| DistroWatch Weekly
|Linux Foundation Training
|Reader Comments • Jump to last comment
1 • The 100th issue nice! (by war on 2005-05-16 11:07:49 GMT from United States) |
Great stuff :)
Look forward to it every Monday morning!
2 • SUSE LINUX Administration Guide (by Anonymous on 2005-05-16 11:49:10 GMT from Germany)
I fail to see the deal with this news: it's the Admin Guide of SUSE 9.3 written by SUSE taken from CD/DVD and published on the net.
> This has to be one of the most comprehensive SUSE guides ever published on the Internet.
Only until you can download the very same as rpm once SUSE 9.3 FTP is released.
3 • Re: SUSE LINUX Administration Guide (by Anonymous on 2005-05-16 11:57:13 GMT from Germany)
Another note now that I remember the "SUSE increases community involvement" canard of issue #84: it's nice of you discovering the strengths of SUSE step by step now but I'm a bit disappointed that *the* distribution expert site didn't know about these stuff before.
4 • Gentoo Linux Installer (by Andrew N. on 2005-05-16 11:59:23 GMT from United States)
That is very good news! Front End Installer and Text-setup for the Distro install from Hell. I could only get 3/4 through way through before giving up I am very exited.
5 • love (by Kevin on 2005-05-16 12:07:48 GMT from Canada)
I Love Distrowatch.
This is most likely the more interesting / entertaining distro list websites around. I commend you!
6 • best wishes (by HelloWorld82 on 2005-05-16 12:14:05 GMT from Germany)
best wishes for the 100th DistroWatch Weekly ! Thanks for this great webpage :)
7 • on Linux Distribution Chooser (by Peter at 2005-05-16 13:15:39 GMT from Romania)
well it seams that my distribution isn't yet invented ;)
"Sorry, we were not able to find any matches. Please come back later"
A don't thinks I've asked too much either... apt-based, with a graphical installer, having One Click install with Gnome as default and geared toward sub 500Mhz notebooks ;)
as a side note.... CPU frequency is nothing compared to available RAM
8 • Debian out soon (by Rituraj on 2005-05-16 13:25:51 GMT from India)
It's a great news that the Metadistribution Debian is releasing soon. But i think it wont be out on 30th May...it may be out in June or July.
Finally a next major release which is STABLE in a TRUE SENSE OF THE WORD.
9 • woody to sarge using Aptitude (by Scott Wilson on 2005-05-16 13:39:02 GMT from United States)
Why, Debians appeal has been "apt-get" I actually updated a Ubuntu box using distro-upgrade. I find using Debians aptitude rather cumbersome. I wonder for those that have been using the testing branch, need to reloaded with the offical sarge or just change the Apt sources to from testing to stable?
10 • Gentoo (by Beavis on 2005-05-16 13:44:44 GMT from United States)
I love gentoo, not because of the installation, but because of the end result. The portage system is the best software managment tool ever. A graphical instaleer for desktop systems would save me a lot of time. Currently, I am only able to run Gentoo on servers ebcause of the installation commitment required.
11 • Gentoo and FreeBSD Rocks (by mcg on 2005-05-16 14:59:33 GMT from Finland)
Gentoo and FreeBSD Rocks!
Gentoo showed me the Real world!but in FreeBSD,i learn more!
12 • chooser & gramps (by x on 2005-05-16 15:38:58 GMT from United States)
I went through the Chooser several times and provided different answers each time. I noticed the results were the same with a couple of different answer sets. I will do this again later when I have more time. Next time I will take notes and make comments.
How many of the distributions are included in the possible results? Will the BSD's be part of this? Are there any thoughts to adding speciality distro's in the future? (ie does distribution need coffee cup protocol)
I believe this will help a number of people when choosing a distribution, even if no further changes are made.
I was not aware GRAMPS existed, thanks for the info.
13 • Distro Evaluation: need the Java support to be documented. (by Anonymous on 2005-05-16 15:52:14 GMT from United States)
I like what you do: documenting the revision level of the components of Linux distribuitions.
Most Linux Distros come with a Java Run Time Engine, because Sun Does not do a great job, there, what is provided with the distro, is valuable...
For example: Suse 9.3 recently released provides Java 1.4.2 support.
But the popular Bittorent client recommend to using the JRE 1.5 or higher.
So by documenting which JRE is available, you may have the positive effect of providing distro vendors with the most adequate packages.
One step further ?
provide two rev level (when applies):
1) The distro base: what is on the CD/DVD or base install.
2) The rev level provided by the latest on line update of the given distro.
Suggest that the distro vendors, just send an email to "distrowatch" to make this possible... and keep the existing color scheme.
I realize this may be too much work, but still may be nice to have at least for the top five distros, with weekly update?
Thanks again for your excellent web site.
14 • Distro Chooser (by EEDOK on 2005-05-16 15:55:32 GMT from Canada)
wow looks professional compared to my distro chooser at http://eedok.voidofmind.com/linux/chooser.html
But much better than that tux one.
PS: If people out there want to add to my distro chooser e-mail me, my e-mail is in the link after you complete the test.
15 • Debian Sarge (by IMQ on 2005-05-16 16:30:31 GMT from United States)
What's the deal with upgrading to Sarge using aptitute?
Debian is well known when it comes to keeping up-to-date with apt-get update, then apt-get upgrade or apt-get dist-upgrade. I just find this upgrade note little odd. I am aware that there are other ways to update Debian, but this is a very well known, one in which other non-Debian based distros have modeled their upgrade tool similar to apt.
16 • Linux Distribution Chooser is OK, but... (by Richard Lloyd on 2005-05-16 16:32:22 GMT from United Kingdom)
...it has a few minor issues with it. Firstly, the constant having to click "Next..." when you've just answered the final question on the page is annoying (why doesn't it just go to the next page automatically?).
Secondly, it asks the question "Do you need to use kickstart?" without explaining what it is unless you actually click on "No" first (it's a Red Hat/Fedora-specific way of installing a distro, usually across the network and with a fixed config).
Finally, although it did work out that my "ideal" distro is Fedora, it said it failed on the "bit_64" criteria, but then failed to explain what "bit_64" is (I presume it means 64-bit support), never mind the fact that Fedora *does* have 64-bit support !
The final page was also disappointing because it didn't tell me how well my distro rated (e.g. a percentage figure or something) or list any other distros in order of rating (even if they were "unsuitable", I'd have liked to have known how unsuitable they were). Methinks this needs some work.
