| DistroWatch Weekly
If you've enjoyed this week's issue of DistroWatch Weekly, please consider sending us a tip.
(Tips this week: 0, value: US$0.00)
|Linux Foundation Training
|Reader Comments • Jump to last comment
1 • Banners (by John Gabriel at 2003-07-28 14:50:19 GMT) |
Banners 1 & 2 are quite nice, but I think 3 is the best because it is the only one that graphically expresses the worldwide nature of Distrowatch. One of the most interesting qualities of DW is the way incorporates Linux news from all over the world.
2 • Banners (by John Gabriel at 2003-07-28 14:51:33 GMT)
Whoops. Meant Banner 4 not 3. Sorry.
3 • Arch & banners (by me on 2003-07-28 15:18:40 GMT)
Ask Arch about their community, how it may differ from the community that some other similar projects have?
Yea, banner 4 looks perhaps the most pro & pretty one too.
4 • About RHL (by Anonymous on 2003-07-28 15:42:12 GMT)
The rhl-devel lists doesn't seem to have much traffic. I really wonder why any community developer should switch from Debian/Mandrake/Gentoo/... to RedHat while RedHat has the final saying over everything.
5 • Banner 4 all the way! (by Isamoor at 2003-07-28 15:58:16 GMT)
Banner 4 all the way! That little globe is my favorite icon. 1 and 2 aren't bad either.
I did a little reading on Arch. I like the idea of Pacman. Sounds like it's still got a few rough edges.
After reading the documentation for awhile though, I was rather confused about compiling form source and then integrating it into Pacman? It sounded like there was a simple command ("make package" or something) but then it also sounded like I had to edit my own special Makefile or something. I really like the simplicity of checkinstall, especially on slackware based distros. Why can't it be that simple to integrate a source install into Pacman?
6 • Banner (by Anonymous on 2003-07-28 16:33:58 GMT)
I like #5, it shows some attitude.
7 • Banners (by Henrique Maia on 2003-07-28 16:40:40 GMT)
Banner 3. Plain simple.
Banner 5 is very good, but maybe too aggressive, I suppose.
8 • My thoughts (by Nick at 2003-07-28 17:24:45 GMT)
The new RH beta sucks... The new Mandrake sucks... I guess I have elevated to a higher plane. Time to try a source distro, or roll my own.
9 • Banners, in general. (by MadHunter at 2003-07-28 17:27:17 GMT)
I think they are all really good. Use all of 'em! ;)
10 • Oops... browser problems. (by MadHunter at 2003-07-28 17:33:37 GMT)
Sorry about the duplicate post there. Was messing around with Mozilla-Firebird and inadvertantly resent form data when I refreshed the screen after changing my fonts...
11 • banner (by John Wallace at 2003-07-28 17:36:59 GMT)
i think your orginal two are the best
i vote for #1 & #2 in that order
thanks for all your excellent work and the knowledge you pass onto
us," linux distrowatchers"
12 • My vote (by TheClient at 2003-07-28 17:37:59 GMT)
Banner 4. Clean & simple.
13 • banners, etc. (by Bob at 2003-07-28 17:38:41 GMT)
I cast my vote for banner #4. They're all great, but #4 just sort of stands out with a bit more sophistication.
With respect to the new Red Hat ß, I kind of like it. It may not be a hacker's dream, but, as a desktop distro, it's pretty polished. I'm just getting to know it, so these are preliminary thoughts. I also find the Lycoris Build 75 ß to be pretty user friendly as a desktop distro, despite the fact that it's not cutting edge. It's also a polished distro. And I like J.A.M.D. 0.0.0.6. It seems as though the Red Hat clones are taking over.
On the Slackware end of things, I like Peanut 9.5 (proves that good things come in small packages). College 2.3 is okay.
As for Debian, I love Knoppix and Damn Small Linux, but I can't get through the regular Debian Woody installation without wanting to kill myself. Dynabolic is pretty cool also.
I'm still partial to Elx, and am awaiting the release of PowerDesk 3.0 at the end of this month (if they're on schedule).
