 release.
> The package manager got its own section of the release announcement and it is a unique fork. It would be weird if I ignored it.
It's called being transparent. :)
21 • No own spin and other (by JoeA on 2016-01-11 14:50:59 GMT from North America)
I've never made my own spin, but have tried many distros with Xfce and customized them all to fit my liking.
My favorite parts of Distrowatch are Distrowatch Weekly and the Latest Reviews section. It seems like the Latest Reviews section is getting smaller. I like the internal reviews and those from other sources, even if they are from a grumpy old man! (smiley face)
22 • Solus review (by Jesse on 2016-01-11 14:55:43 GMT from North America)
>> "So this is the reason I actually replied again. Your screenshots clearly indicate you're using the older Budgie package. "
Yes, but I took the screen shot on the first day of my trial. I write the review at the _end_ of the week. The screen shot was taken before the updates were installed. Most of my trial took place after all updates were applied.
23 • @20 (by a on 2016-01-11 15:10:21 GMT from Europe)
"As I've said, we make a point in *not* optimising for virtualisation. Of all people you well know that virtualisation is not a true reflection of real hardware testing."
People try distros with VirtualBox and if they don’t work properly they will never install them on real hardware or recommend them.
24 • Opinion poll: I created a distro based on an existing one (by Alessandro di Roma on 2016-01-11 15:16:49 GMT from Europe)
I created a distro based on an existing one, namely I created modified versions of Xubuntu thru good old remastersys, and I distributed it to PCs in my house, and to some friend. I wonder if this can be called a distro. Today Xubuntu 15.10 is so polished I don't need to modify it anymore.
25 • @8; Ikey Doherty: (by dragonmouth on 2016-01-11 15:25:17 GMT from North America)
"All package managers just deal entirely with glorified tarballs." That is a very cavalier, user-unfriendly attitude that is giving Linux a bad name. It is HOW those package managers deal with the tarballs that is important to the end user. Not everybody has the expertise to be so dismissive of package managers. A newbie Linux user who is getting his feet wet with Ubuntu or Mint cannot be expected to maintain his system using 'dpkg' or even 'apt'. He needs to use Ubuntu Software Center, or better yet, Synaptic. So, despite your arrogant disregard for the end users, package managers DO matter.
26 • @25 (by IkeyDoherty on 2016-01-11 15:43:42 GMT from Europe)
What you term arrogance, I call experience.
I never took away from the user experience for one moment. Take a read through https://plus.google.com/u/0/+Solus-Project/posts/6FPLh4WJCkf for greater understanding on what I mean.
You'll notice Solus 2 will completely do away with the package manager for users, and it won't be unfriendly. It'll be a complete separation of OS and Apps, which is what users actually will *benefit* from. They can leave the nitty gritty details of the package manager to folks like me who are building the OS, where it's supposed to be used, as a build tool. Right now it's also a deployment tool, but 2.0 will change that.
I also won't be checking back here for responses, too much of a pain with the way the IDs alter based on the moderation queue, makes it difficult to track. So if you want to follow it up, by all means, please send an email and I'll get back to you after work.
27 • @14 - Mint LXDE (by Uncle Slacky on 2016-01-11 16:39:31 GMT from Europe)
Mazny years ago there was an LXDE spin for Mint. Nowadays your best bet is Peppermint OS, which uses LXDE but incorporates many Mint features. You might also like to try LXLE.
28 • My own Distro (by Nick on 2016-01-11 16:45:03 GMT from North America)
I have tried building my own distro by modding Linux From Scratch to meet my needs, but when I found Gentoo it did everything I wanted - the project ended at that point.
29 • Fedora Stability (by cannibal on 2016-01-11 16:59:28 GMT from North America)
I have used Fedora since F11 and have not had any problems with stability.
I use XFCE.
The only problem I can remember, is that a couple of releases ago, the "Places" menu plugin wouldn't work. A dnf update followed by a logout fixed that.
Fedora is the upstream for just about everything Linux-related; it is the Linux used by Linus, so yeah, it's probably going to have bugs sometime. It's also the quickest to roll out fixes. That's just the way it is.
30 • My own spin for January : Ubuntu Mutter :) (by Tran Older on 2016-01-11 17:49:02 GMT from Asia)
1. Install Ubuntu Mate 14.04 LTS 2. Install Mutter window manager to replace Marco window manager. 3. Install Nemo to replace Caja 4. Install Vivaldi to replace Firefox 5. Use Mate-Tweak to carry out all the replacements 6. Install Mbuntu themes and icons from www.noobslab.com. Install Vibrancy Colors- a bold, modern & beautiful "vibrant" icon theme also from noobslab.com 7. Install Plank. 8. Build the new ISO using PinguyBuilder. (The new ISO is 999MB to be exact :))
The final product is a great contender to Solus 1.0.
31 • LXDE version of Mint (by frodopogo on 2016-01-11 17:54:01 GMT from North America)
@11, Mark, I ran across a Czech writer's Linux once that was based on Lubuntu. It's a great idea. Perhaps you could just write instructions (the "recipe") for your version on a blog. You could have an uninstall script for Terminal for the things you'd want to uninstall, and an install script for the writer's tools you'd add. Then other writers could paste these into the Terminal of any distro using the Ubuntu software repository. Since they would be downloading the standard versions, you wouldn't need to worry about removing the branding.
@14, Nemrut, your enthusiasm for Mint is commendable. I'm just a Mint user, but I read most of the official announcements. It's a relatively small project for the amount of software they put out. On the Main Edition, they already have FOUR desktop editions. On the LMDE edition (based directly on Debian), they HAD the same four, but for the sake of maintaining focus, already spun off the Xfce and KDE desktops into a separate project which is now SolydXK. Since they already cut down on the number of desktops for the LMDE edition, I highly doubt they will add an LXDE edition anytime soon- because Mint is led by the greatly overworked Clem with assistance from his equally greatly overworked comrades-in-coding. ;^D
However, there IS an unofficial Mint LXDE put out by some German Mint users. The live edition runs in German, but when you install it, you can change the language to English or whatever you want. Go to the Mint page here, and click on "Mint Germany" under related websites. And Lubuntu is a good project too, and should give you 97% of what you want in an official version. Trisquel also has a lightweight LXDE version that fits on a CD.
32 • Spins and tweaks and all that (by albinard on 2016-01-11 18:25:20 GMT from North America)
I suspect that everyone who has been a Linux user for a while begins to create something resembling her/his own “spin”, however little it may differ from the base system originally installed. I tried my own first quasi-spin from a mini Ubuntu ISO after a few months' experience at Linux; it worked, but most importantly it was a learning experience. Six years later I'm still learning.
33 • Distro Spins & Bug (by Justin on 2016-01-11 18:39:14 GMT from North America)
I've tried making my own distro several times usually because I wanted to make something custom or small. I've played with Puppy, Slitaz, TinyCore, Debian, and LFS. It's surprising how complicated (time consuming) the process can be unless parts of it are automated (and even then, it doesn't always work as you want or it still takes hours). I guess it depends what you're trying to achieve. That ignores the complications mentioned above about artwork and making the source code available (all that GPL software requires you to do stuff when distributing).
The LFS website has a good page about considerations when you make your own distributions. Don't let it all discourage you from trying, though! Take it more as a reminder of all the time/effort people are donating to our desktops and consider giving back.
@Jesse: I noticed a bug in DW's search. It's not possible to search of distributions based on TinyCore. Also, when you go to a distribution that is based on it like Nanolinux, clicking on "Based on" just brings up a list of all distributions.