17 • Something to think about. (by R on 2005-05-16 17:05:28 GMT from United States)
I was wondering if you could add some forum's to your web site. Distrowatch has been recognized as “the place to go” if you want to get into Linux (or BSD) or to find a distro that better fits your needs. Just by reading the news letter every Monday, you can see that there is a lot of talent reading these news letters, maybe we can use this talent to help newbies, or to help other find better apps. Have one for helping people install Linux (or BSD), have one for news related topics, and one for lets say “spirited discussions”.
18 • distro chooser (by Psionides on 2005-05-16 17:49:18 GMT from Poland)
I went through all the questions, and it told me that my perfect match was Mepis (apart from PC Linux OS). Believe me or not, but Mepis is exactly what I'm using on my PC :))
BTW why does it claim that for Mandriva, "Only a demo version is free" ?? Did they mean that the download edition is a demo version ?... Funny ...
19 • Re: SUSE LINUX Administration Guide (by Anonymous on 2005-05-16 17:51:24 GMT from Germany)
> Only until you can download the very same as rpm once SUSE 9.3 FTP is released.
Actually you can already download the guides just now in different languages (cs, de, en, fr, it, ja) and also as PDF: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/9.3/suse/noarch/suselinux-*guide*
20 • Slackware and kernel 2.6 (by olefiver on 2005-05-16 18:07:41 GMT from Norway)
> There is no word on when Slackware will switch its
> default kernel to version 2.6
Pat has said that Slackware 11 will ship with kernel 2.6 as default.
Thou I can't recall, nor find, where I read it ...
21 • version info suggestion: ++ (by Anonymous on 2005-05-16 18:58:56 GMT from United States)
> provide two rev level (when applies):
> 1) The distro base: what is on the CD/DVD or base install.
> 2) The rev level provided by the latest on line update of the given distro.
In particular, item 2) should show EASILY OBTAINED + installed updates.
22 • GRAMPS...well try phpgedview (by mrbass at 2005-05-16 19:50:58 GMT from United States)
I use PHPGEDVIEW. What's the requirements? webserver with php. You can use an mysql database if you wish or flat text file. You can edit your family data over the internet and enable relatives the ability to do so to if you wish. Here's my install guide for it.
As far as Breezy that OEM installation will be awesome. I guess like redhat kickstart. Also hopefully they'll nail those issues. Can't wait to start testing. Only thing holding up Breezy test .iso releases (from what I've read) is the PPC doesn't fit on 700MB cds....oooops.
23 • Chooser (by Gene on 2005-05-16 20:12:55 GMT from United States)
Odd... I did the Distro Chooser and it recommended Kubuntu. I find this amusing and wonder how it decides what to recommend. The amusing part is that I've been using Simply Mepis for some time so the recommended distro is a Debian based live CD that can be installed. In using the site with Mozilla I found that after answering questions I always had to scroll down to see the next, what resolution is this made for?
Thanks, Disrowatch and the weekly news letter are great!
24 • Lappy Distro Choice (by Soloact on 2005-05-16 20:16:50 GMT from United States)
This is a reply to Peter, I'm using SimplyMEPIS 3.3 on my 450 MHz Laptop, works just fine. Must have external modem for dialup connections though, as those old internal winmodems are worthless. SuSE 8.1 had also been running on the same Laptop with a PCMCIA modem card. SuSE 8.2+ didn't work with the PCMCIA, however.
25 • SUSE LINUX Administration Guide (by Anonymous Penguin on 2005-05-16 21:29:10 GMT from Italy)
I hope this is the beginning of a new trend: more flexibility in the way SUSE is sold: sell just the DVDs/CDs to people who prefer that way (the majority, I would expect), sell the manual(s) just to people who want them.
Don't force people to buy bulky boxes every time: it is absolutely ridiculous. Here in Italy you can't even buy the upgrade edition, you must buy the full monty.
26 • Distro chooser (by Christian Thibodeau on 2005-05-16 21:33:41 GMT from Canada)
> wow looks professional compared to my distro chooser at
Maybe, but your distro chooser results for me were:
Beatrix (I run that at home) [100%]
Damn Small Linux (Never go anywhere without it) [100%]
Ubuntu (I run that at work) [91%]
Vector (On my test machine right now)[91%]
Ark (I will have to look at this one now)[91%]
The other distro chooser had three recommendations: Debian, Gentoo, Slackware. A little too vague for me.
27 • Distro chooser (by Christian Thibodeau on 2005-05-16 21:40:56 GMT from Canada)
For the sake of correctness: Some of the percentages in my message above are incorrect. They should be:
Damn Small 100%
Good thing I don't work as a proofreader :)
28 • Zen Linux (by Anonymous Penguin on 2005-05-16 21:43:56 GMT from Italy)
I am very keen to try this distro, but the torrent hasn't been organized very well.
I have been downloading the DVD for 5 hours with just one seeder and more than 80 peers.
Now a new seeder has stepped in, but BitTornado is still forecasting another 22 hours.
29 • Discontinued Distributions (by JayB on 2005-05-16 21:54:00 GMT from United States)
I haven't read the weekly in a couple weeks and noticed that the count for discontinued distros to go up to 51 (it had been at 49 for a little while now) so i went back to see which other distro was discontinued. Issue 98 showed the count still at 49, issue 99 showed it up to 50 but no news on which distro was discontinued (i looked thru the entire issue in case it was mentioned at the top). I know this is nit-picking but was just curious.
30 • Re: SUSE LINUX Administration Guide (by Anonymous on 2005-05-16 23:01:52 GMT from Germany)
> I hope this is the beginning of a new trend
There is no new trend because there is no beginning (nothing changed, only Distrowatch wrote about it now). Less dead tree manuals is exactly what the Upgrade edition is about.
31 • RE: Anonymous on 2005-05-16 23:01:52 GMT from Germany (by Anonymous Penguin on 2005-05-16 23:38:06 GMT from Italy)
"Less dead tree manuals is exactly what the Upgrade edition is about."
1) You still get the bigger manual
2) I can't get the Upgrade edition in Italy. It doesn't even seem to exist.
Only chance: get the English edtion from Amazon.co.uk
Get just the DVDs or Cds from a private (Ebay in Germany)
Anyway because of this and other issues I am beginning to have enough of SUSE and I am considering going all Debian.
