Archman GNU/Linux

Reader supplied reviews for Archman GNU/Linux Average rating 9.5 from 10 review(s) What are your thoughts on Archman GNU/Linux? Please include a few pros and a few cons, along with your overall impression of the operating system. Our FAQ page has tips on writing a good mini-review. Version: -- 2018.06 Rating:    -- 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 out of 10 Comments (maximum 2,048 characters): Past reviews - sort by: DateVotes Version: 2018.05 Rating: 8 Date: 2018-05-10 Votes: 2 Not as nice as they praise. With all due respect for the creators. I have a computer for a few years old samsung laptop with i5 processor, 4GB RAM and integrated card, Intel and Nvidi optimus. I will compare Manjaro, SzwagArch, Archman on the arch and Mxlinux on the stable debut. Definitely, Maniaro or Mxlinux is better. Mana has very well configured installations for nvidi optimus drivers. It is fast and light. In general, it works without any problems, especially on xfce or gnome environments. Plasma always knows something ... Mxlinux is also light, fast (based on debuting stable), nothing to complain about. My favorite. As for the other two, unfortunately, neither Szwagarch nor Armchan can match them. They are slower, especially the first launches (eg the difference in starting the firefox is about 10 seconds on Mxlinux and about 18 seconds on Szwargarch, Archman). Sure, it's only seconds but still. All you have to do is open two or three programs at the same time and hang up a bit. There are other minor bugs, for example: the lack of some functions under the right mouse button and how they can not be used "cut". When I go from one program to another, it's like the mouse is left behind and there is no smooth transition. As for the stability, I used it too briefly. I think that these errors will be eliminated in the future. Was this review helpful? Yes No Version: 2018.05 Rating: 10 Date: 2018-05-09 Votes: 5 Excellent. But there are too many default applications. Was this review helpful? Yes No Version: 2018.04 Rating: 10 Date: 2018-04-12 Votes: 19 I've been using Linux since 1998 on and off, hopping between distros like the most miserable lover-tester. I have to say Archman wins hands down with any distro on very problematic hardware -- it always boots and runs properly. It's very surprising to find Archman so far down at the Distrowatch list. It is pure Arch Linux with just a few tweaks to make installation totally PAINLESS. Everything runs smoothly. I am currently using 2018.04 Xfce and have no complaints. There are a few superb distros such as Devuan or Gecko, but on Archman I could do everything I wanted without any hiccups. Perhaps it should be more advertised to those who want pure Arch Linux but don't want to spend ages on installation and checking if their hardware would work. I hope Archman will live! Seb Japan Was this review helpful? Yes No See all 10 reader reviews of Archman GNU/Linux...