| DistroWatch Weekly
If you've enjoyed this week's issue of DistroWatch Weekly, please consider sending us a tip.
(Tips this week: 0, value: US$0.00)
|Reader Comments - Jump to last comment
1 • Linux direction? (by atang1 at 2004-08-23 10:46:33 GMT) |
We at motherboards.org are pioneering Linux standards in drivers and other aspects, such as interface(socket and plug-ins), faces(add-ons and drop-ins), skins(by internet webpages) and self stripping on bloated core kernels during boot. this of course promotes Knoppix linecd OS and neglects legacy Linux distros.
2 • Gentoo in decline?? (by Life at 2004-08-23 11:41:54 GMT)
I'm suprised by the decline in Gentoo popularity assumed by the forum poster (Gentoo forums are down at the moment, so can't read the thread), as Gentoo does seem to be the "in thing" lately, every man and his dog seems to be jumping on board.
They do have an excellent support and documentation community, and it is highly customisable, can't see why its overall popularity is declining.
However, maybe it is because the general users checking out distribution pages on DW.com lately are primarily those new to Linux, and are steering clear of Gentoo and opting for the distributions that have a reputation for being highly user-friendly, such as Mandrake, SuSE, Fedora etc, or perhaps its just sheer coincidence? Could be down to a few different anomalous factors.
I love the DW.com stats rankings, and they can provide a nice insight into whats hot and whats not, but I don't think they should be taken as 100% proof of a decline or rise in a distributions popularity.
Would be more accurate to check out activity on Gentoo.org's site, forums, and download mirrors, if it were possible, to get statistics from them all for the last few months before claiming the distro is in decline.
Btw, I don't actually use Gentoo, I am a diehard Slackware user, so I'm not trying to defend it for the sake of argument, just my opinion. What does everyone else think on the matter?
As a side note to Ladislav, there is a relatively small computer store near my residence in England, imaginatively called "Computer Cellar", they stock alot of Linux distributions and "alternative" software, and the owner is also very pro-OSS. It seems to be the bigger chain stores that just stock Windows and mainstream software, presumably because there is more cash in it for them, and the chains often have contracts going with vendors like Microsoft which are about as messy as the EULA... maybe this situation will change as demand for supply increases?
3 • Welcome back (by Jose Marcio Batista Borges at 2004-08-23 11:54:33 GMT)
Welcome back, Ladislav.
I´m a frequent visitor of Distrowatch, 2 or 3 times a day, everyday.
I wish you had apreciated your trip, but now I´m happy, because this site will be the best site about Linux Distros again.
Sorry my poor english. I´m a brazilian guy.
4 • Gentoo & The Trees (by Nick on 2004-08-23 12:05:34 GMT)
I'm all for conserving bandwidth (save the trees, etc). I can't use a net-based distrobution such as Gentoo, Debian.. unless they have a clear way to save the downloaded stuffs to discs for later use (again, other machines, for coasters). My current strategy is to use Slackware and keep source code of major packages on disc. Does anyone know a way I can do this in Gentoo so I can play with it some more? Suggestion / Links, please.
5 • The trees are safe (by Neil Bothwick at 2004-08-23 12:17:00 GMT)
Gentoo keeps all downloaded files for re-use, and they can be transferred to another machine or kept on an NFS-mounted partition. There is no reason to download the same package twice.
6 • In debian too! (by fiksve at 2004-08-23 12:31:07 GMT)
The downloaded packages are stored in both debian and gentoo. And you can specify the existing ones as the source on both distros as well...
I was a happy Gentoo user a while ago, but I cant get the damn thing stable enough for my work as a developer, it tends to break too often, I got bored of the ridiculous long builds, nor did I achieve the famed superspeeds. I changed into Debian Sarge a couple of months back, and I couldnt be happier. Its fast, has binary updates and is dead stable.
Dont get me wrong, Gentoo is a very good distro, its just a little imature -- I will probably check it out when they got a couple of more years on their backs.
7 • Gentoo and the tree huggers (by crawancon at 2004-08-23 12:40:21 GMT)
Welcome back ladislav.
Certainly some of the decline is rooted in gentoo's deficiencies..one is the dreaded install. A few gentoo variants have surfaced, the most notable in my head being Jollix. A few of these gentooian distros offer the power and source based goodness of gentoo, with the easier install. Im sure there's more to it. but hey , its monday morning :-P
8 • SourceMage GNU/Linux (by KaZe on 2004-08-23 13:11:10 GMT)
Looking for a sourcebased distro, which saves the compiled package, and can do distributed and cross compilation ? SourceMage GNU/Linux is good for you.
I was a redhat/fedora user for 3 years, and learned a lot of things using it.
Now I use SMGL (for about 3 months), and learned another lot of things. It is simple to use/maintain.
For example, 2 days after the kde 3.3 release, a "sorcery system-update" compiled for me kdebase, kdelibs, ... using the same options as I used with the 3.2.x release.
Wanting Samba ? "cast samba", and answering "simple questions" (for people who know a litte about linux), and a after compilation you get stuff to share with the windows world.
