| DistroWatch Weekly
|Linux Foundation Training
|Reader Comments • Jump to last comment
1 • excellent (by alet austria at 2004-09-13 15:58:25 GMT) |
keep up the excellent
work you have been doing
for the Linux community
and a linux nut like me
2 • Desktop/LX 1.4 (by maceto on 2004-09-13 16:40:35 GMT)
Eighter they are dumb, have no what so ever CRM/marketing knowlegde or BROKE.
Cause this is just lame in terms of not having the people waithing for it to help, let us know more etc.
3 • No subject (by Anonymous on 2004-09-13 17:50:31 GMT)
Re: SuSE Advanced Server
A server, especially a UNIX server, should NOT come with a complicated, crash prone GUI. 0.02$
4 • No subject (by Anonymous on 2004-09-13 17:50:58 GMT)
PS: I'm talking about X itself, not KDE.
5 • No subject (by Anonymous on 2004-09-13 19:13:33 GMT)
Even if a server doesn't need a "crash-prone" GUI in your eyes, many people like it, including myself as I have been testing SLES 9 for about a month now. It seems to be rock solid, and, of course, if you don't like the GUI, get rid of it. It's that simple. However, the GUI really does make administration MUCH simpler, especially with Samba which is somewhat of a pain to configure.
6 • so easy, so painfully easy- this is a nifty cmd also for nvidia modules install (by maceto on 2004-09-13 20:03:28 GMT)
/sbin/telinit is linked to /sbin/init. It takes a one-character argument and signals init to perform the appropriate action. The following arguments serve as directives to telinit:
0,1,2,3,4,5 or 6
tell init to switch to the specified run level.
tell init to process only those /etc/inittab file entries having runlevel a,b or c.
Q or q
tell init to re-examine the /etc/inittab file.
S or s
tell init to switch to single user mode.
U or u
tell init to re-execute itself (preserving the state). No re-examining of /etc/inittab file happens. Run level should be one of Ss12345, otherwise request would be silently ignored.
telinit can also tell init how long it should wait between sending processes the SIGTERM and SIGKILL signals. The default is 5 seconds, but this can be changed with the -t sec option.
7 • hurricanix (by crawancon at 2004-09-13 21:55:41 GMT)
greetings from tampa. its nice to see that once power is restored, internet is back up, and trees are cleared out that idistrowatch is still up. ahhhhhh. glad to see the distro season is going much smoother then this crappy hurricane season. power failures? ha! Even without my ups, if a power surge happens and the worst case scenario happens (hard disk failure) i can still plop in a CD and get my shell fix.
8 • Ignalum CD1 weird (by Benjamin Vander Jagt at 2004-09-13 23:11:04 GMT)
Has anyone here installed Ignalum Yarrow? I can't seem to download a CD1 from anywhere that matches the MD5 sums, and when I try to burn anyway it mismatches the ISO I burned from...
the Ignalum Yarrow disc 1 that I download is 655,446,420 bytes, but the Ignalum site says it's supposed to be 655,472,640 bytes...
9 • Unix Wallpaper (by anonymous on 2004-09-13 23:20:19 GMT)
That's a hot wallpaper! Does anyone know where I could get it?
10 • More bashing of people (by Ticked on 2004-09-13 23:36:50 GMT)
maceto - you obviously never actually read anything - just take things at face value. Lycoris announced a while ago now that 1.4 is shipping - it's all over their sites. They were even giving a daily update for a while there. Distrowatch has missed this apparently.
You probably jumped on the bandwagon with Distrowatch bashing KDE last week, too. I noticed that as soon as the comments started going 2-1 against Distrowatch saying KDE 3.3 was the buggiest ever that no one could post comments any longer.
I wonder why people couldn't post comments in last week's Distrowatch Weekly after a certain time? And why did he take it off the front page after only 2 days instead of leaving it up for the normal week? Probably because everyone got sick of the sensationalism.
Back off, people. It's GOOD for companies like Mandrake and Lycoris to miss deadlines if they find bugs. KDE 3.3 is good - but 3.3.1 might be even better.
