 DistroWatch Weekly |
| Tip Jar |
If you've enjoyed this week's issue of DistroWatch Weekly, please consider sending us a tip.
(Tips this week: 0, value: US$0.00) |
|
|
|
 bc1qtede6f7adcce4kjpgx0e5j68wwgtdxrek2qvc4  lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhxarpw3jkc7tzw4ex6cfexyfua2nr  86fA3qPTeQtNb2k1vLwEQaAp3XxkvvvXt69gSG5LGunXXikK9koPWZaRQgfFPBPWhMgXjPjccy9LA9xRFchPWQAnPvxh5Le paypal.me/distrowatchweekly • patreon.com/distrowatch |
|
| Linux Foundation Training |
|
| Reader Comments • Jump to last comment |
1 • Ubuntu MATE 14.10 (by Bill on 2015-03-16 01:31:35 GMT from Planet Mars)
As I stated last week, I am very happy to see that you have aded Ubuntu MATE to the database. It just so happens that I started using Ubuntu MATE 14.10 a couple of weeks ago now and I have no complaints whatsoever. I like it so much I am going to donate. I have been using Mint Rebecca 17 for a while and compared to that Ubuntu MATE just feels much less bloated. Yes it is very fast. I think my boot up time is 7 seconds. But I have everything from Netflix to Compiz to gwave under WINE all running quite nicely. Here is what my Ubuntu MATE 14.10 desktop looks like:
https://backup.filesanywhere.com/FS/M.aspx?v=896c678860636fb87267
I highly recommend it.
Have Fun!
2 • Ubuntu MATE (by linuxista on 2015-03-16 02:27:44 GMT from North America)
At the end Jesse said, "Personally, I am hoping the Ubuntu MATE distribution becomes an official Ubuntu community project."
I'm pretty sure they are an official variant as of about a month or two ago. The UbuntuMATE vivid vervet beta is hosted on the official Ubuntu site. http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mate/releases/vivid/beta-1/
3 • Ubuntu MATE (by Jesse on 2015-03-16 03:11:03 GMT from North America)
@2: That was just a typo. It was supposed to be "happy" not "hoping". The project did become an official community distro and we covered it here just a few weeks ago.
4 • ubuntu mate (by erinis on 2015-03-16 03:12:52 GMT from North America)
@2 Wrong website. Go to the website in the article. Having used it now for 2 weeks have to say Vey impressive and fast. Love it.
5 • cmon mate (by Chris on 2015-03-16 05:21:27 GMT from Oceania)
Is it really necessary to reinstall just to use a different Desktop Environment?
6 • Another L'buntu LTS remix for low-spec/older and/or friend/family-supported (by Fossilizing Dinosaur on 2015-03-16 07:38:57 GMT from North America)
The Pangaea-Lubuntu spin at SourceForge has a dual app-selection of both 'cross-platform full-featured' and 'lightweight/minimal' alternatives.
Nothing you couldn't get by customizing stock Lubuntu, I suspect, but it may be handy for some. Might be interesting to compare to, say, LXLE.
7 • @5 / Mate (by kc1di on 2015-03-16 10:51:26 GMT from North America)
Thanks Jesse for another fine review - been using Ubuntu-Mate since it first appeared and have enjoyed it also. Just works for me.
@5 You can install other desktops on the same install of Ubuntu - there is a tutorial or two on the web a google search will unveil them.
The one draw back of that approach is that often there is interaction among the various DE's install on the same system and you may end up with some duplicate packages that are not needed. so it is more bloated. But it can be done. If you want a pure look at say Mate on Ubuntu though it's better to do a fresh install. Just MHO :)
8 • Old harware? (by Justiniano on 2015-03-16 11:07:51 GMT from Asia)
I can vouch for Simplicity Desktop being nice and kind enough to systems as low as a middling Pentium 4 with only 512 mb ram.
9 • Ubuntu Mate 14.x (by Chris2kari on 2015-03-16 11:26:10 GMT from Oceania)
Extremely polished & very efficient fully featured alternative to the Unity flavor of Ubuntu. As it matures & gains users I can't see a need for Xubuntu frankly. And by the way, Mate is very nice on high end machines, It's not just for museum pieces! I think Ubuntu Mate is the perfect business/productivity/workstation. (For gaming, unfortunately Manjaro is the better choice due to extremely responsive developers to tech issues with Steam etc)
10 • Modern software on older computers (by dragonmouth on 2015-03-16 11:32:10 GMT from North America)
Can we quantify what "older computer" is? The term is very vague and means different things to different people. To some, a P3-based PC is an "older computer", to others, last month's PC is already old. I have no problems running the latest 32 bit versions of distros on 10 year old P4 PCs, or 64 bit versions on 6 year old AMD Athlons. Until it met with an unfortunate accident. recently, I ran Debian Wheezy on a P3 866mhz laptop. Granted I am not getting 5 second bootup times but neither are the PCs painfully slow. Recommending lightweight distros, such as Puppy or Slitaz, for "older computers" without defining the term could be depriving a lot of users of experiencing full distros like Slackware, openSUSE, PCLinuxOS or Mageia.
11 • Try Linux Lite for older systems (by Eddystone on 2015-03-16 12:06:23 GMT from North America)
I have always owned hardware that is quite a bit behind the curve. The specifications of computer hardware being phased, updated or discarded by higher-end users continually improve as time goes by. The only way to determine which distribution matches your needs AND your hardware is to try several of the recommended distros on your machine and check them out. The best place to start is with a system with no data that needs to be preserved onto which you can simply install Linux as the main operating system. I have tried many systems for less powerful hardware and have found that some rather fully fleshed out distros sometimes work as well or better than the minimalist distros.A good example of one of these is Linux Lite 2.0 32-bit which I currently have on my three household computers and on a couple of computers of friends over 80 years old. Lite has a customized XFCE desktop with many user friendly tools for performing routine system tasks. I would recommend it as on distro people with older systems should install and test drive. www.linuxliteos.com
12 • Re 10 Dragonmouth older pcs (by Eddystone on 2015-03-16 12:18:14 GMT from North America)
You can't really quantify the specification of "older computers" because it is a moving target that's always changing. I have used Linux on some REALLY old laptops like your P3 for things like streaming oldies into a 1959 stereo console or for listening to something as I fall asleep. Sometimes it's necessary, and sometimes it's just interesting to see how much functional use you can still get out of simpler hardware. However, there are so many hardware variations for things like sound and video and so many little quirks in different distros that you really do just have to load the distro onto the system and see what happens. There are always surprises, some delightful and some disappointing.
13 • Older Hardware (by matte on 2015-03-16 12:20:10 GMT from North America)
It seems with older hardware, the biggest drag is the browser. From what I've read, some browsers make specific use of the add-on graphics adapter. This seems to work for me. Linux and Windows.
(Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33G, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS)
BTW: 1 computer year = 20 people years
14 • Re 10 Dragonmouth older pcs (by Eddystone on 2015-03-16 12:22:19 GMT from North America)
"Recommending lightweight distros, such as Puppy or Slitaz, for "older computers" without defining the term could be depriving a lot of users of experiencing full distros like Slackware, openSUSE, PCLinuxOS or Mageia." And others, too.
Meant to give you a big thumbs up on this recommendation.
15 • Re: 9 Ubuntu Mate 14.x (by Walt on 2015-03-16 13:06:05 GMT from North America)
@9: "As it [Ubuntu Mate] matures & gains users I can't see a need for Xubuntu frankly."
How about because the user prefers Xfce over the MATE desktop and doesn't want or need both installed? That might be one reason (I'm pretty sure there might be other reasons as well.). While I do intend to look at Ubuntu MATE for my new computer, I am a fan of Xfce and the Whisker menu. I do not plan to have both on my system.
16 • Re 13 Browsers Older PCs (by Eddystone on 2015-03-16 13:11:41 GMT from North America)
I use Firefox and find that AdBlock and Ghostery add-ons significantly improve browser performance by blocking a lot of unessential crap. Some sites are so poorly coded and include so many scripts that you will never get decent performance without the latest hardware. The other 95% of sites will usually function adequately with slower systems. To me, that's a shortcoming of the website and not a bad reflection of the browser or even the older hardware. If sites cannot be viewed properly or smoothly by slightly older hardware, just avoid them. It's their loss.
17 • @10 Modern software on older computers (by Hoos on 2015-03-16 13:15:48 GMT from Asia)
I was running KDE 4 on Debian Testing on a 10 year old P4 with 1 GB RAM until a month ago when it finally died.
RAM was limited but I had no problem with 6 or 7 open browser tabs, a media player running, plus 1 or 2 documents open on Libreoffice. KWin desktop effects were activated. The main resource hog was Flash.
I would say that Pentium 4s are still fairly capable machines for so-called heavier desktop environments, so long as you have at least 2 GB RAM and you're not doing graphics/CPU-intensive tasks.
KDE took maybe 30+ secs to boot up to the login window. Not horrible. XFCE and MATE also ran fine on my machine.
I think the pre-Pentium 4 hardware is where you really consider something old. :-) That's not to say they can't run Linux too. But there will be lots more restrictions on what you can do and your choice of DEs or window managers.
18 • gnome2/mate (by Lee on 2015-03-16 14:03:35 GMT from North America)
On a desktop system with keyboard & mouse, gnome2 has been my
choice for many years. My desktop is littered with files, links,
directories, pictures, & etc. The top panel has menu, clock,
load monitors, desktop switcher, & app links.
On touch screens in the house, I have Win 8.1, iOS, & android.
Someday, maybe, Ubuntu Touch with Unity will be my desktop of
choice.
@5 & @7 Recently, the magazine, Linux Format, offered a disc
with a Mint 16 respin and 10 IDEs. The default was MATE, but
almost any other desktop you can think of was on offer. It
is very heavy and there is a lot of duplication of apps but
one can simply log off one desktop and onto another.
19 • Ubuntu Mate vs Mint Mate (both LTS, 64bits) (by Carlos on 2015-03-16 14:23:35 GMT from Europe)
By coincidence, I've been trying to decide between the two, because I like Mate.
Here's my experience, on my i3 2120 + 16GB RAM desktop machine.
Ubuntu Mate is much faster to boot and feels much faster overall.
By comparison, Linux Mint Mate 17.1 is horribly s-l-o-w and bloated.
Both tried on the same HDD, same partition.
I didn't yet investigate why Mint is so slow, might just install BUM and start clicking, I suspect there's a lot of trash being loaded.
Or I may simply reformat and install Ubuntu Mate again.
20 • Ubuntu Mate 15.04 for Raspberry Pi 2 (by Mahmut Sedat Eroğul on 2015-03-16 15:11:02 GMT from Europe)
few days ago there was news about Ubuntu Mate 15.04 for Raspberry Pi 2, most probably beta, but not mentioned. I downloaded and copied to microSD tested several days.
I was happy with Raspbian but now I feel better.
Link: https://ubuntu-mate.community/t/ubuntu-mate-15-04-for-raspberry-pi-2/517
21 • @12: Eddystone (by dragonmouth on 2015-03-16 15:19:27 GMT from North America)
"You can't really quantify the specification of "older computers" because it is a moving target that's always changing."
I beg to differ. The time of the writing of an article can be used as the target for the specs. I'm not looking for precise definition, only ballpark. For example - "pre-2010" or "CPU slower than P4, 1.6 ghz"
Thanks for the thumbs up. I find that, for some reason, many writers/bloggers consider any PC older than 6 months to be incapable of running the latest distros. :-)
22 • @9 (by Nick on 2015-03-16 15:29:45 GMT from Europe)
It's a bit silly saying that. You could also say:
"As Xubuntu is mature and has many users, I can't see a need for Ubuntu MATE frankly."
23 • Ubuntu Mate vs Mint Mate (by Angel on 2015-03-16 15:34:04 GMT from Asia)
@19,
That's odd. I've been running Mint Mate since Mint 13 (Now on 17.2) on the same CPU and half your ram, and Mint Mate is not slow and does not feel "bloated," whatever that is. Never a problem. I dual-boot Ubuntu XFCE on the same machine, and I see no noticeable difference between the two as far as performance.
24 • Linux Format magazine's Mint 16 Mega Mix DVD (by Fossilizing Dinosaur on 2015-03-16 16:15:57 GMT from North America)
Per Clem, "
- It's broken in many places ...
- It stacks about 10 DEs on top of each others with no care for integration...
- There are branding issues all over the place
- It's not even based on Mint 16, as thought by Linux Format, but on LMDE 201403. ...
they're a great magazine. This is not like them and it isn't like us to produce something that ridiculously broken.
- They promised to be more strict on this and not to customize Mint anymore. They're sorry, they'll publish an errata in the next issue and it won't happen again.
- If you own that DVD, get rid of it. It's no good, it would have never passed QA and we would have never released something like that.
"
As for me (Fossilizing Dinosaur), I'd recommend cross-platform MultiBootUSB (at SourceForge).
(Whether a particular computer is old or not, isn't it best-practice to mention that some hardware is picky about boot parameters/cheatcodes, and point out how to cope?)
25 • Ubuntu Mate vs Mint Mate (by Carlos on 2015-03-16 16:33:44 GMT from Europe)
@19, Angel:
There is a certain sluggyness in Mint, for instance after booting completely I click on "Computer" for the first time in the desktop to open the file manager and it takes a few seconds to open. (!)
It's an ethernity and sometimes I wonder if I really clicked on it.
Opening Firefox for the first time after booting takes an ethernity too.
After loading it the first time, next time it's fast, it loads instantly.