The other reasons are the following:
1)Every new release of SUSE comes very buggy out of the box. You must wait a couple of months before most bugs are ironed out.
2)Very poor multimedia and P2P support. You must rely on apt4rpm, but the apt developers can only do so much. From this point of view at least Mandriva is a lot better.
3) I do not like 6 monthly release cycles. And please don't tell me that I don't have to buy. With the rpm distros if you don't get every new release you are left behind. Which is not the case with Debian or Gentoo, for instance: you can keep updating forever.
32 • Linux Distribution chooser (by Anonymous Penguin on 2005-05-16 23:46:01 GMT from Italy)
Completely wrong, in my case.
My so called "perfect matches":
1)Kubunt: I totally dislike it
2)Xandros: not bad, but I'd rather give it to my granny
3)Linspire: same as above
33 • MD5 links (by Marc on 2005-05-17 00:49:26 GMT from Canada)
I have a whish here ...
Is it possible to also have the md5 link when posting
a new iso. This way we wont use energy for nothing.
Anybody supporting this ?
Thanks again for DWW.
34 • RE: EEDOK (by Anonymous Penguin on 2005-05-17 00:54:52 GMT from Italy)
Also in my case your distro chooser was a lot more accurate:
1)Debian: 90% ( dead on)
2)Knoppix: 90% (replace it with Kanotix and it is correct)
All the following got 81%:
SUSE (OK). Fedora (not OK). Mandriva (OK). Ark (if only I could install it...)
It also knew that I don't like Ubuntu and Mepis: amazing!
35 • RE: Discontinued Distributions (by ladislav on 2005-05-17 01:17:22 GMT from Taiwan)
Last week I flagged TrianceOS as discontinued. Unlike SENTINIX this week, some distributions don't announce that they are going belly-up, they simply disappear. I haven't been able to access the TrianceOS web site for several months.
But the count is still wrong. According to the search page, there are 52 distributions flagged as discontinued (and 44 distributions flagged as dormant), so I still missed one somewhere. Things like this can happen - sometimes I make a change in the database, but forget to update the stats in DWW.
36 • Latest News RSS Feed - Broken (by monkymind at 2005-05-17 02:47:41 GMT from Australia)
are you aware of the RSS problem??
XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Line Number 65, Column 36:Reviews: Putting on My Tie & Tails
PS It's looks like there is a need for more ZenLinux CD and DVD mirrors. Does anyone have the space and bandwidth??
37 • Big Linux 3D Desktop (by Kerry Kappell on 2005-05-17 02:48:13 GMT from United States)
I downloaded Big Linux to see what it was using to create a 3D desktop in KDE. A little websearch and I found a tutorial to turn several desktop environments including KDE and Gnome into 3D ones. My best guess is that this is how big linux is creating their 3D desktop. The tutorial can be found at:
Big fan of distrowatch!
38 • Distro chooser (by Ed Borasky on 2005-05-17 03:04:53 GMT from United States)
I took one of these a few months ago and it came up with Gentoo ... what a surprise. :) This one looks a little more detailed, and it ended up with Gentoo *and* Slackware!! So ... I guess I need to try Slackware, eh?
39 • Linux Names (by Bill Anderson on 2005-05-17 04:36:44 GMT from United States)
Edubuntu- How many more derivatives of the name Ubuntu can there be? But, they've gotta come up with a better name for their laptop version ("Lapbuntu?).
On the other hand, "GRAMPS" is great - it is original, uses an acronym and means something to Joe Sixpack.
40 • Lapbuntu (by Anonymous on 2005-05-17 05:10:00 GMT from United States)
I don't know the name but this is good news
41 • Distro Chooser (by Cyanic on 2005-05-17 06:24:26 GMT from South Africa)
First off... congrats to the DistroWatch team for their awesome work. We all hope you continue with the same passion that has gotten you this far.
As for the DistroChooser, I must admit that it is quite accurate.
It recommended Gentoo and Slackware for me.... which is exactly what I'm running on all of my systems.
[3 Slack, 1 Gentoo]
42 • Distro Chooser (by mikkh on 2005-05-17 11:13:28 GMT from United Kingdom)
A bit limited in scope, and apt (no pun intended) to fork off into restricted choices.
I put I prefer apt-get, and was predictably given Debian or derivatives of it. Apt/Synaptic is available in many non deb based distros including the folowing I'm using now, or have used in the past
Blag (Fedora based Gnome only distro) Excellent one CD distro and the only Gnome based distro I found usable - don't like Ubuntu and the hype machine at all.
Conectiva - RPM based but uses synaptic for both the install and for package management - Superb distro now likely to be tainted by the interference of Mandrake
QiLinux - Again uses synaptic, and like Conectiva gives you a fast desktop with no missing multimedia stuff.
The only Debian based one I have/like is Mepis, although Libranet 2.81 was my distro of choice for a long time.
Slackware used to be a favourite, but I like Vector SOHO (which is based on it) better, and use that instead
43 • Gentoo Logo (by Ariszló on 2005-05-17 12:04:53 GMT from Hungary)
Is it a punched heart or a purple pacman?
44 • Greetings (by Eduardo Baccelliere on 2005-05-17 13:52:01 GMT from Chile)
I am writing from Santiago, Chile.
I want to give Distrowatch my greetings for its 100 th issue.
I read it every week and I enjoy it very much.
By the way I've tried some distributions and the principal obstacle is their installation, because of hardware recognition.
Now I am using Simply Mepis 3.3 and exploring Xandros 3.
I find very important to know about applications. The advantage of Windows are their applications. Very interesting genealogical applications. But what about chess database applications to study games ? I don´t know .
By Ladislav and thanks for your extraordinaire web site.
45 • Re: GRAMPS...well try phpgedview (by Bongoots on 2005-05-17 14:38:32 GMT from United Kingdom)
There's an even better alternative to phpGedView and that is The Next Generation of Genealogy Sitebuilding (TNG) which can be bought (USD$27) from http://www.lythgoes.net/genealogy/software.php .. check out my running setup at http://bongoots.com/genealogy/descend.php?personID=I1&tree=walkers-of-beeston :)
I see now that a new release was made 3 days ago.. now up to v5.0.0. I began back in the days of 3.x. Amazingly, it's via his running demo that I found that I had a double connection to the developer of TNG. He's both my 10th and 8 cousin with 2 or 3 generations of separation on each side, but it all came down to my 4th great grandparents marriage. This is what marrying relatives does for your descendants. I'd be *very* worried if I was in the royal family!!!
