 DistroWatch Weekly |
| Tip Jar |
If you've enjoyed this week's issue of DistroWatch Weekly, please consider sending us a tip.
(Tips this week: 0, value: US$0.00) |
|
|
|
 bc1qxes3k2wq3uqzr074tkwwjmwfe63z70gwzfu4lx  lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhxarpw3jkc7tzw4ex6cfexyfua2nr  86fA3qPTeQtNb2k1vLwEQaAp3XxkvvvXt69gSG5LGunXXikK9koPWZaRQgfFPBPWhMgXjPjccy9LA9xRFchPWQAnPvxh5Le paypal.me/distrowatchweekly • patreon.com/distrowatch |
|
| Extended Lifecycle Support by TuxCare |
|
|
| Reader Comments • Jump to last comment |
1 • GOG.com Now Supports Linux! (by Matti on 2014-07-28 09:26:57 GMT from Finland)
You missed one important news from last week. GOG.com now officially supports Linux. Rather than wait until they had 100 games on launch day they decided to launch early with just 50 games. You can now get DRM-free games in either distro-independent tar.gz archives or DEB files for Ubuntu and Mint LTS. Don't want to spend a dime to try them out? There are two free games you can try out just by registering. Dragonsphere and Stargunner, both first time on Linux!
DISCLAIMER: I am not affiliated with GOG.com. Just an eager fan.
2 • (by dbrion1 on 2014-07-28 09:21:39 GMT from France)
Browser figures and links are interestiong, but wikipedia's audience are students, sometimes teachers (to know how their students cheat?) other profession use it less routinely. This is consisten with the great rank of "smart" "phone"-derived (a young audience) ..
. I noticed that, in an assistance site http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=index (like stackexchange or, maybe, Fedora Ask) people were often encouraged to have a look at wikipedia before asking questions (would find more elaborated answers on trival? questions) . From my estimations, in periods where trivial questions were asked (exams?) wikipedia was recommended with the same frequency than Reading The Holy Manual or asking one's teacher...
Most cybercafés, in France, ban MSIE (as a web browser) in favor of chrome or FF (it takes time -> money to live with MSIE malfunctions) though they keep XP/7...
3 • BlachArch (by steph on 2014-07-28 12:11:02 GMT from France)
Does BlachArch live DVD runs on Virtualbox ?
I tried to use it through Yumi & Vmware Workstation with no success ..
4 • GOG Linux games (by Jesse on 2014-07-28 13:45:29 GMT from Canada)
@1: It wasn't so much that we missed GOG.com's debut of Linux games, but that I felt it wasn't ready to announce yet. I tried to sign up and download a couple of Linux titles and ran into multiple problems (with purchasing, with downloading, with getting support). GOG may officially support Linux, but their site still lacks some support and documentation and not all of their supported titles work yet.
I personally think GOG is moving in the right direction with wanting to support Linux, but they have a ways to go before I will direct people to their offerings.
5 • Deepin review (by Garon on 2014-07-28 14:20:36 GMT from United States)
Well Jessie, Your review of Deepin has been one of the nicest ones so far. I've read several others that have so been so nice to Deepin. I was wondering if you hold off reading other reviews of a distro that you are going to review just so you won't have a tainted opinion? It seems that way to me. Anyway I've downloaded Deepin and when trying it out I didn't really have any problems at all. Seems to be a very nice distro. Nice review also.
6 • Re: Encrypted package downloads... (by Vukota on 2014-07-28 14:27:50 GMT from United States)
Interesting reasons, but I am not convinced correct ones. Usually your network will be bottleneck, not your CPU power to decrypt packages. Its like saying we are not going to use HTTPS sites, because they are very slow. You did not mention cost and hassle to setup HTTPS. Usually it requires SSL certificate which you have to purchase and renew yearly. It also requires (not on modern browsers, but because of it it still does) dedicated IP usually v4, which will cost you additional money (monthly or yearly) and their price is going up, since there are no more v4 available IPs (ISPs have limited number of them and that is it). Who is willing to pay and manually maintain on ongoing base something that is supposed to be free and maintenance free at the first place?
Now, if distributions are willing to use none standard ports and/or protocols with SSL (and self signed certificates), that would be a different story,
7 • Deepin (by mike on 2014-07-28 14:31:13 GMT from Canada)
Hi
I'm a distro hopper, lol, so am constantly trying new ones. I had used Deepin 2013 and at the time had no issues with it.
I tried Deepin 2014 this past weekend and it wasn't for me.
I love the eye candy. All the icons, user interface etc. Its great to look at. But I found it a bit laggy and hesitant at times. I also had difficulty connecting to the internet for some reason and couldn't download anything.
Maybe it was just my settings, I don't know.
8 • Browser stats... (by Vukota on 2014-07-28 14:37:39 GMT from United States)
Interesting observation, but back in a day, I was hiding my real OS/browser with browser extensions that were faking signature as IE. With latest IE version, can your statistical software tell the difference? Nowadays roles changed and IE is faking signature and hiding as "other" browsers.
9 • Deepin (by vaithy on 2014-07-28 14:40:29 GMT from India)
I am one of the early bird that enjoy Deepin 12 but afterwards, it seems, deepin developers are trying more focused to UI instead of functionality...Deepin,in my opinion is,'a Princes with such beauty' , but cann't anyone touch her! what a pity!
10 • Deepin LibreOffice or Kingsoft? (by Jason on 2014-07-28 15:05:47 GMT from United States)
Your review mentioned the included office suite as LibreOffice, but what is listed on the distro info page is Kingsoft, is that just LibreOffice repackaged?
11 • Deepin Review (by DavidEF on 2014-07-28 15:10:34 GMT from United States)
I don't think I've ever read such a glowing review of an OS! If I have, I didn't notice, or at least don't remember. I used to distro hop, but always ended up back at Ubuntu again. Finally, I decided I was just going to stick around Ubuntu and occasionally try out a new Mint release for kicks and giggles. But this review makes me REALLY want to try out Deepin for myself. I like Ubuntu. I like Unity. But, there are a few things that bother me. If Deepin can win me over, it will be the first OS to actually de-seat Ubuntu at my house since 2005, when Ubuntu was the first Linux OS to successfully install on my computer.
12 • Reviews, Deepin and Office suite (by Jesse on 2014-07-28 15:43:11 GMT from Canada)
>> " I was wondering if you hold off reading other reviews of a distro that you are going to review just so you won't have a tainted opinion?"
I almost never read reviews of distributions I plan to review myself. Most times I will avoid visiting a project's forum too as people will flood a forum with first impressions following a release. There have been a few, rare exceptions, but I try to review distributions in an information bubble to avoid tainting the experience.
The exception to this bubble comes from people writing to me to ask me to review a distribution. People will often praise (or complain) about a project they want to see reviewed and this can cause me to look at specific features or problems I might not otherwise find.
>> "Your review mentioned the included office suite as LibreOffice, but what is listed on the distro info page is Kingsoft, is that just LibreOffice repackaged?"
No, Kingsoft and LibreOffice are completely different productivity suites. Kingsoft is closed-source, cross-platform and deals almost exclusively in Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents. It is very good at maintaining MS-Office compatiblity, but lacks many of the applications and file formats LibreOffice supports.
13 • Good distro for old laptop? (by Koro on 2014-07-28 17:40:42 GMT from Belgium)
I have an old notebook equipped with an 1.8 GHz AMD Sempron (therefore 32-bit), 1024 MB of RAM and a deprecated ATI Radeon Xpress 200M graphics card.
This thing is barely able to run Windows XP SP3. For the last few years it has been running Debian Squeeze (old stable) 32-bits with Gnome2 and it works fine.
Now I am considering upgrading to a more current system. It should be extremely light-weight, very stable and have a solid and reliable package manager with packages aplenty. Nice looks and ease-of-use are also important criteria (the laptop is not for me).
I was considering Debian (but it needs some configuration and I am short of time), Crunchbang (but I would need to add desktop icons and a main menu) and Peppermint (most likely the first thing I will try). Also LXLE looks good but they say is heavier than Peppermint or Crunchbang.
I would be glad to hear other suggestions.
14 • Deepin (by Somo on 2014-07-28 18:39:57 GMT from United States)
It's odd how people can see things so differently. I wanted to like Deepin but I found it unusable. The interface, rather than taking the best of other window managers, is an odd conglomeration of confusing patchwork. It's like a Frankenstein. Somehow, everything does manage to look nice though. Not for me but maybe for someone.
15 • @6: encrypted package downloads (by Pearson on 2014-07-28 18:48:38 GMT from United States)
> Usually your network will be bottleneck
I think the encryption overhead is on the server side. I've read that servers incur a fairly small overhead per encrypted connection, but that overhead multiplied by hundreds/thousands of connections per minute (second?) starts becoming noticeable to the clients.
16 • Re: visitor platform and browsers statistics (by cykodrone on 2014-07-28 19:26:42 GMT from Canada)
This "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20140429 Firefox/24.0 Iceweasel/24.5.0" from here: https://wiki.debian.org/Iceweasel means what? The browser identifiers are listed in preferred order?
Regardless, it was interesting reading, some of us love stats. :D
17 • @13 (by kc1di on 2014-07-28 19:37:58 GMT from United States)
I would give Lubuntu or LXLE a try
18 • @13 • Good distro for old laptop? (by pep on 2014-07-28 19:39:36 GMT from United States)
From your comment, you seem quite familiar with Debian, I therefore recommend AntiX. It is VERY light weight (50-80MB logged in, depending on graphics drivers, and very responsive), but all of Debian's goodness is there along with a very reasonable selection of OTB packages. It will run very well on your hardware.