But Mint Mate is also slow to boot, much slower than Ubuntu Mate and Ubuntu loads the programs much faster.
I guess you could get used to how Mint works.
I can't.
It feels like the most bloated KDE 4 distros, where you see the mouse cursor jumping for 5 seconds before a program starts. LOL.
Mate should be and IS much lighter.
26 • Mint Mate (by Carlos on 2015-03-16 16:40:06 GMT from Europe)
LOL, I can't believe this!
http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=206&t=151635
Quote:
"I looked at this file: /usr/bin/startcaja. It says
Code: Select all
sleep 3
caja -n "$@"
and I changed it to
Code: Select all
#sleep 3
caja -n "$@"
.
Then caja starts instantly."
27 • old pc's (by djsi on 2015-03-16 16:51:15 GMT from North America)
Considering a 10+ year old pentium 4 desktop pc doesn't have a single piece of hardware worth more than 5 dollars in it and can be had regularly for free from most town dumps,I wouldn't bother with anything older than that for the internet.
28 • Ubuntu MATE (by Rick on 2015-03-16 16:58:11 GMT from Planet Mars)
It appears that Canonical finally gave in to the outcries of the Linux community and "backpedaled" on abandoning the GNOME2 desktop. However, after 4 years of trying to convince everyone to embrace GNOME 3 and Unity, I think it is way too late to bring the many users they lost back into the fold. Many former Ubuntuites have simply moved on to other distros such as Mint, which has a team and community that really cares about and actually listens to its users. Unfortunately, the same can't be said for Canonical.
29 • Ubuntu MATE is a fine piece (by Barnabyh on 2015-03-16 17:46:22 GMT from Europe)
Spot on Jessie, my thoughts exactly. People who know my preferences might be surprised (or not, considering stable and predictable is an important virtue in a distribution for me), but IMO Ubuntu MATE is a fine piece indeed.
It brings back the glory days of Ubuntu, around the early versions 5.x and 6.x, brings it up to date and delivers it all with a fresh and more appealing theme. A good call indeed.
30 • Not exactly correct. (by Eddie on 2015-03-16 18:06:39 GMT from North America)
@28, I don't believe that is exactly correct Rick. For one thing, there is no Gnome2. Mate is a whole different animal. Canonical has not backpedaled in any way. Unity, which I do like, is still their main desktop environment even tho Ubuntu Mate is very nice. Why does everything have to be a contest with you people? I do believe that people over estimate the amount of people who left Ubuntu all together for Mint. It's a shame that people in Linux world love to hate each other. As far as Ubuntu Mate goes, it's going to be a force to be reckoned with.
31 • Users preferences? (by mechanic on 2015-03-16 18:41:05 GMT from Europe)
"Many former Ubuntuites have simply moved on to other distros such as Mint, which has a team and community that really cares about and actually listens to its users."
Perhaps some like the alternative - identify some guru/designer/project whose values and approach you admire and follow them, trusting they will lead to better, more attractive systems. Worked for Steve Jobs and Apple, customers aren't always right nor do they always appreciate development and improvements.
32 • Security & Mate (by M.Z. on 2015-03-16 19:29:37 GMT from Planet Mars)
I'm glad to hear that Debian is getting more proactive about security, though frankly I'm a bit surprised that they didn't already have AppArmor enabled by default. It seems like many open source projects have the same bad tendencies as closed source counterparts. I remember hearing something about how some of the major Linux desktops weren't set up to be secure by default, & they expected Distros to handle security. I don't remember what it was exactly, but they expected others to turn security features on rather than shipping stuff secure by default & letting the oddballs that don't want the security turn features off. A very wrong headed attitude, IMHO. This Debian move is in the right direction, though it is a bit later than it should be. I also think Wayland can't ship fast enough if all the security issues in X are going to be eliminated. I think all Linux project should stop relying on their general reputation & get more proactive about security.
@Carlos
So you're saying a Linux Distro might have a minor bug in it? That's far from surprising. From what I can see the big bloat difference in Mint Mate amounts to about 40 MB of extra RAM use & perhaps it a bug in the file manager. At least that is, if RAM usage hasn't shrunk in 17.1 compared to Mint 17 when it was reviewed here on DW: http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20140616#feature
Everyone has different hardware & can run into different bugs, so your experience could be worse than in Jesse's glowing review in Mint 17. Of course if your problem with bloat is that extra 40 MB of RAM you might consider switching to a lighter DE like LXDE. Going with a lighter DE is always the best cure for any feeling of bloat, although switching to other distros can help at the margins. Sorry if you ran into a bug, but that happens in all OSs. I've mainly been using the KDE & Cinnamon versions of Mint, which both seem very snappy on my admittedly newer laptop hardware. I couldn't be much more satisfied with Mint personally.
33 • How to make Mate panel menus faster (by Georgios on 2015-03-16 20:55:53 GMT from Europe)
Since I have just (accidentally) discovered something that solves a bug(?) in Mate, I want to share it with the rest of you who currently use/try Mate.
With vanilla Mate the menus in the panel (Applications, Places and System) are painfully slow regardless of the cpu power of the computer. Sometimes it takes 5 secs for a submenu to open and the icons of the applications to appear (e.g., Applications->Office). This happens randomly (and almost always after login) and it is true at least in Debian and Arch with the default Mate installation.
Well, the problem appears to be the default icon set. If you install mate-icon-theme-faenza and customize your favorite theme to use Mate-Faenza (via System->Preferences->Appearance), then the lag completely disappears! I cannot offer a reasonable explanation for this behavior.
34 • @33 : icon cache not generated ? (by Frederic Bezies on 2015-03-16 21:34:25 GMT from Europe)
I saw same kind of slowness. Could it be related to icon cache not generated on installation ?
35 • Mint (by Carlos on 2015-03-16 22:02:28 GMT from Europe)
@33, M.Z.
What I'm saying is that Mint Mate feels "heavyer", even Firefox takes longer to start.
This, compared to Ubuntu Mate.
It's not the 40MB of RAM, of course, it has to be more than that.
Even Opensuse with KDE doesn't feel as slugish, although it does take some time to boot, too.
BTW, about that Mint bug, did you notice the thread I linked to is from December 2013, related to Mint Mate 16?
You didn't.
What I find ridiculous is that this ridiculous "bug" is still present in Mint Mate 17.1 - now LTS!
I'm sure they'll keep this bug until 2019. :o)
Let me quote another sentence from that thread:
Quote:
"I don't see any reason, why one would like to have this sleep-command, other than only for debugging purposes, so I like to change this, because it annoyes everyone."
Great.
36 • Bugs: fix vs. work-around (by Fossilizing Dinosaur on 2015-03-16 22:21:03 GMT from North America)
For an LTS, it's probably best to establish an (independent?) list of work-arounds, since fixing a bug in an LTS means (a LOT of) re-testing.