11 • RE: More bashing of people (by ladislav at 2004-09-14 01:32:59 GMT)
I wonder why people couldn't post comments in last week's Distrowatch Weekly after a certain time?
Sorry about that - I reconfigured Apache last week (to always redirect to distrowatch.com instead of www.distrowatch.com) and forgot to update the script on this page; I only discovered the problem last night. Please don't look for any sinister reasons - this forums is here to provide free exchange of opinions and you are more than welcome to disagree with mine.
12 • KDE 3.3 is fine on my Gentoo system (by Ed Borasky at 2004-09-14 01:55:27 GMT)
KDE 3.3 showed up in the Gentoo "stable" distribution a day or so ago. So I installed it and I haven't had any problems at all with it. I was running it for a few weeks when it was in "testing" with no problems either.
13 • Lycoris Desktop/LX 1.4 (by ladislav at 2004-09-14 02:41:20 GMT)
Lycoris announced a while ago now that 1.4 is shipping
I am posting this from Lycoris Desktop/LX 1.4 and my first impressions are indeed very good. It looks like it was worth the wait, after all :-)
14 • lycoris as a company (by lugnut on 2004-09-14 03:42:51 GMT)
i'm not interested in starting a war of words with you Ticked, but maceto does have a point, though he could have put it across a little more eloquently.
[long and rambling post alert!]
Lycoris has imho evolved from a community oriented company to a ‘take-it-or-leave-it’ one, or at least that is the general impression from a couple of recent incidents. For example, when update 3 came out, the company decided out of the blue to only offer free downloads of the evaluation edition of their latest offering as well as no downloads of their devtools and source code. Now don’t get me wrong here, the issue is NOT whether they have the right to change their policy, but it was how they did it that caused an uproar (http://www.lycoris.org/viewtopic.php?topic=9187&forum=33&start=0).
Consider this; you have a bunch of community folk who sweated blood working out bugs, working on misc coding, and giving back to the distro in whatever form they can, who are suddenly left out of the loop when the company decides to go the commercial route. And this is AFTER the VP of marketing for the company had made it clear that they were against such a policy. Take a gander at this:
[REDMOND, WA (July 4, 2001) - Redmond Linux, Corp., is making a very firm stand on this issue of pay-per-download and per-seat licensing - we're against it. You will always be able to download the ISO images of Redmond Linux; you will always be able to get support from the mailing lists.
Rick Collette, VP of Marketing for Redmond Linux states, "It just doesn't ring right with us that people are over-capitalizing on the Linux distributions. We don't want to be know with the groups that are committing
Linucide, we want to be known as the group who really likes what they do, and do it well."
Our goal is simple: We wish to provide a top-notch Linux Distribution that is EASY to use, easy to support, and comes with NO HIDDEN STRINGS ATTACHED. When you buy or download Redmond Linux, you will get the FULL VERSION, nothing chopped down. When you buy or download Redmond Linux you WILL get support. Buying it give you some additional support, downloading gives you free support online and a path to purchase support if you need to. There are not now, nor will there ever be Per-Seat Licenses. You will not have to pay to download an ISO image. There will not be a charge to get help via the mailing list. These are the things that have always set the Linux Community apart from the other camp, and we feel the culture should be maintained.]
No doubt that Joseph cheek, founder of Lycoris, says that this was submitted without his approval (http://www.lycoris.org/viewtopic.php?topic=9187&forum=33&start=40) but note that he says this AFTER the change in policy to go commercial, 2 YEARS after the statement was made. If he disagreed with the statement, why not rebut it when it came out?
Again, let me make it clear. A company should have the right to change their policy at any time they wish, but they should do so by being fair to the community that has made the company what it is. You can’t make what is seen by the community as a promise today, and then shift your policy tomorrow without forewarning and making an announcement AFTER somebody questions the sudden shift, and then expect no uproar.
Joseph, in his attempt to make it clear that he owes the community no explanation for his decision, has shown how arrogant the company and its decision makers were becoming. Take a look at his reply to the community here (http://www.lycoris.org/viewtopic.php?topic=9187&forum=33&start=40) and you’ll see what I mean.