34 • Spins (by Peter on 2016-01-11 20:34:03 GMT from Europe)
I've made a few spins for private use (family and friends) using Remastersys and now Systemback, after fiddling around the configs I most liked and installing/uninstalling programs untill it seemed a capable but light Surfing/Office/Multimedia/Backup desktop. Nothing fancy, and almost always resembling what most users know better (yes....WinX themes).
I make spins for spanish Windows users in despair and/or in need of light systems on "old" PC's. Rescovering faulty systems or giving new life to crappy PC's is one of the best ways Linux can be presented to Win users.
35 • LXQt (by New User on 2016-01-11 22:29:08 GMT from Europe)
Which distro currently offers the best out-of-the-box LXQt experience?
36 • Survey (by BlueJay on 2016-01-11 22:42:44 GMT from North America)
I've toyed with SUSE Studio before and made a spin of my own for personal testing purposes. I might try it again in the future.
37 • @19 Release strategies (by David on 2016-01-11 22:53:51 GMT from North America)
What Martin needs to realize is that it's not the distros or how they work that's the problem, it's how some upstream developers work that is the problem. If you want bugfixes to get to the users, have stable branches that are maintained for a long time and get backported bugfixes. If distros won't even update those, then you can complain. Otherwise, yes, while your new shiny versions may fix bugs, they may also introduce regressions, mandate configuration changes, change workflows, or affect other software in undesirable ways, which most distros try to protect their users from having to deal with except when upgrading. Many upstreams already do maintain stable branches. Get on board!
38 • Debian, Ubuntu with LXDE desktop (by maroman on 2016-01-11 23:39:12 GMT from Europe)
@11, 14, 31 it makes no sense to invent what has already been invented. I suggest to try wattOS based either on Debian (oldstable) or Ubuntu. to go further, there is semplice based on Debian stable with so-called vera desktop,based on openbox.
39 • Distro/Respin (by Marti on 2016-01-12 01:45:46 GMT from North America)
I am convinced that the Remastersys Linux, based on Ubuntu 12.04 with the EDE desktop, was the finest I will ever use. RIP.
I will never be brave enough to do this, but, oh!, how I'd like to try!
http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/minimal
40 • I think you got these errors (by RJA on 2016-01-12 02:37:23 GMT from North America)
https://solus-project.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=911
Where it claims already mounted or busy.
41 • a few respins (by Demo Mateo on 2016-01-12 03:02:50 GMT from Oceania)
I have a custom spin of Fedora (several), CentOS6, CentOS7 and my current favourite Linux Mint. It's for personal use. I have been using Linux exclusively for work since 2001. My custom spins allow me to reinstall my machine with everything that I would need in under 30 minutes. My spin allows me to integrate with our Windows-centric environment without much issues at all.
42 • I think blankon linux offer more unique exp than solus (by wejick on 2016-01-12 04:50:28 GMT from Asia)
I discovered blankon linux offer more unique experience than solus in desktop Environtment point of view. It has tight integration with gnome ecosystem.
i took a peek here https://github.com/BlankOn They have rather ecosystem for desktop, from html5 api, and DE based on html5 on top gnome 3.
43 • Solus unable to connect via 3G modem (by gnomic on 2016-01-12 06:37:17 GMT from Oceania)
When I ran Solus in a live session I found it could not connect to the internet via a 3G modem and NetworkManager. It appears that the required usb_modeswitch software is not included. There may be other issues associated with this problem of a configuration nature but afaik the absence of usb_modeswitch means no connection with such a device.
The article linked below appears to provide a comprehensive summary of the requirements for a 3G modem connection.
http://www.draisberghof.de/usb_modeswitch/
44 • geckolinux downloads (by gnomic on 2016-01-12 07:33:33 GMT from Oceania)
It appears that in order to download these spins of SUSE one must login via such entities as Google or Novell or facebook, etc etc. Call me completely outdated but I don't use any of these. So it seems gecko is not for me. I did manage to d/l v2 of the initial release without any such requirements.
By the by a 3G modem connection didn't work with that release iirc. A brief look at the forum doesn't indicate that this problem has been resolved. Perhaps it has?
Other recent problems with 3G modems seen with Chapeau 23 version of Red Hat, and Sabayon. 3G access formerly worked with Sabayon I seem to recall. Common factor seems to be no usb_modeswitch. As to what is going on with Manjaro 15.09 KDE wrt 3G heaven only knows. But KDE networking has always seemed to exist in some alternate universe of its own.
45 • RE: The case for a Linux Mint's version with LXDE desktop manager (by Nemrut on 2016-01-12 08:29:24 GMT from North America)
@38 - maroman I appreciate your response but to me it's rather your response that does not make sense. The distros you had suggested (as an alternative to what i'm seeking) are not even remotely comparable to LinuxMint! Also, i wonder as to how am wanting "to invent what has already been invented" simply by requesting a distro with an additional desktop manager? I really wish you had taken your time to read and understood my comment before you had decided to respond @14 - frodopogo Thank you for your tips and info. Thank you friend. You sound all fine, but the fact that there's a large community of Linux Mint's fans coding their own LXDE desktop for Mint; strongly proves my point that there are myriad number of people out there seeking a lighter, faster and better version of Mint?? @27 - Uncle Slacky Thank you for the info.
46 • @45 (by dbrion on 2016-01-12 09:38:38 GMT from Europe)
" "to invent what has already been invented" simply by requesting a distro with an additional desktop manager?" Mandriva,in 2009 offered the choice of at least (did not test beyond that) 4 desktop managers at install. I bet Rosa did: Mageia5 does it (at install, you may choose between KDE, Gnome, LXDE and XFCE IIRC : I have LXDE) Fedora does it, too -but it may be complicated to install they offer .6 DE : KDE, Gnome, Mate, Cinnamion, LXDE, XFCE see https://spins.fedoraproject.org/fr/ I haave LXDE on FC 23...
If you like UBUlinux -same PM as Mint- , lubuntu offers LXDE.
" the fact that there's a large community of Linux Mint's fans coding their own LXDE desktop for Mint; strongly proves ".... they are unsuccessful coders. Maybe a matter of skills (then it would not be that nice to claim they are numerous)....
One does not need a faster, lighter and better version of Mint .... one needs fast and light -if these adjectives can be defined - versions supporting some +++functionalities++ .... unless Mint is a deity, with trancendant properties -and betting for some extra DE does not indicate that.
47 • Distro from code... (by Zork on 2016-01-12 10:36:04 GMT from Oceania)
Many of us have working, older hardware sitting around that is just gathering dust...
Perfect for a Linux From Scratch machine... Set a compile going... Go do something else... Repeat... See how good a system you can build...
Really good for understanding the "nuts and bolts" of Linux but I still prefer a Mainstream Distro for my day-to-day computing...
48 • distro spins (by alex.theoto on 2016-01-12 10:50:32 GMT from Europe)
I just use ArchLinux and I build my system the way Iike. Previously I used Debian stable netinstall.
49 • Creating your own distro (by slick on 2016-01-12 10:56:36 GMT from North America)
Debian live-build only way to go, which Debian is attempting to discard by haulting it's developement. Devuan forunately is pressing on with live-build and certainly the live-build devs will simply go the most progressive route.
Prefer the live-build for not only less complicated, but the fastest set of wheels to produce a distro, for the user too.
Just say "NO" to systemd, support Devuan and live-build.
