| DistroWatch Weekly
|Linux Foundation Training
|Reader Comments • Jump to last comment
1 • Vector (by divadgnol on 2012-01-09 09:20:19 GMT from United States) |
Gotta love Monday mornings. A Fresh cup of coffee and a fresh serving of Distrowatch!!!
I was a Vector loyalist for a short time years ago. I found the distro fun, fast and capable. I am a big fan of Slackware and its derivatives but have recently moved away from them favoring their older siblings from the BSD family.
I am interested in the fairly new desktop environment Razor-qt and look forward to giving it a try. I used to use KDE 3.5 but have since moved to something lighter. It will be nice to have another alternative to the heavy hitters like Gnome3 and KDE4.
I also hope the rumor mill is correct in assuming Ubuntu is making its way into the tablet market. I am one of those people who bought several HP Touchpad during their firesale. I have android running on it now but would like to have more choices from linux.
Good day mates.
2 • Ubuntu on tablet PC (by Koroshiya Itchy on 2012-01-09 10:25:16 GMT from Belgium)
Some people called the obvious "conspiranoia" when it is clear that Gnome3 and Unity are oriented to the embedded devices market and it was clear that Ubuntu was targeting that very same market. There is nothing wrong with that (whatever the outcome may be). But it is not surprising either that most people refuse to use on the desktop a product which has not been conceived for the desktop, but for touchscreen devices.
3 • Goodbye manriva (by LiQuidKermit on 2012-01-09 11:17:02 GMT from Indonesia)
I gotta say goodbye mandriva. Mandrake 9 was my first Linux. Everything went wrong when they acquired connectiva. Sadly, I won't miss you.
4 • Ubuntu TV (by Dien on 2012-01-09 11:28:56 GMT from Canada)
I wonder what chance ubuntu Tv has. With Google Tv is still struggling to establish it self in the market and Apple Tv supposedly coming out. On the other hand, after seeing pictures of its interface, Unity finaly make sence to me.
5 • benefits of Qt? (by Toolz on 2012-01-09 11:51:27 GMT from Vietnam)
What is meant by "benefits of Qt"? I'm writing this from Win XP and I have about 20 Qt apps here. When I'm not on Win XP I'm on Openbox or Xfce or even Gnome and I have a similar number. I've never needed to run KDE. I am dying to look at Razor-qt however.
6 • The Razor-qt desktop environment (by Dr.Saleem Khan on 2012-01-09 12:12:39 GMT from Pakistan)
The Razor-qt desktop environment is an interesting alternate to KDE4 or KDE3 and it is rightly called as an LXDE of KDE4 . I tried it on Arch Linux from AUR package and it worked though not fully functional . It will prove an alternate for KDE and also serve those who want to try something new than the available desktop environments . But I wonder why their website is down ever since and only thing avialble on their website is "The connection has timed out " ?
7 • Vector Linux + MC (by jayell on 2012-01-09 12:20:54 GMT from United Kingdom)
"Well and good, but the default terminal's short-cut keys interfere with Midnight Commander's control keys, so it may be best to only use the venerable file manager if you're running from a real text screen."
I think this is pretty normal when running mc in a terminal window, but I've got used to it. I used Norton Comander way back in PC-Dos days so it was natural to choose mc when I converted to a Linux based system.
I still use mc as my primary file management tool and much prefer it to any graphical one (nautilus and the like).
Have been using Debian (sid) since 2001 and wouldn't dream of changing to any other distro. Currently using Gnome 3 in classic mode as that suits my style of working
8 • Ubuntu also shooting at car embedded systems (IVI's) (by Leo on 2012-01-09 13:35:04 GMT from United States)
The other biggie from Canonical / Ubuntu is about In-vehicle Infotainments. Power to them!
9 • Ubuntu new products (by vw72 on 2012-01-09 13:47:00 GMT from United States)
It seems that there is a lot of concern about how successful Ubuntu could be in the smart-phone, tablet and similar consumer markets. Most of these concerns center around the saturated markets of the United States. However, there are other markets that are just now opening up that aren't saturated.
Time will tell if Ubuntu's consumer market plans bear fruit or not, but we should all remember that it is a global economy they are after, not a US one.
10 • @2 Ubuntu on Tablet PC (by vw72 on 2012-01-09 13:54:30 GMT from United States)
While all the rants have been against Gnome-Shell and Unity on the desktop, when users are polled, the results are quite different. The OMGUbuntu site did a poll of its users as to what desktop they were using and Unity and Gnome-Shell were by far the two most popular ones.
Canonical has enormous downloads of Ubuntu, far more than the KDE/LXDE/XFCE versions combined. So unless people are downloading it and switching to a different desktop environment, there are evidently quite a few users who use Ubuntu's tablet interface.
Are these new interfaces perfect? No, they are not. But are they in use by many, many, many users? Yes, they are.
11 • Mandriva, Ubuntu (by Ron on 2012-01-09 14:21:49 GMT from United States)
@3 Same for me. I really got into Mandrake, but once they merged it with Connectiva it went downhill. Funny, if you told them that back then what direction things where going in, which some actually did, you would get the same responses as Ubuntu is giving people now. All good things come to an end people.
@10 Unity and Gnome 3 are not made for the average desktop. Plane and simple. The numbers you see now for users are short term. Watch as it declines over time. I was once a faithful Ubuntu user. Not anymore. I use Debian or sometimes Linux Mint,. Right now with new users I tell them to use Linux Mint, rather then Ubuntu which is what I use to tell them.
It is sad that many Ubuntu or former Ubuntu users are ignored and told they are wrong and not worth listening to. Well once things get worse, I will be one of the first to say to Ubuntu, "I Told You So."
12 • @10, Ubuntu versions (by Toolz on 2012-01-09 14:29:06 GMT from Vietnam)
> "Canonical has enormous downloads of Ubuntu, far more than the KDE/LXDE/XFCE versions combined."
I imagine more people download the Ubuntu alphas than a typical distro in the top twenty and quite simply, the Ubuntu KDE/LXDE/XFCE editions have never been held in high regard, the Xfce edition was especially shunned. Lubuntu only recently joined the Ubuntu-sanctioned group after a couple of years of effort and the fact that it sits at number 11 on the DW list just shows how you can't read too much into the DW Page Hit Ranking, IMO.
Some respected people have come out and said Unity looks promising but I doubt any of them will be admitting to using it on a daily basis for quite some time yet. And a poll on OMGUbuntu isn't going to shine much light, really, is it?
13 • @11 Unity and Gnome 3 Desktops (by vw72 on 2012-01-09 14:35:38 GMT from United States)
I would have to beg to differ. Unity and Gnome-shell are made for the average desktop. They are not made for the technical user/geek desktop. Canonical is wanting to pursue the consumer market and in doing so they have developed an interface for that market.
Both Unity and Gnome-shell work quite well for the typical user who has a few applications open at a time, while surfing the net and listening to music. Neither does well with multiple monitors or twenty terminal windows.
One of the biggest gripes people had was with the menu bar. While some Apple aficionados liked it, when using multiple windows it was easy to close the wrong one. Well, in 12.04, it has a setting to disable it or not. So, how is that not listening to their user base?
Linux Mint is a fine distro, but it should be recommended because of its merits, not because of displeasure with design choices Canonical has made regarding Ubuntu.
To be fair, when Unity came out, I was not a happy camper, either. But I made myself use it. And for day to day work, it works fine. Then I tried Gnome-shell. I like that even better than Unity, now that various extensions are available. And, I still use KDE and Xfce, too. Of course, when I am on a Mac, I use OS X and on a Windows machine Windows 7.
Each of those desktops has their advantages and disadvantages. However, Canonical shouldn't be faulted for switching to Unity from Gnome 2 when Gnome 2 was discontinued by Gnome. The fact that Mint is developing a Gnome 2 like interface for Gnome 3, also shows how flexible the design is for Gnome 3.
With the standard monitor, laptop or desktop, now being widescreen, Unity and Gnome 3 definately seem to be suited to the average desktop.
14 • VectorLinux (by CliffyB on 2012-01-09 14:42:27 GMT from United States)
Uses LILO? Sorry, no can do.
15 • @12 Ubuntu Versions (by vw72 on 2012-01-09 14:42:38 GMT from United States)
I was referring to Ubuntu's own download statistics and not Distrowatch's page counter.
As for OMGUbuntu, I can't think of a better place to ask the question of desktop use than a site dedicated to Ubuntu (I don't think many Redhat/Fedora/Suse/etc users are going to use Unity).
What was surprising about their non-statistical survey was how many readers on that site actually were using gnome-shell. The low results for KDE, Xfce and the others is understandable as the site mainly caters to the Ubuntu Unity/Gnome-shell crowd.
Maybe distrowatch can run a poll on what desktop environment people use. That would give a much broader group. Of course, Unity would suffer as it is only available on Ubuntu and it couldn't simply say Gnome 3 as that would leave out the alternative shells (it would need to be Gnome 3 with Gnome-shell, for instance).
As I said in a previous post, when Unity first came out, I, too, did not like it. After using it for awhile, it actually is quite easy to use and very functional.
16 • @15, Ubuntu Versions (by Toolz on 2012-01-09 15:11:53 GMT from Vietnam)
What I'm trying to say is that a poll at a site called 'OMGUbuntu' is obviously going to attract people using the current version (of Ubuntu) so "Unity and Gnome-Shell" will be highly represented won't they?
You go on to say "The low results for KDE, Xfce and the others is understandable as the site mainly caters to the Ubuntu Unity/Gnome-shell crowd." - do you have any more chasing-your-tail arguments lined up?
17 • DWW topics (by TomG on 2012-01-09 15:29:54 GMT from United States)
First, like many others, I got started with Linux by using Mandrake (8.0). I have fond memories of that, and although I ended up leaving Mandrake it's still a shame that the company hasn't been stable in recent years. Don't forget, PCLinuxOS, a well-regarded distribution, was (or still is) based on Mandrake.
Second, I liked the review of Vector Linux. I think it's an under-appreciated distro, with a lot of strengths and a top notch appearance. Their biggest downside is simply not enough applications in their repositories. I have found this distressingly common among smaller distributions. Vector has great potential if they can expand their user base and available software. For someone with older hardware and simple needs, it would probably be a better choice than large distributions like Fedora or Ubuntu.
Third, this new lightweight Qt desktop, Razor-Qt, looks promising,
The community needs well-thought out choices such as this one.
18 • @16 Ubuntu Versions (by vw72 on 2012-01-09 15:51:49 GMT from United States)
I understand that OMGUbuntu caters to the Unity/Gnome3 crowd. However, that site is just as vocal about it's dislike for Unity as any other (but not so on Gnome 3). So, the site ran a poll to see how many of its users switched from Unity to a different desktop environment and it appeared that most had not.
One can conclude from that response that either the naysayers were a vocal minority, or the naysayers didn't vote. It wasn't a statistical sample, so of course one can not extrapolate the results to the world wide community.
As for OMGUbuntu doing the poll, well, it would seem to make sense to conduct the poll on a site where you know the people use the software in question. Why would Redhat conduct a poll of Ubuntu users that use Unity?
However, that is also the reason why I suggested that somebody, more neutral, like Distrowatch conduct the poll.
