 DistroWatch Weekly |
| Tip Jar |
If you've enjoyed this week's issue of DistroWatch Weekly, please consider sending us a tip.
(Tips this week: 0, value: US$0.00) |
|
|
|
 bc1qxes3k2wq3uqzr074tkwwjmwfe63z70gwzfu4lx  lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhxarpw3jkc7tzw4ex6cfexyfua2nr  86fA3qPTeQtNb2k1vLwEQaAp3XxkvvvXt69gSG5LGunXXikK9koPWZaRQgfFPBPWhMgXjPjccy9LA9xRFchPWQAnPvxh5Le paypal.me/distrowatchweekly • patreon.com/distrowatch |
|
| Extended Lifecycle Support by TuxCare |
|
|
| Reader Comments • Jump to last comment |
1 • Mint Cinnamon (by mandog on 2012-06-18 10:04:53 GMT from United Kingdom)
That was a very positive review. The Mint team has done a good job with Cinnamon. But no doubt some regulars will still insist its just a re-spin.
I myself will not use it as a main desktop as I roll my own with arch as a base and Gnome Shell + testing for Cinnamon-Git. I do have MInt 13 installed but when grub appears I go for Arch/slackware for some reason just personal choice
2 • packages? who cares about number of packages? (by greg on 2012-06-18 10:13:02 GMT from Slovenia)
"over 38,000 software packages" - i keep hearing about this. it's a useless piece of informaiton for the user. The real qestion is how many programmes/applications (or apps for those that want to be cool) are available? Oblivion is one game but comes with many packages that need to be installed. i don't really care about them much.
it's equally "missleading" in software center/manager it will say how many then there is a number are available. turns out that large number are packages. If you go to games there arent actually 1400+ games available but rather only a few (even fewer good ones). well actually close to 100.
3 • Mint Cinnamon (by Marc Visscher on 2012-06-18 10:27:03 GMT from Netherlands)
I think at this moment Linux Mint is the most attractive Linux-distro available, and even more preferable for novice users than Ubuntu is these days. And really... it just works (like it supposed to be, in my humble opinion!) If Linux on the desktop wants to get a bigger user base and a wider audience, Linux Mint shows us how to do it.
I really like the path Linux Mint is going! First with Cinnamon and MATE, now the Mintbox... Clement Lefebvre is doing a great job!
4 • Mint Cinnamon (by Wine Curmudgeon on 2012-06-18 10:55:04 GMT from United States)
That's about the same experience I had. I needed something to run until the next Elementary is ready, and Cinnamon does the job. Sometimes, just works is all you need.
5 • Debian Multimedia Controversy (by Xaver on 2012-06-18 11:04:04 GMT from Austria)
On reading the thread on the mailinglist regarding the "problems" with Marrilat's Debian Multimedia, I'm left with the impression that Mr. Zacchiroli and some other people have much too much time on their hands.
Debian Multimedia just works and always just worked.
But of course that's enough reason to immediately find some fault with and sabotage it ... one should have seen it coming:
Now that the desktop has been "improved" beyond usability, it's the turn of other parts of the Linux Environment.
Timeo developers improvements ferentes :(((
6 • Bitrig (by david on 2012-06-18 11:20:33 GMT from United States)
It's good to see another OpenBSD derivative.
7 • Audio Recording Distribution (by Angel Candelaria on 2012-06-18 11:25:13 GMT from Puerto Rico)
Another good multimedia/recording distribution suitable for beginners is AV Linux. It comes pretty much ready to run, and includes a lot of useful software to record and edit audio.
8 • An appeal for an endangered species, (by Antony on 2012-06-18 11:33:56 GMT from United Kingdom)
The recent fracturing of the official project and the lack of any clear official direction/information has seen a corresponding plummeting down, and out of the Distrowatch top 100 hits per day chart, with Pardus now being listed as dormant.
A lot of people will by now 'accept' that Pardus (as we knew it) is no more. A lot of enthusiastic ex-users will have moved on.
Yes, there is still an official project, but its immediate focus is on the corporate side. There is though, a passionate community-driven effort which is focused on the 'desktop/home' Pardus. But I think they could benefit from some publicity; for people to be aware of the current situation and the actual work that has so far been achieved and to try to attract more support/volunteers.
Perhaps the more than casual ex-users of Pardus will still be keeping an eye on things anyway, and there may not be much of a target audience - I don't know. But one of the hurdles (biggest?) for developers and prospective users of a particular project is language/communication and I think at this 'embryonic' phase there is a lot of activity going on in the 'shell' - but not fully broadcast to the outside world, or even to fairly close observers.
Anyway, hope you don't mind me posting this but I think the future of one of the most promising and innovative distributions of recent years (to my mind at least), is important. Pardus is not 'just another respin' - it was its own distro and demonstrated real innovation and great quality and attention to detail and I think it would therefore be a real loss to Linux if Pardus disappeared.
Perhaps some readers might consider to check out the Pardus Worldforum? They really could use some help.
Thanks.
9 • @3 (by Arkanabar on 2012-06-18 11:35:53 GMT from United States)
That's the thing we ACTUALLY learn from the DW HPD rankings -- which distros are most interesting to people seeking a new Linux distro. Mint has earned its place at the top.
10 • Mint Cinnamon (by NetbookUser on 2012-06-18 11:37:10 GMT from Canada)
I also agree with the review. I immediately felt that everything just works. All the apps I needed were installed. I also find the black screen booting disconcerting. I'm using an atom netbook and the performance is slow. It sometimes takes a few seconds for the menu to appear. The whole desktop also crashes a lot. I can't play videos smoothly. My guess is my 3d driver isn't good enough. If I try to open windows exe with mono runtime, it never does anything. CAD programs in wine don't work at all. The update notifications work for me, there's a little i and if you hover, it says xxx updates available. There's a problem with tooltips not placed properly and unreadable. I'll try Mate, hopefully it's more stable.
11 • the right thing at the right time? (by meanpt on 2012-06-18 11:39:39 GMT from Portugal)
Not being neither a user nor a fanboy of opensuse, when such an important distribution leaves the bandwagon rush release while seeking to rethink its design and building model, it can only impress me and get my respect.
12 • @#3: Mint Cinnamon (by dragonmouth on 2012-06-18 11:41:31 GMT from United States)
I agree that Mint is the distro for novice users, BUT ONLY if used as installed by default. Once the user tries to make changes to the system, it ceases to "simply work". An example would be the uninstall of unneeded/unwanted packages. Most packages are integrated into the core system and the removal of any of then results in making the system unusable.