And in an attempt to kill all debate, Robbie_n, a nice fellow in an unenviable position as Community Liaison, had to come out with these announcements:
“With regards to the changes to the Evaluation policy, we ask that you live with our decision – what is done is done. The new policy may not have been taken or announced in the most appropriate manner, but it will stand.”
“I have a request from the company that I would ask you to honor. All statements by company employees on this website made before 11/16/03 should be considered unofficial and non-binding.”
after all was said and done, and after the loss of a few good community members (and dare I say a few desktop l/x users), things settled down and life was good once again. At least until the recent debacle concerning the release of desktop l/x 1.4 that is.
After making an announcement of the release date of 1.4 and taking pre-orders, the company just clammed up. When the release date came and went, and no cd came in the mail, the community started questioning what was going on. Again, there were NO announcements made of the sudden delay in shipping until people started fretting (http://www.lycoris.org/viewtopic.php?topic=11851&forum=74). It was only then did lycoris come out with the reason for the delay.
Is this really how they treat their community members, and worse, their paying customers? How do they think this makes them look to potential converts to their distro? They keep touting themselves as “the leader in desktop linux”, but they seem to forget that goodwill is an important aspect for the survival of any company, more so to one that makes linux their core business and believes that they are (or should be) the leader in their market.
To the Lycoris diehards; ignore me, dismiss me, I really don’t give a flying penguin. But at least realize that the company needs to take a serious look at themselves. open communication, honesty and integrity. These are what seems to be lacking in Lycoris as a company today.
Btw, in case you are wondering, I’ve been a desktop l/x user since way back when it was still known as Redmond linux. I may not be active in the community forums, but I’m always lurking around there.
Ok, I’ve said my piece. I’ll shut up now.
15 • Ignalum CD1 weird part 2 (by Benjamin Vander Jagt at 2004-09-14 03:51:55 GMT)
the Ignalum site notes the incorrect size of CD 1, and they're in the process of fixing it
16 • OSS Piracy (by Anonymous on 2004-09-14 05:07:06 GMT)
Interestingly in Malaysia:
17 • Distro chooser (by EEDOK at 2004-09-14 05:18:43 GMT)
The distro chooser still seems incomplete and lacking, maybe I'll make a backend ot this set of questions to choose a distro:
18 • Damn Small Linux site hacked? (by KnightFire on 2004-09-14 05:46:44 GMT)
Ah... has the Damn Small Linux site been hacked? The main page says:
f***ing destroyed by skopjec and Peur2Rien
And thus another question... is DSL 0.8.1.1 real?
Peace and Long Life,
19 • No subject (by dreamer on 2004-09-14 05:57:14 GMT)
the damn small linux site seems fine to me...
and the current version is listed as 0.8.1.1
20 • Lugnut (by Jim at 2004-09-14 16:46:03 GMT)
Hmmm. Sounds like something Egon would say...
21 • Good work. (by benn at 2004-09-14 17:10:15 GMT)
I just wanted to let all know how great distrowatch has been for me. I tried many a distro based on the info here, and finally settled on my fave Arch, also from these pages. thanks!
22 • Lugnut (by pulidzz on 2004-09-14 19:59:48 GMT)
I share your feelings man.
23 • Lugnut (by Michael_Valentine on 2004-09-15 00:46:18 GMT)
I'm with you 100% on the Lycoris issue. Don't forget to mention that if you voice your opions about the company you get moderated, censored and even your posts deleted or edited. I have spend many $ supporting this Distro and many others since 1998 and have never been treated like I have been at Lycoris. As a company offering a product or service Lycoris has to learn that the customer is always right even if they don't agree.
24 • Distro chooser (by Chestbursted on 2004-09-15 06:26:19 GMT)
The distro chooser 0.2 is quite much better than the first one, but it still gave me Mandrake 3rd time I filled it :(... First one was Gentoo (which I am using) and second was Debian (which I am considering to install on a friends server).
EEDOK's questions are quite much better, but the distro chooser gives some kind of direction...