LXLE, although heavier (~100MB, quite responsive) is more polished and strikes an excellent balance between usefulness and resource usage. Great OTB package selection. It will also run quite well on your hardware.
Hope it helps.
19 • @13 - Distro recommendation (by Uncle Slacky on 2014-07-28 20:08:37 GMT from France)
Following on from @18's suggestion of AntiX, its stablemate MX-14 is very nice too (I'm using it at the moment).
20 • Good distro for old laptop (by fernbap on 2014-07-28 20:15:52 GMT from Portugal)
Try Point Linux first. If it gets too slow, there is always crunchbang.
21 • @13 • Good distro for old laptop? (by Koro on 2014-07-28 20:31:30 GMT from Belgium)
Thank you for all the answers. I have been considering all of them plus a few others (such as Puppy derivatives).
I have discarded LXLE because the latest version does not have a 32-bit edition (and it seems it is not going to have it).
I have also discarded MX-14 because the recommended system specs are a bit too high.
I have discarded Lubuntu because Peppermint is a Lubuntu derivative that offers more stuff out of the box at a relatively small cost in terms of RAM footprint.
I have also discarded DPup derivatives because there are poorly documented and therefore it is hard to know what to expect.
This leaves me with AntiX and Peppermint. The first seems more light-weight and the second more polished. I will be trying both in a couple of days.
22 • @13: distro for old laptop (by Jason Hsu on 2014-07-28 21:08:53 GMT from United States)
Out of all of the distros you and others have mentioned, I recommend CrunchBang Linux the most. Providing a desktop is easy. Just install LXDE and follow the procedure at http://crunchbanglinux.org/wiki/howto/add_desktop_icons . The Debian Stable base is why I prefer CrunchBang Linux over antiX Linux and Linux Mint Debian Edition (both of which are based on Debian Testing).
Linux Mint Debian Edition, antiX Linux, and Puppy Linux are also good. If you use LMDE, use the MATE edition, because MATE is lighter than Cinnamon.
If your computer is that slow with Windows XP (and not just because of Windows rot), then the Ubuntu derivatives are probably too slow for your computer as well. Ubuntu has a heavy overhead and has grown to be just as heavy as Windows Vista/7/8. The difference between a Debian base and a Ubuntu base is far greater than the difference between LXDE and Xfce, MATE, etc.
23 • Re: Good distro for old laptop? (by cykodrone on 2014-07-28 21:41:12 GMT from Canada)
wattOS, based on Debian, lots of pre-configuration, lightweight. I would never suggest anything based on Canonical's bloat for old hardware, regardless of their Amazon data mining partnership.
24 • old laptop ideas (by M.Z. on 2014-07-28 22:07:16 GMT from United States)
@13
I think XFCE offerers a decent looking desktop that isn't too heavy. You might consider the XFCE version of Mint, or perhaps you could install the XFCE version of Magia via their main install disc. Both are available in 32 bit and seemed very user friendly to me, and according to the Mint folks 1 GB is a good amount to run their XFCE desktop. I think either would be worth checking out.
25 • @13, Distro for Old Laptops (by Rev_Don on 2014-07-28 22:57:28 GMT from United States)
Aside from some of the other recommendations, Linux Lite would be a good choice as I've run it on a similar specced system.
Just about anything with the XFCE or LXDE desktop should work quite well. But personally my choice for a laptop (or desktop) with those specs would be Point Linux based on Debian with the Mate desktop (Mate is essentially updated Gnome 2). I've been successfully running Point on systems with even lower specs than your laptop with good performance. Fairly easy to install with good hardware support out of the box.
26 • Deepin (by vaithy on 2014-07-28 23:20:17 GMT from India)
Hi, If any of Deepin user that suffering from "disappearing 'Control Center' after updates, open the Terminal and past the following lines,
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade -y && sudo apt-get --reinstall install dde-meta-en && sudo reboot
Thanks for Deepin English forum
with regards,
vaithy
27 • AMD notes (by Somewhat Reticent on 2014-07-29 01:23:27 GMT from United States)
Depending on model, Sempron could be 32-bit or 64-bit. (Booting Radeon Xpress 200M may want nomodeset or radeon.modeset=0 .-)
Itchy errs in claiming LXLE has no 32-bit version - they're using the 12.04.# series, since it's "more compatible with vintage hardware".
28 • @13 • Good distro for old laptop? (by jurassic_ on 2014-07-29 01:46:43 GMT from Brazil)
@13 • Good distro for old laptop? I sugest my current machine setup: Slackware 14.1 plus kde-3.10 from Slackware 13.xx. Yes it works out of the box! Just install packages A AP L N X XAP from Slack 14.1 and KDE 3.10 from Slack 13.xx. Minor tweaks here and there, but all works nicely. It will make your friends think you have a modern OS installed jus because KDE 3.10 is fully configurable! KDE 4 (and 5) plus gnome 3 are bloated and unusable and a shot in the foot of the FreeSoftware enforce. Please pass this forward.
29 • Good distro for old laptop? (by jeferson on 2014-07-29 02:59:23 GMT from Brazil)
@13 Try out Legacy OS.
30 • @27 - AMD Notes (by Rev_Don on 2014-07-29 03:23:56 GMT from United States)
>>> Depending on model, Sempron could be 32-bit or 64-bit.<<<
I'm sure that anyone who has had that notebook for as long as he has would know if it's 32 or 64bit. Stating that it doesn't run XP well would lead me to believe that it's one of the early single core socket 754 models which would definitely be 32bit.
Plus, with only 1gig of ram there would be absolutely no benefit in running a 64bit OS anyway. 32bit would be a much better option.
31 • @15 encrypted package downloads (by Vukota on 2014-07-29 03:48:28 GMT from United States)
> but that overhead multiplied by hundreds/thousands of connections per minute (second?) starts becoming noticeable to the clients
It all depends where do you host. Cloud processing power (like AWS or Azure) becomes cheaper by a day and you can scale very well as needed, when needed.
32 • @ 30 (by RJA on 2014-07-29 04:07:28 GMT from United States)
That Sempron sounds like it's socket 462, a rebadged Athlon XP.
33 • @13 Good Distro for old laptop (by 5000YearLeap on 2014-07-29 04:58:51 GMT from United States)
Well Arch based distros do have low "overhead". Manjaro is a Arch based distro made easy to install. Manjaro have LXDE, Xfce, Openbox, LXQT, Enlightenment, Fluxbox, MATE (GNOME 2 based) and others.
Bodhi Linux based on Ubuntu base, with the Enlightenment DE. If you are still up for Lubuntu, LXDE they do have a 32bit ISO for the 14.04/14.04.1 releases https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/GetLubuntu http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/14.04.1/release/
As someone else mentioned there is Linux Mint Xfce and MATE editions, 32bit. In my experiences with Linux Mint, they have better hardware support than Ubuntu.
Crunchbang is a good Debian based distro. A bunch of others, too. As always YMMV.
Cheers
34 • @13 Good Distro for old laptop (by Hoos on 2014-07-29 05:36:50 GMT from Singapore)
I second post @23 - WattOS is now based on Debian Stable. They have different versions with Openbox, LXDE and Mate.
Go for WattOS LXDE if Openbox is too minimalist for you. You'll get LXDE out of the box
Another Debian stable alternative I recommend is Kanotix LXDE (latest Debian stable version is "Dragonfire"). I'm using this on an old machine, same RAM as you, ATI Radeon X300 graphics. Wiki says your graphics card is based on mine. Kanotix LXDE comes out of the box with their modified Compiz. It runs effortlessly on my system complete with minor desktop effects for the min/max/opening and closing of windows.
Ignore the wallpaper which is unfortunately not the nicest looking. You can always change that later.
35 • Re: Old laptop (by eco2geek on 2014-07-29 07:03:16 GMT from United States)
I've also got an old laptop, with a 1.8 GHz Mobile Sempron 3000+ CPU. (For those who like specs, it's socket 754, codename "Albany".) It's also got an AMD Radeon XPress 200M graphics chipset. Neither the CPU nor the graphics chipset are replaceable. It's got 1GB RAM.
(I remember when the proprietary ATI drivers for Linux were current for that chipset, and it ran Xgl on SuSE, and then, later, Beryl with Cgwd -- precursor to Emerald -- on Kanotix. Fun stuff.)
I currently run Xubuntu 12.04 LTS on it. It uses ~200MB of RAM.
The laptop's slow whenever it performs a CPU-intensive task or a disk-intensive task (or both). The point being, I don't spend time trying to chase down that perfect distro for an old laptop. I just accept that there are times it's going to be slow, which is what I would expect from a laptop from 2005. Really, it's not that bad.
36 • @13 - Specs for MX-14 (by Uncle Slacky on 2014-07-29 07:28:37 GMT from France)
I'm not sure what the recommended specs are for MX-14, but it runs well on my 2007-era Asus eeePC 701 4G (900 MHz Celeron) with 1Gb RAM. It's a little slow to generate the desktop on login, but that's only because I have the compositor turned on. Once booted, it's faster than the Bodhi install I used previously (no doubt due to the difference in bloat between the Debian and Ubuntu code bases).
37 • @13 - Distro for old laptop (by Chris Whelan on 2014-07-29 07:46:32 GMT from United Kingdom)
In a very minor way, I helped out with MX-14 during development as a tester. I can state categorically that it is the lightest Xfce distro of the dozen or so main-stream ones I compared it with.
It will run on a Pentium 3 machine if you have an absolute minimum of 256MB RAM; with 348MB it's usable for basic tasks. On a Pentium M laptop, with 512MB RAM it makes a brilliant every-day machine.
It will run very well on your Celeron, especially with all that RAM!