37 • Linux Mint 17.1 (by Carlos on 2015-03-16 22:50:32 GMT from Europe)
I've cheched on my Mint 17.1 and Caja still has "sleep 1".
Removing it gets just a little faster (guess what... minus 1 second) but loading it for the first time after boot is still slow.
I'm really sorry but Ubuntu Mate wins.
38 • Re: @34 • @33 : icon cache not generated ? (by Georgios on 2015-03-16 23:05:10 GMT from Europe)
No, it does not appear to be a caching problem. There are various forum threads on the web dealing with this problem, but no real solution is offered. Maybe Ubuntu and Mint do not experience the problem because they don't offer a vanilla installation.
39 • Still snappy for others (by M.Z. on 2015-03-17 00:01:14 GMT from Planet Mars)
@Carlos
Yes, I noticed, so there is a similar issue for you still; however, not everyone seems to have the issue as the review of Mint 17 I linked to indicates. Others seem to be having completely different issues in other versions of Mate (see @34), so Mate in general seems to have some problems.There are probably other issues in Ubuntu Mate that will cause a few users to switch back to Mint. I'm still very happy with the versions of Mint I'm using & others seem happy with Mint Mate (see #23). I guess the kind of differences that #39 is hinting at are causing different issues for different users. If the Ubuntu version works better for you then use it, I'll stick with Mint with KDE & Cinnamon on my various partitions. They offer a lot more of what I like anyway, & XFCE seems more appealing to me than Mate while operating in the same basic niche. If you hit a bug specific to one distro being able to hop to another is always a good options as long as you find a DE that works well for you.
40 • Ubuntu Mate vs Mint Mate (by James on 2015-03-17 00:03:48 GMT from Oceania)
I've been using Ubuntu Mate since it first came out. I like it much more than Mint Mate due to:
Up to date codebase (Ubuntu 14.10)
Does not have preinstalled Mintinstall, mintupdate and other mint apps.
A 'plain' distro - much less software pre-installed by default
Prefer Ubuntu's standard upgrade path.
The only thing I can say that I poach from Mint Repo is the excellent MintMenu + 2 or 3 dependencies; with this I'm more than happy to step back in time to have a stable functioning desktop.
41 • Ubuntu Mate 14.10 and downloading updated software during installation (by Rev_Don on 2015-03-17 00:04:24 GMT from North America)
Jesse, I have had no problems selecting the updated and third party option during installation on Ubuntu Mate 14.04 or 14.10. I am using Intel based systems with a mixture of Intel, nVidia, ATI, and AMD graphics. Not sure what difference that might make, but I have for years had far fewer problems with Intel chipsets and cpus than with AMD based systems.
42 • #27 old pc's (by anticapitalista on 2015-03-17 00:08:55 GMT from Europe)
[quote]Considering a 10+ year old pentium 4 desktop pc doesn't have a single piece of hardware worth more than 5 dollars in it and can be had regularly for free from most town dumps,I wouldn't bother with anything older than that for the internet.[/quote]
The billions of people who live outside the wealthy nations, however, do not have the same choices as you do. They would love to have a "10+ year old pentium 4 desktop pc ... worth more than 5 dollars"
Try to think outside your own reality.
43 • Extras during install (by cykodrone on 2015-03-17 01:35:28 GMT from North America)
@41 and Jesse, I too have had the same problem in the past with several distros that offer that option (3rd party + updates during installation), and that was on my old Intel/Nvidia machine (I switched back to AMD/Radeon and glad I did, I have ZERO problems with my AMD hardware). I guess it depends on your hardware. I got the impression the bork was caused by Nvidia not installing the header properly, configuring the kernel, etc. It's kind of silly to make huge system level changes when the system isn't even installed yet. After wiping the first bork, Nvidia and codecs installed properly (left both options unchecked) AFTER getting to the desktop for the first time. It's a nice idea but if it has the chance (50/50 in my estimation) of leaving n00bs with a sour puss and giving up their install, it should be removed until it works for the majority of hardware setups.
44 • @43 - Ubuntu's installer doesn't install proprietary NVIDIA drivers (by eco2geek on 2015-03-17 02:33:44 GMT from North America)
> I got the impression the bork was caused by Nvidia not
> installing the header properly, configuring the kernel, etc.
At this point, I've installed Ubuntu products (e.g. Kubuntu, Lubuntu, distros based on Ubuntu, etc.) dozens and dozens of times on computers with supported NVIDIA graphics cards.
The installer has NEVER, not once, EVER, installed the proprietary NVIDIA video drivers by checking the "Install this third-party software" box. That's an extra step that has to be done later.
(Any problems I have with that option are usually caused by an Internet connection to a slow repository.)
This is what the "Install this third-party software" checkbox does:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/22285/clarification-of-the-third-party-software-options-during-system-installation
45 • "More Exciting Developments" (by Landor on 2015-03-17 02:39:44 GMT from North America)
What makes an alpha release of a project that releases regularly more of an exciting development than any other recent news?
Keep your stick on the ice...
Landor
46 • Ubuntu Mate and antiX MX-14 (by eco2geek on 2015-03-17 02:42:24 GMT from North America)
(Sorry for the double post; please nuke #44...)
Ubuntu MATE is nice. About the only thing I don't like about it is cosmetic; that's the ugly green highlight color they're using in the menus. Something to get used to.
If you want a distro that's both light on resources and long on usefulness, try antiX MX-14 (hi, anticapitalista). On my computer, MX-14.4-rc1's footprint was less than 200MB when running from a USB stick. That's pretty impressive.
47 • Mint Mate lag? (by Hoos on 2015-03-17 04:22:44 GMT from Asia)
I read somewhere that Mint has higher setting of swappiness than others. If you do some research, I think there are some articles on how to set it lower.
48 • Mint Mate lag (by Carlos on 2015-03-17 10:15:52 GMT from Europe)
@47 - Mint Mate lag, by Hoos
I have 16GB of RAM in my desktop machine and one of the very first things I always do is set vm.swappiness = 1.
And also noatime in all the mounts in fstab.
So, that is not the problem.
49 • Updates during install (by Carlos on 2015-03-17 10:18:24 GMT from Europe)
I never select this because it's a lottery, as during install you can't change the repositories to something nearer to you (ideally, mirrors from your country), so the install with this option selected may turn to be very slow.
50 • Offline install (@49 • Carlos) (by Fossilizing Dinosaur on 2015-03-17 14:20:49 GMT from North America)
I also prefer to install offline, and on initial boot review/adjust settings.
Particularly in LTS releases, DE "development" repeatedly breaks authentication/policy, so it helps to wait for one or two point releases before hoping offline installs will work without hacking in some work-around.
Since fixing bugs in LTS takes a lot of testing and is therefore unpopular/unlikely, work-around notes in installation documentation should be best-practice, avoiding perceptions of "disrespect for standards", not to mention frustrating newcomers.