My question is why so many dev's are bailing on Debian now and going elsewhere? No future with ubuntu either, never has been.
50 • Solus (by nightflier on 2016-01-12 12:00:32 GMT from North America)
I installed Solus on a couple computers and can confirm that testing in a virtual machine does not do it justice. On real hardware, it runs fast and looks good.
51 • @slick (by Andy Bear on 2016-01-12 12:39:07 GMT from Europe)
"My question is why so many dev's are bailing on Debian now and going elsewhere? No future with ubuntu either, never has been."
Because Debian devs decided to yield and put forth systemd starting from Debian 8 'Jessie'. One could argue systemd is against the UNIX philosophy, but Linux is not UNIX per se so the sanity of the decision is debatable :).
@Jessie Thanks for the response, I wasn't aware. The FreeBSD website for Raspberry Pi mentions that there is an .iso image for -STABLE and -CURRENT, but maybe it's not true, I don't know. Sorry if you felt offended by my previous comment! :)
52 • Raspberry Pi (by Jesse on 2016-01-12 13:23:39 GMT from North America)
@52: I think the confusion here stems from the fact that the Raspberry Pi and the Raspberry Pi 2 are different computers. FreeBSD 10 (Stable) runs on the original Raspberry Pi, but not on the Raspberry Pi 2. FreeBSD 11 (Current) does offer images for both the original RPi and the RPi2.
I was testing a RPi2 for which there are no FreeBSD Stable images. So the FreeBSD wiki is correct, they do have Stable images for the RPi, but that doesn't help those of us running RPi2 computers.
Here are the FreeBSD 10 images: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/arm/armv6/ISO-IMAGES/10.2/ And here are the 11 (Current) images: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/arm/armv6/ISO-IMAGES/11.0
53 • Create distro (by Scuttle on 2016-01-12 14:54:26 GMT from North America)
Over the years iv'e Knocked out a few Distros from base installs. (Usually due to wanting to change over 50% of many distro choices for me)..most never not ending up as the original plan... a bit like when you rebuild a Vehicle it never really gets finished.....
about 2 yrs back i started with Linux from scratch...which after an initial rush of blood to the head seems to have not furthered itself..and everytime i start on it i seem to have to change most things..
I have Gentoo and Arch running which are as good as i could ever hope for from any Distros and i have Manjaro which I had for 4yrs
I
54 • Raspberry Pi (by Andy Bear on 2016-01-12 16:32:48 GMT from Europe)
@Jessie
Many thanks, kind sir! I will download the 11-CURRENT FreeBSD image once I too become a proud owner of a RPi 2 :). Cheers!
55 • The case for a LXDE version of Linux Mint (by Nemrut on 2016-01-12 18:52:51 GMT from North America)
@46 - dbrion I enjoyed reading your response. But it appears you have totally misunderstood my position. You see, Frodopogo #31, had suggested i use a LinuxMint's LXDE version developed by some German fans of LinuxMint -- in response to my initial poster # 14. And instead of accepting Frodopogo's offer, i used his piece of suggestion to further prove my point that there's, probably, a popular demand at large for a LXDE version of Mint that some folks (like those Mint's fans in Germany) are going at length to code their own Mint with a LXDE desktop, however "unsuccessful" or amateurish. Moreover, I'm in total agreement with you regarding what you had stated in your #9 poster about LXDE. ------------------------------------------------------------------- CORRECTION: in my poster #45, i made a mistake. I should have referred Frodopogo as poster #31. I'd like to thank Jesse in advance if he can correct it when he gets a spare moment
56 • lxqt, pcmanfm-qt, libfm and gtk2 (by anonymous on 2016-01-12 20:47:30 GMT from North America)
Anyone seen anything on pcmanfm-qt finally replacing libfm? That's the one thing about that project I've always found odd. pcmanfm-qt depends on libfm which depends on gtk2. Kinda defeats the point of moving away from gtk2 when one of your main components still depends on it.
57 • Ubuntu spins (by John S on 2016-01-12 21:26:45 GMT from North America)
I've created many unique installs based on Ubuntu LTS, solely for learning and fun. My first build from scratch used RazorQt. The one I'm most proud of is my Ubuntu/Fluxbox/XFCE hybrid. Ironically I'm now using WattOS Microwatt with the i3 WM. I've modified it but it is still WattOS. Plus I'm typing this on the latest Bodhi Linux. So "other people's distros" are also satisfactory.
58 • Own spins (by Ostrolk on 2016-01-12 22:41:24 GMT from Europe)
I use my own spin, and have uploaded few Debian & Ubuntu based spins to sourceforge for others to use and enjoy.
59 • spins (by anticapitalista on 2016-01-12 23:00:18 GMT from Europe)
Nice to see so many posters saying they have created their own respin or at least have thought about it. Huge tick for open source and linux.
60 • distro selfies (by BSDjail New Year freedom on 2016-01-12 23:47:03 GMT from Oceania)
Tried creating distros with slax and susestudio. The big problem is hundreds of libraries and add-on packages thrown in with the apps. This makes it a pain to search for interesting apps to install. It shows Linux is still a development environment.
Phones have got it right with their app stores. All you get are the apps to search through and install. Easy!
61 • Lubuntu Gnome (by Roy Huddleston on 2016-01-13 01:03:48 GMT from North America)
I like using the alternate Debian installer. And the first thing I change about Lubuntu before updating is the LXDE to Gnome. This daily build of 16.04 I have been using since 11/05/2015 has been running good. It has been cool to run it pre-alpha. Not only do I get to enjoy Ubuntu tweak but Gnome tweak as well. At least I have stuck with a Distro.
62 • geckolinux openSUSE spins (by Somewhat Reticent on 2016-01-13 05:14:15 GMT from North America)
@44 Simply click on the image for each spin, instead of trying to take a "test drive".
63 • useless semantics (by dave on 2016-01-13 05:57:18 GMT from North America)
There really aren't any concrete definitions of when something is a 'spin' or a 'distribution' .. some people would say that if you reconfigure a distribution to use a different desktop by default, that you have made your own distribution. Others simply rearrange the default applications and call it a new distribution. Even worse, some people think that if they just change the theme and add a bunch of wallpapers, that's a new distribution. It's really kinda sad when you look at the actual 'differences' between a lot of the distributions listed on this very site. There often aren't many to be found.
What needs to stop is application developers using a 'distribution' simply as a means to push one or two of their pet projects. There is a tendency for linux distributions to be nothing more than efforts to stroke ones ego; pretentious efforts to push a piece of software, a desktop layout, or a preferred suite of programs. This is the fragmentation that continues to plague linux. If all you've done is rearranged some things, it's not a new distribution.
What constitutes a 'spin' ..? Do I have to make an iso, or is every one of my customized, frankenstein desktops technically a spin? Maybe they're unpublished distributions! (they're not.) I think a lot of people like to believe that they're better at this whole thing than they really are and the ease of reconfiguring an existing distribution to look or feel slightly different only reinforces this misconception.
I want to see more of these so-called 'distributions' or 'spins' merging their efforts to make something worthwhile, instead of something that will be gone in a few years. People should try joining an existing project before they go through this tired song and dance. And enough with the ridiculous project names already. The final straw for me was Tanglu. Ubuntu sounds ridiculous enough and it seems like there is a race to the bottom, to see who can come up with the most absurd name. Also the whole codename / release name bit is super duper annoying. Just go back to numbers. We've run out of food and animal names. Enough already. How many mango tango blah blah blahs do there really have to be out there? Cmon folks.