38 • Deepin: No Way to Configure Fonts? (by Joncr on 2014-07-29 12:05:04 GMT from United States)
I couldn't find anything in Deepin's settings to adjust fonts other than change the size of an unidentified default font.
No way to change font family, change DPI, adjust hinting, etc.
Makes it a no-go for me.
39 • OS for old machines. (by Garon on 2014-07-29 12:25:12 GMT from United States)
There are many options. A lot of good ones have been named already. Usually a person should stay away from the one man distros, I've seen too many come and go, but with the age of the laptop I really wouldn't worry about that. WattOS would be a good choice along with Lubuntu. Another good choice would be an Ubuntu alternative install, a pick only what you need install. I wouldn't worry too much about bloat as that term just boils down to personal opinion as to what bloat is, and also unless you use Tails you will be data mined if you go online and people are foolish to think otherwise. Crunchbang is also a very good option.
40 • re 4 GOG by Jesse (by corneliu on 2014-07-29 12:38:39 GMT from Canada)
Just curious. Did you try to install the games on Ubuntu? i am not sure but I think they said they support only Ubuntu for the moment.
41 • @13 • Good distro for old laptop? (by Koro on 2014-07-29 12:43:26 GMT from Belgium)
I am glad to learn that two of the most respected distros from the rare old times are still alive and kicking. I did not know about the Mepis/AntiX collaboration in MX-14 and I did not know that Kanotix was still around, let alone that it had an LXDE version. Both definitively deserve a try. WattOS also sounds interesting, namely now that it has migrated to a pure Debian base.
42 • @42 • Deepin's Origin (by Koro on 2014-07-29 13:17:24 GMT from Belgium)
"You know, the same country that has been hacking Western corporations, governments and private citizens."
Exactly the same as the USA... In fact, everything you said about China is correct for 90 % of the Word's governments. And the bigger, the worse. Indeed, China, USA and Russia are among the worst in terms of spying on us with malevolent purposed. So, according to your reasoning, we should not trust any distro coming from any country, except maybe Norway?
43 • Correction ... (by Kroy on 2014-07-29 13:32:37 GMT from Canada)
"that should be there in the first place."
-> "that shouldn't be there in the first place."
44 • Deeping and Nvidia Propietary Drivers (by Alecaldi on 2014-07-29 13:33:41 GMT from Argentina)
I've tested the RC two month ago, I guess, and privative drivers made Control Center to crash with no solution in sight (documentation was scarce, to begin with, and I lack knowledge about Gnome 3 (and this derivative in particular). That was enough to hop to something else.
I've read that by final release the bug was still there and. And without propietary drivers I found performance significantly damaged.
Have they fix it by now?
45 • Good Distro for Old Laptop (by Somo on 2014-07-29 14:26:50 GMT from United States)
You might want to try GALPon MiniNo.
46 • Point Linux as a light weight solution.. (by Az4x4 on 2014-07-29 16:09:15 GMT from United Kingdom)
Lots of great suggestions already made for running light weight distros on older laptops. Want to add my voice to others who've mentioned Point Linux as a top notch choice. Based on Debian Stable, and running the light weight MATE desktop with full out of the box capabilities built in, either the 32 or 64 bit versions provide amazing new life for older laptops.
47 • Good Distro for Old Laptop (by The Shadow on 2014-07-29 16:14:58 GMT from Nicaragua)
I can concur with many of the above with Antix, Mx-14, Peppermint, being great on older less well endowed lappys,
I would add that Watt OS would have been on the list, even when it was Umbongo based..It has changed to Debian which has caused a few teething problems i believe regarding repos. But i am sure Biff Baxter will sort it out.. I tried to access the Watt OS website but it seems to be down quoting a DNS issue. ???
Kanotix i havent used recently though it was good in the past. I thought it had expired. but i notice it has regular nightly builds and ISOs to download..
I would also say have a look at Salix, or any of the Slackware based distros..they used to be light on resoucres, I havent tried them for a while as i can't get them to install, It always comes to a standstill on "making file system usable"
Manjaro with Openbox, fluxbox, PekWM could work, as could the Netbook edition which would probably be the better choice.
48 • Good Distro for Old Laptop @13 (by Huge Mess on 2014-07-29 16:51:21 GMT from Brazil)
Koro:
If you want to stick around in Debian, Sparky is based on Testing and offers a number of lightweight DEs. Pavroo, the man behind it, just published statistics about how much RAM and CPU they use, and the ISO come very well equipped.
My two cents. Nice distrohopping ;) !
49 • Deepin Review (by Mac on 2014-07-29 18:20:54 GMT from United States)
I am a kde fan and now I have got to try Deepin. Jesse next time find something bad. Have fun Mack
50 • Old Laptops or computers (by wolf on 2014-07-29 18:46:31 GMT from Germany)
For a friend I had to find a distro which would run on a laptop from 2002/2003, needless to say it wouldn't boot from USB so I had to burn many Images what a waste....
First place much to my surpise did go to Simplicity everything worked out of the box and fast as hell (use of Ramdisk cause the laptop had enough RAM)
Second place the aforementioned Point Linux
I think they are both supposed to work from Usb Stick and so they use RamDisk a lot which worked really fine for my friend even after Installation
Try Simplicity from a stick you'll see what I mean
51 • @13 @50 • Good distro for old laptop? (by Koro on 2014-07-29 19:26:50 GMT from Belgium)
Does Simplicity have an installer? Is it using slapt-get as a package manager? With Slackware repos?
After many years without distro-hopping, my first attempt was wattOS R8 Microwatt. It runs nicely from an USB key. The problem is that the installer does not understand encrypted LVM2.
52 • Deepin (by Platypus on 2014-07-29 21:55:14 GMT from Australia)
I whole heartedly agree that Deepin is one of the most thoughtful and innovative distros I have ever used. Unfortunately, I can't use it on my work box because there are far too many little things that either I can't configure or fix. For example my bluetooth headset can't connect with pulse audio and there is no way (other than good knowledge of the command line) to fix the problem. I can't remove a connection a device either. Nor can I use my nvidia card which is a real pain because I use it for photography and image work. My daughter complains that Minecraft is too slow as well. Lack of dock configuration is another issue. There are other packages and configs that I like to use but Deepin locks you out. However, I love some of the other features like the boot manager, the desktop wallpaper changer. So at the moment I am using and xfce desktop and will wait another year or so for Deepin to mature before I switch back. It is well worth a try for kids just wanting internet and social media though.
53 • @50: waste of ISO burns (by Kazlu on 2014-07-30 08:40:40 GMT from France)
@50 Wolf: "it wouldn't boot from USB so I had to burn many Images what a waste...."
I use CD-RW or DVD-RW without any problems for years, no waste (except of time maybe...). But recently I discovered something that might please you if you face another situation like this: http://www.plop.at/en/bootmanager/index.html
That little thing boots on anything and allows you to then boot on a DVD, USB or whatever. It even fits on... a floppy disk. I hadn't been using floppy disks for years, I found it fun to use them again for a real purpose :D Thanks to my new floppy disk, my old Pentium III powered machine can now boot on DVD and USB, which is necessary today for a majority of live systems if you want to test drive live.
54 • Good Distro for Old Laptop @13 (by CedarCreek on 2014-07-30 09:00:55 GMT from United States)
If you are trying lightweight distros but aren't going minimalist, you really should try Linux Lite 2.0 before you make a final decision. I have a laptop with similar specs and another that is older, and Linux Lite 2.0 seems to just install and work without a lot of the oddball issues I have encountered with some other distros aimed at low resource computers. It has an XFCE desktop and seems very polished to me.
If you're trying several, try this one.
55 • @13 • Good distro for old laptop? (by Koro on 2014-07-30 10:08:18 GMT from Belgium)
Thanks to all for your suggestions. I have learned a few interesting things. After trying three distros, I have ended up installing Debian "Jessie" with LXDE. It feels more responsive a needs less memory than Squeeze with Gnome2. It needs some configuration to make it pretty and usable but not too much. I just wonder when and how will happen the transition from LXDE to LXQt, if it happens....
56 • @48 (by Mac on 2014-07-30 11:49:36 GMT from United States)
If you like debain, you can order the hold set form OSDisc.com on home page and chose the desktop you would like to try.That is what I do and 7.6 I realy like. Have no idea abt low specs. But those 10 disk are fun. Have fun Mack
57 • GOG and Linux support (by Jesse on 2014-07-30 14:42:43 GMT from Canada)
>> "Just curious. Did you try to install the games on Ubuntu? i am not sure but I think they said they support only Ubuntu for the moment."
According to the GOG website, they support the most recent LTS releases of both Ubuntu and Mint. I was testing the games on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64-bit, one of the supported distributions.
58 • @13 • Good distro for old laptop? (by Koro on 2014-07-30 19:51:38 GMT from Belgium)
OK, the system is fully configured and working well. Most often, the bottleneck is the CPU, but as far as you do not multitask a lot is quite alright. The graphics card is also showing its age. All in all, the laptop is more powerful than most netbooks and has plenty of ports and connectors that most netbooks lack. I think it was worth recovering it.
The main problem I see with Debian right now is that one needs to use the --no-install-recommends flag very often. Otherwise you end up with the whole Gnome3 (or KDE) nonsense installed. However, it is not convenient to set this as the default apt-get behavior.
In my opinion most of the recommended packages should be just suggested (such as the entire Gnome documentation when you install Cheese).
59 • @52: Deepin with proprietary nvidia drivers (by eco2geek on 2014-07-31 03:51:59 GMT from United States)
> Nor can I use my nvidia card which is a real pain because I
> use it for photography and image work. My daughter
> complains that Minecraft is too slow as well.
By that, I take it you mean that you can't use the proprietary nvidia drivers from their repositories with Deepin (?).