Sourcebased distros have the advantage of making the distro looking like the way you want it to.
And people on the IRC chan #sourcemage are really good, and patient with newbies. Don't be afraid to ask questions on it ;)
The hardest step was to first install the system. But using the forum and the wiki made it easy finaly.
Ps : sorry for my bad english :(
9 • Gentoo increase in populatary (by Nick at 2004-08-23 13:33:54 GMT)
I don't know about everyone else, but I just converted to Gentoo . It's a fantastic server and an "OK" desktop. The fourms are great and the documentation is the best I've ever seen from any Linux distro.
It does require you to get a little more hands on than most distros, but in retuen you get complete controll of you system and quick, easy, and free access to the lattest software updates.
I think Gentoo will increase in populatary as more people get sick of the bloat in Fedora, SuSE, and Mandrake. Thats why I switched.
10 • Lycoris Desktop/LX 1.4 - released or not? (by Lycoris User on 2004-08-23 13:55:21 GMT)
I get the feeling Lycoris has managed to screw things up and is using the release announcement to buy some time. How can you release something and not make it available at the same time to paid users? Their Website has not even been updated. It still links to the old Desktop LX Tour. I think they will loose lots of business with this type of action. Enough is enough, fess up Lycoris!
11 • Gentoo popularity and updating woes (by Jonathan at 2004-08-23 14:49:22 GMT)
I have used Gentoo off and on (currently off) since pre-1.0. The installation, though tedious, is straight-forward. The difficulty I run into is more my fault than Gentoo's. I update my software packages readily, and before I know it I have several hundred files in /etc I need to manually update. I then realize that I do not have enough time to manually resolve all of them and switch back to Slackware.
If emerge could automatically call a diff program on all changed config files to encourage users to 'do the right thing.' I prefer emacs ediff, but I supose such a thing should be customizable.
12 • gentoo (by Anonymous on 2004-08-23 15:00:25 GMT)
For what it's worth: I have noticed a lot of interest in Gentoo on the VIA mini-itx boards.
13 • No subject (by Anonymous on 2004-08-23 15:21:19 GMT)
One of the reasons the stats may be declining for Gentoo is that it's already achieved peak popularity. For an existing gentoo user, there is no reason to get another install disk. So the downloads have declined, even if the actual installs may have been the same.
14 • Gentoo popularity and updating woes (by motub on 2004-08-23 15:36:02 GMT)
Jonathan, have you never heard of etc-update? It gives you a list of all the changed config files, and diffs them when you select them by number. It also automatically merges "trivial" updates, reducing the list to only the files that need human intervention. If you've done a large, system-wide update, it can still be a lot of files, but you can also choose to ignore the updates (thus leaving both the original file and the new file intact until you want to deal with it).
You can even configure etc-update to use the diff mode of your choice; regular diff (the default), colordiff (available in Portage), or a GUI diff editor, such as vim, meld or one of the others available in Portage.
So, while Portage does not do this itself, at the end of the emerge, it will tell you that several config files have the potential to be changed, and suggest that you run etc-update.
15 • 1. Gentoo & source distros 2. European net cafes (by Penguin on 2004-08-23 15:58:50 GMT)
Gentoo & source distros:
The truth is that the source-based distros were just a very fashionable and much hyped thing some time ago. Everybody and your grandma wanted to try them out. However, as time went by, people noticed that running a source-based distro was, after all, not necessarily the best thing since sliced bread. For example, the superior speed benefits of compile optimizations were much exaggerated, there were stability problems etc.
However, for experienced people, who know their way around problems and who want to have as much control as possible, a source-based distro like Gentoo may be an excellent choice.
So, I think that what has happened, is simply that Gentoo and other source distros have found their own faithful user-base. There may not be so many people anymore just trying things for the sake.of trying (and only browsing Gentoo web pages...), but more real faithful, loyal users. Nothing wrong with that, is there?
As to European Internet cafes, maybe Ladislav should have had his holidays in the Nordic countries (oh, well, ok, it may rain even in summertime, and beer may not be as good as in central Europe, except Denmark...;-). Especially the Nordic public library system is excellent and advanced. Nowadays most (all?) public libraries have free to use Internet PCs, and quite many have Linux PCs too. Lots of organizations etc. have free/cheap to use Internet PCs in their public places too. (maybe not so good a situation everywhere in the Nordic countries either though?)
16 • No subject (by Anonymous on 2004-08-23 18:57:37 GMT)
I hope the declining gentoo stats are because the fad is dying.
Source based distros are a hobbyist niche, not suitable for mass consumption. (or in other words "leet".) Gentoos popularity is, I suspect, a side effect of the community's tendency to point newbies at bloated, RPM-hell distros.
gnubies who try gentoo right away will think that gnu/linux is hard. source isn't something they should have to dick around with. gentoo deserves to be about as popular as slackware: the other distro for masochists, and it is.
It can't rise in popularity forever. Its not gonna take a chunk out of windows market share, its just not a mainstream type of distro. Its something sorta neat to do for bored computer geeks.