I'm currently working on getting a better distro running. I gave up on my major *stagnant* (unnamed) distro in January and have been hopping around from one to the other ever since.
I've tried Ubuntu 5.04 (NIC problems), Slackware 10.1 (MBR problems), Mandriva 2005 (they've managed to make KDE look FUGLY), Fedora Core 3 (nice, but there is better), FC4 T2 (crashed and burned my drive, but that could have been anything) -- out of the lot, I loved FC4 T2 the most and look forward to the final FC4 release... unless Gentoo or SuSE 9.3 get to me first.
I've burnt SuSE 9.2 to DVD and am currently tossing up whether I should try Gentoo first. Reason being that I hate the look and feel of SuSE 9.2, but 9.3 is sexy and professional looking (I tried the Live DVD). I can't wait for the FTP release.
I guess it's Gentoo for today, maybe SuSE tomorrow and FC4 sooner or later! :D
46 • Distribution Chooser doesn't give me Slackware... (by Anonymous on 2005-05-17 18:15:34 GMT from China)
Do you know what a "Linux distribution" is? Yes
Have you successfully installed an operating system before? Yes
Do you know how to "partition" a hard drive? Yes
Which kind of installation do you prefer? Text mode
Are you using any wireless devices? No
How would you rate your technical skills? Intermediate
What kind of computer are you installing on? A desktop computer
What is the primary use of this computer? Desktop / home system
How old is the computer you are installing Linux on? Aging ( < 1 GHz )
How would you rate your knowledge of linux? Beginner / Intermediate
What package management system do you prefer? I don't care
What desktop environment do you prefer? I don't care
Do you need one-click-installation of new software? No thanks / I don't care
Do you want to include Live CDs in the results? No, just standard distributions
Does the Linux distro have to be free? No
Are you using a PC or a Mac? PC
Results: Ubuntu, Kubuntu, MEPIS, Xandros, SuSE
Others: Debian, Mandriva, Fedora, Desktop/LX, Linspire
Which is WEIRD, since I don't like all the above distros. I love Slackware.
Why I don't like the above distros:
Ubuntu: based on Debian, installation of packages too easy
Kubuntu: like Ubuntu
MEPIS: No comment; don't know this distro much
Xandros: What??? I'll be d*mned
SuSE: See Xandros
Debian: Package management too easy
Mandriva: Too similar to Windows
Fedora: I hate RPM
Desktop/LX: Too similar to Windows
Linspire: Too similar to Windows
So what did I choose wrong? I thought the results would be around *BSD, Slackware, Gentoo, and Debian (the REAL Debian), but instead is gives me a list of unusable desktop distros. Did I do something wrong?
47 • re doesnt give me slackware (by mikkh on 2005-05-17 19:58:08 GMT from United Kingdom)
"I don't like ubuntu, based on debian, installation of packages too easy"
Too easy! and why is that a problem? You get some perverted pleasure out of finding unmet dependencies? It has to be hard or it's not linux?
Well thanks for giving me the biggest laugh of the day anyway.
Slackware is not exactly rocket science, typing pkgtool in the directory where you downloaded the file, or untarring a file and typing ./configure
doesn't qualify you for mensa either.
People who 'prefer' gentoo make me smile. They wear it like some badge of uber geekdom and wax lyrical about customisation/optimisation and speed. And yes I've installed it - twice! I'm not impressed and it seems no faster than slackware.
"instead it gives me a list of unusable distros"
lol, stop it, my sides hurt now
48 • Re: MD5 links (by tom on 2005-05-17 19:59:49 GMT from Austria)
m5sum links would be great ;-)
49 • badges of uber geekdom (by Anonymous on 2005-05-17 20:35:41 GMT from United States)
It makes me smile when Slackware users trot out that old shibboleth (I'll mix metaphors if I want too. Besides, isn't making fun of Slackware "beating a dead horse"?) that "If you use $NONSLACKDISTRO, you learn $NONSLACKDISTRO, but if you use Slackware, you learn LINUX", when Slackware is neither FHS nor LSB compliant.
50 • GRAMPS (by pp on 2005-05-17 22:40:07 GMT from United Kingdom)
Nice review. I've just been thinking of starting genealogy research..
51 • Gentoo installer (by nightshade on 2005-05-17 23:01:59 GMT from Australia)
Two words - no point.
52 • Re: Gentoo Logo (by Ed Borasky on 2005-05-18 01:16:49 GMT from United States)
Gentoo Logo (by Ariszló on 2005-05-17 12:04:53 GMT from Hungary)
Is it a punched heart or a purple pacman?
I believe it is a stylized lower case letter "g".
53 • • Distribution Chooser doesn't give me Slackware... (by Anonymous on 2005-05-17 (by Anonymous on 2005-05-18 01:44:46 GMT from United States)
"Fedora: I hate RPM"
Well you do not have to use RPM. You can still use your old .tar.gz, .tar.bzip, untar them
In the end it works all the same. Most of the distros still complain about dependencies like missing lib***.so. I've heard about RPM hell but most things have a solution. In the end when you put the time into it, you can make your distro do what you want and the way you like it. If you do not want to do anything and still want to run linux use SLAX and/or KANOTIX. Both are great live cd's and I recommend them to anyone who wants to learn about linux. SLAX runs off ram if you have 256MB or more with excellent chosen software and very nice layout. Kanotix is a full blown distro on CD just like KNOPPIX was, but just like Kano says I like KNOPPIX but I had to improve it. It is very nice. You can typset beautiful documents on KANOTIX with Kile and included tetex.
54 • Who's going to catch UBUNTU? (by Anonymous on 2005-05-18 02:02:45 GMT from United States)
I am wondering who is going to catch Ubuntu.
Many distrowatch weekly's ago and distrowatch home pages it was
1. Mandrake Linux
..., and so on,
Now it is
..., .. and so on
Ubuntu has taken the Linux world by storm. I cannot say anything negative about Ubuntu because I have not tried it. Otherwise, I would say something about it. Some friends tell me that just as things rise sooner or later they will fall. Ubuntu is like defying the odds, it keeps going on getting more and more hits per day. Mandriva is not even close which was the all time champ(Mandrake Linux). Who is going to catch Ubuntu? We will come back next week to Distrowatch to check what will happen. I love Distrowatch and I like to read what other people say about linux in general. Many friends say that Linux is the wave of the future. I have to agree with them.