What you can do is download the latest proprietary driver from nvidia's web site and install it manually. I've tried that with 64-bit Deepin and version 340.24 of the nvidia driver, and it works fine.
(Doing it by hand may require that you set up a custom "xorg.conf," and it may require you to edit /etc/default/grub. It'll definitely require you to blacklist the nouveau driver.)
60 • Third impressions of Deepin 2014 (by RollMeAway on 2014-07-31 04:42:19 GMT from United States)
My install was at the other end of the users experience spectrum from Jesse's.
Computer is a 2.8 Ghz Pentium 4, 2 GB ram, nvidia 6200 video (uses nvidia-304 driver).
Boot up was very slow due to nouveau driver from the live DVD, but it did work.
I started the installer, got to the screen asking which partition to install to, I chose sdb4.
I clicked the button, expecting more questions, but to my surprise it simply installed from there!
No other questions about other partitions, a boot loader, or ANYTHING else.
Results were it did install to the chosen partition but grub2 was installed to the MBR of the second hard drive. This wiped my partition table and provided no means of booting the new install.
Fortunately this was not my first dance. I restored the partition table OK from a backup.
I then used a PMagic rescue CD, and chroot enviornment to get into deepin, and installed grub2
to sdb4 OK.
I booted into deepin successfully and installed 'nvidia-304-update' from a terminal.
Upon rebooting I now have a functioning system.
Not exactly the joy ride others claim.
Now to see if I can tweak the interface enough to satisfy my needs.
61 • @58 --no-install-recommends (by Kazlu on 2014-07-31 08:34:35 GMT from France)
"The main problem I see with Debian right now is that one needs to use the --no-install-recommends flag very often. Otherwise you end up with the whole Gnome3 (or KDE) nonsense installed. However, it is not convenient to set this as the default apt-get behavior. "
Could you give more details about that? You need some GNOME/KDE packages but don't want some of their recommanded dependancies, is that it? Is that the case with every GNOME/KDE package? Can't you find what you need then with alternatives drawing less dependancies, like packages one can often find in LXDE or Xfce desktops? The first example that comes to my mind is Xfburn instead of Brasero. I would like to know more about this.
Also, you say in #13: "Nice looks and ease-of-use are also important criteria (the laptop is not for me)." Isn't that a problem, if that person wish to install some packages and then draws a lot of GNOME unnecessary packages?
I would like to suggest some distros for you but a lot of wise suggestions have already been made :) I would avoid Mageia though, it's nice but not really adapted to low power machines. I tried the LXDE edition on an old Pentium III with 512MB of RAM, it uses 150MB of it when just logged in...
Have fun :)
62 • @60 (by jaws222 on 2014-07-31 11:32:03 GMT from United States)
"Not exactly the joy ride others claim."
That's why I always try new distros out in virtualbox first. I do not like these types of surprises.
63 • @61 • @58 --no-install-recommends (by KI on 2014-07-31 12:37:20 GMT from Belgium)
Well this is a problem with all Debian-based distros, including Ubuntu and derivatives.
The first problem is that often a program is split in several packages and, unless you install all packages, you will not have the full spectrum of functionality. In some cases this makes sense, because the split package can be a library or a plug-in that is shared with other programs. But sometimes it is hard to understand why certain functionality which is intrinsic and exclusive of a given package is offered as a separate package. This is one of the reasons why recommended packages are installed by default in most Debian-based systems (including Ubuntu).
In my ignorant opinion, it would be a lot better not to split a package unless it is strictly required or very convenient so doing. If the current policy is maintained, it would be very convenient, instead, creating meta-packages gathering all the possible functionality of a given application or suite. This would allow users to disable installing recommends globally.
The second problem is indeed desktop environment integration. It is true that for certain applications desktop integration is important. However this is not the case for most packages. For instance, I may want to profit from the power of Gedit while using LXDE without the need of pulling the entire Gnome desktop because, even if Gedit is a "Gnome application" it does not need Gnome to function.
The problem with the current situation is that if I disable install recommends globally I loose functionality in certain applications (unless if I pull all the modules separately, but, in order to do that, I need to know they actually exist); if, on the contrary, I let the configuration as it is, I will be downloading an installing numerous unnecessary packages (which is a problem if you have a slow internet connection, or a small hard-drive or a slow computer).
The solution is checking in a case per case basis whether or not installing a given packages will pull unnecessary bloat into the system and, if so, use the --no-install-recommends flag.
Finally, this is a rather arbitrary thing that often depends on packager's particular taste. For instance, in the past Gedit will pull a lot of Gnome stuff whereas Cheese will not. Now it seems to be the other way around. Less often it is the developers who decide, for instance, Kdenlive needs the whole KDE bloat even to compile it from source.
64 • Avoiding bloat-creep (DebIan-based) (by Fossilizing Dinosaur on 2014-07-31 15:38:11 GMT from United States)
"... recommended packages are installed by default ..."
"The solution is checking in a case per case basis ..."
Or tell Synaptic Preferences not to add "recommended" packages, then ask Synaptic which "recommends" aren't installed.
Isn't there a simple (script-able) command-line version of this simple protocol?
65 • @ 64 • Avoiding bloat-creep (Debian-based) (by Koro on 2014-07-31 19:38:20 GMT from Belgium)
Yes, of course, you can set it system-wide as explained here:
http://superuser.com/questions/615565/can-i-make-apt-get-always-use-no-install-recommends
But, as explained in my previous post, if you do that, some packages will lack certain functionality.
So essentially you have the following options:
1.- Do nothing and live with the bloat.
2.- Set the No-Install-Recommends flag system-wide and install necessary recommended packages one by one.
3.- Use the --no-install-recommends flag in as per package basis.
66 • Lubuntu 14.04 not too functional (by Ben Myers on 2014-07-31 20:28:57 GMT from United States)
Downloaded Lubuntu 14.04 and gave it a run. Why, oh why, oh why, pick anything instead of LibreOffice and Firefox for pre-installed software, a so-called out-of-the-ISO experience?
67 • Granular bloat\\\\\non-core-packaging control (by Fossilizing Dinosaur on 2014-07-31 21:00:24 GMT from United States)
Using only global preferences, "some packages will lack certain functionality".
In Synaptic, would granular controls be best placed under "Advanced Options"? Sounds like a reasonable improvement proposal. It would be nice to tag certain packages with 'no-recommends' or 'all-recommends'. How about a way to tag by functionality!?
And perhaps there's a method via apt configuration file(s)?
(How does DebIan/die.net documentation compare to Ubuntu in this area? etc/apt/preferences etc/apt/preferences.d/ apt-config apt.conf ... hmm...)
68 • Good distro for OLD computers (by TuxTest on 2014-07-31 21:44:47 GMT from Canada)
A miracle today at my job
I have a very old desktop and after tested many many Distro like this: Manjaro XFCE, Manjaro Openbox, Voyageur, Xubuntu, LXLE, Lubuntu and other small distro... The best is the last 14.1 Salix Openbox. Now this old desktop is really fast, I am a big surprise by boot, launch software, firefox is really fast too. The only problen is my old XP 2400 AMD sempron cpu is not supported by last flash Player. Just need to download and install old version of flashplayer on adobe web site.
Step:
After in root just replace the file *libflashplayer.so* by old version in /usr/lib/flashplugin
reboot and bingo you can see on firefox your tv or youtube video or radio station...
Config of my old Desktop:
CPU AMD Sempron XP2400
1024 mo ram
80 go hard drive
Graphic card old 2004 Geforge 6000 serie
1 DVD and 1 CD player.
Good luck
69 • 39 • OS for old machines. (by Garon on 2014-07-29 12:25:12 GMT from United State (by jurassic on 2014-08-01 01:24:02 GMT from Brazil)
Garon says: "Usually a person should stay away from the one man distros, I've seen too many come and go," Yes, some come and go, but the good ones stay. And big people bloated (too many "collaborators") dont make they secure. Last week I have teste two of those big ones. Fedora 20 installer is crude and insecure, one foul step and you get your dual boot system destroyed! It's instable. KDE and LXD are buged and crash all time. I dont recomend it to my enemies. Debian 7.5 the installer is buged or saboted because if you let it to make alterations to the computers mbr it you destroy it (I took it twice!!!), and, the worst, it consumed two ( I say two) hours to complete a simple desktop install. Slackware takes 15 minutes and you get a full system! Knoppix 7.2 make it all in 20 minutes. Windows 7 gets 30 minutes! There is something going wrongly into these big distros. I think it is time to instrospection and fixing!
70 • @66 - Re: Lubuntu 14.04 not too functional (by Rev_Don on 2014-08-01 01:54:50 GMT from United States)
>>> Downloaded Lubuntu 14.04 and gave it a run. Why, oh why, oh why, pick anything instead of LibreOffice and Firefox for pre-installed software, a so-called out-of-the-ISO experience?<<<
That's something that most distros with lightweight DE's suffer from. For some reason the developers are under the mistaken impression that anyone using a light weight desktop like XFCE, LXDE, etc. don't want or need a full featured office suite or browser (among other things). I don't know how they became so delusional,
I have an i7-3770k, an i7-2700k, and an i5-2500 with 8 or 16 gigs of ram but I prefer to use Mate or XFCE as I can't stand the abomination of Unity, Gnome 3, and KDE 4. I want a fairly simple desktop that does what is needed and gets out of my way. LXDE is okay, but is just a bit to limited for my tastes. It's annoying (and a waste of time and bandwidth) to have to either install a distro with the Desktop I can use only to have to uninstall all of the overly limiting and feature lacking applications then install real Big Boy apps or install a distro that has the full featured apps I need then replace the horribly bloated and performance draining desktop with something that allows me to get some serious work done.