Mint (and Ubuntu) by default install dozens of language packs, drivers for dozens of printers and video cards. Which is fine as it allows all users to have a system in their own language and their hardware. However, once the desired language and drivers are installed, why force the user to keep 200, 300 and sometimes 400 megs of superfluous software on the drive? The user should be able to uninstall that software.
13 • Multi-distro box (by Paul on 2012-06-18 12:11:01 GMT from United Kingdom)
I'd advise against having a shared home partition. This can lead to conflicts between applications from different distros. A much cleaner, albeit slightly more complicated, approach is to have a home partition per distro and a dedicated data partition. Works for me very well.
Linux Today has more detail - http://www.linuxtoday.com/blog/2009/08/painless-linux.html
14 • @12 (by greg on 2012-06-18 12:11:12 GMT from Slovenia)
i haven't tried unistalling and i don't think newbie would do it. I think MS does something similar (not sure) i.e puts some drivers that are not actually used on disk.
anyway i did a quick math and 400MB would cost the user about 3 cents (mabye even less). i am not really sure this used disk space is actually an issue. unless you have a 90's era maschine with HDD from that age. in which case Mint is probably not the way to go.
and look at it from another angle - you add a new hardware and it has a biogger chance to be plug any play.
15 • @12 • @#3: Mint Cinnamon (by mandog on 2012-06-18 12:44:55 GMT from United Kingdom)
That goes for any Linux distro if the core app you want to remove requires a explicit shared lib.
16 • Q@A: dividing disk (by Luiz on 2012-06-18 13:15:31 GMT from Brazil)
First of all, congratulations about the weekly news!
About "dividing-a-disk", a comment: if you have two distros installed and a single /home directory, as pictured, you'd may run into problems if some distro's config files conflict with the equivalent of one other distro.
I had this problem with Mandriva 2007.1 and Slackware (don't recall the exact version), both sharing KDE 3.5 both installed at the same machine, some time ago.
I found better to have "n" /home directories, one for each distro. There, a single link to a "/var/local/data" "data" partition was set up as ~/data, which ideally would hold only the user's "data", excluding the "configuration". Of course, this generates also some problems, such as programs having two "identities" when called from one or other distro, but the "data" can be managed to be unique.
Not perfect, draws some extra effort, but it worked reasonable well in that case.
17 • @13, @16 partition layout (by Alexandru on 2012-06-18 13:49:16 GMT from Romania)
I always do this way: let configurations to be per-distro while using common data-only partition.
One more reason: along Linux there exist another OSes that can access linux filesystem, namely FreeBSD and Haiku. If all them are installed in one machine, configurations have a good chance to conflict among them.
18 • Multi-distro setup (by octathlon on 2012-06-18 14:23:48 GMT from United States)
We should also mention that you will want to make an Extended partition so that you can have more than 4 total partitions to allow for more than 2 distros.
Like #13, I have always kept a separate data partition and let /home stay with the / partition of each distro. Having your application config settings maintained separately for each distro is both the safety feature and a bit of a pain (have to set up links and edit fstab, and have to re-apply settings in each distro), but seems like the best way.
However, when I got my new laptop last month and installed Ubuntu 12.04, I got lazy and just went ahead and mapped my data partition as /home, thinking I wouldn't bother with any other distros. But Mint is looking so good that now I want to install it. I'm hoping that sharing /home between Ubuntu and Mint should not cause any conflicts, since after all Mint is based on Ubuntu.
19 • mint and other distros (by walter_j on 2012-06-18 14:53:26 GMT from Canada)
I'm using mint 11 and 12 at work, and am happy with both. I have ubuntu 12.04 on a partition at home, but only occasionally try it. I'm unsure how long mint 11 will be supported, but thats ok, since 12 also works fine. Good review - I've had the same experience as jessie.
I'd like to suggest another distro I've been curious about: 2X Thin Client. Or do you need hardware specific for such a distro?
20 • multi boot partitioning (by Joseph on 2012-06-18 14:53:39 GMT from United States)
I have kept my data separate from the operating system for the last 10 years by keeping it on an external drive. This improves reliability of data storage because the external drive only experiences reads/writes when I call for data instead of both when I call for data and the operating system does. I believe the drive lasts longer the less frequently it is accessed. I can also change operating systems reliably by simply unplugging my data drive without worry about losing data.
21 • @2 packages? who cares about number of packages? (by Stuart on 2012-06-18 15:05:37 GMT from United Kingdom)
I (and many others) do care about the number of software packages. Desktop Linux is a system for developers, and so I want access to development software, software libraries, and all sorts of software which isn't a program to an end user.
The Linux world does not begin and end with the Ubuntu Software Center.
22 • @13, @16 (by Patrick on 2012-06-18 15:26:35 GMT from United States)
I also use this approach. I used to do the shared /home thing but it caused problems. Other than having a ~/Data symlink pointing to my separate data partition, I also change the default ~/Documents, ~/Downloads, ~/Music, ~/Pictures, etc folders to symlinks that point to corresponding folders in ~/Data. Seems to work very well. I also use symlinks to have a common mailbox between distros, it works as long as I'm careful to have similar mailer versions between installs.
23 • Re:#7, Audio Recording Distribution (by Apostrophe on 2012-06-18 15:34:25 GMT from United Kingdom)
I agree. AV Linux has a tweaked real-time kernel for better performance of demanding a/v applications. It also receives lots of praise in the reviews of specialist magazines. I'm not so sure though, how beginner friendly AV Linux is. Ubuntu Studio is possibly a more universal and newbie friendly distribution.
An excellent source of information on the subject is Dave Phillips' series of audio articles in Linux Journal ...
http://www.linuxjournal.com/users/dave-phillips
... although they're written from a musician's perspective, they cover the whole range of music production, (multitrack-) audio recording, audio effects, audio restoration, music notation and so on. Very recommended reading.
24 • Debian Multimedia Controversy (by Ron on 2012-06-18 16:49:35 GMT from United States)
I think Debian should just go back to older ways. The distributions seen as certified free software barely even make the ranks here on tis site. Why you may ask? Because people expect the system to work and gimping drivers and whatnot is not a easy way to attract people to your brand.
Debian used to be one of my favorite. When they started stripping the Kernel in order to appease the "purists" I stopped using it. Been using one form or another of GNU/Linux since about 1999. I don't want to regress back to days trying to get my hardware working when there are plenty of distributions that always work out the box.
Going back to a purist was of thinking is a step backwards. Just concentrate on making your system easy to use and maintain the geekyness that has always been Debian and you will do fine. Try and conform to the purists and nice knowing you and you will hit a rank over 100 on DW and Ubuntu with becaome the new Debian. Please don't do this!