Maybe the question asked could be: If you are an Ubuntu user and switched from Unity, what did you switch to?
f) Something Else
g) I'm still using Unity
A second question could be: Regardless of the linux distribution you use, what destkop environment do you use most often?
a) Gnome 3
f) Something else
Those two questions would tell what most distrowatch users use and if Ubuntu users switched from Unity, to what did they switch to. Again, the results would be biased as it would be based off of the readership of Distrowatch. But then again, most surveys are always biased.
19 • ubuntu 11.10 (by walter_j on 2012-01-09 15:52:30 GMT from Canada)
I tried ubuntu 11.10 for about 5 days. I got used to the side bar eventually, although I still think it's all that useful. It isn't easy to find minimized programs in the side bar. I also need more space at the sides than I do at the top and bottom when I have many programs open at once. Although you can place a program over it, it becomes annoying when you try to get at something at the left edge when the side bar keeps popping up. The worst feature is the finder. I found myself typing, then using the mouse to select the item. I eventually abandoned that and just used the menu - which isn't easily accessible.
The best part about ubuntu 11.10 is the fast boot. 10 to 15 seconds as opposed to a full minute for opensuse 12.1 kde. Electricity is getting expensive, so I try to conserve where I can, so I turn off the pc if I'm away for a few hours, so a fast boot time is nice. Maybe other distros should look into how ubuntu is able to boot so quick.
Ultimately I abandoned 11.10 because of instability. No obvious crashes - just programs not opening after being minimized, or opening under other programs. Occasionally being dumped back to the login. These issues should be resolved before going to mass market items such as phones, tv's, otherwise the return rate will be high. I'd be interested in the phone if it worked well with my pc.
20 • @18, Ubuntu Versions (by Toolz on 2012-01-09 16:23:40 GMT from Vietnam)
@18: You start off with:
> "The OMGUbuntu site did a poll of its users as to what desktop they were using and Unity and Gnome-Shell were by far the two most popular ones."
Then we get:
> "The low results for KDE, Xfce and the others is understandable as the site mainly caters to the Ubuntu Unity/Gnome-shell crowd."
Now you're wanting to design polls!
> "there are evidently quite a few users who use Ubuntu's tablet interface."
You mean: "there are evidently quite a few users who use Ubuntu's interface", right?
> "I was referring to Ubuntu's own download statistics and not Distrowatch's page counter."
When I mentioned DW Page Hit Ranking (for Lubuntu) I was supporting your argument, not countering it.
21 • @19, Ubuntu boot time (by Toolz on 2012-01-09 16:26:58 GMT from Vietnam)
> "The best part about ubuntu 11.10 is the fast boot. 10 to 15 seconds"
Ubuntu have been putting a lot of effort into boot time since 2009. In fact certain promises with given which have not been kept (certainly not since the last LTS).
22 • @19, ubuntu 11.10 (by Toolz on 2012-01-09 16:33:17 GMT from Vietnam)
> "Electricity is getting expensive, so I try to conserve where I can, so I turn off the pc if I'm away for a few hours, so a fast boot time is nice."
It's 2012, try suspend or hibernate.
23 • @13 (by Ron on 2012-01-09 16:40:49 GMT from United States)
Don't get me wrong. I am not one of those people that wants to see Ubuntu fail. However if Ubuntu thinks they will get more Windows users with this, I doubt it very much. I am checking out Windows 8 developer preview and as much as I hate to say it, I am lking how they have it set up compared to Gnome3 or Unity. Well except for one thing. Windows 8 has Aero and Metro. The one thing I hate about it is with installed apps icons. The default ones are huge and look great. The installed user apps are small and ugly. But what I do like is this. They have two screens. A more traditional desktop you can add icons to. The other one is the start menu replacement. But the great thing is that it takes very little to get from one to the other. Opposed to more clicks with Gnome3 or Unity.
Linux Mint seems to see this and is working on something better, a compromise. I never thought I would be impressed with Linux Mint, lol.
Gnome3 and Unity has to clean it up a bit more. And I also like Unity more then I do Gnome3. However.... "I really hate saying this, I hate Microsoft,) but I like the feel of Metro much better.
Also. I am not recommending Linux Mint out of spite for new users. I think right now they are the best choice for those use to XP and Windows 7 and new to linux.
I hope things get better for Gnome3 and Unity. I will check out 12.04 and give my honest thoughts on it. I was there when Ubuntu first came out. I new it would make it far. So lets see if they can balance things like Linux Mint is trying to do.
I don't hate anything that is Linux related. I have favorites and prefer some things over others. But I want to see Linux succeed in general for many reasons. This includes Ubuntu being successful as well as Gnome3.
24 • @10 - Plus one, here! (by DavidEF on 2012-01-09 17:00:07 GMT from United States)
I use Unity every day and am quite happy with it, aside from a few growing pains (it is relatively new, after all). My 11-year-old daughter uses it quite successfully on her laptop, as well. In fact, she has been using it since it was "Netbook Remix." My wife is the hold-out. I set up Gnome3 Classic for her.
@11 - you are not forgotten. Unity was apparently NOT made for YOU, but there are plenty of others to choose from.
What I think is strange is that we promote choice as one of the better features of free operating systems (better, compared to non-free O/S's), but at the same time people bash Mark Shuttleworth and Canonical for introducing more choice. After all ,that's all they've done. They haven't stifled choice, they've expanded it! What's wrong with that?
Mostly, I think people are frustrated because THEIR choice is not the DEFAULT choice in Ubuntu any more, meaning they would have to take the extra step of installing something different themselves. Even still, there are derivitives now for that! Problem solved! Leaving Ubuntu proper doesn't have to be with heavy hearts and hurt feelings. If a derivitive succeeds, Ubuntu succeeds (and Debian, and Linus Torvalds, and Unix, ...) Can't we all just get along?
25 • Ubuntu Versions (by Bill on 2012-01-09 17:07:57 GMT from United States)
I started with Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy and was so grateful to get away from Windows, free at last! After setting up all the programs and getting compiz to work, I never gave it another thought. I could browse the internet, watch movies, edit audio files, work on documents, even compiled a kernel just for fun. But them came 11.10 and Unity. OG is right, what the heck??
I switched after a few days to another distro that was staying with Gnome 2 until it's death. In the meantime I tried KDE, Lxde, Xfce and Gnome 3 (OpenSuse).
Xfce was the winner because I could get everything working very close to Gnome 2, even compiz and Cairo Dock.
Then came Mint MGSE, and I was thinking that would be the answer to not lag behind the linux world. Now comes Mint Cinnamon, nice but still needs some work to be able to have mutter equal compiz and to be able to have bar at top and change themes.
So it's down to Xfce or Cinnamon and may the best developers win.
26 • Pear OS Debian Edition Alpha (by Vic on 2012-01-09 17:12:54 GMT from Canada)
Comment deleted (please no release announcement in the comments).
27 • VectorLinux Review (by Simon on 2012-01-09 17:14:05 GMT from United Kingdom)
All in all a decent review but when I read the following line -
"VectorLinux is a good option. It's especially well-suited to older hardware."
I wondered on what basis was he making that claim considering he installed it on two high end machines - dual-core 2 GHz CPU, 3 GB of RAM, Intel video card and 2.5 GHz CPU, 2 GB of RAM
My experience of Vector 7 on older hardware (1 GHz CPU, 528 MB RAM) was that it was rather sluggish.
There also are issues (in my experience) for getting Vector 7 to install nVidia drivers and getting compiz-fusion to work - but it doesn't appear Jesse tried to configure this.
I have to admit though, that Vector 7 is still the most polished distro this crew has produced so far. Gotta love the weather app - only wish I could get it on Mint.
28 • @24 (by Ron on 2012-01-09 17:18:01 GMT from United States)
I completely agree. That is the great thing about open source and the linux community. If we don't like something we have choices. You can't get those choices with MS Windows at all, or even with Macs.
I also agree that we don't nee to fight at all. The success over Linux in general is much more important. I think Shuttleworth is doing a great job, even if I disagree with him at times. It seems that Linus Torvalds and Richard Stallman don't always agree at times. But they get along and Gnu and linux always work great together. That is the way it should be. We can all agree or disagree but we are all part of the same community and should want to see things in general succeed.
29 • ShuttlePad (by Chris on 2012-01-09 17:19:20 GMT from Latvia)
Comment deleted (disrespectful).
30 • VectorLinux (by DavidEF on 2012-01-09 17:20:06 GMT from United States)
I've tried Vector Linux many times. I'm addicted to trying new distros, and I want to like Vector, so I try almost every new release. But, it just doesn't seem that I'm a fit for their style. I guess I'm just the kind that wants/needs a smoother experience than they offer. But I would recommend that people try it, especially if they have low spec hardware.
My favorite low resource distro is Puppy. But, I only use that for quickies. On my own computers, I use Ubuntu. One man's "bloat" is another man's "icing on the cake."
31 • @26 Pear OS Debian Edition (by Dion on 2012-01-09 17:32:14 GMT from United States)
Thank you. I loved Pear OS other than the minor language translation problem. I think it is great that they are taking the direct Debian approach to it.
32 • CentOS (by Anonymous on 2012-01-09 17:39:18 GMT from United States)
[The CR repository was] not needed with CentOS 6.2, but we recommend it be installed...
With the lack of concern for their users' security, how has Cent not gone the way of WhiteBox?
33 • Choice (by Ron on 2012-01-09 18:03:36 GMT from United States)
"What I think is strange is that we promote choice as one of the better features of free operating systems (better, compared to non-free O/S's), but at the same time people bash Mark Shuttleworth and Canonical for introducing more choice. After all ,that's all they've done. They haven't stifled choice, they've expanded it! What's wrong with that?"
For some time now, I could not crystallize my thoughts about this 'Choice' idea of Linux. Finally, it came to me regarding the new Unity, Gnome3 debate. Think, choice for its own sake alone is not good.
For instance, just imagine your automobile. What if someone decided to suddenly sell cars with the brake and gas pedals in new places. Think about a valet or garage attendant or mechanic's shock and difficulty when suddenly confronted with this.
Choice is good if it improves something, but choice can have the effect of diluting effort and standards. That's it - standards. We have standards in use everywhere for good reason. When Windows first came out there was one version. Everyone rallied around it, now there's multiple versions, professional, home, home-cheapo, and .....
No wonder people are fed up with it.
By having unneeded diversity, you spread out effort and suffer the consequences of wasted resources. Sometimes I think the same can be said of so many distro versions of Linux. How much better could things be if all the human effort was concentrated on fewer Linux projects rather than multiple similar projects for the sake of CHOICE!
34 • Vector Linux (by David McCann on 2012-01-09 18:10:09 GMT from United Kingdom)
I'm not sure what Jesse did, but I certainly didn't find myself logged-in as vl. Nor do I remember finding the installer unfriendly; I particularly noted it's pop-up help screens and the sensible way it encourages the use of /home.
When I test a distro, I run all the main programs from the command line to check for warnings. It's surprising how many distros throw up "critical" and "this may cause a crash", but Vector passed with flying colours. Personally, I'll trade a pretty installer for stable software any day!
35 • @6 Razor-Qt Site (by randomreader on 2012-01-09 18:17:08 GMT from United States)
Check your Internet connection. I can access their site just fine.
36 • Pear OS Debian (by Koroshiya Itchy on 2012-01-09 18:23:11 GMT from Belgium)
I certainly will give Pear OS Debian a try as soon as the 64-bit version become available!