It makes sense that people say for Distrochoosers
linux for laptops LapUbuntu,
linux for grandma, Grumpuntu,
linux for older machines, Oldbuntu
linux for the desperate: DesperUntu
Why not a BSDchooser? This is also a BSD site.
BSD for security: NetBSD
BSD for general purpose: FreeBSD
BSD for not installing: FreeSBIE.
BSD's are also very nice.
BSDuntu would not be cool I think. That would be overkill.
Cheers to all.
55 • no openBSD (by EEDOK on 2005-05-18 06:27:16 GMT from Canada)
Where's OpenBSD on that BSD chooser, I think NetBSD is wrongfully in it's place >:o
56 • Notice Ibiblio's FTP? (by Aingel on 2005-05-18 07:00:56 GMT from Philippines)
Yeah, have you noticed the changes on Ibiblio's repository? There seems no way to upload but only on the user's home. Anyone noticing the same?
57 • Re: badges of uber geekdom (by Ariszló on 2005-05-18 20:08:30 GMT from Hungary)
Slackware is neither FHS nor LSB compliant.
Four of my favorite distros (Arch, Buffalo, Frugalware, Slackware) and many others that I use less frequently (including SuSE, Conectiva or FreeBSD) deviate from the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, so I don't really care.
As for LSB, it is a misnomer. It should be RSM, i.e. RPM Standard Base, because its scope is restricted to rpm-based distributions:
58 • Re: doesn't give me Slackware (by Ariszló on 2005-05-18 20:56:25 GMT from Hungary)
No, it doesn't give me Slackware either, no matter how much I try to get it. It wants to convince me that Kubuntu is the distro of my choice and Ubuntu only fails for the wrong desktop. I hope it's not a disguised Ubuntu-advocacy site.
It only seems to know about three types of package management systems: rpm, dpkg, or source. It does not seem to know about binary package management without dependency checking (Slackware's tgz). And I am not sure it knows about APT-RPM either because it seems to exclusively associate APT with Debian-based distributions.
59 • clarification and correction for Ariszlo (by Anonymous on 2005-05-18 23:11:38 GMT from United States)
I don't think my remarks made the distinction I have in mind clear enough. I'm not knocking Slackware for lack of standards compliance. It may well be that Slack - or the Rox desktop, the GNUStep environment, Gobolinux, whatever - is doing things in a BETTER way. Rather I am knocking the smug attitude of certain Slackware USERS who bring out that old saying, insinuating that other distros are idiosyncratic while Slack is somehow the standard of Linux, when in fact Slack neither sets nor follows the standards. Slack is Slack, Debian is Debian, Gentoo is Gentoo, RedHat is RedHat and claims that one is more ESSENTIALLY Linux are pretty silly. But it seems even more silly with regard to a distro that doesn't make an effort to comply with standards.
Now the correction: LSB is NOT just for rpm based distros. It requires on that the distro SUPPORT rpm, as, e.g. Debian's alien does quite ably. If things were as you say, neither Debian nor Gentoo would be aiming for full LSB compliance, would they?
60 • No BSD (by Anonymous on 2005-05-19 03:13:30 GMT from United States)
"Where's OpenBSD on that BSD chooser, I think NetBSD is wrongfully in it's place >:o"
Sorry, You are absolutely right, I forgot about OpenBSD. There is also a DragonFlyBSD and PC-BSD which has gotten lots of hype.
61 • Onebase Linux is dying (again) (by Anonymous Penguin on 2005-05-19 04:41:07 GMT from Italy)
Have a look at the number of new posts or new members at their forum: you'll soon realize that an average 101 years old granny is more vital.
Have a look at this thread as well:
(hint: do it quickly before it gets deleted)
So how comes that a distro which has just released looks dead already?
The explanation is very simple: its own developer, who doesn't have enough common sense to realize that nobody is going to pay for an almost unknown distro when there are hundreds out there to try for free, not even counting the BSDs, the BeOS based projects, MenuetOS...you name it.
62 • Re: clarification and correction for Ariszlo (by Ariszló on 2005-05-19 06:07:49 GMT from Hungary)
Things like whether you install KDE into /usr or /opt do not have much to do with the essence of Linux (or GNU/Linux if you like), though some standards, designed many years after the first distributions were shaped, might be read as if those were very important.
What Slackers like in their distribution is that most applications work and look like they were designed by their developers. No crippled KDE with hidden Menu Editor or removed KPackage (which is a very nice gui tool to look inside packages). No replacement of KDE's kogwheel button or Gnome's paw with distribution logos. If you want to know the real features of an application then you must go for a distribution that does not redesign it. Slackware is a vanilla distro similarly to Debian, Arch, or Gentoo as opposed to highly customized distros like Fedora, SuSE or Mandriva. It's a matter of taste whether you prefer a vanilla distro or a customized distro.
63 • re : Onebase Linux is dying (again) (by Marc on 2005-05-19 12:59:25 GMT from Canada)
The post has been deleted ...
What did it say ?
And thanks Ladislav for those new MD5 sum links.
They will be good for our environnement !!!!
Talking of environnement, is scrap cd's recyclable ?
Can i put them in my plastic and tin bin ?
I've allways put them there without knowing.
64 • mepis in solitary confinment (by manchine on 2005-05-19 13:35:41 GMT from Spain)
Several months ago it was "just" a misfortuned political decision favouring the US military. Then i have wrote extensive rants to expose the drawbacks of bringing controversial issues into this yet tiny linux thing.
Among many other cons surrounding MEPIS, the scope of my criticism focused on the "one man" nature of its development model and the spartan hierarchy imposed by a bunch of diehards.
Shortly afterwards i have decided to withdraw, mainly becuase of technical flaws, rather than ethics zealotism.
Nowadays it's plain to see that MEPIS is devised to remain under tight centralized control with some prospects of forthcoming profit. There has NEVER been any clear intention to improve it as a community driven project.
A bit out of this mess, but still related to MEPIS and other full fledged live CD's, i'd like to know what Real, Sun, Macromedia, Apple, Skype and other companies would have to say when they discover that their property stuff is being bundled and redistributed. Is it legal to pre-install all these goodies and give copies away?