51 • @Carlos 25, 26 Mint mate (by Angel on 2015-03-17 15:26:03 GMT from Asia)
Just because I had time, I downloaded and installed Ubuntu Mate in Virtualbox alongside an identical VM for Mint Mate. Ubuntu boots about round 3 seconds faster and uses 284MB ram at idle vs 308 for Mint. I really detect no difference opening applications like Caja or Firefox. As I wrote in my previous post, I also see no noticeable difference in performance between Mint Mate and Xubuntu, installed on my hard drive. Not a matter of getting used to anything.
My use of Linux is not philosophical. It is pragmatic. We run a PC shop here, mostly working on Windows PCs, and I really don't want to spend time messing around with my work PCs. Tried Ubuntu first, 9 years ago. Wifi problems. No problem with either Mint or PCLinuxOS. Have tried Ubuntu several times and always something has been lacking. No emotional attachment to Linux Mint other than it works for me with few if any hassles.
I did try editing "startcaja" as per your post about Mint Forum. Didn't really change anything. The delay should be only at start of session, and that seems to be the case. Afterward Caja opens quickly, as in Ubuntu.This was reported as a bug on Launchpad. In my desktop install (Rebecca) it has been changed to "sleep 1" rather than "3." According to Clem, the delay should no longer be needed, but better to read what he says. ("startcaja'" by the way, is not in Ubuntu.)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/1358935
52 • Mint Mate (by Carlos on 2015-03-17 16:36:12 GMT from Europe)
@51, Angel:
Maybe the test in VMs is not exactly the same as in bare metal, but I'm not going to discuss that.
About Mate in general, I'd better return to my beloved and fast(er) XFCE, which is rolling (literally, from the Cauldron repositories) for a couple of years in my laptop with Mageia, without problems.
53 • Mate (by Carlos on 2015-03-17 16:40:28 GMT from Europe)
Oh BTW, I can't resist:
apt-get install thunar :o)
54 • @52 Carlos Mint Mate (by Angel on 2015-03-17 19:58:50 GMT from Asia)
I normally don't have a problem making myself understood, but I guess there's always a first time.
I repeat: I am running Mint Mate on my desktop's hard drive with no issues of lagging, bloating, slowness, etc. I think that qualifies as "bare metal." I am also running Xubuntu (XFCE) on the same desktop, which runs fine but not so much faster than Mint Mate that it is noticeable when using it. Also bare metal. I used the VMs to compare side by side so they would be as equal as possible and since I have no desire to change what's in my desktop at the moment.
55 • Mint MATE icons (by frodopogo on 2015-03-18 05:58:45 GMT from North America)
@33 and those responding to Georgio.
I've had some lagging menu openings in Mint MATE 17 and 17.1, and changing the icons to MATE branded icons seems to fix it. (Thanks, Georgio!)
It may be more likely to happen if you use custom themes.... If I understand correctly, the themes change the icon set even though you might not be intending to do so. I tend to do this first thing after a new installation to make it feel like "home", so that may be the problem. The themes I've been using were off the Gnome-looks site for Gnome 2.
On another computer with MATE, changing to an icon set with the Linux Mint logo fixed the problem.
Preferences>Appearance> Customize (button)>Icons
I've been experimenting, and the Gnome icons also work. The Mint-X icons when used immediately cause the lagging Menu behavior ("start" menu). Maybe the Mint-X icons are incompatible with Gnome themes? IIRC, the Mint -X themes came packaged with Mint MATE 17.1, so maybe they work fine with the Mint-X icons.
56 • Getting rid of lagging in Mate menu (by Georgios on 2015-03-18 14:22:56 GMT from Europe)
@55
frodopogo, you are welcome! It is really a mystery. The default icon set (and theme) for Mate is the one used by Gnome2 (in order to make Mate users feel at home). Obviously, there is something wrong regarding compatibility. The interesting thing is that the choice of theme does not cause any problem - it is the 'wicked' Gnome2 icon set that somehow causes the lagging.
BTW, one can change the leftmost icon next to the Applications menu by replacing /usr/share/icons/matefaenza/places/24/start-here.png with a user provided icon. The new icon can be svg or png (in the latter case it must be 24x24 in size).
57 • LMDE (by Leonard Ashley on 2015-03-19 08:03:45 GMT from North America)
Took LMDE 2 Mate for a spin, got bored and installed openbox 3.5.2-8, obconf, obmenu, tint2, and conky with synaptic. I rebooted into a Crunchbang clone, even with a similiar conky. Tint2 was similiar to Crunchbang's, not the rounded corners that is normally offered. I began to ponder how much of this was in-house with LMDE. Ran into some obmenu issues, simply would not accept changes, but ~/home/.config/openbox/autostart was the culprit with commented out lines pertinent to the obmenu. Actually not a bad openbox, and quite stable. Thought I would toss it out there for folks who are looking for a new openbox to try out. It is on top of Debian Testing, and that is a real plus. Also seems to have some pipe-menus linked to i3 tiling window manager, new on me. Also with the exit, required tl-exit, but installed cb-exit with no problems. I think it will be a good substitute for Crunchbang followers. The default Mate install was really very updated and appearance a welcomed change. LMDE 2 RC was full of surprises.
58 • Some comments (by Alex on 2015-03-19 10:24:26 GMT from Europe)
@ 5 • cmon mate Chris
Is it really necessary to reinstall just to use a different Desktop Environment?
If you are using Debian or Ubuntu, it is just apt-get install "desired DE." If you are using any Mint distro, you'd have to get rid of all kinds of Mint blocks to do something like that.
While, Ubuntu would put out more and more releases, Mint would just stay back with Ubuntu 14.04. Also, LMDE would be at RC level for a long time, and while other developers would release Debian based distros.
59 • @58 (by jaws222 on 2015-03-19 15:07:06 GMT from North America)
"Is it really necessary to reinstall just to use a different Desktop Environment?"
In some cases yes. Pinguy and Parsix are two great examples. They push the default gnome desktop and I always run into issues. Under the hood these are both pretty good distros and when I add the Mate desktop both run like champs. I've been running Pinguy 12.04 for quite a while and all my issues went away when I went to the Mate DE.
60 • Mutiple DEs (by M.Z. on 2015-03-19 17:22:06 GMT from Planet Mars)
In my experience multiple DEs can leave bits of each other floating around & causing a disjointed effect, like wallpaper from Cinnamon showing up every time you log out of KDE for example. I think a fresh install devoid of other DEs would offer the best & lightest experience with any particular DE because that would be no cross contamination between configurations in your hidden .dot files that exist in your /home folder. It might not be noticeable on all system, but it can cause an issue with any shared home folder, whether you're using different DEs in the same distro or booting into a different partitions using the same /home folder.