25 • Mepis (by deeLer on 2004-09-15 07:45:09 GMT)
I've tried Mepis, I'm impressed. It seems a very mature and solid distro.
To everyone who likes to check out distro's: don't forget to test this one !!!!
26 • Mepis registration levels (by pfpearson on 2004-09-15 12:19:03 GMT)
I had to smile when looking at the Mepis site. "Lobster Dinner Registration" "Steak Dinner Registration" ? :-)
27 • Michael Valentine (by Tim on 2004-09-15 21:30:17 GMT)
Apparently this is one of those people who doesn't read well. Didn't know Lycoris was even around in 1998 - right on the company page it says 2000. Apparently he's making up stuff to discredit Lycoris.
The customer isn't always right - this Michael Valentine loser is a Linspire fanboy - go look over at the Linspire forum pages. Looks like he's just causing trouble because he likes Linspire. That's not what Linux is about.
Maybe Valentine ought to start his OWN Linux - but I doubt he's got any knowhow if he can't graduate past Linspire.
As a company, Lycoris doesn't have to take every single customer's point of view into account, especially when that person is a known Linspire troll.
Give it a rest, fanboy.
Even Ladislav commented that it was worth the wait for Lycoris 1.4, and he reviews everything.
Glad to see Ladislav doesn't bow to every customer - he just puts out quality!
28 • Tim (by Michael_Valentine on 2004-09-16 00:20:24 GMT)
Sorry Tim, I did not mean I been using Lycoris since 1998, but Linux. Yes I have been verbal with Lycoris, with good reason. If all my comments had not been censored or erased people could judge for themself. Now your verbal attacks don't offend me since it just shows what you are made of. You will also find me on the Xandros, Libranet forums and I'm a huge fan of Buffalo Linux. The thing I like about other forums such as Linspire for example is that you can point out negative things about the company without being censored or banned, heck I found it just to be the opposite...they welcome the critice to improve upon the product or the way they handle business. Take care Tim, have fun bashing honest posters...no hard feelings here. Tell Rus hello! :)
29 • Tim (by DanQ on 2004-09-16 02:27:58 GMT)
seems clear that Michael was referring to linux in general in his post (note he said "this Distro and many others since 1998").
and why is it that when another person does not subscribe to your point of view he automatically becomes a "loser"? granted, i don't know michael, and i don't know you, so i don't know what history the two of you have together, but doesn't he have the right to have his own opinion, even if it is quite the opposite to yours?
and in response to your rather distasteful name calling, wouldn't it be fair to call you a 'lycoris fanboy' and a 'lycoris troll' due to your somewhat fanatical response to a valid criticism (IMHO) of lycoris as a company?
and what is wrong with linspire? i think both lycoris d l/x and linspire are great products, each with their own strength and weaknesses (though must admit i use debian myself). all the criticism i see here seems to be directed at lycoris as a company and not its product.
to be honest, most criticism against lycoris i come across seems to be directed at the company and not the product (take a look at the comments on news pieces appearing on osnews).
ever hear the saying "there's no smoke without fire"?
30 • Re: Distro Chooser (by rreigh at 2004-09-16 03:06:17 GMT)
I tried EEDOK's distro chooser, but it didn't work for me. I filled out the form, clicked submit, and ... nothing -- no results, just a blank form.
31 • Distrowatch Slogan (by Vince on 2004-09-16 03:36:39 GMT)
just noticed the changed slogan for distrowatch:
"Put the fun back into computing. Use Linux, BSD."
i'm sure all the bsd users out there really appreciate the recognition, ladislav. thanks.
32 • Re: Re: Distro Chooser (by EEDOK at 2004-09-16 04:22:22 GMT)
it goes nowhere as the backend hasn't been made yet, I'd need a better host with some +bandwidth, and php support, but yea if people are interested in starting a project of a distro chooser, mail me and maybe I might take some time out of my busy schedule and put it towards the chooser
33 • Distrowatch slogan (by Tom Mydosh at 2004-09-16 04:37:13 GMT)
Why not "BSD/Linux" ?
It sounds better (at least in English), alphabetical, and more historically correct.