LinuxLite gets it right and so does Point Linux so why can't others? I know that there others that do, but I can't think of them at the moment. SolydX gets it wrong as do most of the other XFCE distros. If it wasn't for Point and LinuxLite I would probably do a net-install of Debian, but I would rather USE my system to get some work done than waste a bunch of time playing around with it.
71 • @69 and 70; @66 (by Hoos on 2014-08-01 07:04:48 GMT from Singapore)
One man shows: Kano of Kanotix is still around and his venerable distro is still alive and working well. From what I can see, it's currently not a solo project as the developer of the acritox installer used in Kanotix is also involved. The latter is hosting the Kanotix nightly builds and preview (Debian 'Jessie') images of the next version of Kanotix on his own website. It may not be the most glamorous and trendy distro, but it works.
Of course, for those who mind these things, Kanotix LXDE version does not have Libreoffice out of the box, so you'll have to install it separately. :-D I honestly don't think it's a big issue.
@Koro, since you did not mind installing Debian Jessie+LXDE (net install?), you might want to give Kanotix's Jessie preview images a try. As usual, it's in KDE and LXDE versions. Even the KDE version ran quite well live on my old machine. Might save you the trouble of getting everything configured and set up properly yourself.
Other lightweight distros with a full complement of "Big Boy" apps? MX14.2 is lightweight XFCE but it does come with Libreoffice and Iceweasel out of the box. And everything still fits on a CD. Like Kanotix, not very glamorous, wallpaper not the prettiest, but it works well.
72 • @71 Kanotix Jessie (by Koro on 2014-08-01 08:00:47 GMT from Belgium)
Which one is the Jessie one?
http://debian.tu-bs.de/kanotix/KANOTIX-LinuxTag2014/
Dragonfire or Spitfire?
73 • @72 (by Hoos on 2014-08-01 08:18:09 GMT from Singapore)
Debian Jessie preview image is Spitfire.
Current stable Wheezy version is Dragonfire, which I'm using.
I tried Spitfire KDE live on USB, seemed quite good even on my old machine.
74 • Old PCs for Koro Number 13 (by Arch Watcher 402563 on 2014-08-01 10:44:28 GMT from United States)
Koro, I'm a Debian refugee who fled to Arch. It's night and day. Debian was a nightmare by comparison. I cannot believe the years I wasted with it. Arch is in fact more stable, against Debian's FUD propaganda. If I'm opinionated it's only experience speaking!
I make Arch run 32-bit CPUs with low RAM amzingly fast. If your CPU is pre-i686 class then use another distro for these methods (Gentoo?). If they're not for you, give SliTaz.org a whirl. It's made for speed.
Anyway the key Arch tuning moves are
(1) SSD system disk
(2) busy mounts in tmpfs
(1) IDE/PATA mobos lacking SATA are easy to fix. Get cheap SATA to IDE adapter. The usual SSD tuning like TRIM will apply. I use ext4 without a journal. If your SSD has a SandForce controller, then drop TRIM along with ext4 journals. Trust me, I've never found any help from ext4 journals, just bugs and slowdowns.
The nice part? Old boxes can max out cheaply with whatever top-end video they can handle, etc. All the upgrades are cheaper now than back in the day. A laptop not so much, but you can do the SSD. Technically, even IDE SSDs exist if an adapter won't fit. Worst case: USB2 flash stick.
(2) I run old boxes with /tmp and $HOME and /var/cache junk-o-ramas in tmpfs inside 2 GB RAM on a typical 32-bit mobo. Technically /var/tmp is nonvolatile, but I run it from tmpfs and don't give a rip. No problems at all.
If you go my route, read /etc/tmpfiles.d man page. You can also put pacman's package cache in tmpfs and it will just need cleaning after each upgrade to clear the RAM.
OpenBox works well, but even fat KDE works in an old 2 GB PC. The trick with KDE is moving its infernal kudzu-growth of temp files to RAM and keeping a handle on them there. Yes, they disappear upon reboot, and good riddance, I say.
A script in /etc/profile.d will do:
unset KDEVARTMP
export KDEVARTMP="/tmp/KDEVARTMP_$USER"
mkdir "${KDEVARTMP}" 2> /dev/null
unset KDETMP
export KDETMP="/tmp/KDETMP_$USER"
mkdir "${KDETMP}" 2> /dev/null
Naturally KDE also has fancy-pants graphics effects that may or may not fly with an old video card. Just figure out what works and what doesn't by hand. I get pretty decent aesthetics and window animations from old AGP video cards.
Good luck, Koro!
75 • Distro quality. (by Garon on 2014-08-01 12:18:29 GMT from United States)
@69, "I dont recomend it to my enemies." Thanks for saying that. It made my day. You are right that there are some really good one man distros but a lot of the one man projects fades away after a while. Then there are some that you think will stay around forever but then fizzle out. One of my favorites was Mepis. I loved that distro and the Mepis community but Warren had to make a living. Yes I did enjoy the good old days. The cassettes, the punch cards, the 8 inch floppies, and it's sad that a lot of your so called computer experts today had never had any experience with the old school stuff. Maybe that is why most have such a tendency to complain and whine all the time. Instead of appreciating what they have now, the choice they have now, they cry why isn't it better and why isn't it what "I" want, and why do I have to do anything except turn it on. A sad state of affairs.
76 • One man distros (by fernbap on 2014-08-01 17:11:08 GMT from Portugal)
As someone already said here, he strated with a Debian netinstall and built up from there, struggling all the way not to include useless baggage presented as dependencies for apps he wanted to install,
That is where the "one man distro" comes to the rescue. He already did all the work you are struggling with, doing probably a better job that you would manage to.
Oh, no! The distro ended. What exactly ended? Debian? certainly not. The apps? neither. The DE? Not at all.
All you would have to to to keep your system working would be some clever management of repositories in order to keep your install working exatly as it had been working.
No big deal, is it?
Much worse would be for a large distro to move in a direction you don't agree with or adopt solutions that you can't stand on a personal level.
77 • @74 Arch for old PCs (by Koro on 2014-08-01 17:22:43 GMT from Belgium)
Wow, the notion of disabling journal is very tempting. At least for laptops, for the machine should keep running and eventually be more or less gracefully shut down in case of a power failure. However, I will not try that in a workstation.
In the current scenario, that would obviously involve buying a new battery for the old one is completely kaput.
Regarding Arch and the other stuff. I am not going to use a bloated DE such as KDE or, worse, one that is not only bloated but it is becoming increasingly rigid, such as Gnome3 and Unity, as long as there are more sensible options to fulfil my needs. Happily, there are aplenty: Xfce, LXDE, Mate and, in the near future, LXQt.
Regarding rolling distros, typically they require more maintenance. This is something unavoidable and I do not have too much time for that (well, I am currently on holidays). Besides, I am not an computer-literate fellow and therefore I do not have an intrinsic interest on the matter. That said, I tried Arch long ago and, each times the upgrades broke something, I have able to solve it, but, again, I prefer to to spend time solving avoidable issues. The same goes for Sid derivatives. I have tried many to reach to the very same conclusions. Debian Testing is kind of OK, namely its stabilised derivatives. Well, now with the migration to systemd and libc the Testing experience will be more similar to that of Arch or Sid (and, yes, I am aware that Arch is much more stable than Sid).
I was a Gentoo user for half a year and a Funtoo user for over a year. I remember those days as being spending far too much time in front of a computer.
Debian is just fine. Stable is rock solid and Testing tends to require less tweaking than Arch and, of course, Sid. That is at least my experience. But, then, I do not know, maybe Arch is more stable now than it was the last time I tried.
78 • @69 Debian (by Mac on 2014-08-01 20:09:38 GMT from United States)
I have installed Debian 7.5 and 7.6 somewhere 10 to 15 times in the last 2 months with out any problems. And 7.6 is a snap.
Have fun Mack
79 • Browser & OS stability (by linuxista on 2014-08-01 20:20:01 GMT from United States)
Is wikipedia really mainstream? I wonder what browser market share stats are at Fox News, BBC or Yahoo news are.
I just had a poor experience with Ubuntu 12.04 that shook my distro paradigm. I friend was having trouble updating for a while. He's the type that does NO maintenance whatsoever outside of automatic updates. Never opens a terminal. Happy as a clam running Gnome3 on 12.04 LTS. He was complaining of an error msg saying something about "lock". Okay, easy enough. I removed the lock file but 4 other issues surfaced. One a broken dependency. Solved. But the last 3 when updating package lists were 1) bad gpg keys for updates and backports 2) one of the translation archives wouldn't unzip and 3) if you tried to dist-upgrade anyway there were bad header errors for certain packages. I spent about 45 min. trying various things, incl. apt-get clean and replacing /var/lib/apt/lists & lists/partial, requested new keys, tried a few different repos. Nothing worked. My friend just wants to do a clean install with 14.04 UbuGnome. I don't blame him, and if he had any inclination to do a little bit of maintenance, I'd install Manjaro on his machine. I've always thought Ubuntu derivs were the most stable and best for beginners, but I'm reevaluating that now.
80 • @69 ubuntu (by Mac on 2014-08-01 20:44:05 GMT from United States)
May want to go with 14.04,1 it has been real good for me no longer that is has been out time will tell. But I use Kubuntu on desktop and Debian on laptop. As my go to systems for years and try nearly everything and nothing has replaced them yet. But not everybody likes the same thing and that is what makes the world go round.
Have fun Mack
81 • Debian one-man shows (by RichJack on 2014-08-01 20:52:13 GMT from United Kingdom)
I have been building a one-man show distro/re-spin recently (not yet in Distrowatch though) for the last 2 months and I have mostly been basing on Debian Testing. The switch to Systemd took me by surprise (should have seen it coming and kept an eye on the Debian announcements). Now I need to roll a new ISO, but it'll have to wait until after the summer holidays! Much change in Jessie land at the moment though - packages being dropped left,right and centre - now where did alsa disappear to?