37 • Ub (by M1k on 2012-01-09 18:28:06 GMT from Italy)
Ubuntu again trying to follow Apple.
You can run android apps on the device and in 2 years maybe ubuntu on a phone.
Too late Mark...too late...........
We do need INNOVATION...not another alternative to....
38 • The Razor-qt desktop environment (by Dr.Saleem Khan on 2012-01-09 18:31:46 GMT from Pakistan)
@35 Razor-Qt Site , thanks I did that after I posted my comment , somehow their website wont open for me unless i hide my IP address as
dont know if my ISP is causing that or they have some kind of access control for my region .
39 • Vector (by Jesse on 2012-01-09 18:34:41 GMT from Canada)
>> "I wondered on what basis was he making that claim considering he installed it on two high end machines"
I don't think most people would consider my equipment "high end". The laptop is about three years old and was "bottom of the line" then. The desktop is about seven years old and was also considered economy class at the time. At any rate, my description of Vector as being suited toward lower end machines was based on its speed and low resource usage. Just about any machine made in the past ten years should be able to run Vector. Which you proved by saying it would run on your old 1GHz CPU wwith around 500MB of RAM. Sure it's sluggish, but your running a modern OS on equipment a decade old. Of course it's not going to be optimal.
>> "I'm not sure what Jesse did, but I certainly didn't find myself logged-in as vl."
Did you perhaps install from the installation CD instead of the live CD? I'm fairly certain only the live CD installs the VL account. If I recall correctly the editions feature different installers too.
While I'm posting, I have a shameless plug to make. My entry was picked as the winner in the iXsystems haiku contest.: http://blog.pcbsd.org/2012/01/winner-of-haiku-contest/
40 • @18 (by Roy H Huddleston on 2012-01-09 19:00:12 GMT from United States)
LXDE then Gnome shell. Really like LXDE except Ace-of Pidgin and the Xscreensaver. Got to keep the LxPanel and LxTerminal. But then there was the LXDE, then LXDM and finally the LDM. I had the choice of the LXDM or GDM and I chose the GDM. I did the same with Debian once of an option of KDE or Gnome and I always choose Gnome eventually even with a choice of Classic Gnome or Gnome 3 I will choose Gnome. Second choice Gnome 3 with those Keep It Simple Stupid 'on-off' buttons. I like the 'on-off' buttons. I like the Xfburn over Brasero though. So much like K3B from KDE. I like the Shisen-Sho from KDE. I really like the alternate CD Debian installer. that is just plain awesome for want a better word. That is really K.I.S.S. I am surprised there isn't a linux distro called K.I.S.S. I think it would be awesome. :)
41 • Choice and Fear. (by Eddie on 2012-01-09 19:29:31 GMT from United States)
@33, The car analogy was about the most stupid thing that I've heard in a while. In the first place doing to a car what you said would make that car unusable. Gnome3 and Unity are very useable and very easy. Also who determines if diversity is unneeded in anything? I take it that by standards you mean "everything looks the same." Desktop environments should have nothing to do with standards. Standards are how things work in general. You need to learn a little bit about how the open source world works. It is built upon choice. Without it you would end up like Apple. A walled garden with a dead business model for desktop computers. Don't be afraid of change.
@25, Bill, Gnome 2 is dead completely and thankfully. I used Gnome 2 for years but was glad to move on up to something better. Whatever Mint or the other Gnome 2 spinoffs use, remember that it will not be Gnome 2.
@20, All polls are designed. Didn't you know that? You keep going around in circles like you're chasing your tail or something. Same old, same old. Will the bitch fest ever end? I don't see it happening.
Well I miss the good days at DWW. Then we all had just one common complaint and it had to do with MS and the things we talked about were always helpful most of the time. Now it seems that everyone hates everyone else. People are too stupid to know when they have a good thing. Sometimes a person just don't know when to shut up or they think that they are owed something. Unless you paid for it you are owed nothing. Just my 2 cents but really, who cares?
42 • @39, Jesse: VL Installer (by Pearson on 2012-01-09 20:43:27 GMT from United States)
"I'm fairly certain only the live CD installs the VL account. If I recall correctly the editions feature different installers too."
May I recommend that you add this note to your review? This sounds pretty important and like something a reader would find useful.
43 • re: Razor-qt (by Michael J King on 2012-01-09 20:44:04 GMT from United Kingdom)
Great to hear about Razor-qt, I added it straight away to have a play myself. On my system (Bodhi linux, and a thinkpad x40) this seems to uses 160mb on boot up (My E17 starts up under 100mb to compare ), I am still trying to configure certain things but I will following this and see how it goes, It looks very clean and KDE like.
44 • @39 Jesse's review etc (by Vic on 2012-01-09 20:47:22 GMT from Canada)
Congrats on the contest. Thanks again for another good review and piece on razor-qt, both good reads.
In regards to vl being created on install, you are correct in your assumption that it had to depends on the media you use. The live cd installer for Vector basically just dumps the live cd system directly to the HD, the vl account and all with little change to the system. Unless you need to test your hardware first, the install media is the better choice. It offers a more 'polished' installer that actually creates a fresh system according to your choices.
I ran Vector 7.0 for about a month after it's release and I enjoyed it for it's very simple KISS set up. Of course the bottom dock doesn't follow that theme, I think it's an added eye candy feature to boost visual appeal to new Linux users. Vector was a nice way to try Slackware with out the hassle of setting a system up from scratch. If I wasn't so badly bitten by the distro-hop-bug it might have lasted longer. Alas I've moved on, though after today's read I'm glad I saved the install HD image in case I feel like a trip back...
45 • Editions (by Jesse on 2012-01-09 21:05:03 GMT from Canada)
>> "I'm fairly certain only the live CD installs the VL account. If I recall correctly the editions feature different installers too."
May I recommend that you add this note to your review? This sounds pretty important and like something a reader would find useful."
The above is just my theory, I didn't try the plain installation media, so I'm not sure that's the case, but based on your comment it seemed logical. Since I didn't use the plain install media, I don't think I should write about it. I pointed out in my review there were two editions, Standard and Live and I reviewed the Live one. If you used a different edition it makes sense for you to have different results.
46 • Rasor-Qt (by Occupant on 2012-01-09 21:42:44 GMT from United States)
Now only if Symantec could detect and filter results my tool chain (k,g or Q). I'd be all set. But I too can't wait for distros using the new light KDE desktop. I have everyone still on Easy Peasy/UNR (laptop) and XFCE, E17 or LXDE on the desktop. I'm tied of bumping into KDE based apps I can't run without adding a big bunch of packages.
47 • Vetcor Linux 7 review, responses to a few comments (by Caitlyn Martin on 2012-01-09 21:43:11 GMT from United States)
The standard (installable) version of VectorLinux has always worked better than the Live version. This release is no different. In general, I was shocked at how many things I found in Jesse's review that I would consider inaccurate or just plain wrong. For example, there is a 64 bit build of Vector Linux 7.0 which is still in beta but it is remarkably close to ready for prime time at this point. The claim that this is a 32-bit only distro is just not correct. Similarly, Vector Linux Light 7.0 is in beta, with Light Live close behind. The KDE Classic version is also in development. Each is treated as a separate project with separate lead developers so the do trickle out. In any case, as with Vector Linux 6.0 there are already at least have a dozen editions, not two.
While I agree that Cairo-Dock was not quite ready for prime time the rest of the distro works incredibly well and really isn't difficult to use at all. NVidia setup works well in the standard version but is more challenging starting from Live. Command line FTP clients (you have choices) are in the repository and are just a couple of clicks away. Midnight Commander is not the default file manager by any means. That would be Thunar. mc is simply an alternate choice for the command line. jayell nails in in #7. mc works perfectly well in a console session. In a terminal window the behavior Jesse saw is common to most if not all distributions and has nothing to do with VectorLinux per se.
#14: Slackware uses LILO so it's not surprising that most Slackware derivatives do as well. Why do you say "No can do"? Is that your personal bias or do you have some practical reason. I find LILO works very well indeed in most situations and is a lot simpler to configure than GRUB2.
#27: I'm surprised you found it sluggish at all with >512MB RAM. Have you tried the Light beta? That works well down to about 128MB RAM.
#30: Does your comment include VL 7.0? I've had much more trouble with Ubuntu being anything but smooth on my hardware than any Vector Linux version since 5.8. If you're going back to 5.1 or so, then, yes, I'd agree with you. VL 5.8-6.0 did take a bit more configuration than Ubuntu but once running smooth is exactly the word I'd use to describe them. With VL 7.0 my hardware works out of the virtual box, something decidedly not true with Ubuntu.
I could go on and on but you get the drift. I have a Vector Linux 7 review which will be published by O'Reilly within the week. It's much more comprehensive and is based on two months use rather than one week. It does cover the installable version (recommended) and the 64-bit versions as well. Read it for yourself and come to your own conclusions. I respect Jesse highly as most of you know but this is one time I find his review way off base.
Oh, and no, I have no association with Vector Linux, haven't had for about two years, and had nothing whatsoever to do with the development of this release.
48 • Builds (by Jesse on 2012-01-09 21:56:31 GMT from Canada)
>> "I found in Jesse's review that I would consider inaccurate or just plain wrong. For example, there is a 64 bit build of Vector Linux 7.0 which is still in beta"
I assume you're referring to this statement in the review:
"At the time of writing, both editions are available in 32-bit builds only"
Since you just pointed out the 64-bit build is still in beta and I wrote this review a few weeks ago I fail to see how my comment was inaccurate.
I didn't claim there wasn't an FTP command line client available in the repositories, only that there isn't one in the default install. Nor did I claim the Midnight Commander is the default file manager. I simply pointed out it is available and recommend (which is it whenever you open a terminal).
All the things you say are inaccurate about my review are things I didn't actually claim or are things which were true when I wrote them and may change over time.
I realize you're a big fan of Vector, understandably so, but putting words in my mouth and then attacking those words won't help the project any.
49 • Response to #48 (by Caitlyn Martin on 2012-01-09 22:13:03 GMT from United States)
I didn't put words in your mouth, Jesse. That is what you implied. The current beta build of VL64 was available in December. The first beta was available in November. It is very much inaccurate to claim it's a 32-bit only distro. It would have been accurate if you said that the 64-bit build was still in beta so you focused on 32-bit only. Regarding mc, you're splitting hairs. You claimed that it was "recommended". OK, that's a better word than default. Pray tell, where is it recommended over Thunar? I also wasn't disputing what you said about the command line FTP client not being included on the Live iso. I pointed out why I considered that irrelevant. Big difference.
As far as my being a "big fan" of Vector Linux... If I am, why hasn't it been my desktop distro of choice since December, 2010? Hmmm... It would be fair to say that I consider some of the developers to be friends and I respect their work. "Fan" is a stretch at this point.
Sorry, I don't find Vector to have "undesirable defaults" (that's a personal preference issue, of course) and I don't think you did it justice starting with Live rather than Standard. It's called Standard for a reason. Considering I found it easier to get Vector working right on my hardware than Ubuntu, I find your conclusion curious at best.
