 Visitor Reviews |
See latest ratings.
See all project rankings.
Ubuntu Studio
|
Reader supplied reviews for Ubuntu Studio
Average rating
7.4 from 16 review(s)
Version: 16.10
Rating: 10
Date: 2018-02-09
Votes: 0
|
Had Enough of DRM and Paid (or shipped with pc, (bug one, you know)) Operating Systems. Some random Crashes on an old machine (478 and 775 sockest) when working on audio, (I'm not a Pro or a Tweaker nor programmer I just record music and play) but nothing tedious, for now. What I really wish is to have a highly publicized known - to work- out - of - the -box - hardware so one can build a tailored machine on it, Anyway thanks for the work and I recommend to grow the guides and all related tutorials and known-to-work tips and tricks. Ubuntu Studio Deserve it. I see many value and worth in it. Viva Music viva Ubuntu Studio!!!
|
Version: 16.04
Rating: 10
Date: 2018-01-19
Votes: 2
|
What I use it for:
Music composition, 3D Modeling, Programming, Gaming.
Wanting to get away from a certain OS every computer comes with... I tried a couple Ubuntu 'Flavors' before I settled on Ubuntu Studio. Why?
Pros:
- Simple, easy to use UI. Nothing excessive, nothing ultra-flashy, nothing complicated. Simple, direct, saving every little bit of system resources for what YOU want to do.
- Xfce! Enough said. (:
- Quick start-up (None of this 'still loading even though you're at the home page' business).
- The best free apps for A|V Designing (Blender, GIMP, Krita, LMMS). It could benefit from Hydrogen in the Audio section, though.
Cons:
- It lacks in the text editor section. Since it's labeled 'Studio' I'd expect things for programmers as well. Packaging something like Emacs would fill that gap well.
- The sheer amount of software can be overwhelming at first, especially the audio pulg-ins. It takes a little research and learning, but once learned, it's easy to use them.
Conclusion:
If you're wanting a nice OS for development in A|V, Programming, or anything; This is the most non-demanding, and reasonable Ubuntu flavor out there for just that. Or what if you're just wanting something for regular use? The simplicity of the UI will make it real easy to learn and use.
|
Version: 16.04
Rating: 10
Date: 2017-12-31
Votes: 0
|
This is cool.
Distraction free work space.
Needs a few tweeks here and there, but don't we all?
|
Version: 16.04
Rating: 8
Date: 2017-11-17
Votes: 4
|
Ubuntu studio has been my main distro for 1 or two years, I think.
Pros :
- ubuntu and KX studio repos compatibility.
- obviously : out of the box low-latency kernel.
- Nice default choices. XFCE is still my favorite "functional and stable with no bull***" desktop. Hence the reasonable overall footprint.
- recent Ardour out of the box ! \o/
- A lot of usefull software included. Id did discover some of them with U.S.
- Good stability. No major problem encountered, daily usage.
Cons :
- Installer could let the end user choose which software package get to be installed. (although I would have probably ended up installing them all, anyway.
Conclusion :
If you are in for a full creation studio (sound + graphic apps) almost out-of-the-box, on top of a popular distro, with an balanced desktop (capabilites/footprint), then Ubuntu studio is a decent choice. Especially if you are looking for an easy way to install Ardour.
If you do not want the extra-software, you might want to build your custom studio on top of Xubuntu, with a few extra repos. (Studio, and KX-studio)
|
Version: 16.04
Rating: 8
Date: 2017-11-11
Votes: 3
|
ubuntu Studio is an extremely stable operating system in my Lenovo M91p. I went with it because it has most of the resources that I wanted to use. I had very little additional programs to load.
I am one of those that has been trying to get away from MicroSloth but some of the ubuntu based programs just don't stack up, are difficult to use or just don't offer the same flexibility or ability to create as I need to. This is not a fault of u-Studio, this is the fault of the software writers which means this problem will appear in all of the distros that these programs are issued with. u-Studio seems very well thought out and runs beautifully. I have not had any crashes or problems with an install and I have installed u-Studio in quite a few computers in my studio area.
My experience is rather wide banded as i work on music, video, and graphics so I have been in all the catagories and used much of what is offered.
The recent lack of a forum for u-Studio is a concern since I have become comfortable with the distro, support may become a problem. Thank goodness for the most part, u-Studio is ready to go and has been developed so well, I have had practically ZERO problems using the distro.
|
Version: 17.10
Rating: 1
Date: 2017-10-30
Votes: 2
|
Lots of crashes, problems with my Intel GPU (the driver for the older Intel GPU's Q43/Q45 is defective or not installed in the kernel so the display corrupts and crashes the session), now you can't choose at the installation phase which packages to install and which you don't want installed (because a musician doesn't need graphics or video editing packages...) and worse of all you can't install packages like gdebi, which I use a lot. Of course I know the command line but still I like to have choices. I had the same problems with Xubuntu so I don't really like where the Buntu's family is going. Surprisingly, the mother distribution Ubuntu 17.10 works very well and doesn't exhibit the graphics driver crash problem. I'm going with AV Linux with the added KX Studio repositories. I won't use KX Studio itself because the interface is way outdated (KDE 4). Another solution would be just to use Debian and install everything I need from the KX Studio repos but AV Linux is already configured to audio production. Goodbye Ubuntu Studio, please don't come back, thanks.
|
Version: 17.10
Rating: 9
Date: 2017-10-30
Votes: 0
|
I'm running live from usb drive on my toshiba satellite laptop, and it's working great. No stability problems; all hardware drivers included and working fine; window manager and menus are attractive and glitch free.