And yes I am biased toward .DEB. But thats because I've tried all the branches on the family tree (.DEB .RPM .TGZ) and .DEB is the one that didn't suck. I'm pissed the community didn't point me at .deb and apt-get sooner. As a newbie I shouldn't have had to play musical distros, dependency hell is a solved problem!
17 • Gentoo on the decline (by Reverend at 2004-08-23 19:15:49 GMT)
I have no luck with any source build. Even in the cases where there was an installer available, the source build just doesn't fly on my system. I would love to have a source build distro running just to say I have a runing source build. In the end though...Does it matter ? After all a distro is the Linux kernel pluss software packaged by some one else. The kernel remains the same regarless of who is boxing the thing. Kernel x.x.x is going to be kernel x.x.x no matter who shoved it in a box.
I love distrowatch and any time something new pops up then I just have to try it. So far , I find that RedHat based distros are the best. I like Fedora and ASP.
18 • Too difficult to install. (by BTdown on 2004-08-23 20:52:20 GMT)
I like the idea, but Gentoo is just too hard and tedious to install. Something "so wonderful" shouldnt be so complex to install.
19 • Gentoo Declining (by Marcel at 2004-08-23 21:22:48 GMT)
I agree with Anonymous. I guess we are finally getting to the stage where Linux is becoming more popular and the masses are discovering it. No more geek-stuff is needed and I'm happy with that.
There is no more need to recompile the stuff to get it working or to gain 10% performance. The PCs used nowadays are fast enough to be used without the hassle.
And to become a serious option for use within companies a few day installation is out of the question where desktop use is concerned.
20 • No subject (by Anonymous on 2004-08-23 21:28:22 GMT)
welcome back ladislav!
21 • GoboLinux Gone? (by Anonymous on 2004-08-23 21:59:55 GMT)
What's up with GoboLinux. Are they gone?
22 • Gentoo Installation (by Stefan Ilivanov at 2004-08-23 23:34:22 GMT)
Gentoo is easy to install, the installation in Gentoo is better than LFS, Lunar Linux. It's the best distribution I ever used. I've start in 95 with Debian, it's a nice distribution, with perfect deps tree (missed in RH/Fedora), but when I found Gentoo before 6 months, I dont want to change it with anything else. Documentation in Gentoo is numer one, no one have docs like Gentoo. Gentoo is useable for Server and Workstation, easy to use and faster. I cant understand ppl who says Gentoo install is hard, why u should not try Lunar or LFS. Gentoo will move up again, very soon.
23 • Gentoo/Why the decline (by Lord Necropolis on 2004-08-23 23:59:00 GMT)
I have now attempted to install Gentoo a total of 33 times on one of my servers and 16 on my laptop. I have never succeeded. I do not blame Gentoo for my failure to install it though, i do beileve it to be user error. I currently use Mandrake 10, Puppy, FreeBSD, Freesbie, Mandrakemove, SystemRescueCD, & Slackware. My favorites are the first 3. I have tried dozens of others and continue trying them as they hit distrowatch.
I will continue trying to install Gentoo until such time as i do get it right. And that is why i think it is on the decline. Here at fort hood Tx. (i'm a soldier) i am considered a computer geek. this is because i love playing with computers, building them, fixxing broken ones, ect. I fix my friends computers for them. The only guy in my Battalion more of a geek than I (we call him spaceman) won't even try Gentoo.
So if the guys the mainstream guys think are geeks can't get it right, then the mainstream thinks how could we get it right? i have convinced 11 users to switch to different linux distros in my 7 months of using it so far, none will try Gentoo.
24 • Gentoo and other distros... (by Linux User on 2004-08-24 00:03:28 GMT)
I ahve tried to install Gentoo, in spring 2004 ago, and did not find it so easy.
I reconizze humbly that I did not try very hard, and should I, I would expect success.
The documentation looked to me very good, possibly one on the best, for a LInux distribution.
But the point may be:
In the Linux paradigm, there should be room for at least two types of distros:
1-The distro for "the regular Linux user" who is just that: a user.
This kind of distro should have a very consistent user interface (KDE for now, possibly KDE+Gnome), and be as simple to use as practical. Lot of "geeky stuff" should be mostly hidden to the user, and automated. An automated version of Gento would well fir there, and I like the concept: install on the hard-drive only what you need, with eventually capability to save the configuration you like, (as often as desired!). Saving a set of scripts files would be ok with me, and should allow an easy rebuild of the system, if necessarry (dammage, hard disk scatch, of just clonning elsewhere).
2-The "geek" (software engineer) distro, who's purpose is to try new things, and achieve break through, later integrated in somme regular distro.
With all the energy available, Linux could eventually tap in the good will available, and be able to provide the easiest, and prettiest OS user interface, as well as new powerfull applications.
3- Possibly a version of Linux for a given field, like engineering, but so far I am not sure this is necessarry: it already somewhat exist, with sets of packages for almost everyone.
But surprisingly no one as either though or endavored to do this.