50 • Vector Linux + MC --hide-menubar (by Kristian Nygaard Jensen on 2012-01-09 22:28:06 GMT from Denmark)
If you modify the launcher for the terminal and add the "--hide-menubar" switch you can use all the fatures of MC and the cli emacs bindings as aswell. This used to be possible with gnome-terminal too, both gnome shell and unity have this switch for the terminal, but it does not work. This is the reason I have switched to XFCE.
51 • @50 (by Gustavo on 2012-01-09 23:32:08 GMT from Brazil)
Nice tip, Kristian!! The function keys behavior has always annoyed me.
On XFterminal just uncheck show menu bar option on the menu itseft.
52 • cinnamon, razor-qt (by Candide on 2012-01-09 23:48:45 GMT from Taiwan)
I happily installed Razor-qt on my LinuxMint12 partition. Unfortunately, Razor just won't start. But I've noticed that I can't get OpenBox to run on this machine either (at least under Mint12). Most every other desktop will run - go figure.
I also decided to give Cinnamon a try. It's pretty, but seems sluggish, at least on my ASUS eeePC. The sluggishness probably has something to do with its Gnome3 roots. MATE runs better and I use that when I need a complete desktop, but Enlightenment is superfast though it lacks a few features (like automounting of USB devices).
So mostly I run Enlightenment, or MATE when I want all the bell and whistles. Switching between the two only takes about 10 seconds.
The war for the perfect desktop continues...
53 • Razor-qt (by Pumpino on 2012-01-10 00:06:40 GMT from Australia)
Thanks Jesse for the article about Razor-qt. It's refreshing to see a new DE on the horizon. I switched from Gnome2 to KDE, but then switched to XFCE due to the feeling of bloat. Having a "lite" DE like Razor-qt might be just what I'm after.
Which distro did you try it under? I noticed on the Razor-qt website that the link to Fedora packages takes us to openSUSE packages. :(
54 • Lost In Translation (by Woodstock69 on 2012-01-10 01:05:00 GMT from Papua New Guinea)
Great to see a few distros running Trinity. More needed though and a stable repo wouldn't go astray. Nonetheless great effort by the Trinity devs to keep the beloved KDE3 alive and kicking.
I'm not sure if Google or the webmaster of ROSA is playing tricks on us but has anyone noticed the translation of Russian to English on the ROSA Linux site?
"Mandriva/ROSA desktop 2011 is a software package for the deployment of modern viruses, the workplace at no additional cost."
Gives new meaning to the phrase "lost in translation".....
Lastly, any review posted on DW is going to be mostly opinion and personal experience. We all realise that, though some forget. I doubt very much that Jesse would consciously misrepresent a distro, and of course the reader is entitled to argue their own rebuffs, but I did think Caitlyn's comments came across as a little harsh and personal. He reported what he saw and had available at the time of review.
I wait in anticipation at Caitlyn's review on her blog and the expected lively comments following..... ;-)
55 • @14 Vector 7 Boot Loader (by TheBullDog on 2012-01-10 01:42:01 GMT from United States)
When I installed Vector 7, I was given the choice of installing LILO or GRUB. Nice option.
56 • Mandriva (@3, @11) (by Adam Williamson on 2012-01-10 02:32:52 GMT from Canada)
Sad to hear the latest news about Mandriva.
Contrary to @3 and @11 I'd suggest it wasn't the Conectiva merger that hurt Mandriva (actually, the Brazilian team was fantastic, and Brazilian sales continued to be strong); Ubuntu pretty much killed Mandrake/iva five years ago. The only viable business model MDV ever had was to sell copies of a desktop Linux operating system; once someone shows up who is willing to give away a perfectly competent desktop Linux operating system for free, that business model loses rather a lot of its practicality...
You can argue the toss about whether MDV or Ubuntu is better all day long, but the truth is there isn't a whole hell of a lot of difference at the end of the day. They're both perfectly competently made Linux desktops. Mandriva's continued existence depended (still depends, really) on people buying it; Ubuntu's doesn't. There's the key to the whole thing.
There were some of us at MDV who recognized this, and various different ideas for different alternative business models, and trying all of them half-heartedly at once probably wasn't a great idea. But I'm not sure any of them could ultimately have panned out, for the company Mandriva actually is/was. It's not built to be a Red Hat, because it really doesn't understand how to do enterprise/government support properly. It's not built to be Apple, either. It did a fairly good job of being a modest paid distribution house in the years when being one of those was a viable plan, but those days are long gone...
57 • Vector (by Neal on 2012-01-10 04:10:42 GMT from United States)
What ever happened to Vector ligt? I liked that one using the Icewm...Last release of VL was april 09.
58 • #19 - openSUSE boot times (by Andy Prough on 2012-01-10 05:01:02 GMT from United States)
@walter_j "The best part about ubuntu 11.10 is the fast boot. 10 to 15 seconds as opposed to a full minute for opensuse 12.1 kde. Electricity is getting expensive, so I try to conserve where I can, so I turn off the pc if I'm away for a few hours, so a fast boot time is nice. Maybe other distros should look into how ubuntu is able to boot so quick."
"Ultimately I abandoned 11.10 because of instability. No obvious crashes - just programs not opening after being minimized, or opening under other programs. Occasionally being dumped back to the login. These issues should be resolved before going to mass market items such as phones, tv's, otherwise the return rate will be high. I'd be interested in the phone if it worked well with my pc."
Sorry to hear about your slow boot times with an openSUSE 12.1 installation. I've had quite the opposite experience with openSUSE. I'm running it on a workstation I built for work with a 6-core AMD processor and an nVidia 550 video card, and I've had it booting in about 6 seconds into KDE login. I actually took steps to slow down the boot process, as it seemed a bit too fast for my tastes. On my Dell 1737 laptop, it boots in about 15 seconds, and on my eee PC netbook, it boots in about 12-13 seconds. On both the laptop and the netbook, I made tweaks to optimize the boot time, but I haven't seen anything near 1 minute since prior to the 11.3 release.
The programs are quite stable, and KDE 4.6 is very stable - although I do avoid the use of PackageKit as the software management tool - it still seems a bit buggy, and YaST2 works much better for me when I'm installing and upgrading software. If you want to take another shot at it, I would invite you to bring any boot speed issues to the forums at forums.opensuse.org, and we would be happy to help.
Kyle, Texas, USA
59 • @56 - Ubuntu and Mandrivas existance (by Mike on 2012-01-10 05:42:13 GMT from United States)
Hi Adam, do you really believe that Ubuntu/Canonical's existance isn't dependent on someone "buying it"? I would view Ubuntu's desktop and server offerings as their loss-leader when their real offering is Support and perhaps the mobile space. Now granted in the enterprise space they lag Red Hat and Suse, but they are trying to make inroads. If ultimately Ubuntu/Canonical fails in the support and mobile space I wonder if Shuttlesworth will continue to burn capital to fund Ubuntu. I don't get the impression Ubuntu could continue as a pure community distro.
60 • Mageia Phuckery (by Tony on 2012-01-10 07:05:52 GMT from United States)
How come Mageia keeps rising in the HPD when their forum never has any users? I've been there every day for the past month an there are never more than 2-3 people online. What kind of phuckery is going on here?
61 • VectorLinux and LILO (by CliffyB on 2012-01-10 07:30:37 GMT from United States)
It`s my personal preference, Caitlyn. I`ve got Win 7 and Ultimate running Grub2 and don`t feel like changing that setup. Also, you come across as very protective of a distro you "use to work for." Not very objective, no?
62 • @59 (by greg on 2012-01-10 07:34:53 GMT from Slovenia)
Mark set a side a fund in case that happens, so that (in that case) community can pick off where Cannonical left.
63 • Criticism (by Koroshiya Itchy on 2012-01-10 12:15:14 GMT from Belgium)
Am I the only one who thinks it is a bit puerile accusing anyone who has different criteria of being either a fan-boy or a hater? Different people have different needs. It is as simple as that. One can prefer certain features over others and that does not make him either a fanboy of X or a hater of Y. Free software is libre, and that freedom leaves a lot of room for everybody.
64 • @60 (by Ron on 2012-01-10 12:44:39 GMT from United States)
Forum activity is quite different then operating system usage. Usage is always higher then the forum activity.
65 • Vector 7 (by TuxTest on 2012-01-10 13:50:34 GMT from Canada)
I do not have the same verdict on Vectorlinux 7. I tested it on 5 different PC, setup Intel and AMD.2 Laptop and 3 desktop with diffrérent config. First you must use the real install version to be able to do a properly evaluation. My test is based on three months of use on 5 different PC. The installation steps are very simple and easy to understand for a newbie.
Recognition hardware is really exellent for old and new material. Sound, wifi,3 usb wifi, video card no problem. Compared to Ubuntu 11.10, VectorLinux 7 was run perfectly on my PC 5, Not Ubuntu and several other like Debian to name another.
The only problem with linux Vector 7 is the management of languages that is not in native during installation on all version. Internationalization language needs to be reviewed if the team wants Vectorlinux attract more users around the world. The Vasmant needs to be a little polish, but is working properly. Gslapt is Clear and run fast! The update is too easy. For doing a real review, I think should be done over several weeks. If you want a really have an overall vision of a distro.
Vector 7 could easily be in the top 10 with some improvements (Internationalization choice language start at on the fist step of intallation on all version. Need some polished on Vasm management admin tool.
I think a reader must be put in perspective the review is on Distrowatch! With respect, I do not think we should see the reviews on Distrowatch as an absolute truth. People must make an effort themselves! The best way!
In conclusion, my experience with Vector 7 day to day use is great with not bad surprise. I'am not a Vector big fan user, actually Vector 7 is on my fist Laptop with 2 other distro. I don't have a main system.
66 • #57: Vector Light, #61 I never worked for VL (by Caitlyn Martin on 2012-01-10 13:59:41 GMT from United States)
#57: Vector Linux Light 7.0 is currently in beta. Info is at http://forum.vectorlinux.com/index.php?topic=15565.msg88940#new
$61: I never worked for Vector Linux. Sorry. I'm also not "protective" of them. I agree with TuxTest in #65: Using Live is an unfortunate way to test Vector Linux if you intend to install. The installer on the Live version has never produced great results. (See, I criticize too) and I found Jesse's review results to be what was really harsh. It had to be the most negative review of Vector Linux I have ever seen and I honestly feel it was unwarranted.
Regarding comments I will receive on the O'Reilly Broadcast website, well... hate comments are nothing new to me.
67 • VL64 (by Koroshiya Itchy on 2012-01-10 14:04:07 GMT from Belgium)
Approximately, how many packages are available in Vector Linux and Vector Linux 64 through slapt-get?
68 • Scalability of Open Source (by Baul on 2012-01-10 15:03:08 GMT from United Kingdom)
I think what Ubuntu and what it is trying for open source is important and unique - yes there is a bothersome re-design issue going on - the old (for me) Gnome interface was lovely but now there is a need to scale up - how can you complain against a visionary like MS - this conversation would not be happening 15 years ago.
Personally I think there has to be two interfaces - one private and one public free to use.
However that happens - I guess is not really touch based or to pull down a menu and point at something.
If I am wrong criticise me - but the new technology paradigm is scalability of use and interface - Ubiquity get a bad press - but it is a possible winner as well (I kinda thought that open source was a kinda area for people to try out ideas - not be shut down because it was different!).