14 • banner (by mike at 2003-07-28 18:00:02 GMT)
Me thinks banner 1 & 2 if you plan to modify the website to match. If not then banners 3 & 4 are more simple in design and should fit in without any changes. Or just do what you want, but don't change the content. That's what keeps us coming back! Great Job.
15 • Banners (by Penguin Domesticus on 2003-07-28 18:01:15 GMT)
I vote for #4 too. I would give a shared silver medal to #5, #2 & #3. Number 5 is the funniest but maybe too big, and isn't the penguin from the GoTux wallpaper series (license?)(http://www.kde-look.org/index.php?xsortmode=high&page=0) which may have a bit too anti-MS idea...
16 • banner (by flubie at 2003-07-28 18:12:40 GMT)
I vote #4 and #5
17 • Banner (by Charles at 2003-07-28 19:46:51 GMT)
I vote for #4.
18 • Banner (by JConnell on 2003-07-28 20:04:51 GMT)
Definately #2/#1, those look great.
19 • banner (by matt on 2003-07-28 20:14:18 GMT)
i vote #4. i might have voted #5, but its SO big
20 • Redhat Retail (by Devilotx at 2003-07-28 21:16:01 GMT)
I picked up Redhat 8 Retail at my local best buy, I knew I could grab it free online but I wanted a manual and what not.
Now currently running dual Systems at home (XP and RH9) I feel happy when I see the redhat and Suse boxes on the shelf, it gives us all a shot at choice on the desktop.
now where are my retail Lindows boxes at best buy ;)
21 • Banner (by Matt Parlane at 2003-07-28 21:20:32 GMT)
One more for #4.
22 • Red Hat 9.0.93 (by Benjamin Vander Jagt at 2003-07-28 21:25:44 GMT)
I favor Red Hat 8.0 most often, almost never recommend Red Hat 9, and am totally stunned at Red Hat 9.0.93. It does not look good.
Next I'm going to try Mandrake 9.2. After using Mandrake 9.1, which I've hated for a long time, my opinions of it are changing, as I'm actually getting more compatibility and speed out of it, and it includes more of the software I like (such as tiny window managers). I think the rumors are true. The tides (for precompiled sets) are turning towards Mandrake. Of course, I have to actually try MKD 9.2 beta before I can make a good prediction.
And I like Banner 2 myself. It fits in with the current DWW icon, and it looks like very professional newspaper banner. If the current DWW icon is scrapped, then I'd vote for banner 6. Banner 1 doesn't need to be so big to convey the same idea, banner 3 looks like a newsletter header (which might not be a bad thing), banner 4 looks too much like SuSE for my tastes (and I don't see the significance of the planet Earth in the logo), and banner 5 is yet another mean penguin picture, and it may convey the impression that DistroWatch is an opinionative site. Just my thoughts...
23 • #4 with a side of fries! (by Adam Doxtater at 2003-07-29 03:27:28 GMT)
My vote is for #4 :)
24 • Banner (by motub on 2003-07-29 04:43:28 GMT)
#6, #4, #3, #2, in that order. Am I the only sucker for shiny brushed metal and engraved tezt? I also like the way that #6 is so monochrome that Tux becomes really noticeable as the only colored object-- yet the object is still soft and flowing, not jarring or garish.
#4 is very clean and businesslike. #3 is also nice, if you want a page-spanning banner, and I prefer the smaller, thinner version of the first banner, meaning #2.
Thumbs down on #5, both because of its size and because I don't like mena/mischieveous Tux images-- certainly not on a site like this.
Great work by all contributors, though. Thanks!
25 • Banners (by Jerry at 2003-07-29 06:49:45 GMT)
I like #4. Professional looking and clean
26 • Banner vote (by Offer on 2003-07-29 06:58:24 GMT)
I vote for #4 because it looks so good, but also since it says "Put the fun" rather than "Put fun" like some of the other banners, which I feel doesn't sound as good. If #6 were to be changed to "Put the fun" I would vote for it as my second favourite.
In a related matter, I think it would be nice if the banner on the top of the page was a link to the homepage.
27 • banner #4 (by david on 2003-07-29 08:40:20 GMT)
Just another vote for banner #4. All the pros has already been said, thus i don`t have to reason. The banner could be a bit larger though.