But the fundations are there, and none prevent to add a new group of applications for systems installers as "Yast" and its Fedora counterpart, or Synaptic, or Yum.
It would be nice to be able to have such a script for EDA tools, medecine, law, architects, etc...
And within an industry, exchange of data in standards and Open formats should be possible, more that today: if PDF, HTML, etc... are Open (documented) many formats are still undocumented or proprietary.
Open source, make more sense with open data format.
25 • Tagline (by Vince on 2004-08-24 00:47:15 GMT)
off-topic i know, but i was just wondering whether DW plans to change its tagline now that it covers the different BSD flavors and all.
"Distrowatch.com: Put the fun back into computing. Use Linux and BSD."?
i've got too much time on my hands...
btw, welcome back ladislav.... things just haven't been the same without you.
26 • should be (by anon on 2004-08-24 01:07:47 GMT)
"Distrowatch.com: Put the fun back into computing. Use SCO UNIX based derivative."?
27 • RE: Tagline (by ladislav at 2004-08-24 01:37:48 GMT)
"Distrowatch.com: Put the fun back into computing. Use Linux and BSD."?
You are right, the slogan should be modified. The trouble is that we have that slogan in many different languages and it is just too much tedious work to modify the graphic for each language. Maybe some day -- during Christmas or some other holiday -- when there is not much happening in the distro world :-)
28 • Debian-plus-Gentoo distro? (by Knoppix user on 2004-08-24 04:05:16 GMT)
I began using Linux when I first came across with RH5.2. I also switched distros like SuSE, Mandrake, Slackware, Gentoo, LFS...I am currently staying with Debian (more precisely Knoppix). I fully agreed ".DEB is the one that didn't suck". But there is one problem with Debian and its derivatives. Debian is only optimized for i386 on x86 platform. This implies it is slow. Kanotix is slightly better by offering a i586 optimized kernel. If there is a distro exists that operates like Debian but packages optimized in Gentoo sense, that would be great. DFS does not really do the job.
29 • 1 word for the gentoo decline (by EEDOK on 2004-08-24 05:07:51 GMT)
archlinux.. Lots of gentoo refuges seem to use it..
30 • Red Hat to Debian to Gentoo (by Ed Borasky at 2004-08-24 05:13:06 GMT)
I started with Red Hat at the 7.0 level. I stayed with them through 9.0, then switched to Debian (Woody) when Red Hat announced they were splitting into RHEL and Fedora. Then I discovered Knoppix. Aside from the inconvenience of keeping Knoppix updated after installing to hard disk, which the Knoppix folks have fixed, I was happy with Knoppix.
Then I discovered Gentoo. I'm now running Gentoo on all but one of my systems. The big selling point for me with Debian was the number of packages -- there must be 18,000 by now in "sid". Gentoo, however, has some things in the 7,000 packages that Debian lacks. The main reason I left Debian for Gentoo is that Gentoo has much better support for Java and has more Java-based applications.
My "dream distro" would be a merging of Debian and Gentoo. Both are community based and have similar "social contracts," although the died-in-the-wool free software types cringe in horror when I tell them I want to run Java applications. I think Debian's and Gentoo's package management systems are more or less equivalent in convenience -- it's easy to update a Debian system from source if you want to, for example.
Why is Gentoo declining in the ratings? Well ... I think the main reason is that momentum is building for Fedora and Knoppix. But I'm happy with Gentoo, and, after all, a distro is only Linux and GNU and a package management system. I still run things directly from source or binaries outside what comes with any distro -- the PEPA performance modeling program, Protege and a number of Java-based (non-free) sound packages.
31 • the same (by sanitys3j at 2004-08-24 07:23:20 GMT)
It's all the same....... I've been using gentoo since the 1.2 days, still have 2 boxes running it. All current of course. The reason for the decline is this. It boasts outstanding speed, but, it's not much faster (a few milliseconds) than SlackWare or Debian. Fact is, you can configure all of them to be identical for all practical purposes. Plus, it's less stable than the other 2 and takes longer to upgrade if you don't believe in automation for some production environments.
The #$@#'n money chasers in IT just jump on the Linux bandwagon with Novell or Fedora, both good in their own rights, but just average comparatively.
Gentoo does have about the best documentation around, it's better (and easier to find) then stuff on www.tldp.org .
32 • RE: Debian + Gentoo = Dream Distro (by JoeLinux at 2004-08-24 07:30:35 GMT)
Ed, a distro that marries the best of both Debian and Gentoo would be a "dream distro" you say...I cannot but most whole-heartedly agree, if this do come about, it could be just what that is needed for GNU/Linux to finally .do MS Windows in i.e. combining the ease of installation (The Sarge Installer is already very awesome even though it is but still RC 1 and can only become better, you literally can walk through the whole install blindfolded!) + excellent hardware identification of Debian derivatives like Knoppix and Mepis + the architectual optimization and control afforded by Gentoo....mmmmmm...now that is sexier than sex I say! :)
- Just your average Debian + Slackware user -
33 • Optimized Debian packages? (by Anonymous on 2004-08-24 13:02:15 GMT)
Knoppix user wrote:
"Debian is only optimized for i386 on x86 platform. This implies it is slow. Kanotix is slightly better by offering a i586 optimized kernel. If there is a distro exists that operates like Debian but packages optimized in Gentoo sense, that would be great."