69 • VectorLinux (by CliffyB on 2012-01-10 15:23:44 GMT from United States)
@ 66: Well, you said yourself you "hadn`t had any association" with VL for two years, implying you were associated somehow in the past. Since you seem to be some sort of consultant, that implies you worked for them in some capacity, at least. It wasn`t a hate comment, no need to get defensive.
70 • Installation and Vector Linux (by David McCann on 2012-01-10 16:43:42 GMT from United Kingdom)
It's interesting to see how Jesse and I got different perspectives of Vector just from using different CDs. This seems to be a common problem. Anyone reviewing Fedora or CentOS from their live CDs will get a very different experience to someone using the DVDs. As for OpenSUSE, I remember two successive versions where the live CD was shipped with a broken installer. Some developers obviously regard the creation of a live CD as something of an afterthought, a concession to popular demand. The moral for Vector and the others is "get it right, or have the courage of your convictions and don't do it."
71 • #69: Clarification, #70: Live CDs (by Caitlyn Martin on 2012-01-10 17:53:07 GMT from United States)
#69: Oh, good grief! I never said your comment was a hate comment. I said I get those on O'Reilly. I never stated or implied I worked for Vector Linux. As people who have been around DWW for a while know I was a volunteer packager and later, briefly, a repo maintainer for VL. That was my way of paying back when I used it as my primary desktop. I do believe in giving something back to the FOSS community.
#70: First, I fully agree with you about the Live CD being a different, and often inferior experience, and installing from Live doesn't do justice to a lot of distros. I agree with you that Fedora and CentOS are in that category, as is Scientific Linux. I don't think VL Live is an afterthought but, like Fedora or CentOS, you don't get the same quality of results from the live installer. Their live installer has always had minor issues and this one is no different. Also, they always have to leave a few package off the live version to make it fit on a CD sized iso and that sometimes is a factor as well.
I'll gladly concede that a big part of the very different results Jesse and I get may be due to his choice to review Live and my choice to work from Standard.
72 • re: Choice and Fear (by Peter Besenbruch on 2012-01-10 18:41:38 GMT from United States)
"Now it seems that everyone hates everyone else."
"Hate" is too strong a word. I would say rather, that people often fail to show basic respect and courtesy.
"People are too stupid to know when they have a good thing."
This is a good example of that failure.
"Sometimes a person just don't know when to shut up or they think that they are owed something."
73 • Mandriva and the Good Old Days (by Peter Besenbruch on 2012-01-10 19:57:35 GMT from United States)
Mandrake was the first distro that I installed successfully. As a Windows user in 2002, Mandrake's install went smoothly and made sense. It all went down hill after that. It was the most unstable piece of software I have ever worked with. I also tried Suse, which installed well, but soon had me confronting RPM hell. Red Hat was even more user hostile, while Caldera's installer showed promise, but wouldn't install properly.
Then there was Debian. Early in the installation process you got presented with this screen full of choices, none of which made any sense to this Linux noob. In retrospect, I realize that Debian was allowing me to compile a custom kernel at install time. The proper response was to hit [Enter], and move on. No where did the screen tell you that hitting [Enter] was an option. Yes, that's what usability was like back then.
It is hard wired into our psyches to complain about stuff, and one side effect is to have those complaints escalate into name calling and claims of victimization. One way to minimize that is to look at what the fights have been about in this issue of Distrowatch. They center on Jessie's criticism of the Cairo Dock, and the installation of an extra user in Vector Linux. Then there is the usual complaining about Gnome 3 and Unity. These are either small bugs, or usability issues. Gone are the days of wondering how to get my mouse supported, let alone wifi. Remember when a distribution's failure to support suspend and hibernation on a laptop wasn't counted against it?
Regarding the Vector review: Jessie says they got the basics down, and there were a couple of glitches. Bottom line, Vector works, and will serve someone nicely. Regarding Gnome 3 and Unity: Both introduced huge changes, and weren't very good initially. It's also pretty clear that they are aiming for a certain level of maturity in time for the Spring distro releases, Ubuntu LTS, and the freeze of Debian Wheezy. That's when we need to evaluate them seriously.
I write this as someone who tried KDE 4 (actually 4.3) and then moved to XFCE. KDE is without doubt the most advanced desktop environment out there. I don't hate it. I know they went through hell over the transition, but I admire their efforts. I stopped using KDE, because I didn't want the extras that they offered. That's a personal decision. I am not angry at KDE because their goals and mine differ.
2011 saw the introduction of still more choice into the Linux world. Unity is aimed at smaller screens. Gnome is going the Firefox route with a somewhat stripped down offering, coupled to a growing list of extensions. Who knows how this will all shake out, but 2012 sure looks interesting.
74 • #70 (by Andy Prough on 2012-01-10 20:07:42 GMT from United States)
@David McCann - "As for OpenSUSE, I remember two successive versions where the live CD was shipped with a broken installer. Some developers obviously regard the creation of a live CD as something of an afterthought, a concession to popular demand. The moral for Vector and the others is "get it right, or have the courage of your convictions and don't do it."
What installation problems did you have David? I think I've tried all the openSUSE live CD versions, and never ran into a "broken installer". Distrowatch links to all the reviews over time - I don't think you will find a single one that refers to a "broken installer". No major distro would make it out of beta stage with that kind of a problem! I would dare say you won't find a version of Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, etc that has shipped with a "broken installer" - there wouldn't be any sense in burning the CD in the first place!
Like all major distros, openSUSE does have a forum where more experienced users will gladly help you with your installation difficulties. Have you asked for help?
75 • @61 Mixing multiple distros with different bootloaders (by Vic on 2012-01-10 20:39:55 GMT from Canada)
@CliffyB it's fairly possible and quite simple to run Vector on a system already booting with Grub 2. I had it working fine on my laptop for the month I tried out Vector 7 right after it's release. At the time my first partition contained Linux Mint 12, which uses Grub 2 and handled the booting for all the currently installed systems I was trying out. When I installed Vector I had the option of installing Lilo to the mbr, the partition, or to skip it all together. Cause I used the liveCD Grub wasn't offered. Now I wanted to keep Mint's Grub 2 handling the boot process so installing to the mbr wasn't an option, leaving the later two. I chose to skip adding Lilo and after Vector install was completed I booted into Mint, ran
and the Vector partition was picked up and added to my grub.conf file. Quick reboot and I was able to choose Vector from the boot screen.
Alternately I could have had Lilo installed to Vector's root partition and than manually created an entry into Mint's Grub 2 set up to chainload Vector, effectively handing off the boot process to Lilo. This being a temporary set up I choose the first quicker option.
Hope that helps you or anyone else faced with a similar scenario out.
76 • reviews and gnome 3 (by TuxTest on 2012-01-10 20:45:16 GMT from Canada)
I installed on 1 desktop and a 1 laptop OpenSuse 12.1 education version. For testing at a long term. After 2 week test on Gnome 3.2, I need more time to make an objective reviews of every aspect of this Distro. A few days or one week would not sufficiant. It would not do justice to this version of openSUSE and not make me service in my evaluation.
For this reason, we must put in perspective the reviews of Jesse. His reviews can be as good and as bad as mine. This is not the end in itself! It is an opinion in a short time!
3 For Gnome, I just simply say that it is a matter of taste as regards the GNOME 3.2. Gnome 3.2 is a completely different environment gnome 2.2. For this reason, we should not compare them. Gnome 3 is certainly interesting in terms of look. But it is less convenient than the previous gnome. This is a personal opinion! I do not think I'd like to use this environment every day. Too many simply click to open an application if it is not in the task bar. This will be my only comment about it!
@73 I share your opinion, too much talk in the comment section around Unity or Gnome 3! This is redundant and unnecessary! It is not lack of choice.
77 • #65: Jesse's review, your comments (by Caitlyn Martin on 2012-01-10 20:59:30 GMT from United States)
I think your assessment of internationalization and localization in the Vector Linux installer is fair criticism. International language support has long been a weak area in VL and while it has steadily gotten better it has a ways to go.
Another criticism voiced earlier is the relatively small size of the repositories. That is a problem for almost all smaller distros when compared to Debian, Ubuntu or Mandriva. The good news with VL and a number of other small distros I could name (i.e. Pardus, SalixOS, probably dozens more) is that the packagers take requests and do their best to fill them. In addition, the repository has been growing steadily as volunteer packagers add things. This is where a trip to the forum, and the package request thread in particular, can really pay off.
Finally, one more comment on Jesse's review: Vector Linux does have a notifier that works properly for updates --- but apparently not in the Live version Jesse used. That kind of, sort of makes sense if you think of Live as Live and Standard as the version to install.
78 • Re: 73,76 reviews and gnome3 (by Ron on 2012-01-10 21:08:26 GMT from United States)
"@73 I share your opinion, too much talk in the comment section around Unity or Gnome 3! This is redundant and unnecessary! It is not lack of choice."
Can I believe my eyes? Too much talk in the comment section. How ironic! Where else?
It seems that some people just do not like to hear what they do not like to hear.
79 • Just finished installing Funduntu... (by Vic on 2012-01-10 21:49:59 GMT from Canada)
...to get online this morning and see the newly announced point release, dope! Guess being a rolling release I'm not missing much but a few configuration changes. Already changed my default font to the one to the newly added one. I've been on the new install for 12 hours and I'm pleasantly content for now. It's very close to my CentOS install with all the basic bells and whistles I usually add already there out of the box, and with more current software. Kind of like running Fedora with a sanely familiar Gnome 2 DE. Hopefully this sedates my distro ADHD.
80 • @Caitlyn and @78 (by TuxTest on 2012-01-10 22:11:30 GMT from Canada)
@ caitlyn Thank you for your comment! I also believe that we must consider the standard user does not need to have 25.000 package available in the application manager. Vector has ample enough to package for 90% of users. One thing that is different with the community is that Vector dev team is available/actif on the forum. Also there are many tutorial http://www.opensourcebistro.com/blog1/ here for the curious. This is precisely why VectorLinux is a good community! That is why I class Vector in my top 10. The user will learn a lot if he want. We cannot find this in all Distro.
@78 Ron Week after week, half the comments here are on Unity or Gnome 3 people love it or not! Sorry but the people have XFCE, KDE, TRINITY, E17, MATE, LXDE and many more! People have a choose another desktop manager. That's it! Why make a never ending story when the alternative is there?
81 • Jessie vs. Caitlyn (by Sly on 2012-01-10 23:00:40 GMT from United States)
Wow. I've been checking out the exchange and additional comments by others. In the end it appears that Caitlyn is backtracking on her rather blunt comments. Caitlyn one request for you.....give me this link to where your reviews are published.... if Distrowatch will allow it? One might infer that you are trying to tweak our curiosity to read your reviews, so let's have the link.
82 • #81 (by Andy Prough on 2012-01-10 23:26:51 GMT from United States)
Just google "Caitlyn Martin". She is a very widely published, well-respected journalist. Her site at O'Reilly publishing should come up as the first hit, and I think she links a lot of her material from there.
83 • caitlyn reviews (by TuxTest on 2012-01-10 23:34:07 GMT from Canada)
Caitlyn reviews on VectorLinux 5.8 and 5.9
Another good post by caitlyn
84 • Shuttlepad "mock up" (by shenanigans on 2012-01-11 00:51:13 GMT from United States)
It's nothing more than a picture of an ipad with a half cut off screen of unity. Not very creative.