25 • Black_screen_in-Linuxmint_boot@10 (by gee7 on 2012-06-18 18:58:32 GMT from United Kingdom)
Like some other users, I'm not too keen on seeing a black screen on boot.
It's a minor quibble, though. As said earlier, this distro deserves to be number one on Distro Watch. It's really easy to use. I wish teachers would get it into classrooms - it deserves a place in education and would be a lot more useful there than Microsoft systems.
To see grub bootsplash info, I guess you need to edit /etc/default/grub using the command line:
sudo pluma /etc/default/grub
if your text editor is Pluma as in Maya Mate.
Changing the line:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash"
to
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=""
and then saving and closing the file, before giving the update command in the terminal:
sudo update-grub
This does the trick but there appear to be 2 pages of boot messages, the first easy to read and the second a blur of speed. Not being a coder, I have no idea on how to slow this page of boot info so that it can be read with ease. Perhaps taking a speed reading course would help :-)
But at least this shows the user that the system is being booted.
26 • Re: 13 • Multi-distro box (by Jim on 2012-06-18 21:27:11 GMT from United States)
I agree with Paul and the others. Sharing a /home partition can lead to conflicts and permission problems. If you use the shared data partition as suggested, then there's really no need for separate /home partitions. Just keep /home within the root (/) partition.
27 • Request for future DW: Privacy distros (by Jim on 2012-06-18 21:28:25 GMT from United States)
I've noticed several distributions that take different approaches to protecting users' privacy, such as Tails, Privatix, Liberté and Ubuntu Privacy Remix.
For a future DW, could you do a rundown of some of these, maybe going over which work best for different situations?
28 • Good for openSUSE (by AnklefaceWroughtlandmire on 2012-06-18 21:29:42 GMT from Ecuador)
Well, I'm glad to see that openSUSE is identifying these issues and working to resolve them, instead of just ignoring serious infrastructure issues like some distros tend to do. openSUSE has always struck me as a very practical, pragmatic, and extremely professional offering, and I plan to stick with it.
29 • Confusion over Debian multimedia (by Ralph on 2012-06-18 21:50:44 GMT from Canada)
In the blog article on Debian given above, Rosenberg says he is not confused. But I think he is. He seems to think that the default install of Debian (with no nonfree and contrib repos) will not play mp3 and mp4 files. But it will, and a lot of multimedia formats can be played once you have installed, say, VLC from the free repo. The nonfree and/or contrib repos will contain the proprietary Nvidia driver (but not the latest, which you can get from the Nvidia website), Adobe flashplayer and proprietary wireless firmware. What you can get from Marilatt's unofficial repo, however, is libdvdcss (for playback of encypted DVDs), some video and audio encoding (as opposed to decoding) software like x264 and transcode, and Adobe Acrobat Reader. (In fact, both x264 and transcode are now in the testing repo, so I don't know what is going on here.) So really, a Debian install without Marilatt's packages is not as bad as Rosenberg makes out.
Another source of confusion (which Rosenberg does not mention) is that there is an official "DebianMultimedia" site which has nothing to do with Marilatt.
30 • Re: Multi-distro setup (by Thomas Mueller on 2012-06-19 02:34:20 GMT from United States)
Even better than an extended partition is GPT, where you can have 128 partitions by default, and optionally more. In GPT, there is no distinction between primary and extended partitions. GPT is useful especially with the newer big hard drives, overcomes the 2 TB limit for traditional fdisk/MBR partitioning.
31 • "Dividing-a-disk asks" (by M. Edward (Ed) Borasky on 2012-06-19 04:05:07 GMT from United States)
Multiple booting of Linux distros to find the best one for a given use case is a highly risky and wasteful effort. It's a lot easier to take the existing Windows or Macintosh machine, install VirtualBox on it and boot up the distros to be evaluated in virtual machines. When you find the one that best meets your needs, *then* go through all the hassles of clearing space for a swap partition, the distro itself and possibly a shared data partition with the machine's main install.
32 • Shared /home (by Branjdon Sniadajewski on 2012-06-19 11:45:42 GMT from United States)
If you want to have a shared /home partition for multiple OSes, it's best to have separate accounts for each distro on your system. Having a separate partition for shared data is also recommended.
33 • @24 debian and purists (by Julian on 2012-06-19 12:38:30 GMT from Satellite Provider)
Most of the non-purists either left debian or never used it. I am using debian but I'd switch to ubuntu or mint in a heartbeat if they offered better support for my hardware. While i am not a purist I value what they do for us. They don't need to give us yet another Ubuntu since we have plenty of those. But keeping free software free isn't a bad thing. If we don't, we might see programs and OSes that dont actually WORK unless you pay for some proprietary component.
34 • dividing disk/separate 'home' partition (by notsure on 2012-06-19 13:15:37 GMT from United States)
You could try this:
let's say you want ubuntu and slackware. create 4 partitions:
/ for ubuntu
/ for slackware
swap (if wanted)
/data
Install ubuntu, then slackware, mounting /data in each
mkdir -p /data/{ubuntu,slack}/USERNAME
Log into ubuntu:
cp -rfp /home/USERNAME/{.*,*} /data/ubuntu/USERNAME
chown -R USERNAME /data/ubuntu
ln -s /data/ubuntu/USERNAME/ubuntu USERNAME
Rinse and Repeat for slackware
Then, all your data and User configs are in 1 partition with backups being non-trivial and clean installs less cumbersome.
hope this helps.
35 • @34, correction (by notsure on 2012-06-19 13:17:55 GMT from United States)
Log into ubuntu:
cp -rfp /home/USERNAME/{.*,*} /data/ubuntu/USERNAME/
chown -R USERNAME /data/ubuntu
ln -s /data/ubuntu/ /home/USERNAME
sorry 'bout that.
36 • Mint Mate (by netbookuser on 2012-06-19 13:40:56 GMT from Canada)
After having tried Cinnamon, I've now tried Mate. It seems faster, videos play smoothly now. I miss not being able to right click a drive and see how much space is free. Don''t know about the other bugs yet, but being able to play videos means I'm keeping it for a while. If you're using a notebook, you might try Mate. Also going to give Zorin a try.
37 • Audio Recording Distribution (by Jawara on 2012-06-19 15:18:54 GMT from United States)
Audio Recording Distribution:
Ubuntustudio: Comes with XFCE Desktop
http://ubuntustudio.org/
KXStudio: Comes with KDE4 and XFCE
http://kxstudio.sourceforge.net/Main_Page
DreamStudio: Comes with Unity desktop
http://dream.dickmacinnis.com/forum/
When you say Cuabase like application, i assume you mean an Audio/MIDI application.