Debian is a beast to deal with. You've got LTS in the stable branch, but for anything up to date, you need testing or sid. Anything that I've found interesting isn't packaged in the Debian repos, but there are often Ubuntu ppas. Not recommend to "mix your sources" but sometimes needs must!
Long and short though, if I stop developing and you have installed my distro/re-spin based on Debian, you can keep rolling with Debian indefinitely unless upstream breaks something for good.
On a different note, LibreOffice is just too big to fit on most distros. I am trying to keep mine to CD size. I don't bother including Abiword though as that certainly doesn't cut the mustard. It's good old Ted RTF editor as a stop gap, Google Docs or install LibreOffice from Synaptic. You've not lost any bandwidth or time really anyway! The trend to DVD sized ISOs is disturbing as even in a UK major city, that's a good 1-2 hour download over the old copper pipes. It has to be Firefox though, not Iceweasel.
Regards and feel free to check out my Xubuntu clone on Debian Jessie (beta release only, some bugs, final will come when Jessie becomes stable: http://sourceforge.net/projects/theme-ix/)
82 • Debian v Arch v Think-4-Self re Koro Number 77 (by Arch Watcher 402563 on 2014-08-02 00:41:44 GMT from United States)
Debian's PR kool-aid tastes good, so good luck with that. I'll just speak to your remarks for the record. Use what you love if it kills you; but for everyone else...
I'm with Koro about KDE and mentioned it only to say tuning matters. Think outside lines drawn by distros, DE nerds, and kernel hackers, and "conventional wisdom."
Debian is not stable. Arch is. That is my summary experience after many years in both. Debian is good at FUD.
Debian re-engineers upstream source, while leaving bugs already fixed upstream still unpatched, often for months or years. I KNOW because I sat waiting for fixes to hit Debian stable or sid. That's what drove me to Arch! Debian's endless crashes from bugs with KNOWN fixes.
The con of Debian is that most upstream changes are dangerous new features. False: most upstream commits are bug fixes. I view Debian's FUD about stability as a flimsy cover story for an ill-designed distro that cannot uptake bug fixes well. I tried hard to love Debian. It has so many branches that you never know what's conflicting with what, and nothing corresponds exactly to upstream code.
Arch is simpler. It does not reengineer. It ships vanilla upstream. And Arch does have a testing branch (little known fact!) which each package passes on its way to main repos. Manjaro gives still more QA.
Virtually all problems blamed on rolling methods are upstream goofs THAT YOU HIT IN DEBIAN ANYWAY -- BUT DEBIAN PR WON'T TELL YOU SO. Especially video drivers and/or kernel. So? Boot Arch's linux-lts kernel package instead. Voila, half vanish.
Besides all that, there exists another way to think outside the lines with rolling distros. I never do it but...here it is...
Nothing requires you, personally, to roll. Stop upgrading any time you like. Or just install and stop. Let your distro do the rolling.
So e.g. install Bridge Linux XFCE, but never do pacman upgrades. Tweak the DE as you please, install extra apps (keep a list), and stuff your confs in etckeeper or git on some external disk.
When Bridge ships fresh ISOs, just wipe your disk and reinstall the fresh release, then overlay confs and apps. The reinstall would take one hour. The list of apps is just a long one-line pacman command you can script. It would be a 6-9 month upgrade cycle, I'd guess. I'm not recommending the idea, just saying it's possible, if Debian PR keeps you worried sleepless over rolling.
Yes Gentoo is pain. And a problem for Gentoo on slower PCs is compile time. I might prefer FreeBSD with its new binary packaging for old PCs. But don't forget SliTaz. It uses OpenBox.
I have used XFCE. Anything related to GNOME is bloatware, and XFCE is a lot slower than even our KDE running in tmpfs. If you like XFCE then try some of the tmpfs concepts with it. And RazorQt might be nice.
We get plenty of power crashes in our area, especially in monsoon season. Even light winds knock out power. We lose it suddenly 3-4 times a year, with many brown-outs as well. We consider our PCs immune. We love them!
We DESIGNED these boxes for crash immunity; tmpfs means no disk activity happens in general. We only save to platter/SSD when we sync $HOME to disk. Otherwise we work from RAM. The most we lose in a crash is a half-hour of work. Apps even load faster because $XDG_CONFIG_HOME lives in RAM.
Granted, the layout is unconventional, but it works and very well. Maybe as RAM gets cheaper, it will evolve into "conventional wisdom" that everybody knows. And while we here use our own techniques, Arch does offer anything-sync-daemon and profile-sync-daemon for consideration.
83 • PS (by Arch Watcher 402563 on 2014-08-02 00:58:58 GMT from United States)
On the concept of reinstalling not rolling, you could vector from stock Arch ISOs too. You'd just have a longer pacman command line to run at upgrade time. Arch ships a fresh install ISO each month.
84 • Stability (by linuxista on 2014-08-02 02:42:22 GMT from United States)
I have to agree: My experience also is that Arch is stable and Debian is not. Over the last 5 years my hdd has been a darwinian clash of 3 or 4 distros at any given time. After having tried almost everything what remains is Arch, Manjaro and Mint. I'm not looking for a hard time; I'm looking for something that gives me what I want without presenting unresolveable problems. And I'm thinking of dumping Mint. I've only ever kept an Ubuntu deriv. for insurance purposes, but despite the FUD the fact is that Arch almost never breaks, and on the rare occasion when it does it's never catastrophic, it's never unique or opaque, and there are always clear fixes in the forums and in the wiki. I'm still waiting for most of the PPAs I use to be updated to Trusty. In the meantime, I'm giving up caring. I never though Arch would be the mainstay, but there it is. It just keeps going.
85 • #! (by linuxista on 2014-08-02 02:47:06 GMT from United States)
If Phillip moved Crunchbang from Debian to Arch it would be the ultimate.
86 • @74 Arch for old PCs (by Koro on 2014-08-02 10:19:57 GMT from Belgium)
Ok, I am giving Manjaro LXQt a try. First I tried it in VB and now I am installing in real hardware. It seems good. Too much stuff in it. The only other issue I have found is that if you choose English as your installation language you can only choose your country among English-speaking ones (well, kind off, because they include Denmark but not other Scandinavian countries or The Netherlands...). There are no other options.
87 • lxqt (by justsayin on 2014-08-02 14:47:05 GMT from United States)
You know of course that LXQt is brand spanking new and probably incomplete and unstable in a number of ways. As long as you don't expect a seamless experience, go for it.
88 • @87 • lxqt (by Koro on 2014-08-02 20:17:40 GMT from Belgium)
Yes, I knew and I know better now. After trying Manjaro LXQt and finding a few issues here and there, I moved to Manjaro Openbox, but responsiveness was not great (same goes for Semplice and Archbang).
I had read in several places that Peppermint (a Lubuntu derivative) provided one of the most responsive desktops among the distros with full DEs. To my delight and surprise, this seems to be the case. The LiveUSB was a bit disappointing, but after installing it to the hard drive, deactivating the desktop effects, removing some useless bloat and applying some of the performance tweaks (primarily from the Arch Wiki but also from other sources such this very forum), Peppermint happens to be the most responsive thing that have ever run on this laptop (apart from the Linux console).
It seems like a keep and I might even consider making a respin of my skimmed-down optimised version...
89 • lxqt (by justsayin on 2014-08-03 01:32:48 GMT from United States)
I'm surprised that Openbox on Manjaro was not a responsive desktop. I wonder what exactly you mean? RAM usage? Read times for opening apps? Recently I've gotten into i3wm. I don't know how much faster you can get, and I've been enjoying it a lot.
90 • Debian being "unstable" (by solt87 on 2014-08-03 07:01:46 GMT from United States)
I'm surprised that several people have found Debian stable to be unstable.... I use Wheezy with only two non-Debian repos (one for libdvdcss2 and another for steam), and the only stuff that ever hung up was Steam games and some 3rd party appllications. And there was less than five cases where I had to restart the whole sytem because of a crash (which again was caused by 3rd party programs).... Just last week I tried Chromium on *buntu (~Debian testing), and it was useless; whereas Wheezy'sChromium is just fine. I never really used any Arch dstro, so I can't comment on their stability, but Debian (stable) is as stable for me as it gets.
Also, why would you need the so called "recent" packages? Unless you are a developer or otherwise *really* need the newest version of a particular program, the stable repo is prefectly fine (security fixes and important features are backported.). Many everyday users couldn't even determine the version of the software they use; I doubt they need anything from the "bleeding edge".
91 • @85 (by jaws222 on 2014-08-03 07:03:30 GMT from United States)
"If Phillip moved Crunchbang from Debian to Arch it would be the ultimate."
Hmmmm. Interesting, although I can't see #! getting better, it's nearly perfect.
92 • @89 • lxqt (by Koro on 2014-08-03 07:30:19 GMT from Belgium)
Obviously, the RAM footprint of OB is much lower than that of LXDE. Now, one of the problems with this old computer was the time that the applications needed to start up. For instance, Firefox could take over 10 seconds with almost any distro (and twice that with the preinstalled Windows XP).
I tried several distros and the differences were relatively small, if sometimes noticeable. But, to my huge surprise, Peppermint is the clear winner in this department. Starting times are only slightly worse than Funtoo (a Gentoo derivative) both with default and with carefully chosen compiler flags. Also, when watching videos online, the performance was rather deficient with most distros. Peppermint is also the winner here. And this is quite remarkable considering that it provides a pretty decent out-of-the box experience (even if I have seen better).