34 • RE: Distrowatch slogan (by ladislav at 2004-09-16 06:09:27 GMT)
Why not "BSD/Linux" ?
It's a possibility. But I am not in favour of using the slash - what does a slash represent? And? Or? Both? Or something else? The slash is also interpreted differently in different countries, while the comma has a more universal meaning across the globe. As for the order, yes, BSD should be in front, but Linux is just so much bigger nowadays that it made sense to put it first.
35 • Distrowatch in general (by Glen aka noprob at 2004-09-16 07:34:57 GMT)
It is a pleasure to view the many different distro's of GNU/Linux.
as a n00b to linux it has been a great help to adjust.
Thank You distrowatch.com!
36 • Request corrections (by d00m3d on 2004-09-16 12:00:12 GMT)
Pls allow me to draw your attention on the LFS page in distrowatch.com. Many download links in the table in http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=lfs are not valid. In fact, the release date of 5.1on 2005/05/16 in "Complete Release History" does not make sense.
Pls amend relevant corrections.
37 • Linare Linux (by Glenn E. (Retired Old Man) at 2004-09-17 01:22:12 GMT)
Please be advised that Linare Linux "automatically" installs the boot loader into the MBR. At least, I sure didn't see any options during installation. Most other distros (Mephis, SUSE, Libranet, Vector to name a few I've tried) give you a choice of MBR or root partition, but not Linare. It screwed me up real bad because I run V-Com's System Commander for OS Selection, and I had to reinstall all my OS's over again from scratch. Really irritating!! And not only that, but Linare's boot loader only recognized Win98 and Itself, and not any of the other OSes I had installed. I'm not a programmer or linux guru, so I may be missing something here, but I thought I'd "warn" you anyway. Now that I'm thinking about it, I don't think it gave me a choice of HD either. (I have 3 hd's in my sys). Anyway, Linare smells too much like M$/win to me with regard to "taking over" the whole computer, so they're on my blacklist.
I'll be eagle-eying Distrowatch for a review of Linare to hear someone elses opinion on in. By the way, Distrowatch is fantastic! I have it as my home page!
38 • Thanks for your research, lugnut!!! (by torque2k on 2004-09-17 04:54:22 GMT)
Concerning "lycoris as a company (by lugnut on 2004-09-14 03:42:51 GMT)", I just wanted to say a big Thanks to lugnut for going above and beyond the call of duty when researching what he's talking about! It's great to see someone who cares enough to include links to points they're trying to make. That's a class act, and too few people in ANY forum do the same anymore.
And thanks for bringing me up-to-date. Haven't used Lycoris since the first version after the name change from Redmond Linux, but interesting to see how the company is being run. Makes me think of the latest issues with Gentoo, or Smoothwall.
Number of Comments: 38
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
|• Issue 843 (2019-12-02): Obarun 2019.11.02, Bluestar 5.3.6, using special characters on the command line, Fedora plans to disable empty passwords, FreeBSD's quarterly status report|
|• Issue 842 (2019-11-25): SolydXK 10, System Adminstration Ethics book review, Debian continues init diversity debate, Google upstreaming Android kernel patches|
|• Issue 841 (2019-11-18): Emmabuntus DE3-1.00, changing keys in a keyboard layout, Debian phasing out Python 2 and voting on init diversity, Slackware gets unofficial updated live media|
|• Issue 840 (2019-11-11): Fedora 31, monitoring user activity, Fedora working to improve Python performance, FreeBSD gets faster networking|
|• Issue 839 (2019-11-04): MX 19, manipulating PDFs, Ubuntu plans features for 20.04, Fedora 29 nears EOL, Netrunner drops Manjaro-based edition|