The best i think on Linux thus far is Qtractor, but Ardour 3 is Coming.
I am using a combination of UbuntuStudio and KXStudio with Gnome 3 Desktop with a lowlatency kernel.
38 • Freed OS's - Zealotry vs The Duly Cautious (by Somewhat Reticent on 2012-06-19 16:46:59 GMT from United States)
When purveyors of software refuse to respect a user's choice of hardware or (other) software, whether self-professed freedom zealots or proprietary shills, the effect is the same.
When seeking an OS, I first rule out those who rule my choices out, then seek those which most carefully contain and control any compromising code. Recent efforts to separate compromised code from system cores meant enduring several years of frustration, but we're all better off for it. Like Fedora, DebIan reached high goals, and deserve our support, respect and allegiance. I would hate to see them backslide now.
Of course, I'm also encouraged to see alpha and beta systems finally working (OutOfTheBox) on my not-getting-any-younger hardware. I have every reason to hope that the freed-software community will easily accommodate recent years' hardware proliferation, while keeping it on tight reins.
After all, constant vigilance is always necessary, not only to protect the freedoms we have, but to assure that any concession continues to deliver sufficient benefit to deserve our tolerance.
39 • Ubuntu is Debian. (by Ulf on 2012-06-19 17:17:19 GMT from Netherlands)
@ 37 why recommend 3 diferent distro`s?
All are ubuntu EG Debian,
Take Debian, and install the progs you need.
KISS;
Keep
It
Stupid
Simple
Greetings from the real unix Geek.
40 • Mint MATE (by claudecat on 2012-06-19 17:49:40 GMT from United States)
I have installed and tested both MATE and Cinnamon versions of Mint and for me, MATE is the keeper. Cinnamon just doesn't feel finished yet, and still lacks some configuration options. MATE puts you right back into the Mint 9-11 era - which is a good thing.
I enjoyed the review, but it should be noted that the MATE iso gives you the mintmenu rather than the traditional gnome-style menu that Jesse apparently got by default when installing MATE alongside of Cinnamon.
41 • @2 Number of Packages (by Johannes on 2012-06-19 18:52:00 GMT from Germany)
« Who cares about number of packages? » "over 38,000 software packages"
Thank you for this comment. I have been using CentOS for months, and as far as I can tell, not only the amount of available packages is important, but also how "fresh" they are.
Definitely a problem with Debian stable, RHEL / CentOS and such.
Mint ist an exeptional distro, but some nasty bugs keep me from using it...
42 • LinuxMint development (by DR. GONZO on 2012-06-19 20:55:35 GMT from United States)
One of my favorite Mint "flavors" (horrible pun fully intended) is the very fast "flux box" spin of Mint 9. I'd like to see it brought current with the latest kernel, packages, etc. as was LMDE a few months ago.
43 • @33 - keeping free software free (by Xaver on 2012-06-20 09:27:05 GMT from Austria)
"But keeping free software free isn't a bad thing. If we don't, we might see programs and OSes that dont actually WORK unless you pay for some proprietary component."
This point can't be emphasized enough. The danger of this happening is very real and closer than one might like to believe.
44 • @21 Packages (by DavidEF on 2012-06-20 20:28:17 GMT from United States)
I care about packages, and I'm not a developer. I think it's just fine for someone to not care about packages, and it should also be just fine for those of us who do care. My 11-year-old daughter doesn't care about packages, but I sometimes find I need to access some functionality that isn't a "program" per se. I like how your last sentence puts it:
"The Linux world does not begin and end with the Ubuntu Software Center."
Ubuntu was not the first, nor latest to ship with this particular style "Software Manager" and there's nothing wrong with the idea, but give me Synaptic any day!
45 • Great Mint review (by Mintguy on 2012-06-20 23:27:30 GMT from New Zealand)
This review mirrors my experience with Mint. It is **outstanding**.
Nice clean design, rock-solid feel, and it just "stays out of your way" so you can get things done.
Also good to see an OpenBSD derivative in Bitrig. Very best wishes to them!
46 • why use linux (by david on 2012-06-21 12:23:14 GMT from United States)
Could somebody tell me why they choose mint, ubuntu, magia, etc. I understand that these distros are well supported and have gui's for everything. But what's the point?
Do you choose linux because you can tweak it to your hearts desire, or is it because you want to be different but still have a distro that is windows like.
If one visits the forums of said distros one will immediately come to the conclusion that the user base is novice for the most part.
I am not saying this is a bad thing but it does present a paradox within the linux community.
47 • @46 why use linux? (by Marco on 2012-06-21 16:19:01 GMT from United States)
Why use Linux:
My two use cases (I find myself generally favoring Kubuntu since 11.10):
1. Segregate all my personal usage and virtually all access to the Internet from my work laptop by running Linux virtual machines as guests. The Win7 host only accesses the company intranet, and a very small number of reasonably safe sites.
2. Avoid malware on my home computers, which are accessible to the children by running a live USB.
I think these use cases attracted a non-techie like me. And non-techies can contribute bug reports, improve documentation, and point newbies in the right direction. There are more ways to giving back than to commit code.
48 • @46 Why I choose Ubuntu (by DavidEF on 2012-06-21 17:08:10 GMT from United States)
david,
I started using linux in 2005, with Ubuntu. I had already tried OpenSuse and Redhat, and could not get either to install on my hardware. I had a dial-up internet, and a whole cd download would take over 7 days, downloading 24 hours per day! I got the Redhat CD from a friend, and my brother had downloaded the OpenSuse CD, burned it, and mailed it to me. I wanted linux because I heard it was highly configurable and not prone to crashing and/or needing to be defragged, decluttered, reinstalled, or whatever every few months like XP (my real-life experience, not made up.) I had no delusion that it would be "windows like", nor did I care for it to be.
I searched until I found Ubuntu, and their Ship-It service. They sent me a free CD by slow boat (took about a month) and I booted up linux for the first time. I cut my "linux teeth" on Ubuntu with Gnome. I've since tried other distros, especially after I got dsl internet. I've played around with Puppy, DSL (back when they spelled out what DSL stands for), Vector, Fedora, Mandriva, Lindows, various *buntu spins, remixes, and derivatives, Toorox, 64 Studio, PureDyne, and many others, but I continue to find that Ubuntu meets my needs well enough that there is no benefit to switching. I like it. I even like the infamous Unity desktop. My wife is using Mint with Cinnamon because she prefers the Gnome2-like interface.