The way I see it is that the chosen method of package management is the only truly significant difference between distributions.
64 • @63 - Core distros (by Stan on 2016-01-13 08:57:23 GMT from Europe)
I had the same feeling about a year ago, and even blame the Linux ecosystem to suffer from "the paradox of choice".
I solved this personal controversy that I had by just focusing on independent distros (pure, not based on anything else)
http://distrowatch.com/search.php?basedon=Independent
And because the default package selection is the worst selection that any human been can ever prepare, I focused in DIY distros where Arch is the clear winner due to the amount of pre-compiled software packages + AUR.
In some way I do prepare and run my own personal spin :)
65 • @55 - yes to an LXDE edition of Mint! (by Oliver on 2016-01-13 10:34:04 GMT from North America)
I went through reading all your great posts and wish to second you about the need for a Mint LXDE edition. Even the old, conservative Debian realized such a need, therefore maintains an LXDE edition too. I hope Mint developers take Debian's example. Cinnamon edition of Mint (in my opinion) is totally useless and wasting resources and should be replaced with LXDE.
66 • Mad King Linus (by Arch Watcher 402563 on 2016-01-13 12:01:14 GMT from North America)
"it's not the distros [but] how some upstream developers work that is the problem.... If distros won't even update those, then you can complain."
Hello. I'm officially complaining. Study the endless version rot in the FreeBSD ports tree, or Ubuntu's current release versions of any security software you please. All your base are belong to us. I remember laughing out loud at the version of tor they were shipping for a long time, like ten versions behind upstream.
Most upstream projects have a stable and a testing branch. What they do not have is archaeology such as Debian and its retarded second cousin Ubuntu require.
"they may also introduce regressions, mandate configuration changes, change workflows, or affect other software in undesirable ways, which most distros try to protect their users"
Distros protect only one "workflow," their own, which is sloth on a stick for you to lick.
Now what distros do suffer in common is the Mad King Linus workflow, on which google my previous posts. It's a new 5-year-plan every 2 with Linus. Hey, let's overhaul the device manager! Wow, let's switch to binary logs and Windows INI files! Linus and Lennart remind me of Mad King Ludwig building castles. The reign of Mad Linus simply argues for a good selection of kernels, such as Manjaro offers.
The BSDs don't suffer Mad King Linus but their packagers are sloths. I don't know why. I would switch to BSD if they would just get their ports tree on a par with Arch Linux and Gentoo.
This idea of "protecting" users from upgrades is the most preposterous myth in distroland. No such myth haunts Mac OS X or Windows. Consumers get crayon-colored upgrade thingys to point-and-click. Microsoft labels patches with cryptic codes. Apple doesn't even give that much, just a progress bar.
Radio Hams: Here's a spin for you, albeit sadly Ubuntu-based IIRC. http://www.skywavelinux.com
67 • switching to BSD (by Frosch on 2016-01-13 15:48:33 GMT from Europe)
@ Arch Watcher
«I would switch to BSD if they would just get their ports tree on a par with Arch Linux and Gentoo.»
FreeBSD's ports are quite up to date compared to many distributions, but the main problem with all BSDs is hardware support. I tried GhostBSD once. In a virtual machine, it looked really great, but once installed on the hard drive I had compatibility problems, and the performance was really sluggish compared to any Linux distribution I have tried.
68 • Slackware Beta (by Kragle von Schnitzelbank on 2016-01-13 16:16:32 GMT from North America)
History Happens!
Wait, what's this about bluetooth audio-dependency-creep!? (Did pulseaudio become popular because it provided technical improvement, or because it provided an effective GUI for sound, instead of a mess like ALSA or OSS? And then there's Jack…)
Are Desktop-Environments a symptom of a lack of Basic Linux Standards, giving rise to fiefdoms mimicking smart-device GUI churn?
Shouldn't everybody be able to generate their own 'spin'? How else can you make a backup copy of apps/programs with all your personal tweaks, or share your setup, or carry it with you to/on other hardware?
(Ludwig II was visionary; Linus herds cats. XML need not be binary.)
69 • Tails and systemd (by Linux Apocalypsis on 2016-01-13 18:39:20 GMT from Europe)
Does the latest beta version of Tails use systemd?
70 • LXDE version of Mint (by frodopogo on 2016-01-13 21:15:10 GMT from North America)
Over the years of using Mint, and seeing Clement Lefebvre's response to various requests, I've gotten a sense of his personality and philosophy.
1. He has a very strong vision of what Linux Mint is supposed to be.... and I haven't seen large changes since version 5 Elyssa, unless those changes were foisted on Mint by the upstream projects.
2. Mint has not experimented much with alternative desktops, except for Cinnamon. Now that they've added Cinnamon for a fourth desktop, there is even less willingness to experiment with other desktops.
3. Clem has a REALLY strong sense of discipline and focus, and is very aware of the danger of spreading resources too thin. If anything, the knowledge that there are other Linux projects with different approaches frees him to stay true to his focus and vision.
4. Mint has never been much about being lightweight, instead tends to take a middle of the road approach to resources. Most computers made in the last 10 years can run Mint comfortably.
5. Packaging popular programs like Firefox and LibreOffice pays dividends in reliability. More popular = more people to report bugs!!!
6. Clem seems to fit the saying quite well "if it ain't broke, don't fix it!" I think this is partly because he is aware that new features mean new code which likely contains bugs which cause regressions.
7. Mint's formula seems to be working, so it's definitely not "broken", so there is little sense of a need for change. So the possibility of an LXDE spin seems very remote.
8. Xfce has always been Mint's lightweight alternative. For LXDE to have a shot, Xfce would have to go away. That wouldn't bother me personally, since I have a slight preference for LXDE, but given what I know about Mint, I'll be VERY surprised if that happens.
9. This may be the reason that Lubuntu is the most popular Ubuntu community distro- Xubuntu, Kubuntu, and Ubuntu MATE have to compete against Mint versions of those programs, Lubuntu doesn't.
71 • Solus (by hotdiggettydog on 2016-01-13 22:27:02 GMT from North America)
Nice to see Solus have a comeback. I used the original SolusOS way back when, and it was pretty sweet. Sadly, there was a lot of drama around the project and the developer abandoned it.
72 • Argument for a Linux Mint LXDE edition (by H. Güzelaydın on 2016-01-14 06:59:28 GMT from North America)
I'm really delighted to see this issue being discussed here on the universal Linux central arena. Just like Nemrut (post #15) I, too, often install Linux Mint's Xfce edition on old hardware for friends and acquaintances. Accordingly, I too, am, appealing for an LXDE edition of Mint. And yes I'm aware of all those distros out there offering LXDE editions. But I, unfortunately, found none of them as reliable or properly maintained as Linux Mint is. According to frodopogo (post #70) "Xfce has always been Mint's lightweight alternative. For LXDE to have a shot, Xfce would have to go away" and adds ”that wouldn't bother me personally, since I have a preference for LXD.” Well, nor it would bother me, or (i think it would) bother overwhelming majority of fans of light & speedy Linux distros for that matter. So, I'm strongly hopeful that Mint developers hopefully will find a way to come up come with an LXDE edition regardless of dropping Xfce (which would have been shadowed anyway if it were offered alongside LXDE) due to some (but not all) the qualities neatly summarized here by dbrion (post #9) who states that he has chosen LXDE for the following reasons: (a) my "net" "books" are old (1 G RAM) (b) I do not like new, "phone" like (or W10 like) DEs (c) it is RPis DE Also, while on the subject, I would like to scribe a few words about my recent experiment with an outstanding new distro https://www.bunsenlabs.org/ for the aforementioned purpose of keeping old hardware functioning for friends. BunsenLabs Linux is based on the noble philosophy of the minimalist design. However, BunsenLabs developers have, by bundling their distro with LibreOffce - one of the most bloated Linux application - partially ruined such a, indeed, promising super light and speedy distro. Otherwise, BunsenLabs Linux would have, probably, been the greatest and most reliable in this category of distros coded so far. Despite this terrible blunder, i have installed BunsenLabs Linux on several antiquated machines and received lots of heartfelt "thank you(s)!" from grateful friends whom, I'm sure, would be even more thankful if Mint were to release an LXDE edition, and BunsenLabs were to, either, drop bloatware or, at least, release an edition without it.