If one doesn't dare to compile her own personally optimized kernel, Debian does offer kernel binary packages optimized for almost any CPU architecture, from K7/athlon kernels toi686, i586, Amiga, PowerPC, SMP and what ever: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=kernel-image&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Besides, via http://www.apt-get.org/ you can find some repositories that offer e.g. Debian testing packages optimized for AthlonXP etc. However, maybe I could tell that I tried the Athlon XP optimized Italian repository, but didn't notice any significant software speed improvement.
Compile optimizations do give small speed benefits but those advantages may often be too much exaggerated and hyped in my opinion. On the other hand, things like trimming down distro bloat and making the installed software work well together have much more effect on distro speed in general. The source-based distros like Gentoo can shine in those repects too, but really only in the hands of relatively experienced computer users.
34 • Gentoo Decline (by Borgmeister at 2004-08-24 15:40:23 GMT)
Gentoo to me seems like alot of work, i mean, i run Yoper, its fast install, owns Gentoo's, Community is good, there is no 'elitist attitude' and it uses APT-GET, ok, so the repository isnt vast, but its good enough for 'humble' me. Ok, so gentoo is fast, but i gota be twiddling my thumbs for a long time to make up for teh time wasted at install.
And, who cares? Linux is about CHOICE, i can use whatever I want to use, not what everyone else is doing, and yes i still run windows. m$ have got game support spot on imho.
35 • Gentoo Decline (by jmirles at 2004-08-24 21:10:06 GMT)
Maybe Gentoo's perceived decline is due to VidaLinux and NavyNOS climbing through the rankings. Both are Gentoo based but offer easy installation. I have tried Vidalinux and like it very much. I will try it again once it is gold. I couldn't bring myself to try a distro with the word Navy in it. I'm an Army retiree! By the way, the Portage system really is good! I can't decide which I like better between apt-get and Portage. For those wondering about Vidalinux, it is Gnome-based. NavyNOS is Flux based.
36 • Lycoris- Is it really released? (by Janis E. Deater at 2004-08-24 21:10:29 GMT)
Thank you DistroWatch for speaking openly about this delay. Lycoris keeps saying, if they say anything, words such as "soon".
1.4 was to have been shipped in July. September now looms and not a single copy of this "release" has actually been seen in public.
No one has received a pre-paid copy to date.
How is this "released"? It remains a genuine mystery. No downloads are available, even to those who "pre-oredered".
The lack of real communication concerning the specifics of this "release" has absolutely frustrated the loyal Lycoris supporters. The leadership of this company has done very little to engender respect from it's customers during this botched "release".
37 • Lycoris Release (by William McNeill at 2004-08-25 02:30:57 GMT)
So DisroWatch wonders aloud regarding the veracity of Lycoris release 1.4?? You have doubts? Imagine the users' frustration. Lycoris has yet to show anyone that this release is genuine. They may intend to actually release 1.4, but obviously, the entire matter has been manipulated. Prepaying customers provided the front money allowing Lycoris the funds to go into production. A more fiscally solvent company probably wouldn't use such a process, they wouldn't need to. Remember, 1.4 is hardly seems cutting edge to begin with. 2.6 kernel will be offered, when? Lots of eye candy built on rather conservative (older) base features.
It matters little that much of the Lycoris community begs for answers. All they are given is meaningless promises and vague responses. One wonders if anyone would be foolish enough to ever again front Lycoris money. What will people do next year when Lycoris promises "release" 1.5?? Hopefully, everyone will remember the summer of discontent that has been 2004
38 • RE: Debian + Gentoo = Dream Distro (by MstbZalle at 2004-08-25 15:40:24 GMT)
Just a hint.... I've only read a review of it but never used it myself.... but I suggest that Arch Linux may be worth a try. HTH.
39 • Gentoo decline (by killfire on 2004-08-25 19:24:16 GMT)
personally, i havent found a better distro than gentoo.
i started out with red hat 6.2, flew through caldera, tried debian, have tried slack, and settled with gentoo.
the main reason is the package management and the community.
i think the decline is because gentoo has a very live community, as in people dont check distrowatch as much, because they find it in different ways. i used to read distrowatch all the time, and then i found gentoo and i havent been back until now, when i saw a link to this on the post quoted. other distros are checked all the time, to see if slackware 11 is out, or suse 10, or whatever, btu gentoo isnt, because the updates arent a big deal.
also, the dificult install is completely a myth. there is a very descriptive guide to installing it, and the only dificult hting to do is compile your own kernel, which you can avoid with a handy tool they provide. another words, if you think the install is dificult, then you cannot read and follow directions.
gentoo's install was more friendly than any other install id done before, for a couple reasons. you can pick up from where you left off, and keep going. you can do it from another computer, in an xterm via ssh. you can install it inside another distro, or from a live cd.
also, since im running on ppc, i dont have to bother with finding optimized binary packages when compiling from source.