I'm not a highly technical user. I like to learn, and I've had many problems that have caused me to need to learn. But, overall, I'll keep my linux problems over going back to Windows. At least the linux problems generally have a reason that I can understand and sometimes fix, other times work around. I don't think having an influx of newbies is a problem, as long as those newbies are willing to roll up their sleeves a little and learn that Linux is a new and different OS, not a "free Windows". Hope this helps answer your burning question.
49 • @46 Why I choose Ubuntu (by mcellius on 2012-06-21 19:11:58 GMT from United States)
I started using Linux a little over a year ago, just about the time Ubuntu 11.04 came out. I knew about Linux through reading computer news, as i worked in IT supporting Windows desktops and networks. I had seen Linux on the desktops of others - but I had no idea about different desktop environments on Linux. I was impressed, though, that sometimes when I needed something done, it seemed that it was always the Linux people who could do things on and over the network that just couldn't be done on Windows. I was very familiar with working with the DOS and OS/2 command lines, so that aspect of Linux didn't frighten me.
So now, no longer working in IT, I was getting frustrated with Windows. Too many security issues of all sorts, too much need to keep buying new versions, too little ability to customize in significant ways (although I was a big user of Stardock's Object Desktop which allowed me to customize to the maximum degree possible), etc. I was just tired of and bored with Windows.
So I decided to get and install Linux. The only versions I could name were Fedora, OpenSUSE, and RedHat, so I began looking at them online. In the process I heard of Ubuntu and learned that it was not only popular, but also seemed to be designed for those new to Linux. Although I was computer-savvy, I was new to Linux, so I decided to give it a try.
I liked it from the beginning, and I've learned a lot. In the past thirteen months I've tried maybe fifty or sixty distros and every desktop environment I could find, and I no longer use Windows on my home computers. Linux lets me do everything I want. It's as easy as I might want, yet as involved and complex as I might need. I can change just about everything and get in deep under the hood when I find that desirable. And after installing and trying so many distros, I keep coming back to Ubuntu because it does seem to me to be the perfect mix of techie and simple.
But Linux to me is not a distro, or hundreds of distros: it's the kernel, the open-source philosophy, the helpful community, etc. Ubuntu is Linux, but so are all the others.
50 • Why use Linux? (by fernbap on 2012-06-21 21:45:55 GMT from Portugal)
I could name a lot of reasons to use Linux:
No viruses, no need to an antivirus
It is stable, no more Blue Screen of Death
Virtually every application a typical user will ever need for free
Pay nothing for a OS that actually works, and do it legally
But THE main reason why i use Linux, you will only find out after you try it:
Linux is fun.
That's it.
51 • @46 (by Mac on 2012-06-21 21:47:02 GMT from United States)
Been in Linux for about 10yrs. now and some of the people here make me look like a beginner. I use Debian KDE and Kubuntu. Low fat settings on all. Why ????
Have Fun
Mack
52 • opeSUSE-Puppy-Why (by Landor on 2012-06-22 02:39:10 GMT from Canada)
openSUSE:
It seems really odd that after increasing their release cycle they still have to halt and deal with stuff.
Puppy:
When I read the comment here (last week?) about Puppy now dealing with the non-root issue it seemed as if it was an official fix, now it's a community fix. Also, wasn't Barry and crew supposedly working on some way to fix it? Will this issue ever really get officially resolved? I personally don't think so.
Why:
The whole why questions smacks as trolling in my opinion. Is there any reason anyone would have to ask why? Seriously? You either use it or you don't, for your own reasons. Who cares what anyone else does, and why. It's gotta be a troll. If not, the question is regardless. Pointless, nothing else.
Keep your stick on the ice...
Landor
53 • Puppy's Peer Pressure (by DavidEF on 2012-06-22 13:14:42 GMT from United States)
@52 Landor,
Puppy running as a single root user was a design decision from the first. Puppy was never meant to be an installed OS, but a convenient little runs-in-RAM live CD. It has since matured and changes have been made along the way. The "community fix" is not a "fix" at all. It is a re-spin or remix for those who might find it useful.
I think Puppy linux has more re-spins and derivatives than Ubuntu, because of the extremely modular nature of the project, and the encouragement from Barry for people to make it their own, use it however they like, have fun with it, and share what they do with others. This is just another one of those community spins.
We in the linux community at large have been beat over the head so much about protecting the root account that we seem to have forgotten that the greatest security risk is between the keyboard and the chair. We give people sudo power using their own user password, automatic login to the desktop, and other modern conveniences, just so they can BYPASS security, and get on with what they WANT to do, all the while thinking they're safe because they're not logged in as root.
I'm not assuming you're party to any of this, or that you agree with any of it. I'm just stating that linux security depends on the user having a brain. It always has, and hopefully always will. The only alternative is the Windows model of having anti-malware programs eating up resources 24/7 to "protect" us from the bad guys.
54 • RE: 53 (by Landor on 2012-06-22 14:53:11 GMT from Canada)
#53
Why would you even bring up another operating system. I find it ironic that you did though. It proved that you really didn't know what you were trying to talk about. Running as root and given ultimate powers on the other OS' are exactly the same thing.
Yet here you are talking down the scaled down privileges of sudo, and a password. I haven't read anything so disturbing in a long time. You need to take a more serious look at trying to understand security, and risks involved before defending running a wide open system as root.
WoW.
Keep your stick on the ice...
Landor
55 • Deepin (by Hassle on 2012-06-22 15:29:26 GMT from Ireland)
ONE MORE TIME : as it seems to be very difficult to understand ....
There's an international version of Deepin, new release coming up very soon :
http://www.linuxdeepin.com/download
reg.
Hassle
56 • @54 (by DavidEF on 2012-06-22 15:30:20 GMT from United States)
Landor,
Perhaps I am a little bit ignorant on the subject of security, because I totally missed the point of what you just said. I will try to catch a couple things and respond to them. Tell me if I misunderstood you.
"Running as root and given ultimate powers on the other OS' are exactly the same thing."
I disagree. There is a lot more to security than whether a person is running as root or not. The problem with the "other OS" (I guess you're talking about Windows) is that it started as a single-user system, then added multiple user capability without changing the security model. What Barry has done with Puppy linux is just the opposite. He took a true multi-user system, and made it single user, also without significantly changing the security model. While addressing this subject, can we just look momentarily at the term "single user"? If I'm running a "single user" system, am I not "root", no matter what you call it?
"You need to take a more serious look at trying to understand security, and risks involved before defending running a wide open system as root."
Well, you may be right, that I need to look at security more seriously, but I still disagree with the assertion you make in this statement, that the fact of running as root, taken by itself, is a major security threat. You seem to believe that running as root negates all other security measures. I think it doesn't. In fact, you equate running as root with being "wide open" as if the two are inseparable. I think they aren't. Maybe I'm wrong. I'm definitely open to the possibility that I am.