|• Issue 838 (2019-10-28): Xubuntu 19.10, how init and service managers work together, DragonFly BSD provides emergency mode for HAMMER, Xfce team plans 4.16|
|• Issue 837 (2019-10-21): CentOS 8.0-1905, Trident finds a new base, Debian plans firewall changes, 15 years of Fedora, how to merge directories|
|• Issue 836 (2019-10-14): Archman 2019.09, Haiku improves ARM support, Project Trident shifting base OS, Unix turns 50|
|• Issue 835 (2019-10-07): Isotop, Mazon OS and, KduxOS, examples of using the find command, Mint's System Reports becomes proactive, Solus updates its desktops|
|• Issue 834 (2019-09-30): FreedomBox "Buster", CentOS gains a rolling release, Librem 5 phones shipping, Redcore updates its package manager|
|• Issue 833 (2019-09-23): Redcore Linux 1908, why Linux distros are free, Ubuntu making list of 32-bit software to keep, Richard M Stallman steps down from FSF leadership|
|• Issue 832 (2019-09-16): BlackWeb 1.2, checking for Wayland session and applications, Fedora to use nftables in firewalld, OpenBSD disables DoH in Firefox|
|• Issue 831 (2019-09-09): Adélie Linux 1.0 beta, using ffmpeg, awk and renice, Mint and elementary improvements, PureOS and Manjaro updates|
|• Issue 930 (2019-09-02): deepin 15.11, working with AppArmor profiles, elementary OS gets new greeter, exFAT support coming to Linux kernel|
|• Issue 829 (2019-08-26): EndeavourOS 2019.07.15, Drauger OS 7.4.1, finding the licenses of kernel modules, NetBSD gets Wayland application, GhostBSD changes base repo|
|• Issue 828 (2019-08-19): AcademiX 2.2, concerns with non-free firmware, UBports working on Unity8, Fedora unveils new EPEL channel, FreeBSD phasing out GCC|
|• Issue 827 (2019-08-12): Q4OS, finding files on the disk, Ubuntu works on ZFS, Haiku improves performance, OSDisc shutting down|
|• Issue 826 (2019-08-05): Quick looks at Resilient, PrimeOS, and BlueLight, flagship distros for desktops,Manjaro introduces new package manager|
|• Issue 825 (2019-07-29): Endless OS 3.6, UBports 16.04, gNewSense maintainer stepping down, Fedora developrs discuss optimizations, Project Trident launches stable branch|
|• Issue 824 (2019-07-22): Hexagon OS 1.0, Mageia publishes updated media, Fedora unveils Fedora CoreOS, managing disk usage with quotas|
|• Issue 823 (2019-07-15): Debian 10, finding 32-bit packages on a 64-bit system, Will Cooke discusses Ubuntu's desktop, IBM finalizes purchase of Red Hat|
|• Issue 822 (2019-07-08): Mageia 7, running development branches of distros, Mint team considers Snap, UBports to address Google account access|
|• Issue 821 (2019-07-01): OpenMandriva 4.0, Ubuntu's plan for 32-bit packages, Fedora Workstation improvements, DragonFly BSD's smaller kernel memory|
|• Issue 820 (2019-06-24): Clear Linux and Guix System 1.0.1, running Android applications using Anbox, Zorin partners with Star Labs, Red Hat explains networking bug, Ubuntu considers no longer updating 32-bit packages|
|• Issue 819 (2019-06-17): OS108 and Venom, renaming multiple files, checking live USB integrity, working with Fedora's Modularity, Ubuntu replacing Chromium package with snap|
|• Issue 818 (2019-06-10): openSUSE 15.1, improving boot times, FreeBSD's status report, DragonFly BSD reduces install media size|
|• Issue 817 (2019-06-03): Manjaro 18.0.4, Ubuntu Security Podcast, new Linux laptops from Dell and System76, Entroware Apollo|
|• Issue 816 (2019-05-27): Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0, creating firewall rules, Antergos shuts down, Matthew Miller answers questions about Fedora|
|• Issue 815 (2019-05-20): Sabayon 19.03, Clear Linux's developer features, Red Hat explains MDS flaws, an overview of mobile distro options|
|• Issue 814 (2019-05-13): Fedora 30, distributions publish Firefox fixes, CentOS publishes roadmap to 8.0, Debian plans to use Wayland by default|
|• Issue 813 (2019-05-06): ROSA R11, MX seeks help with systemd-shim, FreeBSD tests unified package management, interview with Gael Duval|