73 • @69_Re:_Tails_and_Systemd (by k on 2016-01-14 10:27:58 GMT from Europe)
Re: your question: "Does the latest beta version of Tails use systemd?"
Tails is one of the most "transparent" ongoing Linux (Debian-based) works, so one can always check and find changes at https://tails.boum.org/ , but -- addressing your question -- one can also always check any distro's process for startup/booting using terminal command, possibly needs also typing "sudo" before:
cat /proc/1/comm
provided by Robert Storey in his DW article Manjaro OpenRC 0.8.13 - reinventing init without systemd, and typing return should produce response:
init
as for build 1.8.2 - 20160109
74 • Low fat Mints (by Ghost Sixtyseven on 2016-01-14 10:48:01 GMT from Europe)
@70 '8. Xfce has always been Mint's lightweight alternative.' ~ What about their wonderful Fluxbox releases in the past? Those are the ones I would love to see making a comeback in the 'Mint' pantheon. :)
75 • @72 and 55: Stop whining for Mint LXDE (by watching on 2016-01-14 11:04:02 GMT from Europe)
I'm sure even the lightweight Mint Xfce has a package manager. Why don't you just install LXDE and be happy?
And I really LOL'd at the "terrible blunder" of including LibreOffice - one of the "must have" apps for anyone who actually wants to use Linux for work. I'm sure that "blunder" could also be rectified with a package manager - or is BunsenLabs so nobly minimal that they don't even include something as useless as a package manager?
76 • @69 @73 Tails and systemd (by Linux Apocalypsis on 2016-01-14 11:40:35 GMT from Europe)
Finally, I managed to find the information:
https://git-tails.immerda.ch/tails/plain/debian/changelog?h=devel
Yes, Tails 2 will ship with Gnome Shell and systemd.
Forensic work is urgently needed before using that distro in any privacy-sensitive contexts.
77 • @75 - RE: Stop whining for Mint LXDE (by Nemrut on 2016-01-14 12:28:31 GMT from North America)
Yes -- however, most ordinary linux folks are newbies who do not have even those basic technical skills to carry out what you're recommending. Moreover, most computer users (windows or linux alike) really don't want to be bothered with all those new learning curves and commands.They just wanna to plug 'n play. That's it. As for LibreOffice, it is, indeed, terribly coded and it's an undeniable huge bloatware: http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/five-apps/the-five-most-bloated-linux-applications/ I acknowledge that, yet, LibreOffice is widely used by Linux users as they have no choice and are not aware of a better alternative office suite like, for example; http://www.freeoffice.com/en/
78 • @72 and 77 - "bloated" or full-featured? (by Hoos on 2016-01-14 13:33:01 GMT from Asia)
"...most computer users (windows or linux alike) really don't want to be bothered with all those new learning curves and commands.They just wanna to plug 'n play..."
That's the precise same argument I would use for why Libreoffice is included in Bunsenlabs and many other distros.
Maybe Bunsenlabs is meant to be a full-featured distro? Maybe they hope to target newbies as well as the experienced pro-minimalist-interface Linux users?
LO makes the iso file size bigger, but does that necessarily mean Bunsenlabs is no longer light and speedy?
79 • @76_Tails_2.0_and_systemd (by k on 2016-01-14 14:25:14 GMT from Europe)
Regarding your comment/conclusion: "Forensic work is urgently needed before using that distro in any privacy-sensitive contexts."
Not sure what you meant, but on Tails web page at https://tails.boum.org/news/test_2.0-rc1/index.en.html , under What's new in 2.0?, is included claim: "that will make the Tails experience both safer, and more pleasant. For example, all custom system services are harder to exploit thanks to the use of Linux namespaces, set up by systemd."
Any additional comment(s) or insight(s) much appreciated.
80 • @79 (by Linux Apocalypsis on 2016-01-14 17:19:24 GMT from Europe)
How can a huge Trojan horse make things harder to exploit...? Contradictio in terminis.
81 • @77 - Bloat (by Ben Myers on 2016-01-14 17:54:04 GMT from North America)
LibreOffice may be bloated compared to many other Linux programs, but it is way less bloated than Microsoft Office, with which it strives to maintain 99+% compatibility at the document level. Many who use Libre Office need that Microsoft Office compatibility to interchange documents with others and they are willing to pay the price of some bloat.
GIMP has some bloat, too, due to its myriad of features also present in PhotoShop.
If one needs to use the features, one accepts the bloat.
82 • Linux Lite (by Bill on 2016-01-14 21:10:05 GMT from North America)
Just installed Linux Lite to see how well it faired with other top distros. I compared it with debian 8, manjaro, fedora, opensuse and mint,... all except opensuse were xfce versions.
Liked them all but was especially impressed with the performance and easy setup of linux lite. I also installed virtrtualbox on each distro and found linux lite to be an easy setup compared to fedora or manjaro.
My Favorite distro's in order are: Debian 8, Debian Stretch Linux Lite Mint Fedora Manjaro OpenSuse
ALL are great distros and worthy of consideration by anyone looking for a Linux Distro.
Bill
83 • Or Mint LXLE? (by Kragle on 2016-01-14 22:11:56 GMT from North America)
Now that would be both lean and productive - and not merely minimal.
Or replicating the functionality and robustness of Linux Mint (without a "DE" - maybe just FLTK/OpenBox?) on Qubes_OS/Aboriginal Linux, before XML and binary-blobs take over? There's a fine challenge!
84 • Misc Replies (by Arch Watcher 402563 on 2016-01-15 07:30:08 GMT from North America)
@Frosch #67 Any software for servers is on a par in BSD. Graphical apps are behind, including security tools like Retroshare, a must to update properly. The BSD maintainer has left it stale half a year by now.
@Tails-interested Yes Virginia, the systemdeath virus means you cannot trust Tails. Tails made the mistake of trusting Debian, which made the mistake of trusting RedHat, an NSA contractor. I have no doubt agents work there undercover, and others consult overtly.
I hope someone respins Tails away from Debian generally. Tails is unusable just for package staleness, never mind System D-. Look at the old, rotten version of LibreOffice that Tails ships.
@LibreOffice-interested The alternatives are closed-source and not popular meaning bugs don't go as fast. LO is the only serious option. If you're going to mention goffice please look at the notice of vacancy on the goffice home page.
An office suite is big by nature. LO has a good active dev team which has mostly stripped and streamlined old cruft legacy code. Too bad we can't say the same about openssl and glibc. Keep LO but switch your distro to libressl and musl-libc.