57 • Why Linux and security (by Jesse on 2012-06-22 16:56:50 GMT from Canada)
I run Linux because it does what I want it to do. It's inexpensive, it comes with lots of great development tools, much of the software I need is installed by default and running Linux avoids many malware threats. Perhaps the biggest reason though is package management. Hunting down and installing software and dependencies on other OSes is a huge waste of time. With most Linux distros it's a simple matter of going to the package manager, selecting the appropriate category and clicking the download button.
>> " In fact, you equate running as root with being "wide open" as if the two are inseparable. I think they aren't. Maybe I'm wrong."
The two often go hand in hand, but they are definitely separable. Several years ago a developer (I think he worked with Red Hat) set up a Fedora installation and gave everyone root access to the box.. It stayed uncompromised for weeks. It was a test of SELinux, to see if the kernel modifications could be used to protect a system even when the root account was compromised.
Security is all about layers. Not running as root is one of those layers, but there are many others.
58 • root security (by notsure on 2012-06-22 17:37:23 GMT from United States)
running a 'single user system' does not imply that you don't make yourself a user account, at least i never interpreted it that way.
run as user, administer as root, not run and administer as root.
if you run solely as root, the trademark applies: Bad Things Will Happen.
Maybe not today, nor tomorrow, but they will...
in a pristine-upon-boot ram based system (i think puppy,tiny core) you have a bit more protection from yourself, but don't fool yourself.
even dsl and tinycore have normal user as default login, maybe there's a good reason...
59 • Root Security ... Maybe a little clarity is in order. (by DavidEF on 2012-06-22 18:39:26 GMT from United States)
I just want to clarify my stand on root security. I do believe running as root is "less secure" than running as user, in a general sense. I just don't believe running as root is "insecure," as in "wide open system as root."
I liked comment #57 by Jesse from Canada. I agree that running as user, instead of root, is a layer of security. I don't believe it is an absolute necessity for security.
Taking the bullets out and putting your gun in a locked cabinet are both good safety measures, but not "necessary". Sometimes you're better off having it loaded under your pillow. The best form of gun safety is knowing how to handle it. The same can be said for root user security.
60 • Security (by Landor on 2012-06-22 18:43:51 GMT from Canada)
I guess all of you semi-proponents leave your homes unlocked with the doors and windows open as long as you've taken precautions by putting your valuables in a closet someone can open up with little effort.
Try telling that to companies that run server farms. I bet they run systems wide open as root all the time.
The RH analogy was a bullshit example to say the least.
Keep your stick on the ice...
Landor
61 • @60 (by notsure on 2012-06-22 19:40:52 GMT from United States)
yup, the RH BS was quite funny to read, i thought that was a joke. Not to mention root's worst enemy is the Enter Key.
Gun loaded and under your pillow? Good Luck with that.
62 • Root Security I guess it all comes down to perspective. (by DavidEF on 2012-06-22 19:54:42 GMT from United States)
@60 Landor,
Circumstances dictate what layers of security are needed. Where my mom lives, she indeed leaves all the doors of her house unlocked and, in the summer, the windows open. Her car keys are always in the ignition, so the car is ready to go when she is. In 20+ years of living there, she has had no problems, and I suppose she won't for a long time to come. I only lock my home because my wife is a little paranoid, like some of you guys. And yes, some people do have their gun loaded under their pillow. I pity the fool who breaks in on them. I know I won't be trying it.
Running as root is NOT inherently "insecure", although definitely "less secure", as I've said before. And locks only keep honest people out. The biggest danger of running as root is the ability of a dummy to trash his own system.
63 • @60 Single user server farms? (by DavidEF on 2012-06-22 20:11:52 GMT from United States)
Landor,
I think we can all safely agree that running a server farm in single user mode would be pointless, if not utterly useless. Remember, "single user" is what we're talking about here. Puppy linux is a "single user" system. I doubt Puppy linux will EVER be considered for use in commercial server farms. It is an end-user OS, not a server OS. Server OS do need all the layers of security we can give them, including a protected, closed, locked root.
64 • @62 (by notsure on 2012-06-22 20:16:43 GMT from United States)
not getting into the gun safety part here, but intruders just might get to you before you know it... anyway, inappropriate analogies aside, this is computer security, not home. think chicago in a much larger, say "world wide" scale..you know, the ww before web...
65 • Puppy Linux (by greg on 2012-06-22 20:24:21 GMT from United States)
I, for one, hope Puppy Linux remains the same. When a hard drive crashes, Puppy can be used to recover or change files. It is a great demonstration tool, for showing Linux to newcomers. For casual web surfing it is the fastest I've found, since it runs on RAM. I don't use it for secure environments, but I haven't found any distro that can "do-it-all".
66 • RE: 61 - 62/63 - 65 (by Landor on 2012-06-22 22:31:53 GMT from Canada)
#61
It really was absurd. First off, anything that comes out of the RH/Fedora group instantly smacks of being dressed up for the prom to say the least. Then not to mention it was obviously a controlled environment, which is obvious again because of who was doing it, and why. Let's put it this way, they sure as hell didn't let the BackTrack boys take a few swings at it I'm guessin'.
#62/63
I can't believe the comments you're typing and you can't see the correlations, and contradictions. It's amazing. The more you try to get me to listen to reason (which I've yet to actually see any, I might add), the more you convince me you're grasping at straws and don't really understand the things you yourself are typing out.
#65
Funny, you don't consider your own systems needed secure environments? You stated you use it for casual web surfing, no?
Keep your stick on the ice...
Landor
67 • RE:66 (by greg on 2012-06-23 01:54:31 GMT from United States)
I mostly use Slacko-Puppy-Linux on one computer. It is my distro-hopper computer, which has very little personal information. While the distro flavor-of-the-week may change, Puppy Linux remains as a second OS. The other computer I have Puppy Linux on, is there only as a tool. I think it's the easiest way to fix or change grub, if need be, and such.
68 • RE: 67 (by Landor on 2012-06-23 05:51:23 GMT from Canada)
Are any of these systems networked? Is more than one system on a time?
Keep your stick on the ice...
Landor
69 • Linux Mint Maya MATE (by Woody on 2012-06-23 09:28:18 GMT from Kuwait)
I tried lots of different Linux Distros, but always go back to Linux Mint. It works out of the box with no hassle. Why can't other distros do that? Before I stuck with Linux Mint 9 with Gnome, but now I've switched all of my computers to Linux Mint Maya MATE. MATE is a much better graphical interface than the GNOME 3 interface that comes with Ubuntu and Fedora. No wonder Mint is the most popular distro in the Distrowatch page hit rankings. Thank you Clem!