I only recall facing one minor challenge, after waking up from suspend, you get prompted for a username and password. Had to google to figure how to unlock it (FYI username=ubuntu-studio, password=(blank))
I like the selection of graphics tools, and I was thrilled to see LaTeX is included. The audio tools are mostly gui based. I would have liked to see a few more command line tools, since sometimes I like to write scripts and automate stuff. But that's only a minor quibble. Overall, I'd rate this distro as excellent.
|
Version: 16.10
Rating: 10
Date: 2017-09-29
Votes: 11
|
Everything works. Nothing to complain about other than maybe too many choices. Don't like all the choices? Uninstall some things.
This is serious software for any music, movie maker, or photo enthusiast. The best function of this distro is that it has real-time latency built in. Yes, Jack is a bit cumbersome. Yes, some things are a little hard to get used-to. So what? When you figure it out, it works - that simple. Ardour is great software. Audacity is great software. The RackaRack guitar effects are pretty darn cool. The modeling software can be pretty digital sounding but the array of sound tools that you can tweak is astounding. All the sounds and software easily compete with Microsoft developed software that I have used. There is just a little learning curve. Again, so what?
Best part? It is all free. Kudos Ubuntu Studio. Kudos.
|
Version: 17.04
Rating: 10
Date: 2017-09-04
Votes: 0
|
I just love this version and even others in the pass. I've never had a problem installing Studio, and also I install tonnes of other software without any problems. If those that complain about this free software, then they should go back to, what is the name: MS something and pay through their nose for half ass software.
keep up the good work.
|
Version: 16.04
Rating: 9
Date: 2017-08-13
Votes: 0
|
works great so far got it on a throw away box with no hard drive , got 4 gigs ram, intel video , installed to a 500 gig seagate expansion drive. recognized network chip, and installed and updated flawlessly, almost too good to be true. only problem so far was plume writer. i installed synaptic pkg mgr.. and uninstalled plume writer love the distro..
|
Version: 17.04
Rating: 1
Date: 2017-07-23
Votes: 2
|
I figured I would try this distro since I was FINALLY setting up a fully Linux Audio / Video / Photo studio, and had heard so many good things about it.
The system is a C2Q 3.0GHz, 8gb DDR2, nVidia 6400, and a couple 1TB Hatchi drives.
I tried 4 versions, including the newest, and no go. Like another review said, I was getting empty / ghost menues, random crashes, and Audio that flaked out a LOT.
AV Linux, tho not as full of programs as before, is WAY more stable on this system, so I will go with that one....sorry Ubuntu Studio.
|
Version: 16.04
Rating: 1
Date: 2017-06-22
Votes: 3
|
Seriously, this is the worst Linux distro I have ever seen. Apart from weird optics it comes with three surprises: a crashing installation routine on my first attempt. Then a completely messed up whisker menu which randomly generates new "unused menus" every time you try to edit it. And a pre-installed JACK that is never operational, not even on an entirely fresh install. Why developers decided to set up a distribution that forces the two sworn enemies JACK and PulseAudio are into marriage, is beyond my understanding. What is this thing aimed at? Multimedia creation? Yeah, like hell. Actually I consider going MS again. Or just forget about it altogether.
|
Version: 17.04
Rating: 5
Date: 2017-04-23
Votes: 1
|
Cant install pulse audio equalizer wireless internet network not working cant install ubuntu software center
guayadeque audio player a lot of software will be missing with out software center you are number one so dont forget the people that love UBUNTU.
|
Version: 16.04
Rating: 8
Date: 2017-04-19
Votes: 1
|
very snappy on my dual core laptop,compared to ubuntu.I was hoping for something I havent seen before in photo editing,but maybe I need to play with it more.I like the idea of focusing on performance rather than eye candy.
|
Version: 17.04
Rating: 9
Date: 2017-04-14
Votes: 8
|
"Ubuntu Studio 17.04 zesty" VERSUS "Xubuntu 17.04 zesty"
https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=compare-packages&firstlist=ubuntustudio&secondlist=xubuntu&firstversions=0&secondversions=0&showall=yes#allpackages
Both have the same updated files. Both are XFCE. If you want more European fonts, but without the detailed AUDIO, VIDEO & GRAPHICS applications, then ordinary Xubuntu is ok.
No other ready-made Linux distro has this "STUDIO" setup at the moment. It is not perfect. Very detailed customizations, with complex script languages has yet to be done. Usually the fashion-followers who love tiny-pale scratchings on a deep-black background will find it to be not good enough. Most GTK & QT drivers are set for Dark-foreground, Pale-background, which is not fashionable, atm
After installation, the operating system will upgrade drivers, etc - as is usual with EVERY Ubuntu-based operating system. Like most Linux operating systems however, Canonical & the official Ubuntu-community remain ignorant of the power & flexibility of Grub-customizer, for multi-booting into any installed Linux kernel, and-or multi-booting into any of several operating systems.
|
Version: 16.04
Rating: 10
Date: 2017-02-05
Votes: 7
|
comes with the best pre-installed selection of creativity apps and
wisely uses xfce.
I've used it without any problems since at least 12.04 (actually before that, when it used GNOME, pre-Unity, so maybe 11.04) and it has also upgraded without incident.
|
|
|
|
|
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