85 • @72 BunsenLabs (by Head_on_a_Stick on 2016-01-15 21:29:35 GMT from Europe)
Hello, I'm one of the BunsenLabs developers :)
We will be looking into different sized ISO images in the future and this may include slimmed down versions.
Just to note: the standard (rc1 at the moment) installation does *not* include LibreOffice, it has a menu entry which will install LibreOffice with a single click but it is not included by default.
86 • @85 bunsenlabs distro (by sojourner on 2016-01-15 22:18:03 GMT from North America)
Hi, i have just installed your distro on a really old (almost 10 yrs old) panasonic Toughbook and i'm totally awed and amazed how extremly my almost 10 yrs old laptop is now faster, even much, much faster than my brand new Acer laptop i just bought recently on boxing day!! And i sincerely wanna thank you for that. I'm surprized that such a great distro is not listed in distrowatch! I diiscovered only because someone mentioned it here on this forum.
87 • LO 'bloat' & systemd (by M.Z. on 2016-01-15 22:18:51 GMT from North America)
@77/Nemrut - LO 'bloat' Where exactly is LO compared to it main competitor MS office in terms of resource use? Also what gave you the nonsensical notion that LO was poorly coded? From what little I've heard the LO folks have tried to cut useless cruft from the old OpenOffice code base whenever they could & I see no good reason to think the coding is anything other than good.
Also as a general comment on LO, & as others have mentioned, we are a full featured office suite here. If you don't like the way most distros default to the best & most useful office suite around, feel free to try AbiWord or Calligra, or whatever else gets it done for you.
@84 Enough with the systemd FUD already. It's all nonsense. I use it in Mageia & find no issues whatsoever. There is no sane reason for the anti-Red Hat FUD, & if fact all users should be glad that reputable companies like Red Hat are around to do most of the hard work involved in making the Linux ecosystem so functional for so many users. They also support Gnome & the brain dead trash coming out of that project so Red Hat is far from perfect, but on net they do a lot of good.
Also given the degree of controversy surrounding systemd I would be surprised if the open source code coming from the project hadn't been heavily audited by technical minded folks suspicious of systemd. The only safe assumption on the security of systemd that users without an axe to grind or a tinfoil hat to wear could make is that systemd is a) more complicated, b) more actively developed, & c) likely more audited than the alternatives. On net there is no good reason to believe it is any less secure than any other init give that points b) and c) are likely to offset a).
88 • Created distro from scratch (by Mutua Kilonzo on 2016-01-15 22:20:18 GMT from Africa)
Just for fun and increase my linux knowledge, I created a distro from scratch and it worked! It's a great learning experience. I'm not trained in any computer course, but I managed to get it to work using the Linux from Scratch website and googling where I ran into a problem.
89 • @86 BunsenLabs (by Head_on_a_Stick on 2016-01-15 22:25:13 GMT from Europe)
Thank you for your kind words, glad you like it!
BunsenLabs is currently at rc1 status so a DistroWatch placement would be slightly premature ;)
90 • bunsenlabs @86 (by James F. Cape on 2016-01-16 05:06:53 GMT from North America)
That's a nice and encouraging user feedback. However, I think, the super speeds you report and credit bunsenlabs OS for it, may in part be due to super quality hardware your PANSONIC brand laptop posses. But regardless, what you report is truly impressive
91 • RE:Mint on LXDE, BunsenLabs distro and OpenOffice, the bloatware (by Nemrut on 2016-01-16 10:07:31 GMT from North America)
@84 -Archwatcher and @87-M.Z. Windows has always been against (politically, economically, socially -- and codewise) what Linux stands for. Hence, I'm disappointed to see you folks matching up Linux with Windows - instead of comparing it to OSX which shares the same Unix foundational codes along with a few common goals. @81 - Ben Myers If one needs to use the features, one accepts the bloat I do not code, but i'm educated enough about coding that i can disagree with you without hesitating. Coding is really a form of art best compared to the art of literary writing. Accordingly, a terribly bad writer with lousy writing skills can waste numerous pages, plus, confuse and bore readers by ratcheting up a`merely one-page-long story. On the other hand, a good writer with creative writing skills can write to fit in - the exact same story - on a single page by ratcheting down, and captivate the readers to entertain them at the same time. @83-Kragle Your fascinating proposal definitely makes sense. Pity that Linux Mint developers are unlikely to get off their ivory towers to respond. So, instead, let's wish that this great creative developer, yet humble; Head on a Stick*, our new friend from BunsenLabs notice your proposal and turn it into reality for us all by incorporating it into his attractive still-in-progress distro.
* hope that's not his real nome :) LOL
92 • Holy Mint religion/ systemd (87) (by dbrion on 2016-01-16 16:11:35 GMT from Europe)
" The only safe assumption on the security of systemd that users without an axe to grind or a tinfoil hat to wear could make is that systemd is a) more complicated," Well, that make it unpleasant for limited resources (old ones, RPi) computers...
If an application can be told (what did "top" tell?) bloated, it is a good thing DE is not that bloated....
For LXDE : Mageia and Fedora support it quite well (so does Debian with rapsbian, maybe lubuntu for PCs -people I installed lubuntu did not complain : that was before I tested mageia5). Why should it aggregated with Mint ? Specifically Mint? A religious matter? (I use Fedora if their installer works; if it does not work, I keep old Fedoras or, if Mageia satisfies me -this occured with Mageia 5-), Mageia: what is the need of The Holy Mint?
93 • Spins (by gvnmcknz on 2016-01-16 19:47:31 GMT from Europe)
I use Pinguy Builder, (if what's produced is technically a Spin)? I can have X/Lubuntu LTS set up just right. Try another distro. Revert back as needed, fuss free!!
94 • Spins & Netbooks (by gvnmcknz on 2016-01-16 20:06:07 GMT from Europe)
I also have a need to keep Netbooks running. Downloading Bunsenlabs this minute! Thanks
PS Manjaro is excellent as well as L/Xubuntu Any other ideas?
95 • mammoth LibreOffice, Linuxmint LXDE edition & Bunsenlabs distro (by kimlik66 on 2016-01-16 20:55:28 GMT from North America)
I want to second post #77 about LibreOffice because it's really a pity that this once-a-promising Linux office suite is now nothing but a hopeless mammoth piece of bloatware. Let's, instead, try FreeOffice: http://www.freeoffice.com/en/ and see that the difference is like day and night. Similarly, I, too, agree with all those posts above; calling for an LXDE edition of Mint. Also, BunsenLabs distro, within this context (of a lean and speedy linux) is a promising project worth to try: https://www.bunsenlabs.org/
96 • LO & such (by M.Z. on 2016-01-16 22:57:48 GMT from North America)
@91/Nemrut & 95 - LO weight Well Nemrut, the vast majority of possible users of any office suite would compare any other office suite to MS office. How does it not make since to target a good all purpose replacement for the 800 pound gorilla in the office suite room? The thing is LibreOffice is delivering on it's mission to be a general purpose office suite for the vast majority of users who tend to be familiar with MS office. Whatever else you preconceptions of what an office suite should be are, LO looks to me to be doing an outstanding job at it's main goal of a general purpose replacement for big name proprietary alternatives. Everything else about size/bloat is a value judgement based on personal preferences & I think you are more than welcome to use the package manager to install something else on the Distro of your choice, but the complaint isn't relevant given the mission of LO.
@92 - Mint vs Mageia & systemd I like Mageia as well, though I like Mint slightly better overall. I think it's the best .deb based distro & the best distro overall for home PC users. I do prefer a few things in Mageia like how I don't need some PPA to use GRUB Customizer, but Mint tools more than make up for the loss.