65 • long-winded follow-up for Ariszlo (by Anonymous on 2005-05-19 18:21:32 GMT from United States)
I suspect there is a great deal more about which we agree than about which we disagree. (Certainly in our sentiments: like you, I prefer to see cogwheels and footprints to little red fedoras everywhere.)
I am not saying that there is anything wrong, per se with the Slack way of doing things. FOSS is about choice and that includes the choice not to go along with what this or that committee has proposed as a standard. It may very well be that where Slackware diverges, its approach is actually superior.
I am however saying that Slackware users are deluding themselves and others when they make statements suggesting that learning the Slack way of doing things is necessarily the best way of learning about Linux (GNU/Linux) or Unix generally.
In some ways Slackware is very educational about *nix, but it is also just as idiosyncratic in its own way as other distros are in theirs, so it's a mixed bag. Slogans like the one I mentioned with my first remark gloss over that fact.
And note that the usage of /opt goes back to SVR4 (1990), predating any distribution of GNU/Linux.
As I said, I share the aversion to distros branding everything. And I enjoy playing with packages in their upstream form. But ironically, it is for this very reason that the /opt issue is important to me!
You see, for day to day usage, I want to benefit from the QA and security infrastructure that my distro provides, and that means the occasional patch for KDE. But from time to time, I may also want to try out a binary of the latest KDE - more or less in its vanilla state. I can put this in /opt and rest assured that my distro - since it is FHS compliant - won't touch this version of KDE in any way.
On the other hand, the version of fvwm that I've hacked and customized in various ways (I've never hacked KDE, but it could just as easily be a third version of KDE that I'm talking about.) belongs in /usr/local. And again, my distro won't do anything that affects this, nor will there be any conflicts with a binary version I may get from a third-party and put into /opt/fvwm (or /opt/KDE in the hypothetical case).
All of these versions can happily coexist. And I can do this confidently with any FHS compliant distro I might use. Not only would I not learn this using Slackware, but I wouldn't even be able to do it - not very easily anyway. These are among the reasons I much prefer the FHS compliance of Debian, Gentoo (two distros you've also called "vanilla"), and LFS (which is probably as "vanilla" as one can get) to the seeming indifference of Slackware to those standards.
(I've no experience with Arch, so please no one take my omission there as suggesting any opinion on that.)
But as I said, the Slack way may be superior in other respects. I'm not saying that Slackware is wrong. I'm only saying that these differences are important and that there are significant ways that Slackware is different from most other Linux distros, so that the invidious comparisons in the slogan, "...if you use Slackware, you learn Linux," are more than a bit misleading.
I suspect that this may even tie in with another remark I sometimes see from Slackware users. I have seemingly experienced Slackware users say that package managers that provide dependency checking are a bad thing. Which always seemed ridiculous to me. And they aren't just making a lame excuse for one of the most glaring shortcomings of their favorite distro. They're not even just saying that one learns more doing things the hard way. They seem to quite honestly believe that dependency checking limits their freedom and control. But I can't help thinking that if they better understood the value of FHS, they'd see that their freedom is in now way limited by superb package management like that in Debian. With a distro that respects FHS, they have complete control over /opt and /usr/local and can be assured that their distro's package management system won't touch those. So they can install software in those places in whatever way they please while still having the convenience and power of solid package management for the rest of their system.
One positive thing I'll say about Slackware: my experience with it was beneficial when I began to use NetBSD, because I'd been exposed to the BSD-style init scripts in Slackware. This is the one respect in which the claim that Slackware Linux is the most "Unix-like" Linux distro makes some sense. (Though again, it's a bit misleading, since most systems that are Unix in the legal sense use SVR4. But I think the claim is almost contemporary with Solaris, nee SunOS, moving to SVR4 from BSD standards, and I'm almost certain it predates the resolution of the AT&T BSD lawsuits, so in its context it may have been quite accurate. In any case, Linux and the BSDs have equalled or surpassed proprietary Unix in so many areas now that being more like Unix doesn't have the same cachet it once did.)
Whatever else I have said, I want to add that Slackware has usually been almost as fast as Gentoo and a bit more reliable. Often almost as reliable as Debian stable - for what it includes, anyway - and usually a great deal more up to date. So, I'd still say that Slackware has its advantages. I'll close on that positive note.
66 • Re: long-winded follow-up (by Ariszló on 2005-05-19 20:47:14 GMT from Hungary)
Slackware users are deluding themselves [...] when they make statements [...] that learning the Slack way of doing things is [...] the best way of learning about Linux
Yes, it's quoted all over the web that "Partisans have been known to say, 'When you know Slackware, you know Linux... when you know Red Hat, all you know is Red Hat.'" AFAIK, that slogan is usually used with reference to gui system administration tools in arguments that go like this: a typical SuSE user will know how to configure the screen with SaX, which is SuSE-specific tool, but might not know how to edit xorg.conf (or XFree86.conf), which is common to all Linux distributions. As I understand this, no offense intended. Slackers are simply proud to know some general solutions.
As for FHS-compliance and the advantage of using /opt or /usr/local for personal binaries, you can alway install anything into a user's home directory, and yes, /usr/local is also there for you in Slackware. Having KDE in /opt/kde rather than in /usr has a further advantage: now that Gnome 2.10 is also using FreeDesktop.org's applications.menu, it's easier to keep your KDE and Gnome menus apart in Slackware than in an FHS-compliant distribution by simply adding this line to startkde:
Dependency checking. Whether you like it or not, depends on what causes you more headache: finding out how to satisfy dependencies, which is rarely an issue in Slackware where most of the commonly required libraries are pre-installed, or how to handle circular dependencies and other cases of dependency hell. It's again a case of personal preference. If you enjoy the rare pleasure of finding out what to install to satisfy the requirements of a unique application then Slackware is for you. If you prefer adding the --force option to your rpm -i command then an rpm-based distro will be fun, too. I can't recall how to force things in Debian but it must be similar to rpm -i --force.
Yes, FOSS is about choice and I have enjoyed this discussion. :)
67 • RE: re : Onebase Linux is dying (again) (by Anonymous Penguin on 2005-05-19 21:46:23 GMT from Italy)
>>The post has been deleted ...
What did it say ?<<
Well, basically it was one user saying that the forum felt deserted and that Onebase was dying of a fast death. Another user replied: "guess who is killing it?"
The developer is very prompt in deleting threads he doesn't like.