70 • @69"Why can't other distros do that" (by @69"Why can't other distros.." on 2012-06-24 17:44:35 GMT from Portugal)
Quick answer: because distributing patent encumbered software may be a contingency and because many distros want to keep fidelity to the free open source principles.
71 • root account (by wade on 2012-06-24 18:27:00 GMT from United States)
What the heck does "running as root" mean? You can log in as the root user, but that doesn't necessarily have any effect on what what user your operating system starts it's processes as. When I log in as as the root user on one of my servers, my server doesn't suddenly become unsecure.
72 • root (by greg on 2012-06-25 01:17:43 GMT from United States)
If you are on a server, and mess-up due to unrestricted access, how will anyone else know it was you? I'm sure there will be better explanations coming from others, or correct me if I'm wrong.
Number of Comments: 72
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
| | |
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Archives |
| • Issue 1100 (2024-12-09): Oreon 9.3, differences in speed, IPFire's new appliance, Fedora Asahi Remix gets new video drivers, openSUSE Leap Micro updated, Redox OS running Redox OS |
| • Issue 1099 (2024-12-02): AnduinOS 1.0.1, measuring RAM usage, SUSE continues rebranding efforts, UBports prepares for next major version, Murena offering non-NFC phone |
| • Issue 1098 (2024-11-25): Linux Lite 7.2, backing up specific folders, Murena and Fairphone partner in fair trade deal, Arch installer gets new text interface, Ubuntu security tool patched |
| • Issue 1097 (2024-11-18): Chimera Linux vs Chimera OS, choosing between AlmaLinux and Debian, Fedora elevates KDE spin to an edition, Fedora previews new installer, KDE testing its own distro, Qubes-style isolation coming to FreeBSD |
| • Issue 1096 (2024-11-11): Bazzite 40, Playtron OS Alpha 1, Tucana Linux 3.1, detecting Screen sessions, Redox imports COSMIC software centre, FreeBSD booting on the PinePhone Pro, LXQt supports Wayland window managers |
| • Issue 1095 (2024-11-04): Fedora 41 Kinoite, transferring applications between computers, openSUSE Tumbleweed receives multiple upgrades, Ubuntu testing compiler optimizations, Mint partners with Framework |
| • Issue 1094 (2024-10-28): DebLight OS 1, backing up crontab, AlmaLinux introduces Litten branch, openSUSE unveils refreshed look, Ubuntu turns 20
| | • Issue 1093 (2024-10-21): Kubuntu 24.10, atomic vs immutable distributions, Debian upgrading Perl packages, UBports adding VoLTE support, Android to gain native GNU/Linux application support |
| • Issue 1092 (2024-10-14): FunOS 24.04.1, a home directory inside a file, work starts of openSUSE Leap 16.0, improvements in Haiku, KDE neon upgrades its base |
| • Issue 1091 (2024-10-07): Redox OS 0.9.0, Unified package management vs universal package formats, Redox begins RISC-V port, Mint polishes interface, Qubes certifies new laptop |
| • Issue 1090 (2024-09-30): Rhino Linux 2024.2, commercial distros with alternative desktops, Valve seeks to improve Wayland performance, HardenedBSD parterns with Protectli, Tails merges with Tor Project, Quantum Leap partners with the FreeBSD Foundation |
| • Issue 1089 (2024-09-23): Expirion 6.0, openKylin 2.0, managing configuration files, the future of Linux development, fixing bugs in Haiku, Slackware packages dracut |
| • Issue 1088 (2024-09-16): PorteuX 1.6, migrating from Windows 10 to which Linux distro, making NetBSD immutable, AlmaLinux offers hardware certification, Mint updates old APT tools |
| • Issue 1087 (2024-09-09): COSMIC desktop, running cron jobs at variable times, UBports highlights new apps, HardenedBSD offers work around for FreeBSD change, Debian considers how to cull old packages, systemd ported to musl |
| • Issue 1086 (2024-09-02): Vanilla OS 2, command line tips for simple tasks, FreeBSD receives investment from STF, openSUSE Tumbleweed update can break network connections, Debian refreshes media |
| • Issue 1085 (2024-08-26): Nobara 40, OpenMandriva 24.07 "ROME", distros which include source code, FreeBSD publishes quarterly report, Microsoft updates breaks Linux in dual-boot environments |
| • Issue 1084 (2024-08-19): Liya 2.0, dual boot with encryption, Haiku introduces performance improvements, Gentoo dropping IA-64, Redcore merges major upgrade |
| • Issue 1083 (2024-08-12): TrueNAS 24.04.2 "SCALE", Linux distros for smartphones, Redox OS introduces web server, PipeWire exposes battery drain on Linux, Canonical updates kernel version policy |
| • Issue 1082 (2024-08-05): Linux Mint 22, taking snapshots of UFS on FreeBSD, openSUSE updates Tumbleweed and Aeon, Debian creates Tiny QA Tasks, Manjaro testing immutable images |
| • Issue 1081 (2024-07-29): SysLinuxOS 12.4, OpenBSD gain hardware acceleration, Slackware changes kernel naming, Mint publishes upgrade instructions |
| • Issue 1080 (2024-07-22): Running GNU/Linux on Android with Andronix, protecting network services, Solus dropping AppArmor and Snap, openSUSE Aeon Desktop gaining full disk encryption, SUSE asks openSUSE to change its branding |
| • Issue 1079 (2024-07-15): Ubuntu Core 24, hiding files on Linux, Fedora dropping X11 packages on Workstation, Red Hat phasing out GRUB, new OpenSSH vulnerability, FreeBSD speeds up release cycle, UBports testing new first-run wizard |
| • Issue 1078 (2024-07-08): Changing init software, server machines running desktop environments, OpenSSH vulnerability patched, Peppermint launches new edition, HardenedBSD updates ports |
| • Issue 1077 (2024-07-01): The Unity and Lomiri interfaces, different distros for different tasks, Ubuntu plans to run Wayland on NVIDIA cards, openSUSE updates Leap Micro, Debian releases refreshed media, UBports gaining contact synchronisation, FreeDOS celebrates its 30th anniversary |
| • Issue 1076 (2024-06-24): openSUSE 15.6, what makes Linux unique, SUSE Liberty Linux to support CentOS Linux 7, SLE receives 19 years of support, openSUSE testing Leap Micro edition |
| • Issue 1075 (2024-06-17): Redox OS, X11 and Wayland on the BSDs, AlmaLinux releases Pi build, Canonical announces RISC-V laptop with Ubuntu, key changes in systemd |
| • Issue 1074 (2024-06-10): Endless OS 6.0.0, distros with init diversity, Mint to filter unverified Flatpaks, Debian adds systemd-boot options, Redox adopts COSMIC desktop, OpenSSH gains new security features |