A DWW logo could be made merging #4 and #1. The Globe as base picture and the same font, colours, and style as in #4 with the layout of #1. Sorry for not doing it just speaking of, but i'm not so skilled at graphical design.
28 • Banner vote (by Vic on 2003-07-29 10:53:08 GMT)
#4 is great, very clean
I like #5 too, but Tux does not look very happy on that banner, which stands in contrast to the purpose of the website.
#2 is also very nice...
29 • Banners (by Matt at 2003-07-29 18:35:21 GMT)
I like 4, but the serif style font bothers me.
30 • Banner (by Zor on 2003-07-29 22:39:58 GMT)
My vote goes to #6. Nice silver brushed mono look. Discrete, not too big, simple, but stylish characters. Smooth contrast with colored Tux. And of course the looking glass (watching Tux -- meaning the Distros, ergo: DistroWatch) -- kinda like a metaphor.
Second places goes to #4: clean/simple/stylish enough, not "overdone", you might say: the right touch. But nonetheless I think #6 is just a tad better!
Thanks to all the designers! You've all done a wonderful job. In my opinion, everyone's a winner, just by taking the time to design a logo -- which can be time consuming!
31 • Banner (by Michael at 2003-07-30 00:46:57 GMT)
I like banner 5.
32 • Banner (by AlanS at 2003-07-30 01:34:35 GMT)
Banner 5 rocks.
33 • Banner (by warpengi on 2003-07-30 04:36:46 GMT)
I vote 1 & 2 in that order
34 • Banner (by Spearmint at 2003-07-30 13:09:12 GMT)
Use none! Where can i send my logo?
35 • Banner (by Spearmint at 2003-07-30 13:30:20 GMT)
I have another typeface that you can you use with that globe on banner 4. Email me that globe if you want to see the change. I can make a proposal for the logo and banner then.
36 • For Spearmint (by Leo on 2003-07-30 19:00:22 GMT)
You can reach Ladislav at: email@example.com (see footnote of this very webpage) :-)
37 • My votes (by Leo on 2003-07-30 19:02:05 GMT)
Banner: #4, though the fonts need some smoothing. But is it nice and simple
Logo: It is nice but I think a few more candidates would really be needed before making a decision ...
38 • vote-o-tron (by Runsible at 2003-07-30 20:52:26 GMT)
I think 1 & 2 are the purdiest. Especially 1.
39 • Logo-Discussion (by Gundo at 2003-08-01 09:24:49 GMT)
Only one banner is WATCHING->
therefore # 5 - is best for DistroWATCH
40 • No brainer (by Bob at 2003-08-03 00:23:30 GMT)
4 and 5 (in that order of course)
41 • Hey Spearmint.... (by Bob at 2003-08-03 00:24:38 GMT)
Why not come up with your own banner instead of copying one of the existing ones?
Number of Comments: 41
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
|• Issue 747 (2018-01-22): Ubuntu MATE 17.10, recovering open files, creating a new distribution, KDE focusing on Wayland features|
|• Issue 746 (2018-01-15): deepin 15.5, openSUSE's YaST improvements, new Ubuntu 17.10 media, details on Spectre and Meltdown bugs|
|• Issue 745 (2018-01-08): GhostBSD 11.1, Linspire and Freespire return, wide-spread CPU bugs patched, adding AppImage launchers to the application menu|
|• Issue 744 (2018-01-01): MX Linux 17, Ubuntu pulls media over BIOS bug, PureOS gets endorsed by the FSF, openSUSE plays with kernel boot splash screens|
|• Issue 743 (2017-12-18): Daphile 17.09, tools for rescuing files, Fedora Modular Server delayed, Sparky adds ARM support, Slax to better support wireless networking|
|• Issue 742 (2017-12-11): heads 0.3.1, improvements coming to Tails, Void tutorials, Ubuntu phasing out Python 2, manipulating images from the command line|
|• Issue 741 (2017-12-04): Pop!_OS 17.10, openSUSE Tumbleweed snapshots, installing Q4OS on a Windows partition, using the at command|
|• Issue 740 (2017-11-27): Artix Linux, Unity spin of Ubuntu, Nitrux swaps Snaps for AppImage, getting better battery life on Linux|