But he is extremely slow (if ever) to accept his own mistakes.
68 • for Ariszlo (by Anonymous on 2005-05-19 23:23:08 GMT from United States)
I too have enjoyed this discussion, very much. We've both I think down a good job of keeping what could have been a flame war into something that could be informative.
You know, when the remark is made - as it most often is - with SuSE or RedHat as the distro referenced in the first clause - and especially when it's made with specific reference to learning system configuration, I don't have much of a problem with it. Especially when the point is made that you CAN learn those things with any system (or so I'd assume) but Slackware forces you to learn it - and quickly. That's a good thing.
(A sidenote. I felt a bit of embarassment - and I think it was mutual - when I had a wife's friend and I discovered used Linux. He sat down at my box - I think this was Debian potato, but it could have been woody - and after browsing around a bit, asked "Where's YAST? How do you do things without YAST?" I had absolutely no idea at the time what YAST even was!)
You're right about the use of /home of course. And actually, before I make a project I'm tweeking run system wide, that's what I do. As for /usr/local, this is something a LOT of people get confused about, even suggesting /opt be symlinked to /usr/local or /usr/local/opt, because it seems redundant to them. /opt is for precompiled binaries from third parties. /usr/local is for things you compile yourself. But the fact that so many people find them redundant suggests to me that I'm in a very small minority in seeing the need for both.
Thanks for the tip concerning GNOME 2.10. I haven't messed with GNOME in some time actually, but it's an interesting point.
Yes, dpkg has a --force option as well, including options to turn dependency problems into warning and forcing just version numbers - which is the one way of forcing that I've found works pretty well. Generally, having learned the hard way, I try to avoid using --force. Debian's dependency handling is generally pretty sensible. (I have seen rpms insist on some ridiculous dependencies though.) When I want to work around a conflict, like I said, I go with /opt. Then there are no headaches at all.
69 • Forgot to check my own comment :P (by Anonymous on 2005-05-22 17:29:09 GMT from China)
> Too easy! and why is that a problem? You get some perverted
> pleasure out of finding unmet dependencies? It has to be hard or
> it's not linux?
Well, actually Slack gives me the sense of power (whether true or false). Maybe Gentoo would too, but I haven't had the time to try it yet.
> Well thanks for giving me the biggest laugh of the day anyway.
You're welcome :)
> Slackware is not exactly rocket science, typing pkgtool in the
> directory where you downloaded the file, or untarring a file and
> typing ./configure
> make install
> doesn't qualify you for mensa either.
But it's COOL ;)
> "instead it gives me a list of unusable distros"
> lol, stop it, my sides hurt now
I have friends who use Debian, and about the only bad things about it are its package management and the way man pages are placed in /usr/share/man... Desktop distros are usually unusable, at least for me (the desktop always loads very slowly).
As for the package management thing, it's not exactly a flaw in the package management (pkgtool). It's a feature (and it's not the kind of *feature* that M$ gives you), and if you want you can use swaret. I've personally used swaret before, but I deleted it since I ran out of disk space (it keeps a few MBs of some file or something...)
Actually distro choice depends on the character of the person... I've used Slackware, and now of the BSDs, only OpenBSD appeals most to me -- Theo's attitude, its security record, and its simplicity :)
Number of Comments: 69
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
|• Issue 841 (2019-11-18): Emmabuntus DE3-1.00, changing keys in a keyboard layout, Debian phasing out Python 2 and voting on init diversity, Slackware gets unofficial updated live media|
|• Issue 840 (2019-11-11): Fedora 31, monitoring user activity, Fedora working to improve Python performance, FreeBSD gets faster networking|
|• Issue 839 (2019-11-04): MX 19, manipulating PDFs, Ubuntu plans features for 20.04, Fedora 29 nears EOL, Netrunner drops Manjaro-based edition|
|• Issue 838 (2019-10-28): Xubuntu 19.10, how init and service managers work together, DragonFly BSD provides emergency mode for HAMMER, Xfce team plans 4.16|
|• Issue 837 (2019-10-21): CentOS 8.0-1905, Trident finds a new base, Debian plans firewall changes, 15 years of Fedora, how to merge directories|
|• Issue 836 (2019-10-14): Archman 2019.09, Haiku improves ARM support, Project Trident shifting base OS, Unix turns 50|
|• Issue 835 (2019-10-07): Isotop, Mazon OS and, KduxOS, examples of using the find command, Mint's System Reports becomes proactive, Solus updates its desktops|
|• Issue 834 (2019-09-30): FreedomBox "Buster", CentOS gains a rolling release, Librem 5 phones shipping, Redcore updates its package manager|
|• Issue 833 (2019-09-23): Redcore Linux 1908, why Linux distros are free, Ubuntu making list of 32-bit software to keep, Richard M Stallman steps down from FSF leadership|
|• Issue 832 (2019-09-16): BlackWeb 1.2, checking for Wayland session and applications, Fedora to use nftables in firewalld, OpenBSD disables DoH in Firefox|
|• Issue 831 (2019-09-09): Adélie Linux 1.0 beta, using ffmpeg, awk and renice, Mint and elementary improvements, PureOS and Manjaro updates|
|• Issue 930 (2019-09-02): deepin 15.11, working with AppArmor profiles, elementary OS gets new greeter, exFAT support coming to Linux kernel|
|• Issue 829 (2019-08-26): EndeavourOS 2019.07.15, Drauger OS 7.4.1, finding the licenses of kernel modules, NetBSD gets Wayland application, GhostBSD changes base repo|
|• Issue 828 (2019-08-19): AcademiX 2.2, concerns with non-free firmware, UBports working on Unity8, Fedora unveils new EPEL channel, FreeBSD phasing out GCC|
|• Issue 827 (2019-08-12): Q4OS, finding files on the disk, Ubuntu works on ZFS, Haiku improves performance, OSDisc shutting down|