85 • #84 (by Andy Prough on 2012-01-11 01:09:44 GMT from United States)
84 • Shuttlepad "mock up" (by shenanigans on 2012-01-11 00:51:13 GMT from United States)
It's nothing more than a picture of an ipad with a half cut off screen of unity. Not very creative.
At least we know it's not another ego trip by Shuttleworth - it's not like he named it after himself or anything...
86 • Asturix 4 (by Chds on 2012-01-11 06:16:00 GMT from Liechtenstein)
Practically all the guys, who are commenting here has some years in the calendar. This new DE in Asturix 4 was made by a 15 year old boy from Spain, who is now just 16. Would you older guys like to download Asturix 4 and give feedback to him? The youngsters have cleaner minds, without all the clutter collected in the years. Good day!
87 • gome3 Again (by ken on 2012-01-11 10:06:20 GMT from Congo, The Democratic Republic of the)
I think most people here understand that the problem some us have with Gnome3 is not its existence but its role in the death of Gnome2.Those other alternatives we are told about non of them is gnome2.
88 • @87 (by TuxTest on 2012-01-11 13:01:49 GMT from Canada)
Even if you talk about Gnome 3 it until 2050! This will not change anything! Made you the idea. Using MATE or Other Desktop management. Gnome developers have decided to take another way. That's it! It is their choice and it will live with the consequence
89 • #71 Live CD being a different, and often inferior experience, (by jack on 2012-01-11 14:58:24 GMT from Canada)
This is a real shock
I have only 2 computers; a fairly recent one and an old one that I keep so that I can go online when I screw up my main computer.
In the past , if I saw an OS mentioned on DW I downloaded the live version and if it didn't work I just dumped it.
I would never consider installing it on my main computer as I am not sure that my knowledge level would allow me to correct the potential
So now I either have to buy a new computer as a testing unit or accept the fact that my experience with any live OS may be an unreliable guide.
For example; #86 Asturix, looks interesting; but I could not find out from their site if the 32 bit version is a live version.
Not a happy camper
90 • Asturix live (by jack on 2012-01-11 15:49:11 GMT from Canada)
from their forum:
El idioma solo está en inglés en la versión live, debido a que si poníamos las traducciones en español, "llenaríamos" mucho el DVD, y de 1 GB que ocupa quizás ocuparía 2 GB. Sin embargo, cuando lo instales, estará en español totalmente, y el teclado también en español, o en la opción que elijas.
The live version is in English only because adding Spanish would double the size.
Once installed it will be completely Spanish, including the keyboard
91 • "old hardware" (by Simon on 2012-01-11 16:21:27 GMT from United Kingdom)
When Jesse made the claim (post 39) that computers with hardware specs of 2 GHz CPU and 3 GB of RAM, and the other - 2.5 GHz CPU and 2 GB of RAM was 'old hardware' I accept that this is his (Toronto?) reality. But it is laughable for those of us of 'the other half'.
It ain't "old hardware" in the Canadian Maritimes where I spent this summer ... or back here in Wales.
He also adds "Sure it's [my 1 Ghz CPU with 512 RAM] sluggish, but your running a modern OS on equipment a decade old. Of course it's not going to be optimal."
Not that long ago I used to install Vector on Pentium III 500 to 650 Mhz with 128 to 256 RAM machines and they used to run pretty good. Not sluggish.
Jesse also added "Sure it's [my 1 Ghz CPU with 512 RAM] sluggish, but your running a modern OS on equipment a decade old. Of course it's not going to be optimal."
Why does a "modern OS" require so much resources when they are not really any better that ones that came out 5 or 6 years ago? Can we conclude that Linux Operating systems are following Microsoft's lead and getting progressively less efficient and resource hungry?
92 • @ comment #33 (by Johnny Hughes on 2012-01-11 19:01:47 GMT from United States)
CentOS does not care about updates ... WTF?
We got the 6.2 point release done in 10 days and released on them on the same day as Oracle did their 6.2 for UBL ... how is that not caring about security?
We did it in 10 days WHILE the lead developer and his wife were having a baby ... WHAT are you talking about?
Every update for CentOS-5.7, 4.8, and 6.2 have been released within 24 hours after their release.
Nice touch with the anonymous post.
93 • Comment #91 on "old hardware" (by Koroshiya Itchy on 2012-01-11 19:36:01 GMT from Belgium)
"Why does a "modern OS" require so much resources when they are not really any better that ones that came out 5 or 6 years ago? Can we conclude that Linux Operating systems are following Microsoft's lead and getting progressively less efficient and resource hungry?"
I could not possibly agree more. Why should we need more resources to do the very same thing? Why is everything getting heavier and heavier? Efficiency, efficiency, efficiency.
94 • #92: CentOS (by Caitlyn Martin on 2012-01-11 20:16:27 GMT from United States)
Nice to see one of the CentOS developers here. CentOS did (past tense) have a problem getting security updates out on a timely basis. The same was true of dot releases but that was less critical for enterprise users. It might make deployment on very new hardware more difficult but it isn't a security issue. Since the CR repository came online the security updates have been universally prompt. Johnny Hughes is right about how timely the CentOS 6.2 release was. There were problems in the past but from my perspective the CentOS developers seem to have solved them.
95 • @93 (by Patrick on 2012-01-11 20:19:38 GMT from United States)
Generally the "more efficient" thing to do is to use more resources as they become available. For instance, a program will run better if it keeps more of its data in memory, hence it has higher memory use. Or drawing a GUI is more efficient when done by a GPU (which is made for the purpose of drawing pixels) than when done by a CPU. This also aids in parallelism since the CPU can run other tasks while the GPU is doing its thing.
So as time moves on, and more powerful hardware becomes commonplace, developers shift their target hardware specs up, making things work better and more efficient on the hardware that is common at the time. This is completely normal and desirable. For instance, I would be quite annoyed if a program kept hitting the hard drive when there are gigabytes of free memory available. I also don't see the point in my GPU sitting idle while the CPU is wasting its time drawing my screen.
The downside is of course that this software optimized for contemporary hardware may be too heavy for ancient hardware. It just wasn't designed for it. This being Linux though, there are plenty of choices, which include distros targeted at old hardware. The endless range of software and huge amount of knobs to turn in the Linux kernel makes it possible to build a system that is optimized for really low end systems. You just can't expect mainstream distro's to do that though. They target higher performing systems, and rightfully so. Using hardware resources when they are available is the most efficient thing to do.
96 • @93+91 (by Barnabyh on 2012-01-11 20:37:47 GMT from United Kingdom)
97 • #86, 85, 93, 91: (by Caitlyn Martin on 2012-01-11 20:53:54 GMT from United States)
Building on the excellent points made by Patrick and Barnabyh, I'll add that there are also many more types and models of hardware to support. A distro circa 2000 really only had to worry about wired networking. Today we have wifi and Bluetooth and 3G/4G modems to support. Naturally networking utilities and tools have multiplied and become heavier. The same can be said of almost any class of hardware. It isn't bloat if it's necessary to run a modern system.
98 • RE: #89 #71 Live CD being a different, and often inferior experience (by Ron on 2012-01-11 21:09:11 GMT from United States)
"I would never consider installing it on my main computer as I am not sure that my knowledge level would allow me to correct the potential"
You would do well to learn the 'Clonezilla' software program. It's available on a CD. It takes a little time to learn, and it must be used properly, but it is a life saver after a super crash or drive failure (it can and does happen alas).
Work Clonezilla through a test system to make sure you have it right and that you do not run into some surprises if and when its really needed. Then, you can clone your entire system/drive and play all you want and still come back exactly as you left things.
99 • Re: Donations: Transmissions receives US$250 (by Jordan Lee on 2012-01-11 21:59:19 GMT from Hungary)
This is pretty cool -- I hadn't looked at the tip jar for a few days, so I found out about this when I downloaded the podcast. Thanks Distrowatch!
100 • 90 • Asturix live (by jack (by Ed on 2012-01-12 01:11:32 GMT from Netherlands)
Go to http://asturix.com/on/ and then check the link Asturix 4. Everything is in English.
Everyone is arguing about how bad Gnome 3 and Unity, but none wants to do something about that. So, a 15-year old did.
Download it, check it, give him your feedback, but don't criticize. Let him grow up to a great developer. He was 15, when he did it! Now he is 16.
101 • @100 (by JR on 2012-01-12 01:41:03 GMT from Brazil)
the world is evil, he has to learn that, the criticism will come one way or another, is what he does about it that will make the criticism constructive or harmful!
102 • Distro Jumping (by TheBullDog on 2012-01-12 04:50:20 GMT from United States)
I checked out four distros this week.
- Fuduntu 2012.1. Boot was uneventful. It seemed to recognize all my hardware. The dock had the most commonly used apps available. Looks like the distro is geared toward the 'cloud' user, and maintenance would be best left to someone a little experienced with linux.
- DreamLinux-5. Booted up to a nice xfce desktop. I though the dock was laid out nicely, functional versus flashy.
- Porteus v1.1. Tried the KDE and LXDE desktops. Nice for KDE enthusiasts.
- Astorix 4 - interesting. Felt like I was stuck somewhere between standard linux and android. Now, if I only had a touchscreen.....
103 • re #91 - that bloatware creep (by gnomic on 2012-01-12 10:05:35 GMT from New Zealand)
"Why does a "modern OS" require so much resources when they are not really any better that ones that came out 5 or 6 years ago? Can we conclude that Linux Operating systems are following Microsoft's lead and getting progressively less efficient and resource hungry?"
Hmmm. I hear what you are saying and I sympathise. However a few quick thoughts on the topic.
* Flash (and the like) - need I say more? Streaming video needs horsepower, and bulkier software.
* Likewise big browsers required to deal with today's web content, and big office suites required to deal with who knows what - maybe mimicking the dread PowerPoint, MS Word, etc etc.
Fatter kernels with more hardware support for stuff only a twinkle in some mad scientist's eye when the Linux journey began. There was a time when vmlinuz fit on a floppy iirc. Remember the floppy disk?
Commercially driven computing's need to be better and newer continually in the interest of selling more stuff.
The nerds want to make more exciting software that uses the latest hardware to the full, but unfortunately leaves behind those thousand dollar 2 meg video cards of yesteryear. Not to mention those megabyte range disks. Now where is that 540 meg disk that cost over $500 back in 1994? Ah yes, still in the 486/33 that cost about $3k.
I was going to say 'games' but let's not go there. Except perhaps to say one could once run Linux in 20MB of RAM - a modern gaming card has 2 gigs of RAM or so I believe - I haven't been keeping up.
In the end one has to decide what one wishes to do with a particular box; that PIII can still be a typewriter that prints output impossible in 1980. or even 1990. It is likely marginal for browsing the web today.
And don't forget: 2 gig of RAM is the new 512.
104 • Razor-Qt (by Craig on 2012-01-12 12:23:58 GMT from United States)
How nice it will be to finally have a Qt alternative to LXDE and XFCE! Thanks for the review. It's the first I'd heard of it.
105 • @103, that bloatware creep (by Toolz on 2012-01-12 13:55:21 GMT from Vietnam)
Not really. Flash has been around a while and in extreme cases it needs horsepower, but not bulkier software. Browsers: Opera is not big. The kernel is increasing in size exponentially: correct.
The main cause supersedes all these: It is *abstraction*.