|• Issue 739 (2017-11-20): Fedora 27, cross-distro software ports, Ubuntu on Samsung phones, Red Hat supports ARM, Parabola continues 32-bit support|
|• Issue 738 (2017-11-13): SparkyLinux 5.1, rumours about spyware, Slax considers init software, Arch drops 32-bit packages, overview of LineageOS|
|• Issue 737 (2017-11-06): BeeFree OS 18.1.2, quick tips to fix common problems, Slax returning, Solus plans MATE and software management improvements|
|• Issue 736 (2017-10-30): Ubuntu 17.10, "what if" security questions, Linux Mint to support Flatpak, NetBSD kernel memory protection|
|• Issue 735 (2017-10-23): ArchLabs Minimo, building software with Ravenports, WPA security patch, Parabola creates OpenRC spin|
|• Issue 734 (2017-10-16): Star 1.0.1, running the Linux-libre kernel, Ubuntu MATE experiments with snaps, Debian releases new install media, Purism reaches funding goal|
|• Issue 733 (2017-10-09): KaOS 2017.09, 32-bit prematurely obsoleted, Qubes security features, IPFire updates Apache|
|• Issue 732 (2017-10-02): ClonOS, reducing Snap package size, Ubuntu dropping 32-bit Desktop, partitioning disks for ZFS|
|• Issue 731 (2017-09-25): BackSlash Linux Olaf, W3C adding DRM to web standards, Wayland support arrives in Mir, Debian experimenting with AppArmor|
|• Issue 730 (2017-09-18): Mageia 6, running a completely free OS, HAMMER2 file system in DragonFly BSD's installer, Manjaro to ship pre-installed on laptops|
|• Issue 729 (2017-09-11): Parabola GNU/Linux-libre, running Plex Media Server on a Raspberry Pi, Tails feature roadmap, a cross-platform ports build system|
|• Issue 728 (2017-09-04): Nitrux 1.0.2, SUSE creates new community repository, remote desktop tools for GNOME on Wayland, using Void source packages|
|• Issue 727 (2017-08-28): Cucumber Linux 1.0, using Flatpak vs Snap, GNOME previews Settings panel, SUSE reaffirms commitment to Btrfs|
|• Issue 726 (2017-08-21): Redcore Linux 1706, Solus adds Snap support, KaOS getting hardened kernel, rolling releases and BSD|
|• Issue 725 (2017-08-14): openSUSE 42.3, Debian considers Flatpak for backports, changes coming to Ubuntu 17.10, the state of gaming on Linux|
|• Issue 724 (2017-08-07): SwagArch 2017.06, Myths about Unity, Mir and Ubuntu Touch, Manjaro OpenRC becomes its own distro, Debian debates future of live ISOs|
|• Issue 723 (2017-07-31): UBOS 11, transferring packages between systems, Ubuntu MATE's HUD, GNUstep releases first update in seven years|
|• Issue 722 (2017-07-24): Calculate Linux 17.6, logging sudo usage, Remix OS discontinued, interview with Chris Lamb, Debian 9.1 released|
|• Issue 721 (2017-07-17): Fedora 26, finding source based distributions, installing DragonFly BSD using Orca, Yunit packages ported to Ubuntu 16.04|
|• Issue 720 (2017-07-10): Peppermint OS 8, gathering system information with osquery, new features coming to openSUSE, Tails fixes networking bug|
|• Issue 719 (2017-07-03): Manjaro 17.0.2, tracking ISO files, Ubuntu MATE unveils new features, Qubes tests Admin API, Fedora's Atomic Host gets new life cycle|
|• Issue 718 (2017-06-26): Debian 9, support for older hardware, Debian updates live media, Ubuntu's new networking tool, openSUSE gains MP3 support|
|• Issue 717 (2017-06-19): SharkLinux, combining commands in the shell, Debian 9 flavours released, OpenBSD improving kernel security, UBports releases first OTA update|
|• Issue 716 (2017-06-12): Slackel 7.0, Ubuntu working with GNOME on HiDPI, openSUSE 42.3 using rolling development model, exploring kernel blobs|
|• Issue 715 (2017-06-05): Devuan 1.0.0, answering questions on systemd, Linux Mint plans 18.2 beta, Yunit/Unity 8 ported to Debian|