@90 Yes everybody knows that Debian Stable is one of the most stable operating systems out there, right behind RHEL and derivatives.
93 • Debian being "unstable" (by grepnix on 2014-08-03 13:09:28 GMT from United Kingdom)
I run everything on Debian Wheezy. Desktop, Laptops and plug computer servers, I do not understand these people who claim its unstable?? Its extremely rare that I have problems. What are you people doing to make it unstable is my question?
I have used practically everything as a long term distro hopper (Yes even Slackware and Arch) and am pleased now to have found my home with Debian stable. Each to there own I guess...
94 • debian stability (by linuxista on 2014-08-03 15:10:44 GMT from United States)
Sorry, I should clarify that I was talking about Debian testing and unstable, not Debian stable, with which I've never had any stability issues. I do however, find the need for updated apps, which never fails to be problematic with Debian. For example when making ebooks I need a newer version of Calibre with certain bug fixes. I have a friend with Crunchbang Waldorf installed, and Geany only goes fullscreen and it's the old version of Thunar that doesn't allow hidden drives (and maybe tabbed browsing I can't remember). So he's stuck for a couple of years with glitches. Try to get it from testing and you need to upgrade gcc which will break the rest of the system. That's why the only Debian I use is Knoppix on a USB with permanence. Works beautifully as long as you don't try to update it.
95 • @94 • debian stability (by Koro on 2014-08-03 16:01:57 GMT from Belgium)
Adding backports to Stable is relatively safe (namely if you skip system core-related packages, such as the kernel, which in fact is normally the only tricky package in the backported repos).
If the packages you need to update have not been backported then you can mix Stable and Testing. This is a bit trickier. You need some knowledge and prudence. But many people have been doing it successfully for years. I myself had some problems with one of my graphics cards not being supported by the combination of recent Nvidia proprietary drivers and recent versions of the X server. So I updated the whole stable to Testing while keeping the X server from Stable. I used that laptop with that configuration for over two years without a problem.
Another option is building newer versions of the packages you need from source. I have also done that many times and it usually works well. Should you need a newer version of GCC to do the compilation, you can also manage that with update-alternatives.
Of course, this implies a learning curve, but it is possible.
Another option is using a Testing-based re-spin with point releases and avoiding dist-upgrading between releases...
That said, the big difference between Arch as a rolling rdistro and Testing or Sid as rolling distro is that in Arch the rolling distro is the main distro and in Debian neither Testing nor Sid are the main distros. So it is quite normal that Arch should be more polished and Testing or Sid.
96 • @91 Moving CrunchBang to Arch-base (by Somewhat Reticent on 2014-08-03 17:16:43 GMT from United States)
Sounds like ArchBang project at SourceForge ...
97 • debian stability (by linuxista on 2014-08-03 20:07:57 GMT from United States)
I have no problem with apt-pinning, it's just there always seem to be dependency issues. The one requiring a new version of gcc an wanting to uninstall the rest of my system being a show stopper. I didn't realize one could compile with a standalone version of gcc, but on the other hand, at what point is it worth the trouble when you could just install Ubuntu or Manjaro?
Re Archbang: Yes, it's just a bit less polished and tasteful, and with a much smaller community, than #!. Manjaro Openbox is the best solution right now. They should bring Phillip Newburgh on as a guest desktop configurer/designer.
98 • #! guy (by Notso Reticent on 2014-08-03 21:33:12 GMT from United States)
Philip Newborough (aka corenominal)
(Sorry, I'm a bit O-C about spelling/grammar.)
99 • @97 • debian stability (by Koro on 2014-08-03 21:47:29 GMT from Belgium)
Well, the nice thing about the free software ecosystem right now is that it covers the full spectrum between professional-grade stability and cutting-edginess.
If you need something stable for mission critical operation you have RHEL, Debian, FreeBSD (without X), OpenBSD and some of their derivatives.
If you want the latest possible version of every package and do not mind fixing one or two breakages from time to time you have Sid, Arch, Gentoo and their derivatives.
And also you have everything in between.
In the current state of things you cannot have both at 100%, but you have reasonable approximations.
The same applies to "lightweightness", versatility, etc.
100 • @93 Ditto (by cykodrone on 2014-08-04 03:19:16 GMT from Canada)
I totally agree, I've distro hoPed for years, once people are done with the other 'training wheels' distros and have a relatively good understanding of Linux, apt, etc, then Debian Xfce stable is the distro for them (and me). I don't have dependency problems like other people do. I have contrib, non-free, STABLE bpo and STABLE dmo enabled but NOT pinned, not one problem yet. I even broke down and installed the proprietary video driver blob the other day, it installs easily following instructions and it's working good (noveau was causing newly typed text to disappear from comment boxes, like on this site for example, and in forums, it was getting annoying). Other than the tiny disappearing text nouveau bug, no problems, nada, solid as a rock and totally dependable. I can do whatever I did with my old proprietary OS and more, much more. I've mixed repo 'levels' in the past, eventually the install turns in to a mess full of headaches. To the repo mixers, if constant troubleshooting is your thing, then go for it, when you get sick of it, try my setup, it's the best of all worlds, it's not so 'yesterday' but functional and stable. My computer is fast, pretty (I installed the elementary-Xfce-dark icons from github/shimmerproject), totally functional, bug and virus free, it doesn't get any better than this.
I keep the "wheezy" designation (as opposed to replacing "wheezy" with "stable" in the lines below) for more control for when Jessie goes stable;
deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main non-free contrib
deb http:///debian/ wheezy main non-free contrib
deb http:///debian/ wheezy-updates main non-free contrib
deb http:///debian/ wheezy-backports main non-free contrib
deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ wheezy main non-free
(There is no 'contrib' section in the deb-multimedia.org repo, NOTE: this is NOT an officially Debian supported repo, all of the others are)
FYI n00bs, DO NOT select 'prefer backports' in Synaptic, it's only there to resolve higher version dependency issues.
Happy computing. (:
Number of Comments: 100
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
| | |
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Archives |
| • Issue 1155 (2026-01-12): MenuetOS, CDE on Sparky, iDeal OS 2025.12.07, recommended flavour of BSD, Debian seeks new Data Protection Team, Ubuntu 25.04 nears its end of life, Google limits Android source code releases, Fedora plans to replace SDDM, Budgie migrates to Wayland |
| • Issue 1154 (2026-01-05): postmarketOS 25.06/25.12, switching to Linux and educational resources, FreeBSD improving laptop support, Unix v4 available for download, new X11 server in development, CachyOS team plans server edtion |
| • Issue 1153 (2025-12-22): Best projects of 2025, is software ever truly finished?, Firefox to adopt AI components, Asahi works on improving the install experience, Mageia presents plans for version 10 |
| • Issue 1152 (2025-12-15): OpenBSD 7.8, filtering websites, Jolla working on a Linux phone, Germany saves money with Linux, Ubuntu to package AMD tools, Fedora demonstrates AI troubleshooting, Haiku packages Go language |
| • Issue 1151 (2025-12-08): FreeBSD 15.0, fun command line tricks, Canonical presents plans for Ubutnu 26.04, SparkyLinux updates CDE packages, Redox OS gets modesetting driver |
| • Issue 1150 (2025-12-01): Gnoppix 25_10, exploring if distributions matter, openSUSE updates tumbleweed's boot loader, Fedora plans better handling of broken packages, Plasma to become Wayland-only, FreeBSD publishes status report |
| • Issue 1149 (2025-11-24): MX Linux 25, why are video drivers special, systemd experiments with musl, Debian Libre Live publishes new media, Xubuntu reviews website hack |
| • Issue 1148 (2025-11-17): Zorin OS 18, deleting a file with an unusual name, NetBSD experiments with sandboxing, postmarketOS unifies its documentation, OpenBSD refines upgrades, Canonical offers 15 years of support for Ubuntu |
| • Issue 1147 (2025-11-10): Fedora 43, the size and stability of the Linux kernel, Debian introducing Rust to APT, Redox ports web engine, Kubuntu website off-line, Mint creates new troubleshooting tools, FreeBSD improves reproducible builds, Flatpak development resumes |
| • Issue 1146 (2025-11-03): StartOS 0.4.0, testing piped commands, Ubuntu Unity seeks help, Canonical offers Ubuntu credentials, Red Hat partners with NVIDIA, SUSE to bundle AI agent with SLE 16 |
| • Issue 1145 (2025-10-27): Linux Mint 7 "LMDE", advice for new Linux users, AlmaLinux to offer Btrfs, KDE launches Plasma 6.5, Fedora accepts contributions written by AI, Ubuntu 25.10 fails to install automatic updates |
| • Issue 1144 (2025-10-20): Kubuntu 25.10, creating and restoring encrypted backups, Fedora team debates AI, FSF plans free software for phones, ReactOS addresses newer drivers, Xubuntu reacts to website attack |