61 • Is a DE an OS? (by Fossilizing Dinosaur on 2015-03-19 23:28:36 GMT from North America)
Don't some LTS releases consider a Desktop Environment an integral part of an Operating System? This could explain why some "push the default", especially when the default is not compatible with other DEs.
Is "Open Desktop" an oxymoron?
62 • LMDE 2 (by Leonard Ashley on 2015-03-19 23:45:18 GMT from North America)
Topic 57: Had this checked out by others more knowledgeable about Linux, not an LMDE2 issue, seems it could be somehow residual openbox info somehow making it's way into an LMDE 2 install and openbox attempt. I would say this, LMDE 2 behaved quite nicely with openbox, although not the correct file normally associated with a newly applied openbox application. I stand corrected that Crunchbang cloning was an internal hard drive error.
63 • MATE is great. (by Paperless Tiger on 2015-03-20 00:43:09 GMT from North America)
I liked Gnome 2, because, as a user, I felt empowered to redesign the interface to suit myself. The new shell paradigm seems a bit stiff in that regard, although there are several nice shells to choose from. When Ubuntu changed to Unity, I tried it out, but soon embarked on a quest to find my ideal desktop. The problem is, I don't like the default look and feel of any of them. Old school MATE is adaptable, so that works. KDE is even more adaptable, but that cashew was driving me nuts. Note to developers: make everything an option, except for that button that reverts to default when user gets carried away. Thanks.
64 • Multiple DE contamination (by linuxista on 2015-03-20 01:29:58 GMT from North America)
I think it depends on which desktops as far as whether they'll interfere with each other. Generally, the simpler the DE the fewer problems. Also, I avoid mixing GTK and Qt families. So on one partition I have Gnome3, Xfce, Openbox, i3, Awesome and Qtile (I know, I know, but I only really use Gnome, Ob and i3), and they don't interfere with each other at all. On another I've got KDE, LXQt and Lumina, and they seem to be okay together, though I've tested that one less. One thing I've tried before and never will do again is to have Gnome and KDE on the same install (and probably Unity or Cinnamon for that matter).
65 • @ 60, 61, 64: Multiple DEs. (by Kubelik on 2015-03-20 03:33:27 GMT from Europe)
Multiple DEs are certainly often oxymorons.
Multibooting is centainly often your friend:)
66 • Yes & no (by M.Z. on 2015-03-20 07:09:03 GMT from Planet Mars)
@65
I'd warn that multiboot can be just as bad if you're using a shared /home partition, because you have the same cross contamination of .dot files, or else you can't access all your data from the various distros. That's when you have to do some creative stuff like create a unified /data partition that is recognized by all your distros. Be ready to open up nano to edit /etc/fstab & go over the tutorial here:
http://www.linuxtoday.com/blog/2009/08/painless-linux.html
I should play more with GRUB so I can get different distros to play better with each other, but I havn't gone that deep yet. As is stands my laptop has Mint 17.1 Cinnamon & 17.1 KDE working well, but when I try to get PCLOS or Magiea to work I end up reinstalling a Mint so I can get back to Mint after the new distro refuses to recognize the old ones. I also have Mint 17.1 XFCE & Debian playing well on an old junk computer, & of course everything connects to the /data partition well, but not everything duel boots as easily as I'd like. It's always because of a GRUB issue from different & unrelated distros, but I'll probably get it working eventually. I've found lots of generic stuff related to what I'm trying to do, but it doesn't ever seem to do what I want.
67 • @ 66 (by kc1di on 2015-03-20 13:13:37 GMT from North America)
You may be interested in this article. though he doesn't go too deep about it he has a good way of doing multiple distros. both uefi and non-uefi together. good luck ;)
http://www.zdnet.com/article/building-a-pre-release-linux-testbed-with-opensuse-fedora-ubuntu-and-more/
68 • @66M.Z. (by gee7 on 2015-03-20 13:36:59 GMT from Europe)
Re@66 Quote "when I when I try to get PCLOS or Magiea to work I end up reinstalling a Mint so I can get back to Mint after the new distro refuses to recognize the old ones.. " Unquote
hi M.Z. I have had problems in the past with that but not recently - I have 15 open source distros in a multiboot on my old computer, spread over two 500 GB hard drives, including Mint and PCLOS, so the following is how I used to recover grub2 without having to re-install Mint or Debian, or whatever your main operating system is: I found that is is easiest and best to have one main operating system, the grub of which boots all the others. That for me is Debian 8, soon to be new stable.
The following has always worked well for me in the past but whether systemd creates problems now, who knows?
So … how to re-install Grub2 using Linux Mint Debian installation DVD
or any other live DVD on to an operating system which is on, for example, /dev/sdb3.
In the second line, substitute “sdb3” for the root partition that holds the Linux operating system you want to recover.
Thanks to cariboo907 on Ubuntu forums for initial post 3rd February 2011, copied out below:
= ================ =
Pop live installation DVD into dvd drive and boot.
Open a terminal and type:
$ sudo su
# mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt
# mount -o bind /dev /mnt/dev
# mount -o bind /sys /mnt/sys
# mount -o bind /proc /mnt/proc
# chroot /mnt
# grub-install /dev/sdb
# update-grub
# reboot
= ================ =
69 • Multibooot cross-contamination (by linuxista on 2015-03-20 14:19:51 GMT from North America)
@66 "I'd warn that multiboot can be just as bad if you're using a shared /home partition, because you have the same cross contamination of .dot files, or else you can't access all your data from the various distros."
If you're multibooting and sharing a /home partition, each distro/install should have a unique username to avoid cross-contamination. You should end up with a /home/MintUser, /home/UbuntuUser, /home/ArchUser, or whatever, that way the user config files are separate. Then you can create softlinks between the data folders like /home/MintUser/Documents, etc. Works for me, and 0% cross-contamination.
70 • 65 • Multi… (by Fossilizing Dinosaur on 2015-03-20 16:21:45 GMT from North America)
(Indeed, I've only seen a few successful mixes of GTK and Qt.)
In time perhaps using multiple computers will give way to multibooting, then multiple virtual machines, even jails/containers/dockees/domains? Meanwhile, portable is handy…
A separate place for (valuable) data - wisdom.
(Likewise, separate users in common /home for each distro kept.)
Meanwhile, an insistent test distro may be allowed to install its bootloader … to its own partition.
Will os-prober find them all (GrUB2, BUrG, Grub(v0.99/"legacy"(as in PCLinuxOS?), GrUB4dOS, LILO, syslinux, loadlin, GAG, Plop, XOSL, freeldr, DOS/FreeDOS/MSDOS, …, U-boot, CoreBoot, Darwin, NTLDR)?
Will grub-customizer help?
Keep It Short & Simple (and preferably cross-platform).
Linux - It Just Works (aka "I don't care how"), except when it doesn't, of course.