On the systemd thing, I don't see how that affects much after the initial init is done, though I have no idea what the size of the stuff that stays in the background is. It might be fair to say systemd isn't a great choice for lightweight distros, though I'd like some hard numbers to justify that.
97 • Libre Office (by Scuttle on 2016-01-16 23:13:50 GMT from North America)
I have gived freeoffice , libre office and Calligra, even tried WPS...which i quite liked.....But for me Libre office wins at the moment...I rarely use Draw or Presentations...so it could have been a lot lighter... Free Office seemed to have a few docX format issues..though it could have been resolved now...
Caligra was odd to use i think that had Formatting issues for DocX as well
My brief go with WPS wasn't too bad. and seemed ok on DocX...probably i would use it if Libre office Hadn't been with me for so long..and Open Office before....just hard to change now
There is 1 or 2 other suites about i will try one day But as I have to deal with 90% of people using windows DocX formatting needs to be good
If it wasnt for business i could make do with Abiword
98 • On Bloat vis a vis LibreOffice (by Ben Myers on 2016-01-17 02:54:52 GMT from North America)
So what is the metric one uses for measuring bloat? Anybody? Do tell.
LibreOffice is a download of about 200MB, and installs in about a minute. And the development team produces regular updates. Compare that with the DVD-sized, many minutes to download-and-install-and-activate and record specifics in the company-borg data base... Wait, a minute, nobody wants to see the name of the company that peddles the dominant office suite.
Do the various LibreOffice modules eat a lot of memory? I'm sure they do, but I learned long ago to max out the memory on whatever computer I use, because memory is very very cheap these days. But the software is free, and it allows me to interchange most documents with people who want to spend the money on that other office suite. So call me a happy camper with LibreOffice.
99 • @98 of bloat, cheap hardware and careless coding (by Nemrut on 2016-01-17 06:13:46 GMT from North America)
various LibreOffice modules eat a lot of memory ... but I learned long ago to max out the memory on whatever computer I use, because memory is very very cheap these days Yes you're right as memory/RAM is, indeed, very affordable nowadays, therefore what you're suggesting makes sense -- but only practically speaking. That's because i don't think it makes sense at all [from a techno-philosophical point of view] as i think (despite the availability of cheap hardware currently) we should rather continue to strive to code and design software in a way so that it gets reduced and doesn't get enlarged further. Just like we do not -- and never would -- allow car makers to manufacture cars which pollute the environment badly -- simply because now highly effective air cleaning filters are available to us.
100 • @99 What is the metric for bloat? (by Ben Myers on 2016-01-17 15:38:00 GMT from North America)
And the metric for bloat is? Any numbers? Compared to? Join the LibreOffice team. Still worth the price, even with the alleged bloat.
Number of Comments: 100
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
| | |
TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
Archives |
• Issue 1096 (2024-11-11): Bazzite 40, Playtron OS Alpha 1, Tucana Linux 3.1, detecting Screen sessions, Redox imports COSMIC software centre, FreeBSD booting on the PinePhone Pro, LXQt supports Wayland window managers |
• Issue 1095 (2024-11-04): Fedora 41 Kinoite, transferring applications between computers, openSUSE Tumbleweed receives multiple upgrades, Ubuntu testing compiler optimizations, Mint partners with Framework |
• Issue 1094 (2024-10-28): DebLight OS 1, backing up crontab, AlmaLinux introduces Litten branch, openSUSE unveils refreshed look, Ubuntu turns 20 |
• Issue 1093 (2024-10-21): Kubuntu 24.10, atomic vs immutable distributions, Debian upgrading Perl packages, UBports adding VoLTE support, Android to gain native GNU/Linux application support |
• Issue 1092 (2024-10-14): FunOS 24.04.1, a home directory inside a file, work starts of openSUSE Leap 16.0, improvements in Haiku, KDE neon upgrades its base |
• Issue 1091 (2024-10-07): Redox OS 0.9.0, Unified package management vs universal package formats, Redox begins RISC-V port, Mint polishes interface, Qubes certifies new laptop |
• Issue 1090 (2024-09-30): Rhino Linux 2024.2, commercial distros with alternative desktops, Valve seeks to improve Wayland performance, HardenedBSD parterns with Protectli, Tails merges with Tor Project, Quantum Leap partners with the FreeBSD Foundation |
• Issue 1089 (2024-09-23): Expirion 6.0, openKylin 2.0, managing configuration files, the future of Linux development, fixing bugs in Haiku, Slackware packages dracut |
• Issue 1088 (2024-09-16): PorteuX 1.6, migrating from Windows 10 to which Linux distro, making NetBSD immutable, AlmaLinux offers hardware certification, Mint updates old APT tools |
• Issue 1087 (2024-09-09): COSMIC desktop, running cron jobs at variable times, UBports highlights new apps, HardenedBSD offers work around for FreeBSD change, Debian considers how to cull old packages, systemd ported to musl |
• Issue 1086 (2024-09-02): Vanilla OS 2, command line tips for simple tasks, FreeBSD receives investment from STF, openSUSE Tumbleweed update can break network connections, Debian refreshes media |
• Issue 1085 (2024-08-26): Nobara 40, OpenMandriva 24.07 "ROME", distros which include source code, FreeBSD publishes quarterly report, Microsoft updates breaks Linux in dual-boot environments |
• Issue 1084 (2024-08-19): Liya 2.0, dual boot with encryption, Haiku introduces performance improvements, Gentoo dropping IA-64, Redcore merges major upgrade |
• Issue 1083 (2024-08-12): TrueNAS 24.04.2 "SCALE", Linux distros for smartphones, Redox OS introduces web server, PipeWire exposes battery drain on Linux, Canonical updates kernel version policy |
• Issue 1082 (2024-08-05): Linux Mint 22, taking snapshots of UFS on FreeBSD, openSUSE updates Tumbleweed and Aeon, Debian creates Tiny QA Tasks, Manjaro testing immutable images |
• Issue 1081 (2024-07-29): SysLinuxOS 12.4, OpenBSD gain hardware acceleration, Slackware changes kernel naming, Mint publishes upgrade instructions |
• Issue 1080 (2024-07-22): Running GNU/Linux on Android with Andronix, protecting network services, Solus dropping AppArmor and Snap, openSUSE Aeon Desktop gaining full disk encryption, SUSE asks openSUSE to change its branding |
• Issue 1079 (2024-07-15): Ubuntu Core 24, hiding files on Linux, Fedora dropping X11 packages on Workstation, Red Hat phasing out GRUB, new OpenSSH vulnerability, FreeBSD speeds up release cycle, UBports testing new first-run wizard |
• Issue 1078 (2024-07-08): Changing init software, server machines running desktop environments, OpenSSH vulnerability patched, Peppermint launches new edition, HardenedBSD updates ports |
• Issue 1077 (2024-07-01): The Unity and Lomiri interfaces, different distros for different tasks, Ubuntu plans to run Wayland on NVIDIA cards, openSUSE updates Leap Micro, Debian releases refreshed media, UBports gaining contact synchronisation, FreeDOS celebrates its 30th anniversary |