106 • Linux Mint (by CliffyB on 2012-01-12 14:42:54 GMT from United States)
Finally bit the bullet and switched from Ultimate to Mint. This distro is fantastic, Cinnamon installed with the first update and it`s Gnome 2 for all intents and purposes. All my favorite apps like Chromium, Picasa, Amarok and Skype were in the software manager and installed in a snap. Everything works, and works quickly! This is a fast system, I see what all the fuss is about now.
107 • Live vs standard (by jeff on 2012-01-13 00:53:30 GMT from United States)
I always use the live CD or DVD to first check if my hardware and the distro are compatible, I had a bad experience with an install only CD that I never got wireless to work and had no wired internet at the time.
If it works then I install with the same media, since I know that it works.
I would say that most people would do the same, and any distro that does not take that onto account is failing themselves and their users.
108 • Linux Mint 12- cd (by greg on 2012-01-13 01:47:29 GMT from United States)
Linux Mint 12- cd no codecs 32-bit, is worth a try if you have an older computer, as I have. It's nice that the Mint team hasn't forgotten those of us, who are system-challenged.
109 • re #105 - the abstraction problem? (by gnomic on 2012-01-13 03:55:49 GMT from New Zealand)
'The main cause supersedes all these: It is *abstraction*.'
Are you able to expand a little on this statement? I'm not clear on what you are saying here - or is there some source about this matter you can point to?
110 • FreeBSD 9 (by TuxTest on 2012-01-13 04:24:13 GMT from Canada)
first: I am not a troll! I
I downloaded freebsd 9 2.1 GB DVD to see the improvements and make a test. Well freebsd 9 is always equal to itself. A new installer! What? It's worse than ever! I do not understand the dev teams seems to freebsd insistence offer a desktop version. Stop you lost your time. 99.99% of PC users will unable to install and configure correctly desktop management.
Honestly focus your effort on the server version. The version Desktop forgotten! With desktop version you repeat the same mistakes. Why build a system that 0.001% of PC users can install and can't to a fully functional desktop. This seems to be very difficult for freebsd to evolve over time and procede a necessary evolution.
A user is Luckly those who want to use a FreeBSD system, he have a PC-BSD ago that an approach based on real time 2012 not 1990
Sorry but it's reality!
111 • @109, that bloatware creep (by Toolz on 2012-01-13 09:27:02 GMT from Vietnam)
Yes I'll expand, it goes something like this: The first "hello world" program I wrote nearly 30 years ago was just one line of code and it just ran. I tried the same thing with Visual Basic twenty years ago and it was more complicated and I was very disappointed that I had to pack a 1MB library to run it on another machine - 1MB was a big deal in those days. These days to write the same program, in Python for example, you're loading up how many MB of libraries? It's like that because of abstraction - calling functions to take care of housekeeping, calling many more functions than are required just to put 10 letters (and a space) on the screen, loading the odd library that will never be used ... simply cos it's too risky or cumbersome or ugly (yikes! how do I theme it!) to directly put those ten letters on the screen. That's abstraction.
112 • @108 - Mint on older computers (by Uncle Slacky on 2012-01-13 11:04:33 GMT from France)
Mint LXDE or Peppermint OS (also LXDE) would be better choices for older hardware than anything running GNOME, I'd say, especially since the advent of GNOME 3.x.
113 • @112 (by Toolz on 2012-01-13 11:21:37 GMT from Vietnam)
> "Mint LXDE or Peppermint OS (also LXDE) would be better choices"
Both Ubuntu-based ... Ubuntu or Gnome, you'll still get bloat. And I don't know why the parent is stressing the no-codecs version, unless there's a disk space issue.
114 • RE: 97 (by Terminal on 2012-01-13 15:52:49 GMT from United States)
Comment deleted (troll).
115 • @111 (by Patrick on 2012-01-13 16:13:48 GMT from United States)
Unfortunately, abstraction is necessary for increased functionality. No one human brain can deal with everything involved in making a complex system (say at the level of a modern web browser), from the high level functionality of presenting a web page to the user, all the way down to the transistors that are switching to make it happen.
Some people know how to make high performance transistors. Others know how to combine those to make optimized and consistently performing logic gates. Then still others know how to use those gates to build processors. Yes, even at that low level, these are usually not the same people, and abstractions happen in every step that could be considered inefficient. But they are necessary to make the product happen.
So you can call it bloat if you want, but most of us would probably call it functionality. Sure, a side effect is that your hello world program has become bigger over the years, but nobody is interested in running your hello world program. For programs that people are interested in running, such as web browsers, abstraction is an absolute necessity.
116 • Vector Linux (by David on 2012-01-13 19:51:02 GMT from United States)
I am using Vector 7 on an old Thinkpad I got for connecting to wireless over lunch hour at the public library. Until a few days ago it had 256MB RAM, now 512. I had used Vector Light 6.0 before that, tried AntiX in between.
I decided to go from Light to Standard to have a few more programs available. With 256 MB only the text(ncurses?)installer would run, but it's quite straight forward(I used DOS back in the day but I'm hardly a sophisticated user). Compared to the VL 6.0 Light install my chief complaint is it was all or nothing--Light had a number of optional packages one could take or leave. Had problems with the built in wireless that had worked in 6.0 and had a little trouble following the wireless tutorial(later discovered driver was black listed). Among other things I remember some directories having changed from old version to now and the tutorial not being updated(Thoiugh I didn't ask there, forums seem friendly and helpful, just appears not everything updated). I solved the problem by putting in PCMIA card that was autoconfigured.
As to the looks of the distro in XFCE I moved the menu bar to the bottom and got rid of the Cairo Dock as it wasn't useful to me. You can also use Fluxbox, probably more appropriate for old hardware, but I would have like a clock in the panel by default.
Not sure whether having Flash is good or bad, but I mostly use Opera so it's easy to disable.
All in all Vector works OK for me. AntiX would too but I would have to spend time I don't have on the learning curve for a few things.
Finally, can anyone suggest a way to achieve something like Windows US International keyboard on linux?
117 • @113 - Less bloated distros (by Uncle Slacky on 2012-01-13 20:15:04 GMT from France)
If it's less bloat you're after, then Debian-based distros like AntiX, Crunchbang or Mint Debian XFCE might be more appropriate.
I suggested Ubuntu-based distros as some people like having access to the larger repositories, but Debian's aren't too shabby.
118 • @110 - FreeBSD (by Mike on 2012-01-13 20:44:06 GMT from United States)
"Honestly focus your effort on the server version. The version Desktop forgotten! With desktop version you repeat the same mistakes."
What would give you the impression that FreeBSD developers focus on a desktop version as opposed to a server version? FreeBSD is developed for the server market first and foremost, the motto is "the power to serve". FreeBSD isn't making any mistakes, they are building a great OS that you can use however you see fit. You are correct that PC-BSD focuses on making FreeBSD a great desktop so what is the issue?
119 • FreeBSD @118 (by TuxTest on 2012-01-13 22:28:35 GMT from Canada)
thank for your reply
I do not question the quality of development the FreeBSD. But I simply said is that FreeBSD should drop the desktop version. Make way for other like PC-BSD and perhaps GhostBSD. I suggest you one thing! Do this experience: Take 10/20 people on the street with medium or good ability with a PC. Ask these 20 people to install FreeBSD on a PC, any of them will be able to do so. Why work a built desktop version that nobody will be able to install or maybe 1/2..
FreeBSD is sold as a Desktop solution but in fact it is nothing for 99.99% of people who might be interested! Only if you're a Geek
best regard Mike
120 • RE: 118-119 (by Landor on 2012-01-14 03:18:10 GMT from Canada)
I agree with Mike, their target is exactly what he said, the server. I'd go further and say anyone wanting a cli experience for the desktop as well. Not that there is anything wrong with their GUI Desktop (a point you failed to clarify I might add, since the cli is still considered a desktop by many).
But you miss the boat completely with your rant about FreeBSD, and this is a common thing that I find every single 'evangelist' does wrong. You think that the rest of the world wants to use FreeBSD, or Gentoo, or Linux, or Haiku, etc. Then you say only if you're a Geek. That's exactly the target audience, so they don't care.Walk out your door and ask the first totally random person if they might be interested in FreeBSD, they'll look at you like you're out of your mind. Not because FreeBSD is so hard, but because they're not a Geek or Nerd and have never heard of it, nor even understand what an operating system is, even though they use various ones all the time.
So FreeBSD's doing everything right. But also, I haven't had problems with their installer, though I admit I haven't used the newest one. I doubt I'll have problems with that one either. Maybe you should review the process a little more if you are. Gain a big more skill, and I'm being honest, not rude.
Keep your stick on the ice...
121 • @115 (by Toolz on 2012-01-14 07:21:35 GMT from Vietnam)
> "Unfortunately, abstraction is necessary for increased functionality."
Of course. I hope you're just being rhetorical here.
> "So you can call it bloat if you want, but most of us would probably call it functionality."
I'd never have expected to see an argument on Distrowatch that abstraction, per se, might be a negative thing. I hope you're just being rhetorical here. (You're definitely being repetitive.)
> "a side effect is that your hello world program has become bigger over the years, but nobody is interested in running your hello world program"
I'm not interested in who is running my hello program. Now I know you're just being rhetorical. What I care about, in similar vein to my worries about the Linux kernel - is that the rise seems exponential. Simple utilities just don't come in under the 5MB mark anymore - anybody remember MS Word v6? The rise in memory usage of simple utilities is outstripping the gains brought by Moore's Law. It's because of abstraction gone mad - to cast it off as just the price we pay for a linear growth in functionality* is to be disingenuous.
(* Or is functionality being added at a rate that is tailing off? Save that one for another day.)
122 • @117, Less bloated distros (by Toolz on 2012-01-14 07:26:14 GMT from Vietnam)
> "If it's less bloat you're after, then Debian-based distros like AntiX, Crunchbang or Mint Debian XFCE might be more appropriate."
Those are more up my street. I've also been pointed toward Parsix, and I was looking at Semplice (Debian unstable, unfortunately) and Liquid Lemur. Parsix might be the one (for me).
123 • Dreamlinux 5 (by JJ on 2012-01-15 06:31:45 GMT from Netherlands)
Whatever people here might say, Dreamlinux is a pretty excellent distro with very good apps. It responds to clicks faster than Antix, but slower than Puppy Linux.
It responds much better than Ubuntu, Mint, Fedora, Arch etc. Out of the the four mentioned, Mint is the slowest.
124 • @123 Mint slowest? (by Vic on 2012-01-15 15:01:45 GMT from Canada)
I've always found Mint to be on par, performance wise, with Ubuntu. Do you have any data to support your claim? Or is it opinion based?
125 • RE: 124 (by Landor on 2012-01-15 17:11:39 GMT from Canada)
'I've always found Mint to be on par, performance wise, with Ubuntu.'
Do you have any data to support your claim? Or is it opinion based?
Keep your stick on the ice...
126 • @125 Lol (by Vic on 2012-01-15 19:17:23 GMT from Canada)
Data of course, though the last time I ran benchmarks on both I was running installs of Ubuntu 9.10 and Mint 8...
127 • ArtistX 1.2 impossible to install (by chon on 2012-01-16 01:42:26 GMT from Thailand)
I just tried to install ArtistX v1.2
The setup routine is presented with a ' theme ' that varies from " dark black " to " light black ", but no matter if I change my glasses, reach for the torch, take a magnifying glass, I can not read what I am supposed to select.