40 • Slackware sources saved - Debian can do that too (by Jari Aalto on 2004-08-26 09:19:03 GMT)
"• Gentoo & The Trees (by Nick on 2004-08-23 12:05:34 GMT) ... My current strategy is to use Slackware and keep source code of major packages on disc. Does anyone know a way I can do this in Gentoo so I can play with it some more? Suggestion / Links, please."
Debian based distributions can do this quite easily
$ apt-get --download-only install
This will retrieve all dependencies as well and you can pretty much build your Debian installation from scratch if you save all the *.debs (or at least the latest versions of the programs). I do that for
1) Installing basic Libranet CD
2) doing "upgrade"
3) putting all upgrade *.debs to my own CD
Nest time you reinstall Libranet, you do not
need Network connection at all. just install
the official CD + my own *.deb CD and ask "apt-get" to use it as a source.
41 • Lycoris has been delayed (by lycoris user on 2004-08-26 14:13:18 GMT)
42 • gentoo decline (by helix_r at 2004-08-26 19:57:02 GMT)
I used gentoo for a while. It made a nice stable workstation but it was a real pain to deal with sound card drivers. Also, I dreaded having to think about updates and dependencies.
I spent a _very_ long time installing gentoo, X, XFCE and various applications. I don't want to spend that much time installing an OS ever again unless there is some learning goal to it.
As for learning, I think LFS would be better, albiet more painful (someday I will try LFS).
For having a workstation that just works and does what you want a mainstream distro is easier. The additonal time you spend customizing it is much less than the time you would spend installing gentoo + X.
The gentoo community is very helpful however, I wish all distributions had such a community.
43 • No subject (by JusKickNit at 2004-08-27 01:17:27 GMT)
Gentoo's Awsome, What make's Gentoo so good is not gcc optimization's. It's "USE" flags. You'll never get them in a non-source distro.
44 • Debian, Mepis. (by SFSouthpaw at 2004-08-27 03:11:26 GMT)
While every distro I've tried has it's advantages, it wasn't until I tried out MEPIS linux that I felt I could ditch windows completely (as opposed to the dual boot setup I'd been running for years and years).
While distro's like Gentoo are great for hardcore geeks, IMO it's the ease of installation (MEPIS) and updating (DEB) that makes the best case for Linux on the desktop. You don't have to get "into the guts" of the OS unless you want to.
I found personally, that the commercial distro's tend give you lots of software on the install CD/DVD's, but provide little assistance in updating and installing new software (including dependancies).
45 • ...what? (by silentbob at 2004-08-27 15:22:33 GMT)
Why are there so many comments about the Gentoo install being both hard and long? I was a linux noob last year and managed to get Gentoo running 1st time around by reading the excellent install docs *thoroughly* and following them to the letter. (This was on an SMP system as well).
How often do you need to re-install an OS anyway? With Gentoo a simple emerge -u world will bring your system up to date.
I wouldn't have me Gentoo system any other way.
46 • Gentoo, Debian & Linux in general... (by Trevor at 2004-08-28 23:26:49 GMT)
Firstly, the distrowatch hits do not tell you what distro someone is actually running - it shows where the interest is.... I am currently dual-booting Debian & Gentoo to decide which will be my main system for the next... well, until something else catches my eye :-)
Whenever I want to know what a distro is/does/etc, my first point of call is DistroWatch (thanks heaps for a great website!!), but I don't hit on Debian or Gentoo... only distro's I don't know yet.
So saying Gentoo is in decline because of less hits on distrowatch just says to me everyone knows what it is now and don't need to look it up no more :-)
As for the "best" linux distro... I started with RedHat 5.2 back in '98 & have tried lots since... for a few years I ran Mandrake...
But I tired of the "update every 6 months" cycle - both debian & gentoo are always up-to-date as long as you use apt-get or emerge regularly. But both have less than acceptable installers & hardware detection - Knoppix & MEPIS show what Debian is capable of - and as they exist and are open source, there is no excuse for the hell that you have to go through to get either a pure Debian or Gentoo install running. Yes - the doc's are excellent, and if all goes well it is easy - but Debian does not autodetect my video and Gentoo fails with my sound card, and my current nightmare with both distro's is getting usb memory devices to auto-detect & mount upon insertion - especially devices that have multiple LUN's!!! Since you have to compile the Gentoo kernel at install time, I made sure that it had the right options - but so far only Knoppix does it right "out of the box" - I have found no other distro that handles them - and I've tried lots!!!
I particularly need them because I use a usb card reader to access my digital camera's card - new model, no linux support as yet :-( - and most card readers seem to assign each slot as a separate LUN - most distro's only see the first slot :-(
SilentBob asked "How often do you need to re-install an OS anyway?" - I average at least once a week! and if we are ever going to convert all those M$ boxes out there to Linux we are going to have to up the pace dramatically!!!!!!! :-) so a linux install HAS to be quick & easy & work without manual tweaking.