• Issue 1076 (2024-06-24): openSUSE 15.6, what makes Linux unique, SUSE Liberty Linux to support CentOS Linux 7, SLE receives 19 years of support, openSUSE testing Leap Micro edition |
• Issue 1075 (2024-06-17): Redox OS, X11 and Wayland on the BSDs, AlmaLinux releases Pi build, Canonical announces RISC-V laptop with Ubuntu, key changes in systemd |
• Issue 1074 (2024-06-10): Endless OS 6.0.0, distros with init diversity, Mint to filter unverified Flatpaks, Debian adds systemd-boot options, Redox adopts COSMIC desktop, OpenSSH gains new security features |
• Issue 1073 (2024-06-03): LXQt 2.0.0, an overview of Linux desktop environments, Canonical partners with Milk-V, openSUSE introduces new features in Aeon Desktop, Fedora mirrors see rise in traffic, Wayland adds OpenBSD support |
• Issue 1072 (2024-05-27): Manjaro 24.0, comparing init software, OpenBSD ports Plasma 6, Arch community debates mirror requirements, ThinOS to upgrade its FreeBSD core |
• Issue 1071 (2024-05-20): Archcraft 2024.04.06, common command line mistakes, ReactOS imports WINE improvements, Haiku makes adjusting themes easier, NetBSD takes a stand against code generated by chatbots |
• Issue 1070 (2024-05-13): Damn Small Linux 2024, hiding kernel messages during boot, Red Hat offers AI edition, new web browser for UBports, Fedora Asahi Remix 40 released, Qubes extends support for version 4.1 |
• Issue 1069 (2024-05-06): Ubuntu 24.04, installing packages in alternative locations, systemd creates sudo alternative, Mint encourages XApps collaboration, FreeBSD publishes quarterly update |
• Issue 1068 (2024-04-29): Fedora 40, transforming one distro into another, Debian elects new Project Leader, Red Hat extends support cycle, Emmabuntus adds accessibility features, Canonical's new security features |
• Issue 1067 (2024-04-22): LocalSend for transferring files, detecting supported CPU architecure levels, new visual design for APT, Fedora and openSUSE working on reproducible builds, LXQt released, AlmaLinux re-adds hardware support |
• Issue 1066 (2024-04-15): Fun projects to do with the Raspberry Pi and PinePhone, installing new software on fixed-release distributions, improving GNOME Terminal performance, Mint testing new repository mirrors, Gentoo becomes a Software In the Public Interest project |
• Issue 1065 (2024-04-08): Dr.Parted Live 24.03, answering questions about the xz exploit, Linux Mint to ship HWE kernel, AlmaLinux patches flaw ahead of upstream Red Hat, Calculate changes release model |
• Issue 1064 (2024-04-01): NixOS 23.11, the status of Hurd, liblzma compromised upstream, FreeBSD Foundation focuses on improving wireless networking, Ubuntu Pro offers 12 years of support |
• Issue 1063 (2024-03-25): Redcore Linux 2401, how slowly can a rolling release update, Debian starts new Project Leader election, Red Hat creating new NVIDIA driver, Snap store hit with more malware |
• Issue 1062 (2024-03-18): KDE neon 20240304, changing file permissions, Canonical turns 20, Pop!_OS creates new software centre, openSUSE packages Plasma 6 |
• Issue 1061 (2024-03-11): Using a PinePhone as a workstation, restarting background services on a schedule, NixBSD ports Nix to FreeBSD, Fedora packaging COSMIC, postmarketOS to adopt systemd, Linux Mint replacing HexChat |
• Issue 1060 (2024-03-04): AV Linux MX-23.1, bootstrapping a network connection, key OpenBSD features, Qubes certifies new hardware, LXQt and Plasma migrate to Qt 6 |
• Issue 1059 (2024-02-26): Warp Terminal, navigating manual pages, malware found in the Snap store, Red Hat considering CPU requirement update, UBports organizes ongoing work |
• Issue 1058 (2024-02-19): Drauger OS 7.6, how much disk space to allocate, System76 prepares to launch COSMIC desktop, UBports changes its version scheme, TrueNAS to offer faster deduplication |
• Issue 1057 (2024-02-12): Adelie Linux 1.0 Beta, rolling release vs fixed for a smoother experience, Debian working on 2038 bug, elementary OS to split applications from base system updates, Fedora announces Atomic Desktops |
• Issue 1056 (2024-02-05): wattOS R13, the various write speeds of ISO writing tools, DSL returns, Mint faces Wayland challenges, HardenedBSD blocks foreign USB devices, Gentoo publishes new repository, Linux distros patch glibc flaw |
• Issue 1055 (2024-01-29): CNIX OS 231204, distributions patching packages the most, Gentoo team presents ongoing work, UBports introduces connectivity and battery improvements, interview with Haiku developer |
• Issue 1054 (2024-01-22): Solus 4.5, comparing dd and cp when writing ISO files, openSUSE plans new major Leap version, XeroLinux shutting down, HardenedBSD changes its build schedule |
• Issue 1053 (2024-01-15): Linux AI voice assistants, some distributions running hotter than others, UBports talks about coming changes, Qubes certifies StarBook laptops, Asahi Linux improves energy savings |
• Issue 1052 (2024-01-08): OpenMandriva Lx 5.0, keeping shell commands running when theterminal closes, Mint upgrades Edge kernel, Vanilla OS plans big changes, Canonical working to make Snap more cross-platform |
• Issue 1051 (2024-01-01): Favourite distros of 2023, reloading shell settings, Asahi Linux releases Fedora remix, Gentoo offers binary packages, openSUSE provides full disk encryption |
• Issue 1050 (2023-12-18): rlxos 2023.11, renaming files and opening terminal windows in specific directories, TrueNAS publishes ZFS fixes, Debian publishes delayed install media, Haiku polishes desktop experience |
• Issue 1049 (2023-12-11): Lernstick 12, alternatives to WINE, openSUSE updates its branding, Mint unveils new features, Lubuntu team plans for 24.04 |
• Issue 1048 (2023-12-04): openSUSE MicroOS, the transition from X11 to Wayland, Red Hat phasing out X11 packages, UBports making mobile development easier |
• Issue 1047 (2023-11-27): GhostBSD 23.10.1, Why Linux uses swap when memory is free, Ubuntu Budgie may benefit from Wayland work in Xfce, early issues with FreeBSD 14.0 |
• Issue 1046 (2023-11-20): Slackel 7.7 "Openbox", restricting CPU usage, Haiku improves font handling and software centre performance, Canonical launches MicroCloud |
• Issue 1045 (2023-11-13): Fedora 39, how to trust software packages, ReactOS booting with UEFI, elementary OS plans to default to Wayland, Mir gaining ability to split work across video cards |
• Issue 1044 (2023-11-06): Porteus 5.01, disabling IPv6, applications unique to a Linux distro, Linux merges bcachefs, OpenELA makes source packages available |
• Issue 1043 (2023-10-30): Murena Two with privacy switches, where old files go when packages are updated, UBports on Volla phones, Mint testing Cinnamon on Wayland, Peppermint releases ARM build |
• Issue 1042 (2023-10-23): Ubuntu Cinnamon compared with Linux Mint, extending battery life on Linux, Debian resumes /usr merge, Canonical publishes fixed install media |
• Full list of all issues |
Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
Random Distribution |
postmarketOS
postmarketOS is an Alpine-based Linux distribution for mobile devices. The project offers three mobile interfaces: Phosh, Plasma Mobile, and Simple Mobile X Interface (Sxmo). The project aims to provide long-term support for a range of mobile devices, key among them the Librem 5 and the PinePhone, though other, traditionally Android devices, are supported.
Status: Active
|
TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
|