|• Issue 826 (2019-08-05): Quick looks at Resilient, PrimeOS, and BlueLight, flagship distros for desktops,Manjaro introduces new package manager|
|• Issue 825 (2019-07-29): Endless OS 3.6, UBports 16.04, gNewSense maintainer stepping down, Fedora developrs discuss optimizations, Project Trident launches stable branch|
|• Issue 824 (2019-07-22): Hexagon OS 1.0, Mageia publishes updated media, Fedora unveils Fedora CoreOS, managing disk usage with quotas|
|• Issue 823 (2019-07-15): Debian 10, finding 32-bit packages on a 64-bit system, Will Cooke discusses Ubuntu's desktop, IBM finalizes purchase of Red Hat|
|• Issue 822 (2019-07-08): Mageia 7, running development branches of distros, Mint team considers Snap, UBports to address Google account access|
|• Issue 821 (2019-07-01): OpenMandriva 4.0, Ubuntu's plan for 32-bit packages, Fedora Workstation improvements, DragonFly BSD's smaller kernel memory|
|• Issue 820 (2019-06-24): Clear Linux and Guix System 1.0.1, running Android applications using Anbox, Zorin partners with Star Labs, Red Hat explains networking bug, Ubuntu considers no longer updating 32-bit packages|
|• Issue 819 (2019-06-17): OS108 and Venom, renaming multiple files, checking live USB integrity, working with Fedora's Modularity, Ubuntu replacing Chromium package with snap|
|• Issue 818 (2019-06-10): openSUSE 15.1, improving boot times, FreeBSD's status report, DragonFly BSD reduces install media size|
|• Issue 817 (2019-06-03): Manjaro 18.0.4, Ubuntu Security Podcast, new Linux laptops from Dell and System76, Entroware Apollo|
|• Issue 816 (2019-05-27): Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0, creating firewall rules, Antergos shuts down, Matthew Miller answers questions about Fedora|
|• Issue 815 (2019-05-20): Sabayon 19.03, Clear Linux's developer features, Red Hat explains MDS flaws, an overview of mobile distro options|
|• Issue 814 (2019-05-13): Fedora 30, distributions publish Firefox fixes, CentOS publishes roadmap to 8.0, Debian plans to use Wayland by default|
|• Issue 813 (2019-05-06): ROSA R11, MX seeks help with systemd-shim, FreeBSD tests unified package management, interview with Gael Duval|
|• Issue 812 (2019-04-29): Ubuntu MATE 19.04, setting up a SOCKS web proxy, Scientific Linux discontinued, Red Hat takes over Java LTS support|
|• Issue 811 (2019-04-22): Alpine 3.9.2, rsync examples, Ubuntu working on ZFS support, Debian elects new Project Leader, Obarun releases S6 tools|
|• Issue 810 (2019-04-15): SolydXK 201902, Bedrock Linux 0.7.2, Fedora phasing out Python 2, NetBSD gets virtual machine monitor|
|• Issue 809 (2019-04-08): PCLinuxOS 2019.02, installing Falkon and problems with portable packages, Mint offers daily build previews, Ubuntu speeds up Snap packages|
|• Issue 808 (2019-04-01): Solus 4.0, security benefits and drawbacks to using a live distro, Gentoo gets GNOME ports working without systemd, Redox OS update|
|• Issue 807 (2019-03-25): Pardus 17.5, finding out which user changed a file, new Budgie features, a tool for browsing FreeBSD's sysctl values|
|• Issue 806 (2019-03-18): Kubuntu vs KDE neon, Nitrux's znx, notes on Debian's election, SUSE becomes an independent entity|
|• Issue 805 (2019-03-11): EasyOS 1.0, managing background services, Devuan team debates machine ID file, Ubuntu Studio works to remain an Ubuntu Community Edition|
|• Issue 804 (2019-03-04): Condres OS 19.02, securely erasing hard drives, new UBports devices coming in 2019, Devuan to host first conference|
|• Issue 803 (2019-02-25): Septor 2019, preventing windows from stealing focus, NetBSD and Nitrux experiment with virtual machines, pfSense upgrading to FreeBSD 12 base|
|• Issue 802 (2019-02-18): Slontoo 18.07.1, NetBSD tests newer compiler, Fedora packaging Deepin desktop, changes in Ubuntu Studio|
|• Issue 801 (2019-02-11): Project Trident 18.12, the meaning of status symbols in top, FreeBSD Foundation lists ongoing projects, Plasma Mobile team answers questions|
|• Issue 800 (2019-02-04): FreeNAS 11.2, using Ubuntu Studio software as an add-on, Nitrux developing znx, matching operating systems to file systems|
|• Issue 799 (2019-01-28): KaOS 2018.12, Linux Basics For Hackers, Debian 10 enters freeze, Ubuntu publishes new version for IoT devices|
|• Issue 798 (2019-01-21): Sculpt OS 18.09, picking a location for swap space, Solus team plans ahead, Fedora trying to get a better user count|
|• Issue 797 (2019-01-14): Reborn OS 2018.11.28, TinyPaw-Linux 1.3, dealing with processes which make the desktop unresponsive, Debian testing Secure Boot support|
|• Issue 796 (2019-01-07): FreeBSD 12.0, Peppermint releases ISO update, picking the best distro of 2018, roundtable interview with Debian, Fedora and elementary developers|
|• Issue 795 (2018-12-24): Running a Pinebook, interview with Bedrock founder, Alpine being ported to RISC-V, Librem 5 dev-kits shipped|
|• Issue 794 (2018-12-17): Void 20181111, avoiding software bloat, improvements to HAMMER2, getting application overview in GNOME Shell|
|• Issue 793 (2018-12-10): openSUSE Tumbleweed, finding non-free packages, Debian migrates to usrmerge, Hyperbola gets FSF approval|
|• Issue 792 (2018-1203): GhostBSD 18.10, when to use swap space, DragonFly BSD's wireless support, Fedora planning to pause development schedule|
|• Issue 791 (2018-11-26): Haiku R1 Beta1, default passwords on live media, Slax and Kodachi update their media, dual booting DragonFly BSD on EFI|
|• Issue 790 (2018-11-19): NetBSD 8.0, Bash tips and short-cuts, Fedora's networking benchmarked with FreeBSD, Ubuntu 18.04 to get ten years of support|
|• Issue 789 (2018-11-12): Fedora 29 Workstation and Silverblue, Haiku recovering from server outage, Fedora turns 15, Debian publishes updated media|
|• Full list of all issues|
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the Star Lite, Star LabTop and more. Available with a choice of Ubuntu, Linux Mint or Zorin OS pre-installed with many more distributions supported. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|Random Distribution |
SparkyLinux is a lightweight, fast and simple Linux distribution designed for both old and new computers featuring customised Enlightenment and LXDE desktops. It has been built on the "testing" branch of Debian GNU/Linux.