71 • multiple DE conflcts (by linuxista on 2015-03-21 02:22:48 GMT from North America)
I just ran across an interesting article that throws a new wrinkle into using multiple DEs on the same distro install. The guy says:
"I have Gnome, KDE, Cinnamon, Mate, Deepin, and LXDE installed on my Arch system and there is nothing broken. I must admit that the issue of multiple DEs is more visible on Ubuntu-based systems that have forked components of Gnome, which creates some conflicts. Other distributions are quite tolerant of multiple DEs sharing the same space on the hard drive - no hard feelings." http://www.itworld.com/article/2898189/five-reasons-i-roll-with-arch-linux-and-why-you-should-too.html
The system I was referring to above @64 is an Arch install (the KDE one is Manjaro).
72 • Multibooting (by Kubelik on 2015-03-21 02:35:46 GMT from Europe)
On a PC running BIOS the simplest way of multibooting - in my experieence - is first to make a partion table with Gparted (or the like). You can have 4 primary partitions. So this is what I do:
sda1: to have a place to dump unwanted bootloaders.
sda2: here I put my favorite distro.
sda3: use as extended. I make 7 (sub-)partitions and a swap: sda5-12. If you like you can write labels with distro names.
sda4: here I have all my Data, separated from but readily accessible from all 8 distros. I write DATA on the Label.
To automount the DATA partition you have first to make a folder in each distro:
# mkdir /mnt/DATA
Then you tell the distro to automount the DATA partition:
# echo "LABEL="DATA" /mnt/DATA ext4 defaults,noatime 0 2" >> /etc/fstab
To be sure there are no problems with user rights:
# chmod -R 777 /mnt/DATA
To install a distro you chose a partition and install everything in /. You only need one bootloader, the one you want to command the MBR.
As long as the distro has GRUB 2+ it will automatically find the rest of the distros (via os-prober). No need for configuring. But when you install a new distro, you will have to mount the one that commands the MBR and reinstall GRUB.
All other bootloaders you can safely dump in sda1.
- Some distros won't allow install of bootloader in /. And lately some distros automatically install it to MBR - yes, I am looking at you Fedora and openSUSE. Then you can use a GRUB rescue disc to mount the distro you want to have the bootloader in MBR. From there you reinstall GRUB to MBR. Just use the package manager.
Well this has worked for me in a lot of years. Maybe it will work for you. - openSUSE has a pretty GRUB menu:)
Number of Comments: 72
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
| | |
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Archives |
| • Issue 1048 (2023-12-04): openSUSE MicroOS, the transition from X11 to Wayland, Red Hat phasing out X11 packages, UBports making mobile development easier |
| • Issue 1047 (2023-11-27): GhostBSD 23.10.1, Why Linux uses swap when memory is free, Ubuntu Budgie may benefit from Wayland work in Xfce, early issues with FreeBSD 14.0 |
| • Issue 1046 (2023-11-20): Slackel 7.7 "Openbox", restricting CPU usage, Haiku improves font handling and software centre performance, Canonical launches MicroCloud |
| • Issue 1045 (2023-11-13): Fedora 39, how to trust software packages, ReactOS booting with UEFI, elementary OS plans to default to Wayland, Mir gaining ability to split work across video cards |
| • Issue 1044 (2023-11-06): Porteus 5.01, disabling IPv6, applications unique to a Linux distro, Linux merges bcachefs, OpenELA makes source packages available |
| • Issue 1043 (2023-10-30): Murena Two with privacy switches, where old files go when packages are updated, UBports on Volla phones, Mint testing Cinnamon on Wayland, Peppermint releases ARM build |
| • Issue 1042 (2023-10-23): Ubuntu Cinnamon compared with Linux Mint, extending battery life on Linux, Debian resumes /usr merge, Canonical publishes fixed install media |
| • Issue 1041 (2023-10-16): FydeOS 17.0, Dr.Parted 23.09, changing UIDs, Fedora partners with Slimbook, GNOME phasing out X11 sessions, Ubuntu revokes 23.10 install media |
| • Issue 1040 (2023-10-09): CROWZ 5.0, changing the location of default directories, Linux Mint updates its Edge edition, Murena crowdfunding new privacy phone, Debian publishes new install media |
| • Issue 1039 (2023-10-02): Zenwalk Current, finding the duration of media files, Peppermint OS tries out new edition, COSMIC gains new features, Canonical reports on security incident in Snap store |
| • Issue 1038 (2023-09-25): Mageia 9, trouble-shooting launchers, running desktop Linux in the cloud, New documentation for Nix, Linux phasing out ReiserFS, GNU celebrates 40 years |
| • Issue 1037 (2023-09-18): Bodhi Linux 7.0.0, finding specific distros and unified package managemnt, Zevenet replaced by two new forks, openSUSE introduces Slowroll branch, Fedora considering dropping Plasma X11 session |
| • Issue 1036 (2023-09-11): SDesk 2023.08.12, hiding command line passwords, openSUSE shares contributor survery results, Ubuntu plans seamless disk encryption, GNOME 45 to break extension compatibility |
| • Issue 1035 (2023-09-04): Debian GNU/Hurd 2023, PCLinuxOS 2023.07, do home users need a firewall, AlmaLinux introduces new repositories, Rocky Linux commits to RHEL compatibility, NetBSD machine runs unattended for nine years, Armbian runs wallpaper contest |
| • Issue 1034 (2023-08-28): Void 20230628, types of memory usage, FreeBSD receives port of Linux NVIDIA driver, Fedora plans improved theme handling for Qt applications, Canonical's plans for Ubuntu |
| • Issue 1033 (2023-08-21): MiniOS 20230606, system user accounts, how Red Hat clones are moving forward, Haiku improves WINE performance, Debian turns 30 |
| • Issue 1032 (2023-08-14): MX Linux 23, positioning new windows on the desktop, Linux Containers adopts LXD fork, Oracle, SUSE, and CIQ form OpenELA |
| • Issue 1031 (2023-08-07): Peppermint OS 2023-07-01, preventing a file from being changed, Asahi Linux partners with Fedora, Linux Mint plans new releases |
| • Issue 1030 (2023-07-31): Solus 4.4, Linux Mint 21.2, Debian introduces RISC-V support, Ubuntu patches custom kernel bugs, FreeBSD imports OpenSSL 3 |
| • Issue 1029 (2023-07-24): Running Murena on the Fairphone 4, Flatpak vs Snap sandboxing technologies, Redox OS plans to borrow Linux drivers to expand hardware support, Debian updates Bookworm media |
| • Issue 1028 (2023-07-17): KDE Connect; Oracle, SUSE, and AlmaLinux repsond to Red Hat's source code policy change, KaOS issues media fix, Slackware turns 30; security and immutable distributions |