| • Issue 1073 (2024-06-03): LXQt 2.0.0, an overview of Linux desktop environments, Canonical partners with Milk-V, openSUSE introduces new features in Aeon Desktop, Fedora mirrors see rise in traffic, Wayland adds OpenBSD support |
| • Issue 1072 (2024-05-27): Manjaro 24.0, comparing init software, OpenBSD ports Plasma 6, Arch community debates mirror requirements, ThinOS to upgrade its FreeBSD core |
| • Issue 1071 (2024-05-20): Archcraft 2024.04.06, common command line mistakes, ReactOS imports WINE improvements, Haiku makes adjusting themes easier, NetBSD takes a stand against code generated by chatbots |
| • Issue 1070 (2024-05-13): Damn Small Linux 2024, hiding kernel messages during boot, Red Hat offers AI edition, new web browser for UBports, Fedora Asahi Remix 40 released, Qubes extends support for version 4.1 |
| • Issue 1069 (2024-05-06): Ubuntu 24.04, installing packages in alternative locations, systemd creates sudo alternative, Mint encourages XApps collaboration, FreeBSD publishes quarterly update |
| • Issue 1068 (2024-04-29): Fedora 40, transforming one distro into another, Debian elects new Project Leader, Red Hat extends support cycle, Emmabuntus adds accessibility features, Canonical's new security features |
| • Issue 1067 (2024-04-22): LocalSend for transferring files, detecting supported CPU architecure levels, new visual design for APT, Fedora and openSUSE working on reproducible builds, LXQt released, AlmaLinux re-adds hardware support |
| • Issue 1066 (2024-04-15): Fun projects to do with the Raspberry Pi and PinePhone, installing new software on fixed-release distributions, improving GNOME Terminal performance, Mint testing new repository mirrors, Gentoo becomes a Software In the Public Interest project |
| • Issue 1065 (2024-04-08): Dr.Parted Live 24.03, answering questions about the xz exploit, Linux Mint to ship HWE kernel, AlmaLinux patches flaw ahead of upstream Red Hat, Calculate changes release model |
| • Issue 1064 (2024-04-01): NixOS 23.11, the status of Hurd, liblzma compromised upstream, FreeBSD Foundation focuses on improving wireless networking, Ubuntu Pro offers 12 years of support |
| • Issue 1063 (2024-03-25): Redcore Linux 2401, how slowly can a rolling release update, Debian starts new Project Leader election, Red Hat creating new NVIDIA driver, Snap store hit with more malware |
| • Issue 1062 (2024-03-18): KDE neon 20240304, changing file permissions, Canonical turns 20, Pop!_OS creates new software centre, openSUSE packages Plasma 6 |
| • Issue 1061 (2024-03-11): Using a PinePhone as a workstation, restarting background services on a schedule, NixBSD ports Nix to FreeBSD, Fedora packaging COSMIC, postmarketOS to adopt systemd, Linux Mint replacing HexChat |
| • Issue 1060 (2024-03-04): AV Linux MX-23.1, bootstrapping a network connection, key OpenBSD features, Qubes certifies new hardware, LXQt and Plasma migrate to Qt 6 |
| • Issue 1059 (2024-02-26): Warp Terminal, navigating manual pages, malware found in the Snap store, Red Hat considering CPU requirement update, UBports organizes ongoing work |
| • Issue 1058 (2024-02-19): Drauger OS 7.6, how much disk space to allocate, System76 prepares to launch COSMIC desktop, UBports changes its version scheme, TrueNAS to offer faster deduplication |
| • Issue 1057 (2024-02-12): Adelie Linux 1.0 Beta, rolling release vs fixed for a smoother experience, Debian working on 2038 bug, elementary OS to split applications from base system updates, Fedora announces Atomic Desktops |
| • Issue 1056 (2024-02-05): wattOS R13, the various write speeds of ISO writing tools, DSL returns, Mint faces Wayland challenges, HardenedBSD blocks foreign USB devices, Gentoo publishes new repository, Linux distros patch glibc flaw |
| • Issue 1055 (2024-01-29): CNIX OS 231204, distributions patching packages the most, Gentoo team presents ongoing work, UBports introduces connectivity and battery improvements, interview with Haiku developer |
| • Issue 1054 (2024-01-22): Solus 4.5, comparing dd and cp when writing ISO files, openSUSE plans new major Leap version, XeroLinux shutting down, HardenedBSD changes its build schedule |
| • Issue 1053 (2024-01-15): Linux AI voice assistants, some distributions running hotter than others, UBports talks about coming changes, Qubes certifies StarBook laptops, Asahi Linux improves energy savings |
| • Issue 1052 (2024-01-08): OpenMandriva Lx 5.0, keeping shell commands running when theterminal closes, Mint upgrades Edge kernel, Vanilla OS plans big changes, Canonical working to make Snap more cross-platform |
| • Issue 1051 (2024-01-01): Favourite distros of 2023, reloading shell settings, Asahi Linux releases Fedora remix, Gentoo offers binary packages, openSUSE provides full disk encryption |
| • Issue 1050 (2023-12-18): rlxos 2023.11, renaming files and opening terminal windows in specific directories, TrueNAS publishes ZFS fixes, Debian publishes delayed install media, Haiku polishes desktop experience |
| • Issue 1049 (2023-12-11): Lernstick 12, alternatives to WINE, openSUSE updates its branding, Mint unveils new features, Lubuntu team plans for 24.04 |
| • Issue 1048 (2023-12-04): openSUSE MicroOS, the transition from X11 to Wayland, Red Hat phasing out X11 packages, UBports making mobile development easier |
| • Issue 1047 (2023-11-27): GhostBSD 23.10.1, Why Linux uses swap when memory is free, Ubuntu Budgie may benefit from Wayland work in Xfce, early issues with FreeBSD 14.0 |
| • Issue 1046 (2023-11-20): Slackel 7.7 "Openbox", restricting CPU usage, Haiku improves font handling and software centre performance, Canonical launches MicroCloud |
| • Full list of all issues |
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
| Random Distribution | 
Linvo GNU/Linux
Linvo GNU/Linux was a Slackware-based distribution and live CD/DVD. Some of its more interesting features include a careful selection of applications for every-day use, installable to hard disk from the live medium, use of software modules for extensive customisation of the live CD, availability of the GNOME desktop, applications installed and managed on a per-user basis, and out-of-the-box support for most multimedia formats.
Status: Discontinued
|
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
|
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