| • Issue 1143 (2025-10-13): openSUSE 16.0 Leap, safest source for new applications, Redox introduces performance improvements, TrueNAS Connect available for testing, Flatpaks do not work on Ubuntu 25.10, Kamarada plans to switch its base, Solus enters new epoch, Frugalware discontinued |
| • Issue 1142 (2025-10-06): Linux Kamarada 15.6, managing ZIP files with SQLite, F-Droid warns of impact of Android lockdown, Alpine moves ahead with merged /usr, Cinnamon gets a redesigned application menu |
| • Issue 1141 (2025-09-29): KDE Linux and GNOME OS, finding mobile flavours of Linux, Murena to offer phones with kill switches, Redox OS running on a smartphone, Artix drops GNOME |
| • Issue 1140 (2025-09-22): NetBSD 10.1, avoiding AI services, AlmaLinux enables CRB repository, Haiku improves disk access performance, Mageia addresses service outage, GNOME 49 released, Linux introduces multikernel support |
| • Issue 1139 (2025-09-15): EasyOS 7.0, Linux and central authority, FreeBSD running Plasma 6 on Wayland, GNOME restores X11 support temporarily, openSUSE dropping BCacheFS in new kernels |
| • Issue 1138 (2025-09-08): Shebang 25.8, LibreELEC 12.2.0, Debian GNU/Hurd 2025, the importance of software updates, AerynOS introduces package sets, postmarketOS encourages patching upstream, openSUSE extends Leap support, Debian refreshes Trixie media |
| • Issue 1137 (2025-09-01): Tribblix 0m37, malware scanners flagging Linux ISO files, KDE introduces first-run setup wizard, CalyxOS plans update prior to infrastructure overhaul, FreeBSD publishes status report |
| • Issue 1136 (2025-08-25): CalyxOS 6.8.20, distros for running containers, Arch Linux website under attack,illumos Cafe launched, CachyOS creates web dashboard for repositories |
| • Issue 1135 (2025-08-18): Debian 13, Proton, WINE, Wayland, and Wayback, Debian GNU/Hurd 2025, KDE gets advanced Liquid Glass, Haiku improves authentication tools |
| • Issue 1134 (2025-08-11): Rhino Linux 2025.3, thoughts on malware in the AUR, Fedora brings hammered websites back on-line, NetBSD reveals features for version 11, Ubuntu swaps some command line tools for 25.10, AlmaLinux improves NVIDIA support |
| • Issue 1133 (2025-08-04): Expirion Linux 6.0, running Plasma on Linux Mint, finding distros which support X11, Debian addresses 22 year old bug, FreeBSD discusses potential issues with pkgbase, CDE ported to OpenBSD, Btrfs corruption bug hitting Fedora users, more malware found in Arch User Repository |
| • Issue 1132 (2025-07-28): deepin 25, wars in the open source community, proposal to have Fedora enable Flathub repository, FreeBSD plans desktop install option, Wayback gets its first release |
| • Issue 1131 (2025-07-21): HeliumOS 10.0, settling on one distro, Mint plans new releases, Arch discovers malware in AUR, Plasma Bigscreen returns, Clear Linux discontinued |
| • Issue 1130 (2025-07-14): openSUSE MicroOS and RefreshOS, sharing aliases between computers, Bazzite makes Bazaar its default Flatpak store, Alpine plans Wayback release, Wayland and X11 benchmarked, Red Hat offers additional developer licenses, openSUSE seeks feedback from ARM users, Ubuntu 24.10 reaches the end of its life |
| • Issue 1129 (2025-07-07): GLF OS Omnislash, the worst Linux distro, Alpine introduces Wayback, Fedora drops plans to stop i686 support, AlmaLinux builds EPEL repository for older CPUs, Ubuntu dropping existing RISC-V device support, Rhino partners with UBports, PCLinuxOS recovering from website outage |
| • Issue 1128 (2025-06-30): AxOS 25.06, AlmaLinux OS 10.0, transferring Flaptak bundles to off-line computers, Ubuntu to boost Intel graphics performance, Fedora considers dropping i686 packages, SDesk switches from SELinux to AppArmor |
| • Issue 1127 (2025-06-23): LastOSLinux 2025-05-25, most unique Linux distro, Haiku stabilises, KDE publishes Plasma 6.4, Arch splits Plasma packages, Slackware infrastructure migrating |
| • Issue 1126 (2025-06-16): SDesk 2025.05.06, renewed interest in Ubuntu Touch, a BASIC device running NetBSD, Ubuntu dropping X11 GNOME session, GNOME increases dependency on systemd, Google holding back Pixel source code, Nitrux changing its desktop, EFF turns 35 |
| • Issue 1125 (2025-06-09): RHEL 10, distributions likely to survive a decade, Murena partners with more hardware makers, GNOME tests its own distro on real hardware, Redox ports GTK and X11, Mint provides fingerprint authentication |
| • Issue 1124 (2025-06-02): Picking up a Pico, tips for protecting privacy, Rhino tests Plasma desktop, Arch installer supports snapshots, new features from UBports, Ubuntu tests monthly snapshots |
| • Issue 1123 (2025-05-26): CRUX 3.8, preventing a laptop from sleeping, FreeBSD improves laptop support, Fedora confirms GNOME X11 session being dropped, HardenedBSD introduces Rust in userland build, KDE developing a virtual machine manager |
| • Issue 1122 (2025-05-19): GoboLinux 017.01, RHEL 10.0 and Debian 12 updates, openSUSE retires YaST, running X11 apps on Wayland |
| • Issue 1121 (2025-05-12): Bluefin 41, custom file manager actions, openSUSE joins End of 10 while dropping Deepin desktop, Fedora offers tips for building atomic distros, Ubuntu considers replacing sudo with sudo-rs |
| • Issue 1120 (2025-05-05): CachyOS 250330, what it means when a distro breaks, Kali updates repository key, Trinity receives an update, UBports tests directory encryption, Gentoo faces losing key infrastructure |
| • Issue 1119 (2025-04-28): Ubuntu MATE 25.04, what is missing from Linux, CachyOS ships OCCT, Debian enters soft freeze, Fedora discusses removing X11 session from GNOME, Murena plans business services, NetBSD on a Wii |
| • Issue 1118 (2025-04-21): Fedora 42, strange characters in Vim, Nitrux introduces new package tools, Fedora extends reproducibility efforts, PINE64 updates multiple devices running Debian |
| • Issue 1117 (2025-04-14): Shebang 25.0, EndeavourOS 2025.03.19, running applications from other distros on the desktop, Debian gets APT upgrade, Mint introduces OEM options for LMDE, postmarketOS packages GNOME 48 and COSMIC, Redox testing USB support |
| • Issue 1116 (2025-04-07): The Sense HAT, Android and mobile operating systems, FreeBSD improves on laptops, openSUSE publishes many new updates, Fedora appoints new Project Leader, UBports testing VoLTE |
| • Issue 1115 (2025-03-31): GrapheneOS 2025, the rise of portable package formats, MidnightBSD and openSUSE experiment with new package management features, Plank dock reborn, key infrastructure projects lose funding, postmarketOS to focus on reliability |
| • Issue 1114 (2025-03-24): Bazzite 41, checking which processes are writing to disk, Rocky unveils new Hardened branch, GNOME 48 released, generating images for the Raspberry Pi |
| • Issue 1113 (2025-03-17): MocaccinoOS 1.8.1, how to contribute to open source, Murena extends on-line installer, Garuda tests COSMIC edition, Ubuntu to replace coreutils with Rust alternatives, Chimera Linux drops RISC-V builds |
| • Issue 1112 (2025-03-10): Solus 4.7, distros which work with Secure Boot, UBports publishes bug fix, postmarketOS considers a new name, Debian running on Android |
| • Issue 1111 (2025-03-03): Orbitiny 0.01, the effect of Ubuntu Core Desktop, Gentoo offers disk images, elementary OS invites feature ideas, FreeBSD starts PinePhone Pro port, Mint warns of upcoming Firefox issue |
| • Issue 1110 (2025-02-24): iodeOS 6.0, learning to program, Arch retiring old repositories, openSUSE makes progress on reproducible builds, Fedora is getting more serious about open hardware, Tails changes its install instructions to offer better privacy, Murena's de-Googled tablet goes on sale |
| • Issue 1109 (2025-02-17): Rhino Linux 2025.1, MX Linux 23.5 with Xfce 4.20, replacing X.Org tools with Wayland tools, GhostBSD moving its base to FreeBSD -RELEASE, Redox stabilizes its ABI, UBports testing 24.04, Asahi changing its leadership, OBS in dispute with Fedora |
| • Issue 1108 (2025-02-10): Serpent OS 0.24.6, Aurora, sharing swap between distros, Peppermint tries Void base, GTK removinglegacy technologies, Red Hat plans more AI tools for Fedora, TrueNAS merges its editions |
| • Issue 1107 (2025-02-03): siduction 2024.1.0, timing tasks, Lomiri ported to postmarketOS, Alpine joins Open Collective, a new desktop for Linux called Orbitiny |
| • Issue 1106 (2025-01-27): Adelie Linux 1.0 Beta 6, Pop!_OS 24.04 Alpha 5, detecting whether a process is inside a virtual machine, drawing graphics to NetBSD terminal, Nix ported to FreeBSD, GhostBSD hosting desktop conference |
| • Issue 1105 (2025-01-20): CentOS 10 Stream, old Flatpak bundles in software centres, Haiku ports Iceweasel, Oracle shows off debugging tools, rsync vulnerability patched |
| • Issue 1104 (2025-01-13): DAT Linux 2.0, Silly things to do with a minimal computer, Budgie prepares Wayland only releases, SteamOS coming to third-party devices, Murena upgrades its base |
| • Full list of all issues |
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
| Random Distribution | 
Rockstor
Rockstor is a specialist openSUSE-based Linux distribution designed for Network Attached Storage (NAS) and private cloud storage solutions. It is based on popular open-source technologies, such as the Btrfs file system and Docker for automating the deployment of applications inside software containers. In addition to standard NAS features like file sharing via NFS, Samba, SFTP and AFP, advanced features such as online volume management, CoW Snapshots, asynchronous replication, compression, and bitrot protection are also supported. Rockstor provides additional applications, including ownCloud, Syncthing, OpenVPN and Plex. These applications (called "Rock-ons") are powered by a Docker-based application hosting framework. The Rockstor user interface, written in JavaScript, makes it simple to manage the server from within a web browser.
Status: Active
|
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
|
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