|• Issue 714 (2017-05-29): Void, enabling Wake-on-LAN, Solus packages KDE, Debian 9 release date, Ubuntu automated bug reports|
|• Issue 713 (2017-05-22): ROSA Fresh R9, Fedora's new networking features, FreeBSD's Quarterly Report, UBports opens app store, Parsix to shut down, SELinux overview|
|• Issue 712 (2017-05-15): NixOS 17.03, Alpha Litebook running elementary OS, Canonical considers going public, Solus improves Bluetooth support|
|• Issue 711 (2017-05-08): 4MLinux 21.0, checking file system fragmentation, new Mint and Haiku features, pfSense roadmap, OpenBSD offers first syspatch updates|
|• Issue 710 (2017-05-01): TrueOS 2017-02-22, Debian ported to RISC-V, Halium to unify mobile GNU/Linux, Anbox runs Android apps on GNU/Linux, using ZFS on the root file system|
|• Issue 709 (2017-04-24): Ubuntu 17.04, Korora testing new software manager, Ubuntu migrates to Wayland, running Nix package manager on alternative distributions|
|• Issue 708 (2017-04-17): Maui Linux 17.03, Snaps run on Fedora, Void adopts Flatpak, running Android apps on GNU/Linux, Debian elects Project Leader|
|• Issue 707 (2017-04-10): PCLinuxOS 2017.03, Canonical stops Unity development, OpenBSD on a Raspberry Pi, setting up a VPN for privacy|
|• Issue 706 (2017-04-03): Super Grub2 Disk, Snap packages of deepin applications, Subgraph OS routes network traffic for one application, announcements from Linux Mint|
|• Issue 705 (2017-03-27): Minimal Linux Live, sharing control of the operating system, new KaOS features, Uplos32 provides 32-bit fork of PCLinuxOS|
|• Issue 704 (2017-03-20): ToarusOS 1.0.4, Linux Mint's security record, Debian starts Project Leader election, Ubuntu 12.04 reaches end-of-life|
|• Issue 703 (2017-03-13): SolydXK 201701, CloudReady, Solus announces new features, KDE Connect sends text messages from desktop, openSUSE's YaST module for Let's Encrypt|
|• Issue 702 (2017-03-06): Fatdog64 Linux, elementary OS bundled with new netbook, Haiku announces new features, security and the size of a distro's development team|
|• Issue 701 (2017-02-27): OBRevenge 2017.02, Mageia 6 delays, NetBSD reproducible builds, questions about swap space, trying to steam video on a Raspberry Pi|
|• Issue 700 (2017-02-20): RaspBSD, Debian replaces Icedove with Thunderbird, Fedora's licensing guidlines, tips for switching shells, finding battery charge, getting IP address and killing processes|
|• Issue 699 (2017-02-13): Clear Linux, GhostBSD network utility ported to FreeBSD, Ubuntu coming to Fairphone, elementary OS crowd funding an app store|
|• Issue 698 (2017-02-06): Solus 2017.01.01, comparing containers with portable applicatins, Tails dropping 32-bit support, Debian Stretch enters freeze|
|• Issue 697 (2017-01-30): Subgraph OS 2016.12.30, running Ubuntu on an Android phone, Arch Linux phasing out 32-bit support, Linux Mint testing updated LMDE media|
|• Issue 696 (2017-01-23): GoboLinux 016, remotely running desktop applications, Solus adopting Flatpak, KDE neon using Calamares, TrueOS tests OpenRC|
|• Full list of all issues|
|Random Distribution |
RISC OS Open
RISC OS is a computer operating system originally designed by Acorn Computers Ltd in Cambridge, England in 1987. RISC OS was specifically designed to run on the ARM chipset, which Acorn had designed concurrently for use in its new line of Archimedes personal computers. It takes its name from the RISC (reduced instruction set computing) architecture supported. Fast, compact and efficient, RISC OS is developed and tested by a loyal community of developers and users. RISC OS is not a version of Linux, nor is it in any way related to Windows, and it has a number of unique features and aspects to its design.