47 • ...yes, you only install once but... (by helix_r at 2004-08-30 18:59:12 GMT)
Yes, an install does not happen very often, but it _really_ is a pain if it literally takes days to set-up a machine (at least it does on a 500MHz machine).
What's the time to install gentoo +X+ window manager + mozilla on a modern machine? It must be the better part of a day at least.
Also, "emerge -u world" is kinda scary if you have software whose configuration you can't afford to scew up (or at least can't afford to lose the functionality of for an indefinate amount of time). So saying that keeping up to date is as easy as a one-line command is disingenuous.
48 • No subject (by Anonymous on 2004-10-05 00:13:50 GMT)
This page does not display properly on the right side!
Number of Comments: 48
Display mode: DWW Only • Comments Only • Both DWW and Comments
|• Issue 701 (2017-02-27): OBRevenge 2017.02, Mageia 6 delays, NetBSD reproducible builds, questions about swap space, trying to steam video on a Raspberry Pi|
|• Issue 700 (2017-02-20): RaspBSD, Debian replaces Icedove with Thunderbird, Fedora's licensing guidlines, tips for switching shells, finding battery charge, getting IP address and killing processes|
|• Issue 699 (2017-02-13): Clear Linux, GhostBSD network utility ported to FreeBSD, Ubuntu coming to Fairphone, elementary OS crowd funding an app store|
|• Issue 698 (2017-02-06): Solus 2017.01.01, comparing containers with portable applicatins, Tails dropping 32-bit support, Debian Stretch enters freeze|
|• Issue 697 (2017-01-30): Subgraph OS 2016.12.30, running Ubuntu on an Android phone, Arch Linux phasing out 32-bit support, Linux Mint testing updated LMDE media|
|• Issue 696 (2017-01-23): GoboLinux 016, remotely running desktop applications, Solus adopting Flatpak, KDE neon using Calamares, TrueOS tests OpenRC|
|• Issue 695 (2017-01-16): Zorin OS 12, Peppermint team fixes installer bug, Debian refreshes Jessie media, Ubuntu improves low graphics mode, Exciting things coming in 2017|
|• Issue 694 (2017-01-09): MX Linux 16, Fedora considers systemd security features, DragonFly BSD to support massive swap space, Ubuntu Touch roadmap, Puppy's newsletter, sudo's password prompt|
|• Issue 693 (2017-01-02): Comparing small distros, fig language, video driver comparsion, Debian+PIXEL, Wayland on FreeBSD|
|• Issue 692 (2016-12-19): Bodhi Linux 4.0.0, Cappsule containers, Calculate's new Utilities package, Solus and Ubuntu MATE build new application menu|
|• Issue 691 (2016-12-12): SalentOS 1.0, openSUSE improves YaST, Fedora considers slower release cycle, KDE neon gets LTS branch|
|• Issue 690 (2016-12-05): Fedora 25, Ubuntu adopts rolling HWE kernel, running Android apps on GNU/Linux, Haiku working toward EFI support|
|• Issue 689 (2016-11-28): openSUSE 42.2, Fedora's upgrade path, plans for Korora 25, transitioning from PC-BSD to TrueOS, Webconverger's reproducible builds|
|• Issue 688 (2016-11-21): Endless OS 3.0.5, KDE neon fixes security hole, FreeBSD's Quarterly Status Report, Rolling release trial #2 concludes|
|• Issue 687 (2016-11-14): NAS4Free 10.3.0.3, Fedora gains MP3 playback, budgie-remix becomes Ubuntu Budgie, Ubuntu flavours compared, Rolling release trial #2|
|• Issue 686 (2016-11-07): FreeBSD 11.0, rolling release trial #2, Debian announces supported architectures, Simplicity switching to antiX base, farewell to Mythbuntu|
|• Issue 685 (2016-10-31): elementary OS 0.4, SUSE gains ARM support, Mint improves language support, Dirty COW explained, Rolling release trial #2|
|• Issue 684 (2016-10-24): Ubuntu 16.10, Linux popularity in different markets, Fedora runs on Raspberry Pi, Ubuntu features live kernel patching|
|• Issue 683 (2016-10-17): Refracta 8.0, making packages for distributions, Alpine switches to LibreSSL, 386BSD website publishes classic code|
|• Issue 682 (2016-10-10): KDE neon 20160915, Android-x86 6.0, Fedora warns of update bug, HandyLinux drops English translation, LXQt benchmarks|
|• Issue 681 (2016-10-03): OpenBSD 6.0, DragonFly BSD to support LibreSSL in ports, systemd denial of service bug, upgraded Mintbox Mini|
|• Issue 680 (2016-09-26): Uruk GNU/Linux 1.0, blocking applications at the firewall, Lenovo controversy, Ubuntu running on the Nextcloud Box|
|• Issue 679 (2016-09-19): OpenMandriva 3.0, 32-bit vs 64-bit performance, openSUSE updates, KaOS unveils first run wizard|