| • Issue 1027 (2023-07-10): Crystal Linux 2023-03-16, StartOS (embassyOS 0.3.4.2), changing options on a mounted filesystem, Murena launches Fairphone 4 in North America, Fedora debates telemetry for desktop team |
| • Issue 1026 (2023-07-03): Kumander Linux 1.0, Red Hat changing its approach to sharing source code, TrueNAS offers SMB Multichannel, Zorin OS introduces upgrade utility |
| • Issue 1025 (2023-06-26): KaOS with Plasma 6, information which can leak from desktop environments, Red Hat closes door on sharing RHEL source code, SUSE introduces new security features |
| • Issue 1024 (2023-06-19): Debian 12, a safer way to use dd, Debian releases GNU/Hurd 2023, Ubuntu 22.10 nears its end of life, FreeBSD turns 30 |
| • Issue 1023 (2023-06-12): openSUSE 15.5 Leap, the differences between independent distributions, openSUSE lengthens Leap life, Murena offers new phone for North America |
| • Issue 1022 (2023-06-05): GetFreeOS 2023.05.01, Slint 15.0-3, Liya N4Si, cleaning up crowded directories, Ubuntu plans Snap-based variant, Red Hat dropping LireOffice RPM packages |
| • Issue 1021 (2023-05-29): rlxos GNU/Linux, colours in command line output, an overview of Void's unique features, how to use awk, Microsoft publishes a Linux distro |
| • Issue 1020 (2023-05-22): UBports 20.04, finding another machine's IP address, finding distros with a specific kernel, Debian prepares for Bookworm |
| • Issue 1019 (2023-05-15): Rhino Linux (Beta), checking which applications reply on a package, NethServer reborn, System76 improving application responsiveness |
| • Issue 1018 (2023-05-08): Fedora 38, finding relevant manual pages, merging audio files, Fedora plans new immutable edition, Mint works to fix Secure Boot issues |
| • Issue 1017 (2023-05-01): Xubuntu 23.04, Debian elects Project Leaders and updates media, systemd to speed up restarts, Guix System offering ground-up source builds, where package managers install files |
| • Issue 1016 (2023-04-24): Qubes OS 4.1.2, tracking bandwidth usage, Solus resuming development, FreeBSD publishes status report, KaOS offers preview of Plasma 6 |
| • Issue 1015 (2023-04-17): Manjaro Linux 22.0, Trisquel GNU/Linux 11.0, Arch Linux powering PINE64 tablets, Ubuntu offering live patching on HWE kernels, gaining compression on ex4 |
| • Issue 1014 (2023-04-10): Quick looks at carbonOS, LibreELEC, and Kodi, Mint polishes themes, Fedora rolls out more encryption plans, elementary OS improves sideloading experience |
| • Issue 1013 (2023-04-03): Alpine Linux 3.17.2, printing manual pages, Ubuntu Cinnamon becomes official flavour, Endeavour OS plans for new installer, HardenedBSD plans for outage |
| • Issue 1012 (2023-03-27): siduction 22.1.1, protecting privacy from proprietary applications, GNOME team shares new features, Canonical updates Ubuntu 20.04, politics and the Linux kernel |
| • Issue 1011 (2023-03-20): Serpent OS, Security Onion 2.3, Gentoo Live, replacing the scp utility, openSUSE sees surge in downloads, Debian runs elction with one candidate |
| • Issue 1010 (2023-03-13): blendOS 2023.01.26, keeping track of which files a package installs, improved network widget coming to elementary OS, Vanilla OS changes its base distro |
| • Issue 1009 (2023-03-06): Nemo Mobile and the PinePhone, matching the performance of one distro on another, Linux Mint adds performance boosts and security, custom Ubuntu and Debian builds through Cubic |
| • Issue 1008 (2023-02-27): elementary OS 7.0, the benefits of boot environments, Purism offers lapdock for Librem 5, Ubuntu community flavours directed to drop Flatpak support for Snap |
| • Issue 1007 (2023-02-20): helloSystem 0.8.0, underrated distributions, Solus team working to repair their website, SUSE testing Micro edition, Canonical publishes real-time edition of Ubuntu 22.04 |
| • Issue 1006 (2023-02-13): Playing music with UBports on a PinePhone, quick command line and shell scripting questions, Fedora expands third-party software support, Vanilla OS adds Nix package support |
| • Issue 1005 (2023-02-06): NuTyX 22.12.0 running CDE, user identification numbers, Pop!_OS shares COSMIC progress, Mint makes keyboard and mouse options more accessible |
| • Issue 1004 (2023-01-30): OpenMandriva ROME, checking the health of a disk, Debian adopting OpenSnitch, FreeBSD publishes status report |
| • Issue 1003 (2023-01-23): risiOS 37, mixing package types, Fedora seeks installer feedback, Sparky offers easier persistence with USB writer |
| • Issue 1002 (2023-01-16): Vanilla OS 22.10, Nobara Project 37, verifying torrent downloads, Haiku improvements, HAMMER2 being ports to NetBSD |
| • Issue 1001 (2023-01-09): Arch Linux, Ubuntu tests new system installer, porting KDE software to OpenBSD, verifying files copied properly |
| • Issue 1000 (2023-01-02): Our favourite projects of all time, Fedora trying out unified kernel images and trying to speed up shutdowns, Slackware tests new kernel, detecting what is taking up disk space |
| • Issue 999 (2022-12-19): Favourite distributions of 2022, Fedora plans Budgie spin, UBports releasing security patches for 16.04, Haiku working on new ports |
| • Issue 998 (2022-12-12): OpenBSD 7.2, Asahi Linux enages video hardware acceleration on Apple ARM computers, Manjaro drops proprietary codecs from Mesa package |
| • Issue 997 (2022-12-05): CachyOS 221023 and AgarimOS, working with filenames which contain special characters, elementary OS team fixes delta updates, new features coming to Xfce |
| • Issue 996 (2022-11-28): Void 20221001, remotely shutting down a machine, complex aliases, Fedora tests new web-based installer, Refox OS running on real hardware |
| • Issue 995 (2022-11-21): Fedora 37, swap files vs swap partitions, Unity running on Arch, UBports seeks testers, Murena adds support for more devices |
| • Issue 994 (2022-11-14): Redcore Linux 2201, changing the terminal font size, Fedora plans Phosh spin, openSUSE publishes on-line manual pages, disabling Snap auto-updates |
| • Full list of all issues |
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
| Shells.com |
Your own personal Linux computer in the cloud, available on any device. Supported operating systems include Android, Debian, Fedora, KDE neon, Kubuntu, Linux Mint, Manjaro and Ubuntu, ready in minutes.
Starting at US$4.95 per month, 7-day money-back guarantee
|
| Random Distribution | 
wattOS
wattOS is a fast desktop Linux distribution based on Debian. Using the lightweight Openbox window manager as its default user interface, the distribution strives to be as energy-efficient as possible so that it can be used on low-specification and recycled computers.
Status: Active
|
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
|
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