|• Issue 812 (2019-04-29): Ubuntu MATE 19.04, setting up a SOCKS web proxy, Scientific Linux discontinued, Red Hat takes over Java LTS support|
|• Issue 811 (2019-04-22): Alpine 3.9.2, rsync examples, Ubuntu working on ZFS support, Debian elects new Project Leader, Obarun releases S6 tools|
|• Issue 810 (2019-04-15): SolydXK 201902, Bedrock Linux 0.7.2, Fedora phasing out Python 2, NetBSD gets virtual machine monitor|
|• Issue 809 (2019-04-08): PCLinuxOS 2019.02, installing Falkon and problems with portable packages, Mint offers daily build previews, Ubuntu speeds up Snap packages|
|• Issue 808 (2019-04-01): Solus 4.0, security benefits and drawbacks to using a live distro, Gentoo gets GNOME ports working without systemd, Redox OS update|
|• Issue 807 (2019-03-25): Pardus 17.5, finding out which user changed a file, new Budgie features, a tool for browsing FreeBSD's sysctl values|
|• Issue 806 (2019-03-18): Kubuntu vs KDE neon, Nitrux's znx, notes on Debian's election, SUSE becomes an independent entity|
|• Issue 805 (2019-03-11): EasyOS 1.0, managing background services, Devuan team debates machine ID file, Ubuntu Studio works to remain an Ubuntu Community Edition|
|• Issue 804 (2019-03-04): Condres OS 19.02, securely erasing hard drives, new UBports devices coming in 2019, Devuan to host first conference|
|• Issue 803 (2019-02-25): Septor 2019, preventing windows from stealing focus, NetBSD and Nitrux experiment with virtual machines, pfSense upgrading to FreeBSD 12 base|
|• Issue 802 (2019-02-18): Slontoo 18.07.1, NetBSD tests newer compiler, Fedora packaging Deepin desktop, changes in Ubuntu Studio|
|• Issue 801 (2019-02-11): Project Trident 18.12, the meaning of status symbols in top, FreeBSD Foundation lists ongoing projects, Plasma Mobile team answers questions|
|• Issue 800 (2019-02-04): FreeNAS 11.2, using Ubuntu Studio software as an add-on, Nitrux developing znx, matching operating systems to file systems|
|• Issue 799 (2019-01-28): KaOS 2018.12, Linux Basics For Hackers, Debian 10 enters freeze, Ubuntu publishes new version for IoT devices|
|• Issue 798 (2019-01-21): Sculpt OS 18.09, picking a location for swap space, Solus team plans ahead, Fedora trying to get a better user count|
|• Issue 797 (2019-01-14): Reborn OS 2018.11.28, TinyPaw-Linux 1.3, dealing with processes which make the desktop unresponsive, Debian testing Secure Boot support|
|• Issue 796 (2019-01-07): FreeBSD 12.0, Peppermint releases ISO update, picking the best distro of 2018, roundtable interview with Debian, Fedora and elementary developers|
|• Issue 795 (2018-12-24): Running a Pinebook, interview with Bedrock founder, Alpine being ported to RISC-V, Librem 5 dev-kits shipped|
|• Issue 794 (2018-12-17): Void 20181111, avoiding software bloat, improvements to HAMMER2, getting application overview in GNOME Shell|
|• Issue 793 (2018-12-10): openSUSE Tumbleweed, finding non-free packages, Debian migrates to usrmerge, Hyperbola gets FSF approval|
|• Issue 792 (2018-1203): GhostBSD 18.10, when to use swap space, DragonFly BSD's wireless support, Fedora planning to pause development schedule|
|• Issue 791 (2018-11-26): Haiku R1 Beta1, default passwords on live media, Slax and Kodachi update their media, dual booting DragonFly BSD on EFI|
|• Full list of all issues|
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the Star Lite, Star LabTop and more. Available with a choice of Ubuntu, Linux Mint or Zorin OS pre-installed with many more distributions supported. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|Random Distribution |
Luit Linux was a small bootable live CD distribution based on KNOPPIX and Damn Small Linux. A small compact live distribution with tools and applications for day to day needs, without compromising on its look and feel and ease of use.