|• Issue 678 (2016-09-12): Apricity 07.2016, Mageia adopts DNF, KDE neon to use Wayland, FreeBSD updates Linux compatibility, creating cron jobs|
|• Issue 677 (2016-09-05): Peppermint OS 7, Manjaro updates leadership, TrueOS becomes rolling release, organizing files, creating torrents|
|• Issue 676 (2016-08-29): Korora 24, Fedora 25 to use Wayland by default, Linux turns 25, PC-BSD becomes TrueOS, finding software licensing information|
|• Issue 675 (2016-08-22): Gentoo LiveDVD "Choice Edition", moreutils, Ubuntu improves terminal convergence, MATE packaged for Openindiana, FreeBSD improves video support|
|• Issue 674 (2016-08-15): Zenwalk Linux 8.0, Ubuntu phone follow-up, Lubuntu transitioning to LXQt, Steam running on FreeBSD|
|• Issue 673 (2016-08-03): noop linux and EasyNAS, Debian's GnuPG switch, Fedora "Flock", using "nice"|
|• Issue 672 (2016-08-01): Ubuntu Phone 15.04, Solus embraces rolling release model, interview with Jane Silber, FreeBSD Quarterly Report|
|• Issue 671 (2016-07-25): Slackware 14.2, Point Linux 3.2, OpenBSD disables usermount, KaOS releases significant changes, Fedora 22 reaches end of life.|
|• Issue 670 (2016-07-18): Linux Lite 3.0, Bodhi team plans 4.0.0, pfSense changes licensing, running software across distributions, Linux Mint upgrade path|
|• Issue 669 (2016-07-11): Linux Mint 18, proving a system is secure, LibreSSL in FreeBSD, Ubuntu plans phasing out 32-bit, pfSense status report|
|• Issue 668 (2016-07-04): Fedora 24, Linux Mint plans for 18.1, FreeBSD and DragonFly BSD improve their file systems, comparing Flatpak, Snap and AppImage|
|• Issue 667 (2016-06-27): GeckoLinux 421, Fedora supports Flatpak, Solus unveils new features, running GNU/Linux on tablets|
|• Issue 666 (2016-06-20): Comparing more live update methods, Ubuntu's snap packages, Antergos drops 32-bit media, GeckoLinux unveils Rolling edition, learning Linux resources|
|• Issue 665 (2016-06-13): BunsenLabs Linux Hydrogen, Fedora 24 delayed, NetBSD grows in size, Clonezilla questions|
|• Issue 664 (2016-06-06): Sabayon 16.05, Debian updates install media, the cost of free software, Qubes explains secure build process|
|• Issue 663 (2016-05-30): Comparing live update methods, Ubuntu MATE's progress, distros debate systemd change, DistroWatch turns 15|
|• Issue 662 (2016-05-23): Clonezilla Live, new Fedora community repository, DragonFlyBSD runs Wayland, a live edition of Slackware and kernel components|
|• Issue 661 (2016-05-16): FreeBSD 10.3, OpenMandriva adopts Clang, Debian adds ZFS packages, PCLinuxOS drops 32-bit and comparing CentOS with RHEL|
|• Issue 660 (2016-05-09): Ubuntu MATE 16.04, Mint's xapps, FreeBSD Quarterly Report, Debian updates 32-bit support, addressing GPL violations|
|• Issue 659 (2016-05-02): Ubuntu 16.04, compiling custom kernels, Cinnamon 3.0, Sabayon launches ARM build, Devuan ships Beta release|
|• Issue 658 (2016-04-25): Kali Linux 2016.1, elementary OS 0.3.2, Debian elects Project Leader, Fedora 24 feature preview, Nard reaches 1.0|
|• Issue 657 (2016-04-18): Redox, Linux Mint improves update manager, planned Fedora 24 features, Ubuntu 16.04 getting Snappy packages|
|• Issue 656 (2016-04-11): Qubes OS 3.1, Whonix offers bug bounties, Puppy's family tree, setting up disk partitions and running bash on Windows|
|• Issue 655 (2016-04-04): Parsix 8.5, Sabayon's Community repository, Red Hat offers free subscriptions, Ubuntu tablets, command line tips|
|• Issue 654 (2016-03-28): PCLinuxOS 2016.03, Using signatures to create a web of trust, Arch Linux rolls out Pacman update, GuixSD packages GNOME|
|• Issue 653 (2016-03-21): Antergos 2016.02.21, Debian prepares for election, a Unix-like OS written in Rust, watching Netflix on FreeBSD|
|• Issue 652 (2016-03-14): ReactOS 0.4.0, Debian swaps Iceweasel for Firefox, Fedora moving forward with Wayland, Verifying ISO files|
|• Issue 651 (2016-03-07): Korora 23, Linux Mint improves security, Ubuntu MATE on Raspberry Pi 3 computers, trying different file systems|
|• Issue 650 (2016-02-29): Haiku in 2016, running Android apps on GNU/Linux, 30 years of MINIX, Fedora plans Atomic Workstation|
|• Issue 649 (2016-02-22): Zorin OS 11, openSUSE launches new editions, Linux Mint website compromised, sandboxing applications using Firejail|
|• Full list of all issues|