As I have setup and used v1.0 and v1.1, I am sure the distro will be OK, once installed.
But, how to install , if you have black characters on a black background ?
Anyone shares my opinion ?
128 • @127 ArtistX 1.2 impossible to install (by LinuxFreak on 2012-01-16 06:23:56 GMT from Germany)
I'm still downloading the iso, so I do not (yet) have personally experienced the difficulties you are currently dealing with. Does it help if you highlight the text on the install screen with the mouse? It likely won't work for text buttons, though. Or try the OSD menu of your screen, there might be an option to switch from colour to black-and-white mode for better contrast. Then turn screen brightness way up. Makes you wonder what sort of equipment the developer tested the installer on.
129 • @ 128 (by chon on 2012-01-16 08:00:11 GMT from Thailand)
Yes, you can go to and click on the far right bottom corner.
There you select user and go to settings
Then you can select screen or display ( I forgot which one ) and change the theme.
Then it's fine.
If a newbie to linux comes along, how is he going to find it.
The developer of this one deserves the Nobel Price for < bad taste > for this version 1.2. ( Joking only )
Once it's installed and set up, it's fine.
130 • Better development (by BAD on 2012-01-16 08:02:58 GMT from United States)
With Mint tops on the hits/day list I hope the people who develop open source software take note of what users want. Plain and simple which can be altered to suit a user. Not we are forcing this on you.
131 • @130, Better development (by Toolz on 2012-01-16 08:51:25 GMT from Vietnam)
> "With Mint tops on the hits/day list I hope the people who develop open source software take note of what users want."
Mint doesn't do plain and simple. Mint is alone in introducing around a dozen bespoke apps, including the seemingly irresistible (and annoying, IMO) mintmenu. For the Debian edition they've introduced a whole new layer to the package manager. And the package manager makes it very difficult to choose suitable mirrors - unlike the parent distributions, both Ubuntu and Debian. Not exactly plain-and-simple-can-be-altered.
Number of Comments: 131
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
|• Issue 819 (2019-06-17): OS108 and Venom, renaming multiple files, checking live USB integrity, working with Fedora's Modularity, Ubuntu replacing Chromium package with snap|
|• Issue 818 (2019-06-10): openSUSE 15.1, improving boot times, FreeBSD's status report, DragonFly BSD reduces install media size|
|• Issue 817 (2019-06-03): Manjaro 18.0.4, Ubuntu Security Podcast, new Linux laptops from Dell and System76, Entroware Apollo|
|• Issue 816 (2019-05-27): Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0, creating firewall rules, Antergos shuts down, Matthew Miller answers questions about Fedora|
|• Issue 815 (2019-05-20): Sabayon 19.03, Clear Linux's developer features, Red Hat explains MDS flaws, an overview of mobile distro options|
|• Issue 814 (2019-05-13): Fedora 30, distributions publish Firefox fixes, CentOS publishes roadmap to 8.0, Debian plans to use Wayland by default|
|• Issue 813 (2019-05-06): ROSA R11, MX seeks help with systemd-shim, FreeBSD tests unified package management, interview with Gael Duval|
|• Issue 812 (2019-04-29): Ubuntu MATE 19.04, setting up a SOCKS web proxy, Scientific Linux discontinued, Red Hat takes over Java LTS support|
|• Issue 811 (2019-04-22): Alpine 3.9.2, rsync examples, Ubuntu working on ZFS support, Debian elects new Project Leader, Obarun releases S6 tools|
|• Issue 810 (2019-04-15): SolydXK 201902, Bedrock Linux 0.7.2, Fedora phasing out Python 2, NetBSD gets virtual machine monitor|
|• Issue 809 (2019-04-08): PCLinuxOS 2019.02, installing Falkon and problems with portable packages, Mint offers daily build previews, Ubuntu speeds up Snap packages|
|• Issue 808 (2019-04-01): Solus 4.0, security benefits and drawbacks to using a live distro, Gentoo gets GNOME ports working without systemd, Redox OS update|
|• Issue 807 (2019-03-25): Pardus 17.5, finding out which user changed a file, new Budgie features, a tool for browsing FreeBSD's sysctl values|
|• Issue 806 (2019-03-18): Kubuntu vs KDE neon, Nitrux's znx, notes on Debian's election, SUSE becomes an independent entity|
|• Issue 805 (2019-03-11): EasyOS 1.0, managing background services, Devuan team debates machine ID file, Ubuntu Studio works to remain an Ubuntu Community Edition|
|• Issue 804 (2019-03-04): Condres OS 19.02, securely erasing hard drives, new UBports devices coming in 2019, Devuan to host first conference|
|• Issue 803 (2019-02-25): Septor 2019, preventing windows from stealing focus, NetBSD and Nitrux experiment with virtual machines, pfSense upgrading to FreeBSD 12 base|
|• Issue 802 (2019-02-18): Slontoo 18.07.1, NetBSD tests newer compiler, Fedora packaging Deepin desktop, changes in Ubuntu Studio|
|• Issue 801 (2019-02-11): Project Trident 18.12, the meaning of status symbols in top, FreeBSD Foundation lists ongoing projects, Plasma Mobile team answers questions|
|• Issue 800 (2019-02-04): FreeNAS 11.2, using Ubuntu Studio software as an add-on, Nitrux developing znx, matching operating systems to file systems|
|• Issue 799 (2019-01-28): KaOS 2018.12, Linux Basics For Hackers, Debian 10 enters freeze, Ubuntu publishes new version for IoT devices|
|• Issue 798 (2019-01-21): Sculpt OS 18.09, picking a location for swap space, Solus team plans ahead, Fedora trying to get a better user count|
|• Issue 797 (2019-01-14): Reborn OS 2018.11.28, TinyPaw-Linux 1.3, dealing with processes which make the desktop unresponsive, Debian testing Secure Boot support|
|• Issue 796 (2019-01-07): FreeBSD 12.0, Peppermint releases ISO update, picking the best distro of 2018, roundtable interview with Debian, Fedora and elementary developers|
|• Issue 795 (2018-12-24): Running a Pinebook, interview with Bedrock founder, Alpine being ported to RISC-V, Librem 5 dev-kits shipped|
|• Issue 794 (2018-12-17): Void 20181111, avoiding software bloat, improvements to HAMMER2, getting application overview in GNOME Shell|
|• Issue 793 (2018-12-10): openSUSE Tumbleweed, finding non-free packages, Debian migrates to usrmerge, Hyperbola gets FSF approval|
|• Issue 792 (2018-1203): GhostBSD 18.10, when to use swap space, DragonFly BSD's wireless support, Fedora planning to pause development schedule|
|• Issue 791 (2018-11-26): Haiku R1 Beta1, default passwords on live media, Slax and Kodachi update their media, dual booting DragonFly BSD on EFI|
|• Issue 790 (2018-11-19): NetBSD 8.0, Bash tips and short-cuts, Fedora's networking benchmarked with FreeBSD, Ubuntu 18.04 to get ten years of support|
|• Issue 789 (2018-11-12): Fedora 29 Workstation and Silverblue, Haiku recovering from server outage, Fedora turns 15, Debian publishes updated media|
|• Issue 788 (2018-11-05): Clu Linux Live 6.0, examining RAM consumpion, finding support for older CPUs, more Steam support for running Windows games on Linux, update from Solus team|
|• Issue 787 (2018-10-29): Lubuntu 18.10, limiting application access to specific users, Haiku hardware compatibility list, IBM purchasing Red Hat|
|• Issue 786 (2018-10-22): elementary OS 5.0, why init keeps running, DragonFly BSD enables virtual machine memory resizing, KDE neon plans to drop older base|
|• Issue 785 (2018-10-15): Reborn OS 2018.09, Nitrux 1.0.15, swapping hard drives between computers, feren OS tries KDE spin, power savings coming to Linux|
|• Issue 784 (2018-10-08): Hamara 2.1, improving manual pages, UBports gets VoIP app, Fedora testing power saving feature|
|• Issue 783 (2018-10-01): Quirky 8.6, setting up dual booting with Ubuntu and FreeBSD, Lubuntu switching to LXQt, Mint works on performance improvements|
|• Issue 782 (2018-09-24): Bodhi Linux 5.0.0, Elive 3.0.0, Solus publishes ISO refresh, UBports invites feedback, Linux Torvalds plans temporary vacation|
|• Issue 781 (2018-09-17): Linux Mint 3 "Debian Edition", file systems for SSDs, MX makes installing Flatpaks easier, Arch team answers questions, Mageia reaches EOL|
|• Issue 780 (2018-09-10): Netrunner 2018.08 Rolling, Fedora improves language support, how to customize Kali Linux, finding the right video drivers|
|• Issue 779 (2018-09-03): Redcore 1806, keeping ISO downloads safe from tampering, Lubuntu makes Calamares more flexible, Ubuntu improves GNOME performance|
|• Issue 778 (2018-08-27): GuixSD 0.15.0, ReactOS 0.4.9, Steam supports Windows games on Linux, Haiku plans for beta, merging disk partitions|
|• Issue 777 (2018-08-20): YunoHost 188.8.131.52, limiting process resource usage, converting file systems on Fedora, Debian turns 25, Lubuntu migrating to Wayland|
|• Issue 776 (2018-08-13): NomadBSD 1.1, Maximum storage limits on Linux, openSUSE extends life for 42.3, updates to the Librem 5 phone interface|
|• Issue 775 (2018-08-06): Secure-K OS 18.5, Linux is about choice, Korora tests community spin, elementary OS hires developer, ReactOS boots on Btrfs|
|• Issue 774 (2018-07-30): Ubuntu MATE & Ubuntu Budgie 18.04, upgrading software from source, Lubuntu shifts focus, NetBSD changes support policy|
|• Issue 773 (2018-07-23): Peppermint OS 9, types of security used by different projects, Mint reacts to bugs in core packages, Slackware turns 25|
|• Issue 772 (2018-07-16): Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre 0.2.4, UBports running desktop applications, OpenBSD auto-joins wi-fi networks, boot environments and zedenv|
|• Issue 771 (2018-07-09): Linux Lite 4.0, checking CPUs for bugs, configuring GRUB, Mint upgrade instructions, SUSE acquired by EQT|
|• Issue 770 (2018-07-02): Linux Mint 19, Solus polishes desktop experience, MintBox Mini 2, changes to Fedora's installer|
|• Issue 769 (2018-06-25): BunsenLabs Helium, counting Ubuntu users, UBports upgrading to 16.04, Fedora CoreOS, FreeBSD turns 25|
|• Issue 768 (2018-06-18): Devuan 2.0.0, using pkgsrc to manage software, the NOVA filesystem, OpenBSD handles successful cron output|
|• Full list of all issues|
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the Star Lite, Star LabTop and more. Available with a choice of Ubuntu or Linux Mint pre-installed with many more distributions supported. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|Random Distribution |
AUSTRUMI (Austrum Latvijas Linukss) is a bootable live Linux distribution based on Slackware Linux. It requires limited system resources and can run on any Intel-compatible system with a CD-ROM installed. The entire operating system and all of the applications run from RAM, making AUSTRUMI a fast system and allowing the boot medium to be removed after the operating system starts.